Re: [discuss] Re: LibreOffice

2010-10-21 Thread Sigrid Carrera
Hi Marius,

2010/10/21 Marius Popa :
> When LibreOffice 3.3  final will be released? Will you make a portable
> version of it or www.portableapps.com will deal with it?

This is a question, that no one can answer you on the openoffice.org
lists. If you're interested, you should ask this question in the
libreoffice mailinglists.
You could try either disc...@libreoffice.org or us...@libreoffice.org

Be warned, that discuss has high mail traffic at the moment.


Sigrid

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Re: LibreOffice

2010-10-20 Thread Marius Popa
When LibreOffice 3.3  final will be released? Will you make a portable
version of it or www.portableapps.com will deal with it?

On 5 October 2010 09:26, Graham P Davis  wrote:

> On Thursday 30 Sep 2010 16:37, Marius Popa scribbled:
>
> > What is LibreOffice? Is it the successor of OpenOffice.org or what?
> >
>
> http://www.documentfoundation.org/faq/
>
> --
> Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks.  E-mail: "newsman", not "newsboy".
> "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out." -
> Carl
> Sagan
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org
>
>


-- 
Marius Popa


[discuss] Re: LibreOffice

2010-10-04 Thread Graham P Davis
On Thursday 30 Sep 2010 16:37, Marius Popa scribbled:

> What is LibreOffice? Is it the successor of OpenOffice.org or what?
> 

http://www.documentfoundation.org/faq/

-- 
Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks.  E-mail: "newsman", not "newsboy".
"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out." - Carl 
Sagan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Re: LibreOffice

2010-09-30 Thread RA Brown

On Thu Sep 30 2010 18:57:58 GMT-0700 (PDT)  NoOp wrote:

On 09/30/2010 09:57 AM, RA Brown wrote:

On Thu Sep 30 2010 09:23:36 GMT-0700 (PDT)  Marius Popa wrote:

What LibreOffice will be able to do in addition to OpenOffice? When
OpenOffice.org 3.3 will appear? I see the beta lasts too long.

LibreOffice has some of the more stable code from Go-oo back ported. 
The Icons or not the "official" colorless ones seen in 3.2.1 or 3.3.0 beta.


Andy


Which is *very* nice on linux as you don't have to mess with antiquated
JMF for sound & video as LO uses the gstreamer plugins.



In one the forums I tried to point out to a poster that Go-oo was 
better, but I was basically told I did not know what I was talking 
about.  Not having tried with either I could not prove the point.  I had 
seen you referring to the problems but did not have the references handy.


Andy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] Re: LibreOffice

2010-09-30 Thread NoOp
On 09/30/2010 09:57 AM, RA Brown wrote:
> On Thu Sep 30 2010 09:23:36 GMT-0700 (PDT)  Marius Popa wrote:
>> What LibreOffice will be able to do in addition to OpenOffice? When
>> OpenOffice.org 3.3 will appear? I see the beta lasts too long.
>> 
> 
> LibreOffice has some of the more stable code from Go-oo back ported. 
> The Icons or not the "official" colorless ones seen in 3.2.1 or 3.3.0 beta.
> 
> Andy

Which is *very* nice on linux as you don't have to mess with antiquated
JMF for sound & video as LO uses the gstreamer plugins.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] Re: LibreOffice - What's in a Name?

2010-09-30 Thread Harold Fuchs


"Thorsten Behrens"  wrote in message 
news:20100929120139.gb7...@thinkpad.thebehrens.net...

Phil Hibbs wrote:

Harold Fuchs:
> So, am I being
> paranoid in thinking that the choice of the name "LibreOffice" suggests 
> that

> at some stage it will no longer be Gratis?

Yup.


Totally not - it being LGPLv3 licensed will lead to its source code
being freely available eternally - and transitively, since the
marginal cost of supplying binaries to users approaches zero (with
some purported 100 million users of OOo), that also holds for the
final product.



(besides that, the notion of "gratis" is misleading at best - of
course there's inherent cost in every software, FLOSS being no
exception - and of course someone needs to develop it, test it,
translate it, etc - either by donating time, or money)



Cheers,



-- Thorsten
First, I think you mean "totally yes", in other words I think you think I'm 
being paranoid. Please correct me if I've got this wrong.


Second, the fact that the source code will be freely available forever is of 
no interest to 99% of the users of the software who wouldn't know what to do 
with a single line of c++ or Java let alone several million. Those users 
need a supported product, either supported by a professional organisation or 
by a volunteer group like the existing OOo forums & mail-lists.


The foundation could decide to sell LibreOffice in the same way Sun sold 
StarOffice. The name LibreOffice suggests this might be the plan. However, 
subsequent messages in other threads tell us that the foundation is hoping 
that Oracle will join it and donate the name OpenOffice.org, at which point 
the name LibreOffice will be dropped. So perhaps I was being paranoid after 
all. I hope so.


--
Harold Fuchs
London, England 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [discuss] Re: LibreOffice - What's in a Name?

2010-09-30 Thread Robert Funnell

On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, John Thompson wrote:


On 2010-09-29, Robert Funnell  wrote:


On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Phil Hibbs wrote:


Harold Fuchs:

So, am I being
paranoid in thinking that the choice of the name "LibreOffice" suggests that
at some stage it will no longer be Gratis?


Yup.


This does seem a bit paranoid. 'Libre' nicely emphasizes the 'free
speech' aspect. Isn't the 'free beer' aspect assured by the GPL
licence?


As long as you don't mind compiling it yourself. On linux this isn't a
huge issue, but on Windows I seem to recall that a proprietary compiler
is required.


As long as the source code is 'libre', there is presumably enough of 
an existing community that someone will compile and distribute the 
binaries 'gratis', so I would expect the free beer to continue to be 
available for some time, regardless of what any one group or 
organization might do. Of course, the strength of on-going development 
is another question.


- Robert


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] Re: LibreOffice - What's in a Name?

2010-09-30 Thread Harold Fuchs


"Harold Fuchs"  wrote in message 
news:i7v3tv$gc...@dough.gmane.org...
The word "free" in English is ambiguous. It can mean "at no cost", free as 
in beer - "Gratis". It can also mean "at liberty", free as in speech, 
"Libre". In normal conversation context usually distinguishes between the 
possibilities. However, here we are deep in the world of F(L)OSS where the 
distinction is widely used, recognised and made explicit. So, am I being 
paranoid in thinking that the choice of the name "LibreOffice" suggests 
that at some stage it will no longer be Gratis?


--
Harold Fuchs
London, England


The following message was sent to the us...@openoffice.org list today.
The sender was Marc Paré (m...@marcpare.com)

= begin message ===
At this point, the Document Foundation is hoping that Oracle will be
kind and donate the "OpenOffice" trademarked name to them. If this is
done, the Document Foundation will then abandon the "LibreOffice" name
and go back to the "OpenOffice" name. At this point, OpenOffice has a
great brand name that is recognized the world over. Let's hope that
Oracle will be generous enough to join the Document Foundation and
participate. This would create fewer disturbances in the OpenOffice
development. But, if they do not donate the name to the Document
Foundation, then the "LibreOffice" name will be kept and it will then
be officially known as a fork of OpenOffice. At this point, the Document
Foundation doesn't consider the LibreOffice as a fork but just as a
temporary name change of the community software till Oracle decides what
it will do with the OpenOffice name which they own.

Cheers

Marc
= end message ===

--
Harold Fuchs
London, England 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] Re: LibreOffice - What's in a Name?

2010-09-29 Thread John Thompson
On 2010-09-29, Robert Funnell  wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Phil Hibbs wrote:
>
>> Harold Fuchs:
>>> So, am I being
>>> paranoid in thinking that the choice of the name "LibreOffice" suggests that
>>> at some stage it will no longer be Gratis?
>>
>> Yup.
>
> This does seem a bit paranoid. 'Libre' nicely emphasizes the 'free 
> speech' aspect. Isn't the 'free beer' aspect assured by the GPL 
> licence?

As long as you don't mind compiling it yourself. On linux this isn't a 
huge issue, but on Windows I seem to recall that a proprietary compiler 
is required.

-- 

-John (j...@os2.dhs.org)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] Re: LibreOffice - Why Beta?

2010-09-29 Thread Clair Johnston

On 9/29/2010 5:35 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:

The subject line say it.

Why is the new LibreOffice only a beta? What has been done to
OpenOffice.org that turns it from "production" (or "stable" or whatever)
to beta? Would someone please either list the, presumably new features
or point me at a web site that does so.


The release is beta because it is OOo 3.3 beta, not 3.2.1 which is the 
current stable


Clair


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org



[discuss] Re: LibreOffice - Why Beta?

2010-09-29 Thread Harold Fuchs


"Harold Fuchs"  wrote in message news:...

The subject line say it.

Why is the new LibreOffice only a beta? What has been done to 
OpenOffice.org that turns it from "production" (or "stable" or whatever) 
to beta? Would someone please either list the, presumably new features or 
point me at a web site that does so.



--
Harold Fuchs
London, England


Sorry, forgot to ask: when can we expect to see the first non-beta version?


--
Harold Fuchs
London, England 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org