Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] osgeo.org website - {profile/change password} broken
Thanks for reporting, I will forward to the System Admin Committee. We also take reports via: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo sysad...@osgeo.org Newish- @OSGeo_SysAdmin I'm sure it's related to some work we did last weekend. Thanks, Alex On 5/1/19 15:22, Davlet Panech wrote: > Hi all, > > [Apologies if this is the wrong place to report this, please point me in > the right direction if so] > > The page for changing one's own password that's linked off the profile > page of www.osgeo.org, does not work, here's how to reproduce: > > Go to https://www.osgeo.org/, click "Sign In" in top-right corner, sign > in, you will land on the "Profile" page. > > Scroll down a bit, under "About Yourself" there's a link that says > > To change your OSGeo password, go to: https://id.osgeo.org/ldap/edit > > That link returns HTTP status 403 Forbidden. > > The (similar) reset link seems to work fine. > > Thanks, > D. > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Osgeo presentation at a Gfoss event in Israel
On 05/03/2018 05:56 AM, anna zanchetta wrote: > Hi all gfosser, > > me and Micha (cc) are going to participate soon to an event which we didn't > organize but are very happy is gonna take place in Tel Aviv on the 11th of > June about Open Source GIS. > > It will be a good opportunity to present the OSGeo activities and hopefully > to start thinking to organize a local chapter here as well. > > My question is if there is any ready material online which I could use for > a 15-20 mins talk. Other promotional material, like stickers and posters, > would be a plus. > > Thanks. > > Anna, > active in the Italian chapter few years ago, currently based in the Middle > East > Anna, You should talk to the Marketing Commmittee http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Marketing_Committee https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing As for a premade slides, the OSGeoLive project has some https://live.osgeo.org/en/presentation/index.html#/ Thanks, Alex ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: Charter Member Nomination: Michele Tobias
I second the nomination. -Alex Mandel On 09/05/2017 03:45 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote: > Forwarding Michele Tobias nomination by Kristin Bott. The 2017 member > nominations list has been updated [1]. > > Best regards, > Vasile & Jeff > 2017 OSGeo Elections CROs > > [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/New_Member_Nominations_2017 > > > Forwarded Message > > Nominee: Michele Tobias, USA > Nominator: Kristin Bott, USA; Charter Member 2014 / FOSS4G LOC 2014 / > Code of Conduct Committee chair 2015-present > > I am writing to nominate Michele Tobias for OSGeo Charter Membership. > Michele is active in the development of FOSS4G software and open data > projects, as the lead programmer on the Literature Mapper plugin for > QGIS, the Data Curation Lead for the UC Davis Library’s American > Viticulture Area boundary data creation project, and an active > contributor to OpenDroneMap. She was a founding member of the OSGeo > California chapter and is currently a *re*founding member of the QGIS US > users group (in collaboration with Randall Hale and Kurt Menke). > > Michele brings experience in many open source tools; in GIS (QGIS, > GRASS, SAGA GIS), and a number of programming languages (R, Python, > HTML, Leaflet), and database systems (SQLite, PostGRES, PostGIS, > SpatiaLite), as well as cartography and graphic design (Inkscape), > Photogrammetry & Aerial Photograph Interpretation, and Kite Aerial > Photography. > > A regular presenter and/or workshop leader at FOSS4G (2017, 2014, 2011) > and FOSS4G-NA (2016, 2015) conferences, Michele also is active within > the OSGeo California chapter, serving on the organizing committee for > their annual meetings (2015, 2013, 2011) as well as presenting at same > (2016, 2011). Michele also takes her open source geospatial work outside > of OSGeo venues, leading workshops at local (UC Davis Library, Davis R > User Group) and statewide (California GIS Conference 2015 + 2014; GIS > Day 2014) venues. > > Finally, the call for Charter Members "strive[s] to promote diversity". > While the above qualifications are completely compelling in their own > right, Michele is a woman working in education, research, and science -- > not OSGeo's predominant demographic. Additionally, Michele is interested > in improving the diversity of both OSGeo membership and conference > attendance; by including her as a Charter Member, OSGeo gains the > further commitment of someone who is both technically very strong and > also committed to building a community that is more accessible to all. > > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] "Hostile Takeover" -- what do we mean by this?
On 08/28/2017 09:41 AM, Sara Safavi wrote: > Hi discuss, > > In the notification emails from CRO to new charter member nominees, the > following is included (emphasis mine): > > *"(Charter Members) have the following responsibilities: (1) annually vote > for OSGeo Board Members; (2) annually vote for new OSGeo Charter Members > and (3) be aware of and protect against a hostile takeover of OSGeo."* > > I have had more than one nominee of mine contact me asking what exactly > this means. I agree with their concerns: this is strange language to use, > is not reflected in our bylaws, and frankly does not fit the image I > presented when I first contacted them asking if they would accept a > nomination. > > It may be a language barrier or simply a misunderstanding, but can we > clarify what is meant by using this kind of verbiage, and consider a > re-wording? > > Thanks, > Sara > The term comes from the the business world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takeover#Hostile In the OSGeo context there was concern early on that OSGeo would be the public puppet of a single company or entity. In particular if the majority of board members worked for the same entity, or if a single entity was a majority sponsor of the Foundation. From that perspective the Charter members who elect the board need to pay attention to the affiliations of who they elect to the board, and ensure the interests of the foundation, and it's mission to protect it's member projects is the top priority. Keep in mind that some projects have their Intellectual Property 'owned' by OSGeo, which means in an extreme case the board could re-license those projects to a non free and open source license. I have no opinion on if and how to reword, or incorporate that more into the the bylaws. As stated it's really a guidance/reminder to uphold the original mission of the and maybe should be worded that way, with hostile takeover as an example. Thanks, Alex ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Charter member nomination process - who can nominate?
On 07/18/2016 10:56 AM, Regie Alam wrote: > Hello All, > >Just to confirm, are existing charter members the only ones allowed to > nominate potential new charter members? > > Regie > I believe so, "2. An existing charter member can nominate potential new Charter Member(s)." - https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Membership_Process If you have someone who you think should be a charter member, and you aren't one, you should find a charter member to submit the nomination. Chances are you know one who you could ask. http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/members/voting_members.html Thanks, Alex ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Somebody is Spamming trac_osgeo4w list
Ya we're working on it, it's actually trac spam, not list spam directly. It's affecting all trac instances actually. Anyone with Trac Spam filtering and LDAP experience please hop over the the Sys Admin Mailing list or IRC and offer to help out. Thanks, Alex Sys Admin Committee On 05/03/2016 02:48 PM, Abhay wrote: > Kind Attn: List Admins, > > Just bring this to notices to list admins it seem the trac_osgeo4w list is > bombarded with Spam.. Can list admins take look at it? > > Thanks and Regards, > > Abhay Menon. > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: OSGeo4W > Date: Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:12 AM > Subject: [osgeo4w-dev] [osgeo4w] #505: USA$$U$$*I8447806762 AOL > MAIL t.e.c.h s.u.p.p.o.r.t p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r u.s.a. C.a.l.l > To: > Cc: osgeo4w-t...@lists.osgeo.org > > > #505: USA$$U$$*I8447806762 AOL MAILt.e.c.h s.u.p.p.o.r.t > p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r u.s.a. C.a.l.l > -+--- > Reporter: harsh567 | Owner: osgeo4w-dev@… > Type: defect| Status: new > Priority: major | Component: Package > Version:| Keywords: > -+--- > ((sukhe))Call @@@++ USA 18447806762 AOL MAILt.e.c.h s.u.p.p.o.r.t > p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r u.s.a. C.a.l.l AOL MAIL h.e.l.p d.e.s.k n.u.m.b.e.r > n.u.m.b.e.r C.a.n.a.d.a AOL MAIL s.u.p.p.o.r.t p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.r usa USA > 1 18447806762 AOL MAILt.e.c.h s.u.p.p.o.r.t p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r > u.s.a. C.a.l.l AOL MAIL h.e.l.p d.e.s.k n.u.m.b.e.r n.u.m.b.e.r > C.a.n.a.d.a AOL MAIL s.u.p.p.o.r.t p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.r usa canada > 1-1844-848-1262 USA, AOL Mail Tech Support phone number,AOL MAIL technical > support phone number 1 18447806762 .AOL MAIL Tech Support Number AOL MAIL > Tech AOL MAIL tech support, AOL MAIL tech support number, AOL MAIL tech > support phone number, AOL MAIL technical support, AOL MAIL technical > support number, AOL MAIL technical support phone number, AOL MAIL tech > support number, AOL MAIL support number, AOL MAIL Tech support phone > number, AOL MAIL support phone number, AOL MAIL technical support phone > number, AOL MAIL technical support number,Support Phone Number for AOL > Mail Phone Number for AOL MAIL CustomerService Technical Support Telephone > Number AOL Mail support number AOL MAIL AOL Mail tech support number AOL > MAIL AOL Mail technical support number AOL MAIL AOL Mail technical support > phone number AOL MAIL AOL Mail customer service number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL > internet security technical support AOL MAIL technical support phone > number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL tech support phone number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL > customer support phone number I-844-848-1262 AOL MAIL AOL Mail support > phone number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL support phone AOL MAIL tech support AOL > MAIL customer support AOL MAIL phone support AOL MAIL support number AOL > MAIL AOL MAIL technical support AOL Mail customer support phone number AOL > MAIL AOL Mail tech support phone number AOL MAIL contact AOL MAIL support > AOL Mail technical support phone number ~!~I8447806762++ AOL MAIL AOL MAIL > phone number AOL MAIL tech support AOL MAIL support ticket AOL MAIL > customer support number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL tech support number AOL MAIL AOL > MAIL technical support number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL support center AOL MAIL > telephone support call AOL MAIL support AOL Mail support support AOL MAIL > AOL MAIL billing support AOL Mail technical support number AOL MAIL > support AOL Mail AOL MAIL online support AOL MAIL contact support AOL Mail > support number AOL MAIL AOL Mail customer support number AOL MAIL AOL Mail > tech support number AOL MAIL support for AOL MAIL AOL MAIL phone number > AOL MAIL AOL MAIL customer service phone number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL contact > phone number AOL MAIL AOL Mail phone number AOL MAIL AOL Mail customer > service phone number AOL MAIL phone number AOL MAIL for AOL MAIL customer > service AOL MAIL software phone number AOL MAIL phone number AOL MAIL for > AOL MAIL AOL MAIL customer service telephone number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL > helpline phone number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL contact number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL > customer service number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL customer service phone number > ~!~I8447806762++ AOL MAIL us AOL MAIL customer service phone number AOL > MAIL usa AOL MAIL telephone number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL phone number AOL MAIL > usa AOL Mail contact number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL > contact number AOL MAIL usa AOL Mail helpline number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL > helpline number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL customer number AOL MAIL AOL Mail > customer service number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL contact telephone number AOL > MAIL contact number AOL MAIL for AOL MAIL AOL MAIL software contact number > AOL MAIL AOL MAIL toll free number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL telephone number AOL > MAIL uk AOL MAIL registration number AOL MAIL AOL MAIL toll free number > AOL MAIL usa AOL MAIL customer s
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Requesting services for librttopo
Probably, a cross reference of mailing lists, dns entries and current projects should give us a list of potential "Community Projects". This is the new name for pre-incubation stuff? Thanks, Alex On 05/02/2016 12:00 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > I would ask if the project would consider joining OSGeo as a community > project <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Community_Projects>? This > requirement is minimal, we want some assurance that your project is both > open source and open to collaboration. > > Alex - are their any other projects we provide infrastructure for that we > can extend an invitation to? > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 2 May 2016 at 10:00, Alex M wrote: > >> On 05/02/2016 02:36 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> this mail is to request permission to use the download area >>> of OSGeo for publishing librttopo packages, and possibly >>> an rttopo.osgeo.org domain and webspace. >>> >>> The librttopo project consists of a GPL(v2+) licensed library >>> providing a standard-based topology API on top of user-provided >>> input/output routines for storage. It was derived from the PostGIS >>> liblwgeom library at its 2.2.0 version, from which deviated to >>> drop PostGIS-specific dependencies and add thread-safety (not >>> of interest for PostGIS proper at this time). >>> >>> The upcoming 4.4.0 version of Spatialite will be using librttopo >>> instead of liblwgeom and the aim is to attract other liblwgeom users >>> (QGIS, for example) so to eventually free PostGIS from the burden of >>> maintaining a stable liblwgeom API. Having PostGIS itself use >>> librttopo is currently not on the radar, but might be considered in >>> the future if librttopo gets more development. >>> >>> At the moment librttopo code is hosted in the experimental OSGeo >>> [Gogs service](https://git.osgeo.org/gogs/rttopo/librttopo) and >>> has an OSGeo hosted [mailing list] >>> (https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/librttopo-dev) >>> >>> The project is managed by Andrea Peri of "Regione Toscana" (primary >>> sponsor for the library), Alessandro Furieri of Spatialite and >>> myself from PostGIS/GEOS. >>> >>> Some more background info are available from [my website] >>> (https://strk.kbt.io/projects/rttopo) >>> >>> --strk; >> >> >> This seems to be a reasonable request from a project that is likely >> participate widely in the OSGeo community (note we already provided >> email and a git repo). >> >> +1 >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> Sys Admin Committee >> >> ___ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Requesting services for librttopo
On 05/02/2016 02:36 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > Hi all, > this mail is to request permission to use the download area > of OSGeo for publishing librttopo packages, and possibly > an rttopo.osgeo.org domain and webspace. > > The librttopo project consists of a GPL(v2+) licensed library > providing a standard-based topology API on top of user-provided > input/output routines for storage. It was derived from the PostGIS > liblwgeom library at its 2.2.0 version, from which deviated to > drop PostGIS-specific dependencies and add thread-safety (not > of interest for PostGIS proper at this time). > > The upcoming 4.4.0 version of Spatialite will be using librttopo > instead of liblwgeom and the aim is to attract other liblwgeom users > (QGIS, for example) so to eventually free PostGIS from the burden of > maintaining a stable liblwgeom API. Having PostGIS itself use > librttopo is currently not on the radar, but might be considered in > the future if librttopo gets more development. > > At the moment librttopo code is hosted in the experimental OSGeo > [Gogs service](https://git.osgeo.org/gogs/rttopo/librttopo) and > has an OSGeo hosted [mailing list] > (https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/librttopo-dev) > > The project is managed by Andrea Peri of "Regione Toscana" (primary > sponsor for the library), Alessandro Furieri of Spatialite and > myself from PostGIS/GEOS. > > Some more background info are available from [my website] > (https://strk.kbt.io/projects/rttopo) > > --strk; This seems to be a reasonable request from a project that is likely participate widely in the OSGeo community (note we already provided email and a git repo). +1 Thanks, Alex Sys Admin Committee ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Install Proj and GEOS on Raspbian
Poking around the Debian world there is no package called proj (maybe there was at some point). proj-bin proj-data, libproj0 and libproj-dev should be it. Are you missing some functionality? I think you're just running into selecting packages that go by other names. Try doing some apt-cache search or using autocomplete to find matching packages. Thanks, Alex On 04/20/2016 02:23 PM, Nico Aliotta wrote: > i'm tryng to install Proj and GEos on Raspbian on my raspberry pi3 > > > pi@raspberrypi:~ $ > *sudo apt-get install proj proj-bin proj-data libproj-dev* > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Package proj is not available, but is referred to by another package. > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > is only available from another source > > E: Package 'proj' has no installation candidate > > same for > > > *sudo apt-get install libgeos-c1v5 libgeos-dev* > is there any way to install them? > > > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] [Notice] Email List Maintenance
All of OSGeo email lists and aliases, will be migrated to the new "osgeo6" machine on Thursday evening UTC (~ http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2015&month=10&day=8&hour=18&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179). Expected downtime required for syncing everything over plus testing will be 1 to 2 hours. Thanks, Alex OSGeo System Administration Committee ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Renaming FOSS4G
On 10/06/2015 08:12 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote: > Okay, this is probably sticking a match under a pile of dry wood but > here goes... > > Can we rename The FOSS4G Conference to The OSGeo Conference? > > Cons: > > 1. FOSS4G is an established brand > > 2. FOSS4G sidesteps the "Free" vs "Open Source" argument by including both. > > Counters to those: > > 1. Really? Perhaps amongst OSGeo people, but outside our sphere I > have to expand the acronym and then go on to mention OSGeo. > > 2. Let's have that argument somewhere else, okay? > > Pros: > > 1. Puts the *Geo* visible, not tucked away as a G at the end. > > 2. Gets rid of the "4G", which may have been a cool thing 2 do ten > years ago, but not now :) > > 3. Removes any confusion with 4G telecoms networks. > > 4. Clearly brands the conference as an OSGeo conference. Recent > discussion about the prominence and significance of OSGeo to FOSS4G > becomes moot. > > 5. Is easy to explain. The OSGeo Conference is the open source > geospatial conference. See the OSGeo web site. Search for OSGeo. One > acronym to remember. > > [I toyed with the idea that the conference should be called "OSGeo > Live!" and renaming the OSGeo Live operating system disc as "OSGeoOS" > but that might be a bit too much :)] > > So, this is the discuss list, discuss. > > Barry > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > Branding things to resolve: Is OSGeo just a conference? Sure Foss4g is a little weird, but would the general community what these mean if they aren't part of the community already? SXSW, PyCon, OSCon, AGU, AAG, etc... If we rename, then the conference must be front and side by side on the homepage/1st page of everything OSGeo does. Probably should be as is anyways. Do we alienate sponsors, or do they get that OSGeo is just the organizer? Goes back to question 1 above. I'm sure there's lots of other pros/cons. Seems the other threads about what should OSGeo be in the next few years should probably be worked out first. -Alex ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case
Looks like Jeff or Mateusz needs to login (the designated managers on openhub), and go to https://www.openhub.net/orgs/OSGeo/manage_projects then remove Rasdaman from OSGeo projects. Am I correct in understanding that is what you are requesting? I can't see anything on OpenHub that allows affiliating with multiple orgs so that you could indicate both Ownership and that there is in fact some relationship to OSGeo. Side note, "Code of Conducts" in recent years are generally about how people treat each other in their interactions, with mutual respect. Thanks, -Alex On 09/18/2015 09:41 AM, Peter Baumann wrote: > just to clarify: it is a _very_ simple step: OSGeo needs to login to OpenHub > (obviously they have one, otherwise this false claim could not have been > established) to undo that claim. That simple. > > So, when will OSGeo do that? > > -Peter > > > On 2015-09-18 17:02, Stephen Woodbridge wrote: >> Ok, maybe I don't understand, but why doesn't somebody just fix this issue. >> It >> seems everyone agrees the listing is wrong on the site. Somebody should have >> a >> cease and desist letter sent to the site to change the owner to the correct >> name or remove the posting. >> >> whois openhub.net >> >> for the site particulars. This assumes that the person the created the >> posting >> on the site is unknown or not available to change it. >> >> It might expedite things if BOTH osgeo and rasdaman GmbH sent similar letters >> making similar requests so the site gets confirmation from both parties and >> does not need to worry if this is an attempt to "steal" the listing. >> >> -Steve W >> >> On 9/18/2015 10:28 AM, Michael Gerlek wrote: >>> I agree: Peter’s issue doesn’t seem to be a Code of Conduct issue, it >>> seems closer to a Code of Ethics issue — but even that’s not quite >>> right. I think this is more properly a grievance to be taken up >>> directly with the Board. >>> >>> Suggestion: the CoC team right want to consider a couple lines on the >>> wiki page that (further) clarify the intent of the Code of Conduct, >>> as opposed to the intent of a Code of Ethics [1][2]. The two are >>> similar in their ultimate goals, but address different areas of our >>> professional lives and activities [3]. >>> >>> [1] https://www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethics [2] >>> http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html [3] >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_code >>> >>> -mpg >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sep 17, 2015, at 5:17 PM, Camille Acey wrote: I am having a hard time seeing how this is a CoC matter. Camille On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote: Hi Peter, It may be early here at FOSS4G-Seoul, but I am finding it hard to understand your full issue. Can you please explain here to everyone what you mean by "I found that OSGeo has claimed rasdaman at some time in the past". Claimed how/where/in what way? As far as I know, rasdaman is an OSGeo Project in Incubation, and, having been at the OSGeo booth here most of this week I have spoken to many people coming to the booth about rasdaman. So, pardon me if I am in the total dark here, maybe you could explain more to everyone, as I sense that you are upset. Thanks, -jeff On 2015-09-18 1:21 AM, Peter Baumann wrote: Hello community, here is another real case that I would like to raise. rasdaman [0] is listed on OpenHub [1], like many of us, with owner rasdaman GmbH set originally. By coincidence I found that OSGeo has claimed rasdaman at some time in the past. To my total surprise, as rasdaman is in incubation since about 5 years now [2], and since quite some time OSGeo refuses graduation requiring this and that extra documentation. I find this undercover misappropriation a gross violation of professional ethics and request to immediately "give back" the project as a remedial action. I could do it myself, but recently OpenHub requires a phone number to be entered to which, as blog comments show, spam will get sent. IMO it is on OSGeo to bring this sacrifice. Actually, I know who has "stolen ownership", but will not disclose identity publicly following suggested practice. Rather, I am seeking contact to and investigation by the CoC Committee (or whoever is in charge). Thanks, Peter [0] http://www.rasdaman.org [1] https://www.openhub.net/p/rasdaman [2] http://rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeo PS: On the side, this IMHO justifies an amendment of the CoC rules to prevent such a case in future. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >>>
