Re: [jQuery] Known issue with fadeTo and IE?
Kelvin Luck wrote: OK - I've managed to break the problem down to a simple test case: http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/ As you will see, the fade doesn't happen in IE but the callback does. If you get rid of position:relative or any width in the styles of the UL then the fade works fine... Any ideas? Cheers, Kelvin :) I haven't had a chance to play around, but you may want to set display: block; on the ul to see if it accepts (renders) the opacity correctly? This may alter your underlying layout. ~ Brice ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Known issue with fadeTo and IE?
Brice Burgess wrote: Kelvin Luck wrote: OK - I've managed to break the problem down to a simple test case: http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/ As you will see, the fade doesn't happen in IE but the callback does. If you get rid of position:relative or any width in the styles of the UL then the fade works fine... Any ideas? Cheers, Kelvin :) I haven't had a chance to play around, but you may want to set display: block; on the ul to see if it accepts (renders) the opacity correctly? This may alter your underlying layout. ~ Brice Thanks for the suggestion but I tried it out and it didn't make any difference :( Any other ideas? Cheers, Kelvin :) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Known issue with fadeTo and IE?
OK - I've managed to break the problem down to a simple test case:
http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/
As you will see, the fade doesn't happen in IE but the callback does.
If you get rid of position:relative or any width in the styles of the
UL then the fade works fine...
Notice that the elements jump down in Firefox, and that the As you can
see... paragraph jumps down in IE. Neither of those things should happen,
right?
Also, $('fade-me').attr('opacity', 0.5) document.ready gives an IE script
error in jQuery.attr on the line with elem.filter, because style.filter is
undefined at that point. Even after fixing that, IE doesn't honor the
opacity although I can see it's been set in the filter. So that part of the
problem seems to be outside the fx code.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Known issue with fadeTo and IE?
On 12/7/06, Dave Methvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, $('fade-me').attr('opacity', 0.5) document.ready gives an IE script
error in jQuery.attr on the line with elem.filter, because style.filter is
undefined at that point. Even after fixing that, IE doesn't honor the
opacity although I can see it's been set in the filter. So that part of the
problem seems to be outside the fx code.
You can't set opacity by using attr(). $('#fade-me').css('opacity',
0.5) should work fine though.
--
Brandon Aaron
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Known issue with fadeTo and IE?
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback, I've put my comments in below...
Dave Methvin wrote:
OK - I've managed to break the problem down to a simple test case:
http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/
As you will see, the fade doesn't happen in IE but the callback does.
If you get rid of position:relative or any width in the styles of the
UL then the fade works fine...
Notice that the elements jump down in Firefox, and that the As you can
see... paragraph jumps down in IE. Neither of those things should happen,
right?
Yeah - neither of these things should happen but I'm not bothered by
them. They only happen on this test case page I chucked together and not
on the actual page I am using... And they happen cross browser so don't
seem related to the IE not working problem...
Also, $('fade-me').attr('opacity', 0.5) document.ready gives an IE script
error in jQuery.attr on the line with elem.filter, because style.filter is
undefined at that point. Even after fixing that, IE doesn't honor the
opacity although I can see it's been set in the filter. So that part of the
problem seems to be outside the fx code.
What is attr('opacity') anyway? Do you mean css('opacity')?
I've put together another simpler test case which doesn't involved the
animation:
http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index2.html
As you can see, the problem lies in the code which sets the opacity.
This page works fine in FF and in IE if you remove either of the
mentioned styles (see
http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index3.html for an example).
But when those styles are there it breaks...
Thanks for any more ideas,
Kelvin :)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Known issue with fadeTo and IE?
Brandon Aaron wrote: So in my little bit of testing IE7 shows that the filter is applied because the text has the smoothing removed. Also, it only works for me (IE6 and 7) by removing position: relative; and it doesn't matter if it has a width or not. Position absolute made it fail also. I ran into some weird CSS issues just yesterday with position relative in IE. I'll go through some more testing ... Thanks for taking a look :) Are you sure it doesn't matter if you have width or not? The following both work OK for me (IE 6, WinXP): http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index3.html (position, no width) http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index4.html (width but no position) It is only this one that fails: http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index2.html (position and width). I guess the question is - is it a problem with IEs internal rendering of the opacity or is the problem in how jQuery is setting the opacity? Cheers, Kelvin :) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Known issue with fadeTo and IE?
index3.html and index2.html both fail in IE7 but only index2.html fails in IE6. I really doubt this has anything to do with how jQuery applies the opacity in IE but more to do with IE and its filter. -- Brandon Aaron On 12/7/06, Kelvin Luck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brandon Aaron wrote: So in my little bit of testing IE7 shows that the filter is applied because the text has the smoothing removed. Also, it only works for me (IE6 and 7) by removing position: relative; and it doesn't matter if it has a width or not. Position absolute made it fail also. I ran into some weird CSS issues just yesterday with position relative in IE. I'll go through some more testing ... Thanks for taking a look :) Are you sure it doesn't matter if you have width or not? The following both work OK for me (IE 6, WinXP): http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index3.html (position, no width) http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index4.html (width but no position) It is only this one that fails: http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/index2.html (position and width). I guess the question is - is it a problem with IEs internal rendering of the opacity or is the problem in how jQuery is setting the opacity? Cheers, Kelvin :) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Known issue with fadeTo and IE?
It is a known issue. The next release should be just around the corner ... or just grab the latest from svn. -- Brandon Aaron On 12/5/06, Kelvin Luck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there any known issues with 1.0.3 and the latest svn which should effect fadeTo in IE? On a page I'm building it seems fadeTo is being ignored (although the callback for after the animation is still firing). Of course everything works fine in Firefox... If it's not a known issue I'll attempt to strip down my page to a simplified example for you to look at, Cheers, Kelvin :) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Known issue with fadeTo and IE?
I've still got the issue with r670 (built from svn about an hour ago) so I guess I should put together an example page? Seems like it's a different issue... Cheers, Kelvin :) Brandon Aaron wrote: It is a known issue. The next release should be just around the corner ... or just grab the latest from svn. -- Brandon Aaron On 12/5/06, Kelvin Luck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there any known issues with 1.0.3 and the latest svn which should effect fadeTo in IE? On a page I'm building it seems fadeTo is being ignored (although the callback for after the animation is still firing). Of course everything works fine in Firefox... If it's not a known issue I'll attempt to strip down my page to a simplified example for you to look at, ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
