Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] repo.osgeo.org contains empty files
Interesting, we use it in Nexus as a proxy repo and you were right, these zero-size jars were present in our cache as well. How did you cleaned-up the cache? Search on filesystem and remove files with this attributes and updated index within nexus afterwards? Your help is much appreciated -- Frank Am Mo., 11. Sept. 2023 um 16:48 Uhr schrieb Jody Garnett < jody.garn...@gmail.com>: > I was only asking as if you have a mirror it would of been filled up with > junk and need to have its cache of jars cleaned up. > > When building directlt it is best to have the fewest number of maven > repositories listed (as each one is checked in turn). > > I am not sure why maven pom.xml does not allow an include/exclude filter > on repositories… > > Jody > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 2:08 AM Brogli, Alexander > wrote: > >> Answer: >> >> We do build it directly and dont mirror it (so far, maybe we should, at >> least to reduce some traffic for osgeo). So for us the fix indeed worked. >> >> Thanks & Regards >> Alex >> >> -- >> *Von:* Jody Garnett >> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 8. September 2023 00:59 >> *An:* Brogli, Alexander >> *Cc:* discuss@lists.osgeo.org ; >> fg...@users.sourceforge.net >> >> *Betreff:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] repo.osgeo.org contains empty files >> >> >> *[EXTERNE E-MAIL]* Klicke nicht auf Links und öffne keine angehängten >> Dateien, wenn du die Absenderin oder den Absender nicht kennst. >> Question: >> >> Are you building against repo osgeo "release" directly in your maven >> build? >> If so you should indeed be fixed 🙂 >> >> Or have you setup a mirror or nexus repository of your own that caches >> repo osgeo "releases"? >> In this case you may need to clear your cache (to get rid of any zero >> sized jars). >> >> I am curious how many folks are running downstream caches or mirrors and >> may be affected ... >> -- >> Jody Garnett >> >> >> On Sep 7, 2023 at 12:42:09 PM, "Brogli, Alexander" < >> alexander.bro...@ebp.ch> wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> Thanks for creating the ticket. I haven't created one, since I don't have >> a osgeo ID and am still waiting for a reply to my mantra request. I've >> checked, it seems we can regularly pull from repo.osgeo.org again, so I >> can confirm the problem seems to be resolved for us, thanks a lot! >> >> Regards, Alex >> >> -- >> *Von:* Jody Garnett >> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 7. September 2023 21:04 >> *An:* fg...@users.sourceforge.net >> *Cc:* Brogli, Alexander ; >> discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> *Betreff:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] repo.osgeo.org contains empty files >> >> >> *[EXTERNE E-MAIL]* Klicke nicht auf Links und öffne keine angehängten >> Dateien, wenn du die Absenderin oder den Absender nicht kennst. >> I have gone ahead and created a ticket there: >> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2978 >> >> I did not see you report the ticket yet, and it is capturing feedback on >> multiple channels. >> >> I have found the problem with geonetwork-cache being setup to cache files >> stored in a GitHub repository by geonetwork 2.x series. >> GitHub must of turned off access in this manner yesterday, resulting in a >> lot of time-outs and zero sized files being saved. >> >> The geonetwork-cache has been removed from release configuration; and I >> hope normal service has been restored? Please CONFIRM 🙂 >> >> Notes: >> >>- There is a risk that other repositories have saved these zero sized >>files and will need to clear their cache of OSGeo, and lazily rebuild it >>again. >>- Normal maven builds do not have any way to select what jar to >>retrieve from different repositories. Indeed they attempt to contact each >>repository in turn, checking for every jar. >>So it is expect that repo.osgeo.org releases would field requests for >>all manner of content as we have seen. This is one case where gradle >> offers >>better control ... >>- I will reach out to the core-geonetwork project and determine how >>their build can be restored also. >> >> >> -- >> Jody Garnett >> -- >> Jody Garnett >> >> >> On Sep 7, 2023 at 7:39:38 AM, Frank Gasdorf >> wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I recently stumble about this problem to and my investigation is as >> follows: >> >> * you a comp
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] repo.osgeo.org contains empty files
Hi folks, I recently stumble about this problem to and my investigation is as follows: * you a company uses a repository manager and has osger repo as a proxy repo configured AND * and internal artefact has been request but is not avaliable in internal repositories, that a http get is set to osgeo repo as well * this leads to enties like that with size 0 for each artefact IMHO it seems to be an issue in nexus configuration and I investigate how to configure filter for proxe repositories in Nexus. Once you have a trac issue id, let us know -- Frank Am Do., 7. Sept. 2023 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Jody Garnett via Discuss < discuss@lists.osgeo.org>: > This should be reported to the trac issues tracker, for the system admin > committee. > > I help manage the repo a bit, I wonder where the size zero files come > from? We may be able to check if they were uploaded or fetched from a cache > of an external repo. > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 5:54 AM Brogli, Alexander via Discuss < > discuss@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> We're thankful consumers of osgeo's maven repository, though this morning >> we noticed that empty files are pulled. Inspecting certain cases, we saw >> that since this morning files with size 0 seem to be in the repo, e.g. the >> files here >> https://repo.osgeo.org/service/rest/repository/browse/release/org/jboss/jboss-parent/36/ >> . >> >> Do you know if there's a better place / mailing list to post this >> inquiry, or if the responsible persons are aware of the issue? >> >> Thanks & regards >> Alex >> >> ___ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.
Thanks Darrell for such a clear and structured statement. I'd like to add a few thoughts. First I'd like to aggree to the infrastructure thing, in times Open Source projects can get a space (SCM, Ticket system, Build infrastructure, etc) for free everywhere it's kind of wired OSGeo paying for it. Like Jo noticed, things changing over time and maybe here projects can move forward - e.g. like GeoTools and GeoServer did. The point was and still is, that's not OSGeo driven to provide a common infrastructure for OSGeo projects. Each project cares about it's own setup and that burns a lot of volunteering time. However, maybe here can start the discussion, if that would be a benefit for projects. IMHO FOSS4G is a brand, wheras OSGeo isn't. I never has been involved yet organizing a FOSS4G but it sounds like a hugh effort from local teams slightly supported by OSGeo. I love FOSS4G's because its a chance to have face to face meetings with Contributors and Users from all over the world. In the past I remember the WMS shootouts where I got the impression, OSGeo/FOSS4G is the best place it can be happen: Several projects in a battle to improve these all together. Thats making the world a better place.. On other levels, would it be worth to setup similiar competitions for other fields: Tile caches, Desktop clients, Processing Implementations and so on. Would that help to push projects and provide comparable values between OS and proprietary projects. Same for codesprints and hackathons... Sponsoring such events helps growing community, improving projects and finally helps users who using this great software stack How can OSGeo help creating Solutions with Components of this stack. OSGeo Live is the first step I guess: Setup things and finding out how the fit together. We learned a lot from other projects within OSGeo live and that improves each project I guess. What's the major output for Users? What about "Long Term Support", would that be a field OSGeo could help projects and users in the same way? Maybe we can think about other sponsoring models, where Companies paying anual fees. What could the expect from OSGeo, what would be an added value for these? And finally, from a uDig perspective: Whats the different between Geospatial organizations such as OSGeo and LocationTech. From my perspective : They have a totally different history, I 'd say community driven vs. company driven, which includes different sponsoring models. Maybe its worth to think about: Whats the driver, the community or the business behind sponsoring companies? Again, Thank you Darrell for initial post, I guess the discussion helps a lot to get a Strategy for the future Warm regards, Frank 2015-09-26 15:29 GMT+02:00 Jo Cook : > Hi All, and especially Darrel, > > In his email Darrel articulated some ideas that I have been having for a > couple of years now, but haven't been able to clearly define. > > So firstly I'd like to say that I totally agree with Darrel's points (and > Michael Gerlek's previously)- OSGeo is definitely in danger of becoming > irrelevant. Some of this is down to being a victim of its own success. The > projects have, in many cases, matured and become popular to the point where > they no longer need OSGeo. I'd really like to see a thorough assessment of > our goals and objectives to decide what is still important. The > availability of infrastructure, version control, open data, etc have > improved massively over the last 5 years so now is a great time for a real > spring-clean and decide what we need to keep and what we don't. > > What does the world really need from OSGeo that it can't get from anyone > else? What problems could we solve moving forward? Those are the things we > should focus on. > > I'm currently trying to write an article on open geospatial in 2020 and I > can honestly say I'm struggling to see a place for OSGeo in it. I'd really > like to be proved wrong (and I'd love some predictions for my article, but > that's for another discussion). > > Thanks > > Jo > On 26 Sep 2015 1:40 pm, "Just van den Broecke" > wrote: > >> Dear Milo, >> >> That you agree Darrel's statements is your opinion and fine in any open >> discussion. >> >> I react here on your phrase: '"empty talkers" from my country run for >> charter membership'. >> >> We have 9 Charter Members from the Netherlands, including me. I know each >> of them, and IMO they are far from "empty talkers". They all spend long >> voluntary hours in an array of activities that support OSGeo's global and >> OSGeo.nl local mission and FOSS in general. To name a few: >> Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2015) spends ample time in Debian packaging >> Barend Köbben (2012) helping/speaking at FOSS4G, org academic track >> We all know what Jeroen and Bart have accomplished. I could go on. Not >> all charter members need to make software, some make things happen like >> organizing local OSGeo.nl events and acting in the LOC for the upcoming >> FOSS4G in Bonn. >> >> So I hope you
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2015] Board Nomination for Jody Garnett
I second this nomination! Frank 2015-09-16 8:31 GMT+02:00 Dirk Frigne : > I second this nomination! > > Dirk > > On 16-09-15 08:20, Vasile Craciunescu wrote: > > Forwarding Jody Garnett nomination to the board of directors by Cameron > > Shorter. > > > > Best, > > Vasile > > CRO 2015 > > > > > > Forwarded Message > > Subject: Re: Run for the OSGeo board? > > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:42:05 +1000 > > From: Cameron Shorter > > To: Jody Garnett , OSGeo CRO > > > > > > > > Dear CRO, > > > > I would like to nominate Jody Garnett to serve on the OSGeo Board. > > > > Jody is a man who has a depth of experience with the OSGeo foundation, > > right from getting his hands dirty writing code, through to setting up > > and managing projects, through to evangelising at conferences and > > workshops, as well as chairing OSGeo committees. > > > > He steps up to tackle the hard problems, provides insightful feedback > > and advice, as well ask taking on the less exciting tasks to get things > > done. This depth of can-do practical experience will serve OSGeo well if > > Jody were voted onto the OSGeo board. > > > > For background: Jody chairs the OSGeo Incubation committee, was on the > > FOSS4G 2007 and FOSS4G 2009 organising committees, has presented > > regularly at conferences and workshops, is on the Project Steering > > Committees for UDig, GeoTools, GeoServer, and is a regular contributor > > to numerous OSGeo email lists. > > > > Warm regards, > > Cameron Shorter > > > > > > > > ___ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > -- > Yours sincerely, > > > ir. Dirk Frigne > CEO > > Geosparc n.v. > Brugsesteenweg 587 > B-9030 Ghent > Tel: +32 9 236 60 18 > GSM: +32 495 508 799 > > http://www.geomajas.org > http://www.geosparc.com > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G Seoul team will help you promote your FOSS4G events
Thanks for this opportunity! It would be great if FOSSGIS can be listed as well. FOSSGIS is the German FOSS4G Chapter and its conference is taking place next months, 11th-13th of March For details have a look http://www.fossgis.de/konferenz/2015/ For details please contact organization team via mail i...@fossgis.de - Frank 2015-02-26 0:34 GMT+01:00 Sanghee Shin : > Dear all, > > If you want to promote your open source geospatial event globally, please > let us[1] know. > > Seoul team will promote your events through our website[2], Facebook and > Twitter. Our website and social networks has many visitors and followers. > > Actually I’m not sure whether we could put all the events there. However > we’ll try to be more inclusive. > > Best regards, > > Sanghee > > [1]email: foss4g2015-i...@osgeo.org > [2]http://2015.foss4g.org/related-eventsites/ > --- > Sanghee Shin, Chair of FOSS4G 2015 Seoul > "Toward Diversity! FOSS4G Bigbang from Seoul!" > http://2015.foss4g.org > Twitter: @foss4g > Facebook: FOSS4G2015 > email: foss4gch...@osgeo.org > > > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2014] Nomination of Pirmin Kalberer
I second this nomination because Pirmin is an active member of the German chapter and speeker on several Foss4g's, Germans FOSSGIS, and international onces - Frank Am 27.07.2014 09:37 schrieb "Marco Lechner - FOSSGIS e.V." < marco.lech...@fossgis.de>: > Seconded. > > Marco Lechner > FOSSGIS e.V. / OSGeo D-A-CH > > Am 27.07.2014 um 09:26 schrieb Jorge Sanz: > > Forwarding Pirmin Kalberer nomination by Cameron. > > > > Cheers > > Jorge > > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: Cameron Shorter > > Date: 2014-07-25 10:34 GMT+02:00 > > Subject: Nominating Pirmin Kalberer for OSGeo Charter Membership > > To: CRO > > > > > > I have known Pirmin through his very active role on the OSGeo-Live, > > where he has taken on the responsibility of packaging and supporting > > documentation for many Open Source GIS applications, including QGIS > > Server, TinyOWS, osgEarth and QGIS additions. > > > > He has also been involved across a range of projects, including QGIS, > > GDAL, OGR, Mapfish, MapLayers, Mapserver, TinyOWS, osgEarth, > > GIS-Knoppix, as well as with UbuntuGIS. > > > > More about his experience is at: > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Pirmin_Kalberer > > > > > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2014] Nomination for Silvia Franceschi
I second this nomination and would love to see Silvia as a charter Member! - Frank Am 27.07.2014 09:33 schrieb "Jorge Sanz" : > Forwarding Silvia Franceschi nomination by Venka > > Cheers > Jorge > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Venkatesh Raghavan > Date: 2014-07-26 9:44 GMT+02:00 > Subject: Nomination for Silvia Franceschi > To: OSGeo Chief Returning Officer , Silvia Franceschi > > > Hi Jorge, > > It is my pleasure to nominate Silvia Franceschi[1] [2] for OSGeo > Charter membership. > Active contributor to several FOSS4G projects and also international > community > particulatrly in Africa. She is a co-founder of HydroloGIS where she > develops and uses > JGrassTools, uDig, Geopaparazzi for practical applications. > Her commitment and passion for all-things-FOSS4G is second to none. > > Venka > > [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Silvia_franceschi > [2] > https://sites.google.com/a/hydrologis.com/hydrologis-environmental-engineering-en/azienda > > > > -- > Jorge Sanz > http://www.osgeo.org > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2014] Nomination for Andrea Antonello
I second Andreas nomination. He contributed a lot to uDig as well and lives the way of Free & Open Source. He made great contributions to uDig and involved community to put things into core libraries like GeoTools. In addition he always see the user perspective which is a worth skill for a broader acceptence of open source software - Frank Gasdord Am 25.07.2014 09:43 schrieb "Paolo Corti" : > I definitely second this nomination! > regards > p > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Jorge Sanz wrote: > > Forwarding Andrea Antonello nomination by Luca Delucchi > > > > Best > > Jorge > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: Luca Delucchi > > Date: 2014-07-24 8:44 GMT+02:00 > > Subject: Andrea Antonello nomination > > To: c...@osgeo.org > > > > I would like to nominate Andrea Antonello as Charter Member. > > He is long time contributor to several OSGeo Java project. > > > > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Advocate#Andrea_Antonello > > > > -- > > Jorge Sanz > > http://www.osgeo.org > > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz > > ___ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > -- > Paolo Corti > Geospatial software developer > web: http://www.paolocorti.net > twitter: @capooti > skype: capooti > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Discussion about When for FOSS4G Code sprint in September
Sorry for cross-posting .. I'd like to start the discussion about the when the event takes place. Right now the wiki page (http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2013_Code_Sprint) says Sunday, 22nd but I'm not sure whether is a good idea to have it at the end of a fantastic week: - I guess some will leave earlier (like myself on Saturday) - GeoHack (http://2013.foss4g.org/geohack/) on 17th and 18th I never had the chance in the past to join a code sprint, maybe there are some unwritten rules (post sprint having a drink or something like that). What do you think about moving the OSGeo code print to Friday to have the chance after the sprint getting one ore more beers? Other pro would be the chance to talk to each other on the next conference day after a cool down in the night Thoughts? Opinions? Cheers, Frank ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
