[IxDA Discuss] Intranets: Portal and Portlets or Dashboards

2009-09-18 Thread jon karpoff
I've been tasked with developing the requirements and UX for an
Intranet. The IT folks are talking about a portal model with the
multitude of legacy applications fully integrated as portlets.

I think that a personalized dashboards with single sign-on and links
to apps is OK with info feeds to the dashboard as appropriate.

My fear is that the portlet approach is too complex to successfully
design and implement. This sounds like the type of project destined
to fail. I was wondering if anyone has evidence-based POVs on Portals
vs. Dashboards from a UX / Usability / Project success viewpoint.

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Are We The Puppet Masters? The Ethics of IxD.

2009-07-29 Thread Jon Karpoff
One ethical consideration I run into often is a client wanting the
marketing email option defaulted to "opt-in". Typically these options are
buried at the bottom of the page, below the fold and buried in fine print.
I always push for either "opt-out" as the default, or no default value at
all.

Jon Karpoff
Senior Partner
Director User Experience
Office:   1-212-237-5516
Cell:   1-914-419-4151
Email:   jon.karp...@ogilvy.com

We few, we happy few
636 11th Ave, New York, NY 10036.


   
 Brad Nunnally 
To 
 Sent by:  Jared Spool 
 discuss-boun...@l  cc 
 ists.interactiond "disc...@ixda.org"  
 esigners.com
   Subject 
   Re: [IxDA Discuss] Are We The   
 07/29/09 11:02 AM Puppet Masters? The Ethics of IxD.  
   
   
   
   
   
   




Hi Jared,

Sorry for my lack if responses, currently adjusting to my new life as
a father and learning how to manage my time. I gave been following,
just not able to respond as much as I wish.

I don't see any moral issues when it comes to influencing a persons
behavior. Simple because at the end of the day the person can always
choose to do something different. It is when we as designers take that
choice away I see an issue. The real debate defing the line that
seperates influence and control and what types of influence seem to
push the envelope on "right" or "wrong".

Dave recent comment on HOW we influence is very interesting and one
that I want to explore more.

This message has been brought to you via my iPhone.

On Jul 28, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Jared Spool  wrote:

>
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Dan Lockton wrote:
>
>> it's a great debate
>
> If only I understood what we were debating.
>
> It's disappointing when an author posts his article for discussion
> then doesn't participate in said discussion. Maybe we should debate
> how that is "wrong"?
>
> Jared
> 
> Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
> To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
> Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
> List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
> List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


 
 
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you 
are not the addressee indicated in this message
(or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy 
or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. 
Please advise immediately if you or your
employer does not consent to email or messages of this kind. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this message
that do not relate to the official business of the sender's company shall be 
understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

For more information on WPP's business ethical standards and corporate
responsibility policies, please refer to WPP's website at
http://www.wpp.com/WPP/About/


Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Usability of Buttons versus Links for Navigation

2009-07-29 Thread Jon Karpoff
I'd say use buttons if it something you WANT the User to do vs. links for
things Users CAN do. Also there should be primary and secondary level
buttons with only one primary button per functional area - the acion you
REALLY want the User to chose... The "SUBMIT ORDER" comes to mind.

Jon Karpoff
Senior Partner
Director User Experience
Office:   1-212-237-5516
Cell:   1-914-419-4151
Email:   jon.karp...@ogilvy.com

We few, we happy few
636 11th Ave, New York, NY 10036.


   
 Shivan Kannan 
To 
 Sent by:  disc...@ixda.org
 discuss-boun...@l  cc 
 ists.interactiond 
 esigners.com  Subject 
   Re: [IxDA Discuss] Usability of 
   Buttons versus Links for Navigation 
 07/29/09 10:55 AM 
   
   
   
   
   




Hi

If you see gmail interface, they have a 'Back to Inbox' text link
unlike its adjacent buttons. This is to make the back more prominent
for the user and also that it is in blue underlined (a convention for
links).

You can use the button if that is the only button in that row or
column, or you could use the blue underlined link as gmail has. The
point is to show the difference in appearance thereby making it stand
out from the other trigers (links).

The reason others suggested you to change the link to a button may be
because you already have several similar looking links within the
article. Hence to make the 'BACK' look different from them, button
is advisable.

>From a functionality point of view, link or button doesn't matter
much. From a usability point of view, a button will definitely stand
out from a number of links on the same page.

--
Shivan Kannan
%u2605 uidude.com
%u2605 uidude.wordpress.com
%u2605 twit...@uidude


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=44185



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


 
 
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you 
are not the addressee indicated in this message
(or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy 
or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. 
Please advise immediately if you or your
employer does not consent to email or messages of this kind. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this message
that do not relate to the official business of the sender's company shall be 
understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

For more information on WPP's business ethical standards and corporate
responsibility policies, please refer to WPP's website at
http://www.wpp.com/WPP/About/


Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Do grid systems also apply to application interfaces?

2009-07-29 Thread Jon Karpoff
We use grid-based layouts for apps. First, a lot of financial apps need to
display tabular data. Second, grids help with consistent layout for forms.
If you have multiple functional areas on a single screen use the 'modulus'
concept from the Swiss Style of design. That is, divide your screen into a
grid of small cells that represent the finest granularity of real estate
assignment you need. Then create your functional 'zones' using a muliplier
of cell height and width (cell spanning). Continue to use the grid for
layout within each zone. This will give you a logical and extensible
layout.

This will work for content, displays (charts, graphs, et al.), controls and
form fields as long as all objects are sized as a multiple of the modulus.
Obviously the size of the modulus must be chosen with care since you can't
have fractional dimensions of the modulus - the modulus represents the
finest resolution of object size. The overall usable screen dimensions must
also be a multiple of the modulusAttached is an example using a 5 pixel
square modulus.

A 1024 x 768 pixel screen can be divided into a grid of 256 x 192 cells
using a modulus of 4 pixels square. In this case the finest resolution for
positioning is 4 pixels.(See attached file: Swiss Style.png)


Jon Karpoff
Senior Partner
Director User Experience
Office:   1-212-237-5516
Cell:   1-914-419-4151
Email:   jon.karp...@ogilvy.com

We few, we happy few
636 11th Ave, New York, NY 10036.


   
 Jennifer R
 Vignone   
   Rein Groot ,  
 Sent by:  "disc...@ixda.org"  
 discuss-boun...@l   
 ists.interactiond  cc 
 esigners.com  
   Subject 
   Re: [IxDA Discuss] Do grid systems  
 07/29/09 10:30 AM also apply to application   
   interfaces? 
   
   
   
   
   
   




I design financial applications for trading and trade analysis. I have
always used grids to base my design in. They provide stability to the
design and make the design repeatable so that once created and applied as
needed across the main screens, panels, widgets, etc., it can be replicated
as the application evolves/expands. It cuts down on the back and forth
between me and the developers to fine tune the design, because they have a
grid and patterns to follow (down to the pixel). It also makes rapid
development, where sometimes elements are implemented very quickly (and
occasionally without the benefit of the designer -- ;)  ) still adhere to
some notion of the required design parameters.

Jennifer

===

-Original Message-
From: discuss-boun...@lists.interactiondesigners.com
[mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.interactiondesigners.com] On Behalf Of Rein
Groot
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:06 PM
To: disc...@ixda.org
Subject: [IxDA Discuss] Do grid systems also apply to application
interfaces?

Hi All,

I'm very interested in hearing your opinion/experience on the
followig:

For content sites a grid system can be used to give the page a clean
and consistent layout.

Do grid systems also work/exist for application interfaces?

My own opinion:
I think this does not work since application interfaces are not very
likely to be layed out in columns, but rather in functional spaces.

Hope to hear from you.

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help
This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
__

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Whats in a name, my fellow Usability Experience Specialists?

2009-01-20 Thread jon karpoff
Times are indeed changing, and in many practices the IA is now
responsible for much more than taxonomies and functional wireframes.
We see more cross discipline design work. 

There is also a growing trend towards using some form of Agile for
development. The IA becomes responsible for representing the
end-to-end experience as both the voice of the user and the owner.

In this less documented more Socratic method of application
development with the addition of the expanding experiential palette,
the term IA doesn't begin to cover the actual role.

We also have seen a shift in the UCD community towards a recognition
of the importance of emotional engagement and aesthetics in the
design of web experiences.

I think User Experience Designer is a term that encompasses the
expanding role of IAs, the broadening view of UCD and moves us back
towards Wurman's vision that IA is a creative design discipline that
makes complex information and rich systems easy to understand and use.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=37257



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help