Re: [IxDA Discuss] Desktop Application: Look and Feel

2009-03-04 Thread Adam Lerner
Oliver -

I suppose it depends on what you mean by branding. In this instance
thinking of the brand as every touch between the company and the
consumer might be unhelpfully broad, but there is something to be
said for the look-and-feel to be considered a form of branding in
itself.

[1] I would think that there is a difference between a suite of
products which may/should (?) have similarities across user
interaction controls (text links vs. buttons vs. sliders; use of
wizards rather than single page configurations for tools) and also
the aesthetics of those controls  (menus, button stylings, use of
iconography).

I would see all of the above as part of the brand but also
meaningful elements unto themselves which could contribute to the
unified experience you are thinking about.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=39458



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


[IxDA Discuss] Desktop Application: Look and Feel

2009-03-02 Thread oliver green
This is a two part question:

[1] If there are a number of desktop software products for a platform,
other than menu placement, and branding,
what factors should be considered to provide the same look and feel?

[2] What technologies can be used to create these for desktop applications?

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help