Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo symbols set
I also just made a up a word mark logo for GeoHealthCheck, it could use a logo if you want to talk with Tom. -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 05:55, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > This is impressive work, thank you! > > FYI pycsw is in the process to change/improve the logo. > I will let you know when we have something to look at (an expert's opinion > would be much appreciated :) > > Best, > Angelos > > On 11/20/18 9:53 PM, nicolas bozon wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you all for the positive feedbacks ! > > Kristian, i already have a few ideas for a PROJ logo and will come up > with a SVG proposal soon ! > > Bart, thanks for noticing that mistake, the GeoExt logo has been > removed from the set. Sorry for that. > > Cameron, adding colors to the project logos SVG would indeed be quite a lot > of > work. Only the Foundation related logos are available in color for now. > (see:https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7135374/48731563-a1696800-ec3d-11e8-9a4c-c1b5919a325a.png > orhttps://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg/color > ) > Please also note that you can already add a unique color to each > project logo using CSS). I would be glad to work on a colored version, but > i would need much more free time for that ! > > Best regards, > > Nicolas > > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 à 14:52, SERGIO ACOSTAYLARA > a écrit : > > > Big thanks to Nicolas! Really impressive! > > > Sergio Acosta y Lara > Departamento de Geomática > Dirección Nacional de Topografía > Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas > URUGUAY > (598)29157933 ints. 20329/20330http://geoportal.mtop.gub.uy/ > -- > *De:* Discuss > en nombre de Cameron > Shorter > *Enviado:* martes, 20 de noviembre de 2018 8:10 > *Cc:* OSGeo-Marketing; OSGeo Discussions > *Asunto:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo symbols set > > > Nicolas, these symbols look very impressive! > > As Kristian noticed, there are a few OSGeoLive projects which have logos > which are not as creative as what you have been creating. > (Seehttps://live.osgeo.org/en/presentation.html ) I'd be happy to help point > you to our OSGeoLive points of contact for each project if you would like > to ask them if you'd like to draw them a logo. > > What are your thoughts on logo colours? I'm guessing it would be quite a > bit of work to adopt logo colours into the SVG? > > Once you are done, we should probably be including your logos into the > OSGeoLive documentation. > > Nice work, Cameron > > > On 20/11/18 8:01 am, Kristian Evers wrote: > > Nicolas, > > Very impressive work! > > Regarding projects that doesn’t already have logo, would you be interested > in coming up with logo suggestions for those projects? I can only speak for > the PROJ project, but I am sure all projects without a logo would be > interested in having one. At least a new logo for PROJ would be very > welcome! > > Good job, > > Kristian > > On 19 Nov 2018, at 21:28, nicolas bozon > wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have finally been able to put together and publish a first version of > the OSGeo symbols set. > > This is a visual representation of the OSGeo projects and activities aimed > at supplementing the Foundation branding material. > > A preview of the OSGeo symbols set is available > here:https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/ > > The 48 symbols fall into four categories: > - Foundation (OSGeo fundamentals represented by 'Variations on the > Compass') > - Initiatives (mostly based on the compass shape too) > - Projects (derived OSGeo project logos) > - Community (derived Community projects logos) > > The set is made of two parts, both copyrighted OSGeo: > - The source SVG documents, licensed under CC-BY-SA > > (seehttps://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg > ) > - A cross-browser webfont, licensed under OFL. > (seehttps://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/font > ) > > Important notes: > - Some projects do not have a logotype, only logotext, and cannot be > included in the set at this stage (namely PROJ, GEOS, OSSIM and Degree). > - Some projects logos were heavily modified or redrawn, in order to ensure > constistency and scalability. I'm listening to project owners feedbacks and > will be glad to work towards better solutions if needed. > - All 48 symbols are made available as black SVG. The 16 Foundation and > Initiatives icons are also available in color, based on our brand > guidelines. > - This work may not be exhaustive and is subject to change. > > Hope you will like it ! > > Reviews, comments and ideas are most welcome in the related > PR:https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206 > > > Best regards, > > Nicolas Bozon > ___ > Discuss mailing > listDiscuss@lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > ___ > Discuss mailing >
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Website work during weekend
Hi, sorry for my late reply Yes, they were already similar, but with different history, so merging changes from one to the other was very difficult, basically had to use git cherry-pick. Regards On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:26 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Thank you Vicky! So if I understand correctly this change should have > staging and master be closer in functionality / content? > > I also continue to get email with respect to 2083 > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 05:07, Vicky Vergara wrote: > >> SAC ticket is 2216 >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 7:04 AM Vicky Vergara >> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> There was work done on the website during the weekend, >>> If you added a post, a news item, uploaded a resource: >>> Please verify that is there, it might had being lost during the work on >>> the website. >>> As the backup used was about 24 hours from now. >>> >>> Sorry for any inconvenience. >>> >>> ticket/221 >>> >>> Thanks >>> Vicky from SAC >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) >>> Salzmannstraße 44, >>> 81739 München, Germany >>> >>> Vicky Vergara >>> Operations Research >>> >>> eMail: vi...@georepublic.de >>> Web: https://georepublic.info >>> >>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 >>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 >>> >>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 >>> CEO: Daniel Kastl >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) >> Salzmannstraße 44, >> 81739 München, Germany >> >> Vicky Vergara >> Operations Research >> >> eMail: vi...@georepublic.de >> Web: https://georepublic.info >> >> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 >> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 >> >> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 >> CEO: Daniel Kastl >> >> >> ___ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > -- Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Salzmannstraße 44, 81739 München, Germany Vicky Vergara Operations Research eMail: vi...@georepublic.de Web: https://georepublic.info Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 CEO: Daniel Kastl ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board candidate manifesto
Hi Vicky: thanks for the info, good question. IMHO one possible option might be webinars/sprints in which people register for and an online workshop ensues. For example, we did a pycsw webinar workshop in 2013 and the benefits continue to manifest (real world operational implementations). This would augment nicely the workshops that typically happen at FOSS4G events, with the added benefit of reaching out to more people. ..Tom On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:38 AM Vicky Vergara wrote: > > Hi Tom > > Starting a nomination discussion :) > > I was reading: > "continuous improvement on lowering the barrier to geospatial tools for > anyone" > which leads me to think of Education. > > Can you expand the topic on possible ideas that might be in your mind? > > And thanks for your manifesto. > > Regards > Vicky > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 2:23 PM Tom Kralidis wrote: >> >> Hi all: as per [1], please find my candidate manifesto at [2] >> >> Best of luck to all candidates -- thank you! >> >> ..Tom >> >> [1] >> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2018#Campaign_period_-_2018-11-19_-_2018-11-25_.281_week.29 >> [2] >> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2018_Candidate_Manifestos#Tom_Kralidis >> ___ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > -- > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) > Salzmannstraße 44, > 81739 München, Germany > > Vicky Vergara > Operations Research > > eMail: vi...@georepublic.de > Web: https://georepublic.info > > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 > CEO: Daniel Kastl > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo symbols set
Hi Vicky, Thank you for all these interesting questions. I'll try to answer and make things as clear as possible. First of all, this work is one of the action of the Marketing Committee for 2018. I released it a bit late, and this is still a work in progress. It has not been yet 'approved' by Mark'comm nor merged to the OSGeo Github branding repo. Some additional arrangements are needed, so better not to use it in 'production' for now :) I know the time it takes to do a design, as I do the release tweets designs > for pgRouting. > > Maybe I don't understand the difference with the words symbols and logo. > Can you explain your understanding? > Logo belongs to each project, has its own a story and involved most of the time specific design work by project contributors. Symbols or glyphs are simplified shapes that everyone can remember easily and that can possibly scale at 'any' size. > From my perspective: > The majority of the projects symbol/logos look like their original design > but they lost their color and they "look" gray (or is the gray green in the > guidelines). > The goal of the symbol set is to gather all the projects logos in a symbol collection that can be used as a webfont. One would basically import the CSS and then just write ** to make it appear in any web document, in any color, at any size or screen resolution. I used one of the OSGeo grey color in the demo page you are right, but one is free to use any other. > if a project has its own logo/symbol, like, pgRouting, baby elephant > playing with a compass, full with colors, is there a reason for us to have > a design change, a gray elephant head with two triangles in the ear? > Once again, logo belongs to each project and i wouldn't pretend to change any of them. As for PostGIS Slonik, your elephant was difficult to transform as a simple symbol shape, so i decided to create a simpler one. I feel sorry if that is hurting you or your community. Please note that i'm still at taming those two rebel elephants, so things should be much better shortly :) > Do the projects PSC need to vote for their logo/symbol change or is the > marketing committee, from now on be in charge of the logo/symbol designs of > projects and the projects PSC have no vote on that? > Oh no ! Not at All ! Nobody wants to change any logo, just get a useful SVG symbols collection to represent OSGeo projects in a simpler way when needed. > As SAC member: > Website: > Can you explain where in the website the projects's symbol/logo would be > used > If applicable: where the original logos would be used? > Where/how would the OSGeo foundation symbols set would be used. > Where/how would the initiatives symbols set would be used. > I believe each symbol could be used on related page as subtitles icons, as decorative html elements, as div or page repetitive background, or as images fallback when needed on mobile, or even in the OSGeoLive submenus or docs, as Cameron suggested. These are only ideas. You should probably see this symbol set a basic resource for websites, prints or any other media where using the official project logo is not mandatory. > Wiki: > In the wiki page we have badges for example: > https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/File:OSGeo_PSC.png > We are still using the old logo badges, because there is no specification > on the guidelines of how a badge should look like. > Good point, some of the symbols could replace some of the old badges. I didn't think of it yet. It is planned to integrate the symbols set in our branding assets, so its use will be eventually documented in the style guide. I hope i answered your question and will let you know when the PgRouting symbol will be better. Best, Nick ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo symbols set
Hey Angelos ! Thanks for this information, i'll give my input with pleasure, and integrate the new logo in the set :) I am planing regular updates over time in order to keep the set consistent and every project happy. Best, Nick Le jeu. 22 nov. 2018 à 14:55, Angelos Tzotsos a écrit : > Hi Nicolas, > > This is impressive work, thank you! > > FYI pycsw is in the process to change/improve the logo. > I will let you know when we have something to look at (an expert's opinion > would be much appreciated :) > > Best, > Angelos > > On 11/20/18 9:53 PM, nicolas bozon wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you all for the positive feedbacks ! > > Kristian, i already have a few ideas for a PROJ logo and will come up > with a SVG proposal soon ! > > Bart, thanks for noticing that mistake, the GeoExt logo has been > removed from the set. Sorry for that. > > Cameron, adding colors to the project logos SVG would indeed be quite a lot > of > work. Only the Foundation related logos are available in color for now. > (see:https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7135374/48731563-a1696800-ec3d-11e8-9a4c-c1b5919a325a.png > orhttps://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg/color > ) > Please also note that you can already add a unique color to each > project logo using CSS). I would be glad to work on a colored version, but > i would need much more free time for that ! > > Best regards, > > Nicolas > > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 à 14:52, SERGIO ACOSTAYLARA > a écrit : > > > Big thanks to Nicolas! Really impressive! > > > Sergio Acosta y Lara > Departamento de Geomática > Dirección Nacional de Topografía > Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas > URUGUAY > (598)29157933 ints. 20329/20330http://geoportal.mtop.gub.uy/ > -- > *De:* Discuss > en nombre de Cameron > Shorter > *Enviado:* martes, 20 de noviembre de 2018 8:10 > *Cc:* OSGeo-Marketing; OSGeo Discussions > *Asunto:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo symbols set > > > Nicolas, these symbols look very impressive! > > As Kristian noticed, there are a few OSGeoLive projects which have logos > which are not as creative as what you have been creating. > (Seehttps://live.osgeo.org/en/presentation.html ) I'd be happy to help point > you to our OSGeoLive points of contact for each project if you would like > to ask them if you'd like to draw them a logo. > > What are your thoughts on logo colours? I'm guessing it would be quite a > bit of work to adopt logo colours into the SVG? > > Once you are done, we should probably be including your logos into the > OSGeoLive documentation. > > Nice work, Cameron > > > On 20/11/18 8:01 am, Kristian Evers wrote: > > Nicolas, > > Very impressive work! > > Regarding projects that doesn’t already have logo, would you be interested > in coming up with logo suggestions for those projects? I can only speak for > the PROJ project, but I am sure all projects without a logo would be > interested in having one. At least a new logo for PROJ would be very > welcome! > > Good job, > > Kristian > > On 19 Nov 2018, at 21:28, nicolas bozon > wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have finally been able to put together and publish a first version of > the OSGeo symbols set. > > This is a visual representation of the OSGeo projects and activities aimed > at supplementing the Foundation branding material. > > A preview of the OSGeo symbols set is available > here:https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/ > > The 48 symbols fall into four categories: > - Foundation (OSGeo fundamentals represented by 'Variations on the > Compass') > - Initiatives (mostly based on the compass shape too) > - Projects (derived OSGeo project logos) > - Community (derived Community projects logos) > > The set is made of two parts, both copyrighted OSGeo: > - The source SVG documents, licensed under CC-BY-SA > > (seehttps://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg > ) > - A cross-browser webfont, licensed under OFL. > (seehttps://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/font > ) > > Important notes: > - Some projects do not have a logotype, only logotext, and cannot be > included in the set at this stage (namely PROJ, GEOS, OSSIM and Degree). > - Some projects logos were heavily modified or redrawn, in order to ensure > constistency and scalability. I'm listening to project owners feedbacks and > will be glad to work towards better solutions if needed. > - All 48 symbols are made available as black SVG. The 16 Foundation and > Initiatives icons are also available in color, based on our brand > guidelines. > - This work may not be exhaustive and is subject to change. > > Hope you will like it ! > > Reviews, comments and ideas are most welcome in the related > PR:https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206 > > > Best regards, > > Nicolas Bozon > ___ > Discuss mailing >
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board candidate manifesto
Hi Tom Starting a nomination discussion :) I was reading: "continuous improvement on lowering the barrier to geospatial tools for anyone" which leads me to think of Education. Can you expand the topic on possible ideas that might be in your mind? And thanks for your manifesto. Regards Vicky On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 2:23 PM Tom Kralidis wrote: > Hi all: as per [1], please find my candidate manifesto at [2] > > Best of luck to all candidates -- thank you! > > ..Tom > > [1] > https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2018#Campaign_period_-_2018-11-19_-_2018-11-25_.281_week.29 > [2] > https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2018_Candidate_Manifestos#Tom_Kralidis > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Salzmannstraße 44, 81739 München, Germany Vicky Vergara Operations Research eMail: vi...@georepublic.de Web: https://georepublic.info Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 CEO: Daniel Kastl ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo symbols set
Hello all, I know the time it takes to do a design, as I do the release tweets designs for pgRouting. Maybe I don't understand the difference with the words symbols and logo. Can you explain your understanding? >From my perspective: The majority of the projects symbol/logos look like their original design but they lost their color and they "look" gray (or is the gray green in the guidelines). if a project has its own logo/symbol, like, pgRouting, baby elephant playing with a compass, full with colors, is there a reason for us to have a design change, a gray elephant head with two triangles in the ear? Do the projects PSC need to vote for their logo/symbol change or is the marketing committee, from now on be in charge of the logo/symbol designs of projects and the projects PSC have no vote on that? As SAC member: Website: Can you explain where in the website the projects's symbol/logo would be used If applicable: where the original logos would be used? Where/how would the OSGeo foundation symbols set would be used. Where/how would the initiatives symbols set would be used. Wiki: In the wiki page we have badges for example: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/File:OSGeo_PSC.png We are still using the old logo badges, because there is no specification on the guidelines of how a badge should look like. Regards Vicky On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:28 PM nicolas bozon wrote: > Hello all, > > I have finally been able to put together and publish a first version of > the OSGeo symbols set. > > This is a visual representation of the OSGeo projects and activities aimed > at supplementing the Foundation branding material. > > A preview of the OSGeo symbols set is available here: > https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/ > > The 48 symbols fall into four categories: > - Foundation (OSGeo fundamentals represented by 'Variations on the > Compass') > - Initiatives (mostly based on the compass shape too) > - Projects (derived OSGeo project logos) > - Community (derived Community projects logos) > > The set is made of two parts, both copyrighted OSGeo: > - The source SVG documents, licensed under CC-BY-SA > (see > https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg > ) > - A cross-browser webfont, licensed under OFL. > (see > https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/font > ) > > Important notes: > - Some projects do not have a logotype, only logotext, and cannot be > included in the set at this stage (namely PROJ, GEOS, OSSIM and Degree). > - Some projects logos were heavily modified or redrawn, in order to ensure > constistency and scalability. I'm listening to project owners feedbacks and > will be glad to work towards better solutions if needed. > - All 48 symbols are made available as black SVG. The 16 Foundation and > Initiatives icons are also available in color, based on our brand > guidelines. > - This work may not be exhaustive and is subject to change. > > Hope you will like it ! > > Reviews, comments and ideas are most welcome in the related PR: > https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206 > > > Best regards, > > Nicolas Bozon > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Salzmannstraße 44, 81739 München, Germany Vicky Vergara Operations Research eMail: vi...@georepublic.de Web: https://georepublic.info Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 CEO: Daniel Kastl ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Protected Planet Report 2018 out for UN Biodiversity COP14
Dear colleagues, The Protected Planet Report 2018 informs about the actual status of the world’s protected areas, is available in digital format for the present COP14 of the UN Convention Biological Diversity (CBD). The Protected Planet Report 2018 - Tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas report is available at https://livereport.protectedplanet.net My greetings to all colleagues who are sharing their great work at 14th Conference of Parties (COP-14) in Egypt. Scientists need to guide world leaders to clear and influential targets for combating biodiversity losses in the same way that they have driven international climate accords. Geotechnologies and open data will play a key role to guide policy and improve conservation efforts around the world. Please share this information with the members of your COP 14 delegation and encourage them to attend. Details at https://www.osgeo.org/foundation-news/we-need-to-speak-for-the-voiceless-to-improve-conservation-efforts-around-the-world/ We need to speak for the voiceless – the rest of the estimated 10 million species on the planet, which form soil, water, air, and provide food, shelter, medicine and the spiritual and physical well being of humanity. Best wishes, Suchith This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo symbols set
Hi Nicolas, This is impressive work, thank you! FYI pycsw is in the process to change/improve the logo. I will let you know when we have something to look at (an expert's opinion would be much appreciated :) Best, Angelos On 11/20/18 9:53 PM, nicolas bozon wrote: Hi, Thank you all for the positive feedbacks ! Kristian, i already have a few ideas for a PROJ logo and will come up with a SVG proposal soon ! Bart, thanks for noticing that mistake, the GeoExt logo has been removed from the set. Sorry for that. Cameron, adding colors to the project logos SVG would indeed be quite a lot of work. Only the Foundation related logos are available in color for now. (see: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7135374/48731563-a1696800-ec3d-11e8-9a4c-c1b5919a325a.png or https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg/color ) Please also note that you can already add a unique color to each project logo using CSS). I would be glad to work on a colored version, but i would need much more free time for that ! Best regards, Nicolas Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 à 14:52, SERGIO ACOSTAYLARA < sergio.acostayl...@mtop.gub.uy> a écrit : Big thanks to Nicolas! Really impressive! Sergio Acosta y Lara Departamento de Geomática Dirección Nacional de Topografía Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas URUGUAY (598)29157933 ints. 20329/20330 http://geoportal.mtop.gub.uy/ -- *De:* Discuss en nombre de Cameron Shorter *Enviado:* martes, 20 de noviembre de 2018 8:10 *Cc:* OSGeo-Marketing; OSGeo Discussions *Asunto:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo symbols set Nicolas, these symbols look very impressive! As Kristian noticed, there are a few OSGeoLive projects which have logos which are not as creative as what you have been creating. (See https://live.osgeo.org/en/presentation.html ) I'd be happy to help point you to our OSGeoLive points of contact for each project if you would like to ask them if you'd like to draw them a logo. What are your thoughts on logo colours? I'm guessing it would be quite a bit of work to adopt logo colours into the SVG? Once you are done, we should probably be including your logos into the OSGeoLive documentation. Nice work, Cameron On 20/11/18 8:01 am, Kristian Evers wrote: Nicolas, Very impressive work! Regarding projects that doesn’t already have logo, would you be interested in coming up with logo suggestions for those projects? I can only speak for the PROJ project, but I am sure all projects without a logo would be interested in having one. At least a new logo for PROJ would be very welcome! Good job, Kristian On 19 Nov 2018, at 21:28, nicolas bozon wrote: Hello all, I have finally been able to put together and publish a first version of the OSGeo symbols set. This is a visual representation of the OSGeo projects and activities aimed at supplementing the Foundation branding material. A preview of the OSGeo symbols set is available here: https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/ The 48 symbols fall into four categories: - Foundation (OSGeo fundamentals represented by 'Variations on the Compass') - Initiatives (mostly based on the compass shape too) - Projects (derived OSGeo project logos) - Community (derived Community projects logos) The set is made of two parts, both copyrighted OSGeo: - The source SVG documents, licensed under CC-BY-SA (see https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/svg ) - A cross-browser webfont, licensed under OFL. (see https://github.com/nbozon/osgeo/tree/OSGeo-symbols-set/marketing/branding/symbols/font ) Important notes: - Some projects do not have a logotype, only logotext, and cannot be included in the set at this stage (namely PROJ, GEOS, OSSIM and Degree). - Some projects logos were heavily modified or redrawn, in order to ensure constistency and scalability. I'm listening to project owners feedbacks and will be glad to work towards better solutions if needed. - All 48 symbols are made available as black SVG. The 16 Foundation and Initiatives icons are also available in color, based on our brand guidelines. - This work may not be exhaustive and is subject to change. Hope you will like it ! Reviews, comments and ideas are most welcome in the related PR: https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206 Best regards, Nicolas Bozon ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing listDiscuss@lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Cameron Shorter Technology Demystifier Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant M +61 (0) 419 142 254 ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list
