Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Conference resources working group
Hi! This has been largely discussed for years and never implemented (well, Steven Feldman did his part on the sponsorship team in 2021) so I am all for it! Thanks Luca! On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 4:24 PM Eli Adam wrote: > Hi Luca and all, > > That sounds like a great idea! > > Best regards, Eli > -- > *From:* Discuss on behalf of Astrid > Emde (OSGeo) via Discuss > *Sent:* Sunday, August 28, 2022 11:15 PM > *To:* Luca Delucchi > *Cc:* OSGeo-Conf ; OSGeo Discussions < > discuss@lists.osgeo.org> > *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Conference resources working > group > > Hello Luca, hello all, > > thanks Luca for the idea. I support it strongly. We have such a > structure for the FOSSGIS conference too and it helps a lot. > > I added my name to the page and I am happy to support FOSS4Gs. > > See you Astrid > > Am 29.08.2022 07:33 schrieb Luca Delucchi: > > Dear Conference committee, OSGeo friends; > > > > working on the FOSS4G and SotM 2022 organization I was able to see two > > different types of organization for the two conferences. I really like > > the idea of having a working group helping the LOC team that OSM > > foundation has, this helps a lot to simplify the work of LOC. > > So in these days I spoke with some people about my idea to create a > > working group in helping the different LOCs to have a successful > > FOSS4G (mainly the international one but it could also be done with > > regional if needed, for example setting up or helping with pretalx). > > Most of the people I spoke with really liked the idea so I added it to > > the board meeting and all the members supported the idea. I already > > found some people interested in being part of this working group. > > > > This new group is not a replacement of the Conference Committee > > because they have two different purposes: > > - the Conference Committee has to put out the bid and choose the best > > candidate > > - the Conference resources (final name has to be decided but this is a > > good proposal of Michael) has to help the chosen candidate to set up a > > good FOSS4G and simplify the work and it is a operative entity > > > > I started a wiki page [0] and I'll be working on that in the next > > weeks, if you are interested to be part of and support this working > > group please add your name. > > > > I would like to have the first meeting by the end of September, after > > having a call with FOSS4G 2023 team. > > > > [0] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Resources > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ > Conference_dev mailing list > conference_...@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Conference resources working group
Hi Luca and all, That sounds like a great idea! Best regards, Eli From: Discuss on behalf of Astrid Emde (OSGeo) via Discuss Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 11:15 PM To: Luca Delucchi Cc: OSGeo-Conf ; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Conference resources working group Hello Luca, hello all, thanks Luca for the idea. I support it strongly. We have such a structure for the FOSSGIS conference too and it helps a lot. I added my name to the page and I am happy to support FOSS4Gs. See you Astrid Am 29.08.2022 07:33 schrieb Luca Delucchi: > Dear Conference committee, OSGeo friends; > > working on the FOSS4G and SotM 2022 organization I was able to see two > different types of organization for the two conferences. I really like > the idea of having a working group helping the LOC team that OSM > foundation has, this helps a lot to simplify the work of LOC. > So in these days I spoke with some people about my idea to create a > working group in helping the different LOCs to have a successful > FOSS4G (mainly the international one but it could also be done with > regional if needed, for example setting up or helping with pretalx). > Most of the people I spoke with really liked the idea so I added it to > the board meeting and all the members supported the idea. I already > found some people interested in being part of this working group. > > This new group is not a replacement of the Conference Committee > because they have two different purposes: > - the Conference Committee has to put out the bid and choose the best > candidate > - the Conference resources (final name has to be decided but this is a > good proposal of Michael) has to help the chosen candidate to set up a > good FOSS4G and simplify the work and it is a operative entity > > I started a wiki page [0] and I'll be working on that in the next > weeks, if you are interested to be part of and support this working > group please add your name. > > I would like to have the first meeting by the end of September, after > having a call with FOSS4G 2023 team. > > [0] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Resources ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Summer School 2022 / KISTE project workshop: “Open Source solutions for Earth system data (R, OSGeo, Python)”
Dear colleagues, The OpenGeoHub Summer School 2022 (29th Aug-4 Sep) has many geospatial tutorials. This Summer School is a not-for-profit event and can be followed online. The Summer School lectures will be live-streamed for free on https://www.youtube.com/c/OpenGeoHubFoundation (please note that it will not be possible to interact with lecturers) More details at https://opengeohub.org/summer-school/siegburg-2022/ Best wishes Suchith This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
