Re: [discuss] Vote for more pretty default colors in charts

2007-03-02 Thread Jonathon Blake

Ingrid wrote:


 What about to increase the current colour of chart from 12 to 24 or 36?
Where do you expect that to be used? I would rate charts with 12


I often do bar charts with 18 different fields. Duplicating six fields
does confuse some clients.


Then you would be free to create your own default color set with as many
colors as you usually need. Would that make sense for you?


Yes

xan

jonathon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [interface-discuss] constructing services

2007-03-02 Thread Stephan Bergmann

Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:

Hi Stephan,

[...]
The idea was to move service instantiation into the language bindings 
(so, e.g., in C++ a class implementing a service would probably have C++ 
class constructors matching the UNO service constructors, or static 
factory methods, etc.).


That's something I didn't dare to suggest :).
Moving the ctor handling to the factories, instead of the current
always default-construct and then late-initialize would be even
better. For instance, implementations can get rid of all their not
initialized handling, in case somebody creates them bypassing the
explicit ctors, and does *not* subsequently initialize them.


The current XImplementation stuff is seen as a
gross hack to implement service constructors (at least by me).


+1


Unfortunately, this somehow keeps slipping on the urgent todo list...


Sad enough. Whenever I implement constructors, I find it pretty ugly to
do all this manual initialization coding.


See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75053, also at 
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/To-Dos#Features.


Hope that helps  :)
-Stephan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[discuss] RE: System requirements

2007-03-02 Thread Paul William Brown
On this page:

http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html

we read:

System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 2
Microsoft Windows
Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000 (Service Pack 2 or higher), Windows 
XP, Windows 2003, Windows Vista (enhanced Vista integration from version 
2.2)



So we are going to download page:

http://download.openoffice.org/2.1.0/index.html?focus=download

and SURPRISE!:

Our thoroughly tested builds:

Windows
Windows 2000, NT  XP (93MB)




So my question is: Does it run on W98 or not? Could you make up your 
mind? Thank you.

Best regards,
Marac


I have installed OpenOffice.org 2.1 on four old machines running Windows 98
and none of them have shown any problems.

Paul Brown

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]