Re: [discuss] interesting article on MSFT

[Ian Lynch]

On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 21:53, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
> Bruce Byfield has written a really very interesting analysis of
> Microsoft's latest foray against OSS. It's worthwhile reading,
> especially as it should urge us here to come up with good reasons why
> OSS is better than MSFT.

Because without it MSFT would not even be considering the changes they
are discussing. So if for no other reason that the competion forces MS
to be more customer conscious. This provides OSS with higher level goals
and then all technology gets better from the user point of view either
because of better technology or lower prices or both.

-- 
Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ZMS Ltd


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [discuss] interesting article on MSFT

[Rigel]

--- Louis Suarez-Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Byfield has written a really very interesting analysis of
> Microsoft's latest foray against OSS. It's worthwhile reading,
> especially as it should urge us here to come up with good reasons why
> OSS is better than MSFT.
> 
> See
>  148>
> 
> Best,
> louis
> 
Thanks for this Louis. Read it. I won't comment. I have to be neurotic over
this topic for a while first. LOL

Rigel


__ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[discuss] interesting article on MSFT

[Louis Suarez-Potts]

Bruce Byfield has written a really very interesting analysis of
Microsoft's latest foray against OSS. It's worthwhile reading,
especially as it should urge us here to come up with good reasons why
OSS is better than MSFT.

See


Best,
louis

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]