Re: [slim] Improving Wireless Strength on the Squeezebox
Apesbrain wrote: > Glad this worked out for you, but there is no reason for anyone to > expect the introduction of a 5G wireless router will improve the sound > quality of their Squeezeboxes. You might believe you hear a "bigger > sound stage and more depth", but I suggest this is due to your > expectation of the results rather than to any real result. Valid as > this might be to you personally, it's not an adequate basis for > recommending that others follow a similar path to the same result. > > Suggested reading: 'List of cognitive biases' > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases) It wasn't the router, but the server I added an 5 G adapter, the router has nothing to do with it as the Touch connects to the sever for file info. 1st Touch in main HT rig hardwired to router connected 2nd Touch Wirelessly connected (Master Bedroom) 3rd Touch Wirelessly connected (bedroom) 4th Touch wirelessly connected (bedroom) 5th Touch 2 Wirelessly connected (livingroom) 6th Touch 4 Wirelessly connected (downstairs bedroom) Server (In garage) running on Duo Core P4 3.0 GHz 4 gig ram Windows 7 64 bit 350 Xternal gigHD 1TB backup Verizon Fios wireless router w/HG antana Recoveryone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9205 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=3974 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Improving Wireless Strength on the Squeezebox
It might turn a 1 into a 1.1 and a 0 into 0.1 - you never know *Pi3 with piCoreplayer music on QNAP TS419p via NFS* iThingys/iPeng/Tablets/Jogglers *Living Room* - Joggler & SB3 -> Onkyo TS606 - > Celestion Ditton F20s *Office* - Pi -> Sony TA FE320 -> Celestion F10s / Pi & SB3 -> Onkyo CRN 755 -> Wharfedale Modus Cubes *Dining Room* -> SB Boom *Kitchen* -> UE Radio (upgraded to SB Radio) *Bedroom (Bedside)* - SB Touch -> Topping TP21 -> AKG Headphones d6jg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=44051 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=3974 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] using Squeezeplayers as PA system
openhab home automation has a component to do this. It's a lot of work to set up just for this. Just thought I'd mention it. jth's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=107763 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Improving Wireless Strength on the Squeezebox
Actually think the internet would be a saner place if all texts containing "s*und st*ge" would be quietly sent to /dev/null. I mean, is it really a thing? Is it ever used in any meaningful context? And if someone actually believed the stuff, hooking up the server to 5 GHz isn't "putting out more bandwidth" to any Squeezeboxes, for a number of reasons it will be exactly the same. alfista's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32396 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=3974 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Improving Wireless Strength on the Squeezebox
Recoveryone wrote: > The unintentional bonus using the 5 G on the server was a bigger sound > stage and more depth in my music. After thinking on this, it makes good > sense as the 5 G is putting out more bandwidth to my squeezebox touches. > We all known being hardwire is best, put like most my home was not built > with network sockets in all the outlets, so wifi is the only way to > stream. This could be about the cheapish upgrade to your system to > improve your sound quality. Glad this worked out for you, but there is no reason for anyone to expect the introduction of a 5G wireless router will improve the sound quality of their Squeezeboxes. You might believe you hear a "bigger sound stage and more depth", but I suggest this is due to your expectation of the results rather than to any real result. Valid as this might be to you personally, it's not an adequate basis for recommending that others follow a similar path to the same result. Suggested reading: 'List of cognitive biases' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases) Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=3974 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] HOW hot you Pi3 get?
Greg Erskine wrote: > I didn't think anyone used the CPU temperature graphing. :) > > The [Start] button starts a small script that writes the CPU temperature > to a log file every minute. > > The [Refresh] button reads the temperature log file to generate a SVG > graphic that is then displayed. > > After a reboot everything is gone and the script will need to be > restarted. > > Without going through this process, the CPU temperature can be found > by: > > 1. [Main Page] in [Beta] mode > [Diagnostics] > [Raspberry Pi] > > Or, > > 2. If Squeezelite is running on pCP then [Main Page] in [Beta] mode > > [Extras] > [Test] > > will show the Diagnostics page of all pCP's running Squeezelite. > > The initial "V" displayed on the graph is just the test data I used > during development. > > regards > Greg Cheers jouteur's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=67128 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=107804 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
