[Discuss-gnuradio] Cannot Run TX Flowgraph More Than One time

2008-08-01 Thread Firas A.

Hi,

I thing there is a bug (defect) in gnuradio core. Checked with svn revisions 
7311 and 9036, on  CoreDue system with Ubuntu 8.04, and USRP + RFX900, it
seems that we cannot run TX flow graph properly more than one time. If we
started it more than one time, we will have a very distorted TX signal
(observed on spectrum analyzer). The following python code was used to check
this strange behaviour:

*
#!/usr/bin/env python

from gnuradio import usrp
from gnuradio import gr
import time


tb = gr.top_block()
tb.u = usrp.sink_s(0)
tb.u.set_interp_rate(512)
tb.src = gr.noise_source_s(gr.GR_UNIFORM,1,0)
tb.subdev= usrp.selected_subdev(tb.u,(1,0))
tb.u.tune(tb.subdev._which,tb.subdev,91500)
tb.subdev.set_enable(1)
tb.subdev.set_auto_tr(False)
tb.u.set_mux(usrp.determine_tx_mux_value(tb.u, (1,0)))
tb.connect(tb.src,tb.u)
i = 1
while i  4:
print running = ,i
tb.start()
time.sleep(5)
tb.stop()
tb.wait()
time.sleep(1)
i +=1
*


Regards,

Firas
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Cannot-Run-TX-Flowgraph-More-Than-One-time-tp18776491p18776491.html
Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


[Discuss-gnuradio] Beagleboard

2008-08-01 Thread Eric Cottrell
Hello,

There was some interest on this list earlier about the Beagleboard, a small 
OMAP3 based board.  I just got one from Digi-key and it is small!
http://beagleboard.org/

Besides the GNURadio aspects this may be a good board for ham radio digital 
modem applications like the old TI DSP Evaluation Board that TAPR used.

73 Eric


___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


[Discuss-gnuradio] M Blocks Help

2008-08-01 Thread Swapna Raj
Hello all,

where can I find documentation on mblocks. how can i get some example codes
to learn to exploit a few features of mblocks. I'm trying to send control
messages between USRPs  carrying some desired information like frequency.
Where can i learn about features of M blocks and tested examples..

Thank you
SR
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Beagleboard

2008-08-01 Thread Philip Balister
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Eric Cottrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 There was some interest on this list earlier about the Beagleboard, a small 
 OMAP3 based board.  I just got one from Digi-key and it is small!
 http://beagleboard.org/

 Besides the GNURadio aspects this may be a good board for ham radio digital 
 modem applications like the old TI DSP Evaluation Board that TAPR used.

We have built gnu radio for the beagle board and simple stuff (dial
tone) does work (for some sw builds).

My list of gnu radio + beagle things to do:

1) Get ASoC sound working.
2) Work out USB sound configuration until 1.
3) Need to use libusb-0.1x. USRP transfer speed test works, but kernel
dumps when closing usb interface.
4) figure out how to run make check. Currently, individual tests run
with manual intervention.
5) Develop and test a NEON filter implementation.

Installing GNU Radio, install the Angstrom images, type opkg install
gnuradio :) If you have any questions I am on irc.freenode.net in
#beagle and #gnuradio.

Philip


___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Cannot Run TX Flowgraph More Than One time

2008-08-01 Thread Firas Abbas
 Mason wrote:
 What kind of distortion is it? Also, does it exist for lower 
 interp_rates or just 512? (I ask because the rectangular QAM 
 constellation bending seemed to go away by switching to a *faster* tx 
 rate for me.)

 Mason

Hi,

For interpolation rate of 512, I should get a signal with say 250KHz spectrum 
wide. But actually, I got 32MHz wide, unknown (noisy) spectrum. This phenomena, 
appears for all interpolation rates. 


Firas
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Beagleboard

2008-08-01 Thread Eric Brombaugh


On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Philip Balister wrote:

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Eric Cottrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:

Hello,

There was some interest on this list earlier about the Beagleboard,  
a small OMAP3 based board.  I just got one from Digi-key and it is  
small!

http://beagleboard.org/

Besides the GNURadio aspects this may be a good board for ham radio  
digital modem applications like the old TI DSP Evaluation Board  
that TAPR used.


We have built gnu radio for the beagle board and simple stuff (dial
tone) does work (for some sw builds).

My list of gnu radio + beagle things to do:

1) Get ASoC sound working.
2) Work out USB sound configuration until 1.
3) Need to use libusb-0.1x. USRP transfer speed test works, but kernel
dumps when closing usb interface.
4) figure out how to run make check. Currently, individual tests run
with manual intervention.
5) Develop and test a NEON filter implementation.

Installing GNU Radio, install the Angstrom images, type opkg install
gnuradio :) If you have any questions I am on irc.freenode.net in
#beagle and #gnuradio.


That's great. The next thing I'd like to see is someone using the  
Beagle expansion port for a higher bandwidth RF interface. Something  
to get the data rate up beyond the ~30MB/s that the current USRP  
supports. Seems do-able, but would require some new driver and  
hardware development.


Eric



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Beagleboard

2008-08-01 Thread Philip Balister
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Eric Brombaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Philip Balister wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Eric Cottrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,

 There was some interest on this list earlier about the Beagleboard, a
 small OMAP3 based board.  I just got one from Digi-key and it is small!
 http://beagleboard.org/

 Besides the GNURadio aspects this may be a good board for ham radio
 digital modem applications like the old TI DSP Evaluation Board that TAPR
 used.

 We have built gnu radio for the beagle board and simple stuff (dial
 tone) does work (for some sw builds).

 My list of gnu radio + beagle things to do:

 1) Get ASoC sound working.
 2) Work out USB sound configuration until 1.
 3) Need to use libusb-0.1x. USRP transfer speed test works, but kernel
 dumps when closing usb interface.
 4) figure out how to run make check. Currently, individual tests run
 with manual intervention.
 5) Develop and test a NEON filter implementation.

 Installing GNU Radio, install the Angstrom images, type opkg install
 gnuradio :) If you have any questions I am on irc.freenode.net in
 #beagle and #gnuradio.

 That's great. The next thing I'd like to see is someone using the Beagle
 expansion port for a higher bandwidth RF interface. Something to get the
 data rate up beyond the ~30MB/s that the current USRP supports. Seems
 do-able, but would require some new driver and hardware development.

I've been talking to a friend (he knows FPGA stuff much better than
me) about using the expansion port to communicate with an FPGA via a
SDIO interface. I don't think we can beat the current USRP data rate,
but we should be able to reduce the latency introduced by the USB
interface.

Philip


___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Beagleboard

2008-08-01 Thread Eric Brombaugh


On Aug 1, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Philip Balister wrote:



I've been talking to a friend (he knows FPGA stuff much better than
me) about using the expansion port to communicate with an FPGA via a
SDIO interface. I don't think we can beat the current USRP data rate,
but we should be able to reduce the latency introduced by the USB
interface.


Looks like the SDIO ports run up to 50MHz and have 8-bit wide data. No  
idea how much overhead there is in that, but it might be able to go a  
bit faster than USB2.0 and as you note would have a lot less latency.  
Hook up to a decent FPGA and you could cram a bit of external pre- 
processing in as well. I picked up one of the Avnet Xilinx Spartan 3A  
boards for $50 that would probably work well for that.


Eric




___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio