[slim] Re: problems with new Squeezebox/iTunes

2005-10-14 Thread gages

Set mine up the other day with itunes 5.  No issues.  After I modify the
playlists i do a rescan and after a few minutes everything show up.


-- 
gages
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


RE: [slim] Re: problems with new Squeezebox/iTunes

2005-10-14 Thread Craig, James (IT)
Aaron,
What version of SlimServer are you running  What OS is your SlimServer
running on?

Do you have a lot of music with accented characters in the tags or
filenames?

James


NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does 
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: problems with new Squeezebox/iTunes

2005-10-14 Thread AaronS

Sorry, I should have given that info already.

It's 6.1.1, on XP. I don't have many accented characters. I allow
iTunes to look after the filenames, so they should be pretty
straightforward.

One thing I was wondering.. i do have quite a lot of files with similar
names. For example, I keep a lot of recordings of gigs. When there's
some talking between songs, I tend to give it a track number and no
track name - meaning there's a lot of files named something like
01.mp3, 02.mp3. They're all in different folders, obviously, but
thought I'd mention it.


-- 
AaronS
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: problems with new Squeezebox/iTunes

2005-10-14 Thread tubesguy

I doubt that it's similar song titles or tags, or that it's the way you
have iTunes set up to update the iPod.  I have none of those issues,
and I've found that the only reliable way to have 6.1 recognize the
entire library, instead of some random number that is approximately 2/3
of the library, is to download slimserver again and start from scratch.

There are now a number of posts from folks with similar problems. I'm
just guessing, but this appears to be a bug of some type.  The problem
is that so far, it just appears that peers are responding to these
threads, and no one from Slim is reading them.  I'm new here, and I'm
not sure how to direct attention to the problem. - Pat


-- 
tubesguy
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


RE: [slim] Re: problems with new Squeezebox/iTunes

2005-10-14 Thread Craig, James (IT)
I was having the same problems with chunks of my iTunes library going
missing and upgrading to 6.2 fixed it. (And this was a couple of months
ago) 

I belive the iTunes parser is a complete re-write in 6.2, which I think
is why any complaints about 6.1 are being quietly ignored - no point
fixing something that's already been superceded!

I think that 6.2 will be released officially soon if you don't fancy
installing a 'beta' version.


James


NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does 
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: problems with new Squeezebox/iTunes

2005-10-14 Thread CardinalFang

Craig, James (IT) Wrote: 
 I was having the same problems with chunks of my iTunes library going
 missing and upgrading to 6.2 fixed it. (And this was a couple of
 months
 ago) 
 
 I belive the iTunes parser is a complete re-write in 6.2, which I
 think
 is why any complaints about 6.1 are being quietly ignored - no point
 fixing something that's already been superceded!
 
 I think that 6.2 will be released officially soon if you don't fancy
 installing a 'beta' version.
 
 
 James

Actually I'm not sure I'd agree 100% with that, but it's only from the
standpoint of a user rather than someone with inside knowledge of the
code. 

I had a very similar problem and fixed it by going from 6.1 to a later
version of 6.1. I would agree that there appears to be a parser bug
that seems to get SlimServer knotted at some point and it can't recover
- a clean istall seems to fix it. Are there temporary or cached files
that SlimServer uses that could be at the root of this problem? I
suggested in another thread that a native version of SS would be
faster, it would be easier to debug I would suggest as well...

Paul


-- 
CardinalFang
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: problems with new Squeezebox/iTunes

2005-10-14 Thread kdf

Quoting marc1966 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



Thx James for your hint! But is it a problem for Slimdevices to give us
users this information?


There is no problem as the information has been out there for a long time. The
only limit for some is that it gets tiring saying try 6.2 nightlies all of
the time (for both sides).  The parser re-write was VERY early in the 6.2
changes (probably mentioned in the dev forum in several places) and was not
part of 6.1.2 becuase it was so experimental.  By the time it stabilised, 6.2
was nearing the release cycle.  There is a LOT of work remaining on 6.2 to
clear up the targetted bugs in time, so hopefully you can forgive a bit of
percieved silence.

Slim Devices builds both a stable and developers build evey day.  This means
that changes like this become old very fast for those who update 
daily. Wading through what has now become well over 200 posts a day 
while retaining a

backlog of changes nearly 90 days of builds is tricky for any user or
developer.

-k


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss