Today's Stereophile e-Newsletter has Wes Phillips taking a hack at the
ReQuest F2.250 audio server.  Like most of these one-box players, it is
essentially an expensive computer ($3500).  

One thing was confusing about the review.  Wes says the F2.250 has a
fan and was designed to go in a closet - yet he connected a $650
touchscreen to control it.  He says he installed the F2.250 in his
office and controlled it from his listening room with a Java remote
installed on his wireless laptop.  Yet Wes also says he connected the
analog and digital outputs to his audio system (he would have to to
hear any sound).  I have to assume that he ran long cables from the
office to the listening room, which seems totally counter-productive. 
Why not just skip the audio server altogether and run a long cable from
his computer?

The $3500 F2.250 has a 160GB hard drive.  The $5000 F4.500 has a 320GB
hard drive.  That's a lot of cake for a drive that costs maybe $30 more
than the 160GB.  But the F4.500 has outputs for 4 zones and the F2.250
only supports 2 zones.  What's the deal with these zones?  Well, to use
zones, you have to run audio (RCA) cables from the ReQuest server to
various rooms in the house.  Then you need amps and speakers in each
room.  If you want to CONTROL the playback from a different room, you
also need some kind of networking and a computer or laptop at each
location.  Seems very clumsy and redundant compared to the Slim method,
where audio AND control signals travel over 1 ethernet cable or through
the air via wireless.

Wes also had some trouble with the FreeDB database (don't we all?).  It
wasn't clear whether the database is preinstalled on the hard drive or
whether it gets lookups over the internet, but it's clear that you're
stuck with FreeDB for lookups.

Wes also lost several thousand cool points by calling Ogg Vorbis 'Vogg
Orbis'.  He liked the sound of the ReQuest, but for critical listening
he said he would use his megabuck Ayre Universal Player.  Sooo...the
ReQuest seems like an awful lot of trouble and expense just for
background music.  He's gotta keep all those CDs close at hand for when
he really wants to listen to them, sorta defeating the purpose of
loading a music collection on a server.

It's amusing to read reviews of these expensive audio servers.  It just
makes Slim's design seem infinitely more elegant, flexible and
futuristic, as well as ridiculously inexpensive in comparison.


-- 
Pale Blue Ego
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=23952

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to