Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-26 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Josh Blum j...@joshknows.com wrote:


 I agree with you it's not exactly right.

 I'm not sure about the right action.

 This issue should probably go onto the list of things to be considered
 in the grand build restructuring that was discussed by some of us a
 couple of weeks ago.


 Autotools is trying to be helpful by setting the unspecified prefix to
 NONE during configure. But since gnuradio is using it as if it was always
 set I suggest we do the following at the top of configure.ac

 if test ${prefix} = NONE; then
    prefix=${ac_default_prefix}
 fi

 We can put it on the next branch and hope it fixes more things than it
 breaks... at least until the grand rebuild structuring comes along. :-)

 -Josh


Thanks, guys. I've made a note of this to keep in mind while we're
working on the restructuring.

Tom

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-26 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:40:58AM -0400, Tom Rondeau wrote:
 On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Josh Blum j...@joshknows.com wrote:
 
 
  I agree with you it's not exactly right.
 
  I'm not sure about the right action.
 
  This issue should probably go onto the list of things to be considered
  in the grand build restructuring that was discussed by some of us a
  couple of weeks ago.
 
 
  Autotools is trying to be helpful by setting the unspecified prefix to
  NONE during configure. But since gnuradio is using it as if it was always
  set I suggest we do the following at the top of configure.ac
 
  if test ${prefix} = NONE; then
     prefix=${ac_default_prefix}
  fi
 
  We can put it on the next branch and hope it fixes more things than it
  breaks... at least until the grand rebuild structuring comes along. :-)
 
  -Josh
 
 
 Thanks, guys. I've made a note of this to keep in mind while we're
 working on the restructuring.
 
 Tom
 

It looks like it's part of autoconf's machinery...
On my system I found it in /usr/share/autoconf/autoconf/general.m4
around line 558.

  AC_SUBST(prefix, NONE)dnl

There's a discussion here that's relevant:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/autoc...@gnu.org/msg15773.html


I think Josh's suggestion will work.  It probably has to occur after
AC_INIT (or maybe AC_PREREQ).  Not sure if there's anything else that
needs to run first.

Eric

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Marcus D. Leech



 The problem being that /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig isnt honoring the
 users prefix and possibly libdir. Perhaps we can still make this
 right... Does this patch work for you?

 -Josh

Still no worky.  Must set PKG_CONFIG_PATH manually.   I confirmed that
the patch had been applied to the .m4, then did a make distclean
  then a ./bootstrap, then a ./configure.  The configure fails to
find UHD unless I explicitly set PKG_CONFIG_PATH.


-- 
Marcus Leech
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Josh Blum
This turns out to be a bug in gnuradio configure  - when --prefix is not 
specified with ./configure, the ${prefix} variable is set to NONE


http://www.mail-archive.com/autoc...@gnu.org/msg15772.html

The following code with yeild a PKG_CONFIG_PATH of NONE/lib/pkgconfig


dnl add ${prefix}/lib${gr_libdir_suffix}/pkgconfig to the head of the 
PKG_CONFIG_PATH
if test x${PKG_CONFIG_PATH} = x; then
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=${prefix}/lib${gr_libdir_suffix}/pkgconfig
else

PKG_CONFIG_PATH=${prefix}/lib${gr_libdir_suffix}/pkgconfig:${PKG_CONFIG_PATH}
fi
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH


if may be more appropriate to do the following somewhere at the top of 
configure.ac


if test ${prefix} = NONE; then
prefix=${ac_default_prefix}
fi

gr_standalone.m4 and configure.ac both seem to have this issue

-Josh

On 09/25/2010 09:32 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:




The problem being that /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig isnt honoring the
users prefix and possibly libdir. Perhaps we can still make this
right... Does this patch work for you?

-Josh


Still no worky.  Must set PKG_CONFIG_PATH manually.   I confirmed that
the patch had been applied to the .m4, then did a make distclean
   then a ./bootstrap, then a ./configure.  The configure fails to
find UHD unless I explicitly set PKG_CONFIG_PATH.




___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:24:18AM -0700, Josh Blum wrote:
 This turns out to be a bug in gnuradio configure  - when --prefix is
 not specified with ./configure, the ${prefix} variable is set to
 NONE

Listen guys, you may not like this behavior, but it's not a bug.
If you read the makefile standards, it's to allow a package to be
installed into a different location at make install time.

 http://www.mail-archive.com/autoc...@gnu.org/msg15772.html
 
 The following code with yeild a PKG_CONFIG_PATH of NONE/lib/pkgconfig
 
 dnl add ${prefix}/lib${gr_libdir_suffix}/pkgconfig to the head of the 
 PKG_CONFIG_PATH
 if test x${PKG_CONFIG_PATH} = x; then
 PKG_CONFIG_PATH=${prefix}/lib${gr_libdir_suffix}/pkgconfig
 else
 
  PKG_CONFIG_PATH=${prefix}/lib${gr_libdir_suffix}/pkgconfig:${PKG_CONFIG_PATH}
 fi
 export PKG_CONFIG_PATH

There definitely shouldn't be any PKG_CONFIG_PATH special case
handling for anything in grc_component_name.m4.

A ton of effort was put into making the building system work reliably
and consistently (mostly by Michael Dickens).  A lot of the details
are quite subtle, and the effort took a long time to stabilize, and
has proven itself to work on a wide variety of OS's and distributions.
All of the grc_component_name.m4's should follow the same pattern.
There shouldn't be any divergence in the boilerplate.

I removed the offending code because it was causing my build to break,
and noticed at that time that it shouldn't have been there in the
first place.

Eric

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Marcus D. Leech

 There definitely shouldn't be any PKG_CONFIG_PATH special case
 handling for anything in grc_component_name.m4.

 A ton of effort was put into making the building system work reliably
 and consistently (mostly by Michael Dickens).  A lot of the details
 are quite subtle, and the effort took a long time to stabilize, and
 has proven itself to work on a wide variety of OS's and distributions.
 All of the grc_component_name.m4's should follow the same pattern.
 There shouldn't be any divergence in the boilerplate.

 I removed the offending code because it was causing my build to break,
 and noticed at that time that it shouldn't have been there in the
 first place.

 Eric


   
Fair enough, Eric.  So do you suggest another approach that allows
boostrap/configure/make to just work, or simply more notes
  about this in the build instructions when you're using UHD?


-- 
Marcus Leech
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 03:09:47PM -0400, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
 
  There definitely shouldn't be any PKG_CONFIG_PATH special case
  handling for anything in grc_component_name.m4.
 
  A ton of effort was put into making the building system work reliably
  and consistently (mostly by Michael Dickens).  A lot of the details
  are quite subtle, and the effort took a long time to stabilize, and
  has proven itself to work on a wide variety of OS's and distributions.
  All of the grc_component_name.m4's should follow the same pattern.
  There shouldn't be any divergence in the boilerplate.
 
  I removed the offending code because it was causing my build to break,
  and noticed at that time that it shouldn't have been there in the
  first place.
 
  Eric
 
 

 Fair enough, Eric.  So do you suggest another approach that allows
 boostrap/configure/make to just work, or simply more notes
   about this in the build instructions when you're using UHD?

This really doesn't have anything to do with UHD.  You'd see
the same problem with any other dependency installed outside of
/lib{,64} or /usr/lib{,64}

Just as you have to set your PYTHONPATH for stuff in /usr/local...,
set your PKG_CONFIG_PATH for stuff in /usr/local/lib{,64}

Eric

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Josh Blum



On 09/25/2010 12:01 PM, Eric Blossom wrote:

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:24:18AM -0700, Josh Blum wrote:

This turns out to be a bug in gnuradio configure  - when --prefix is
not specified with ./configure, the ${prefix} variable is set to
NONE


Listen guys, you may not like this behavior, but it's not a bug.
If you read the makefile standards, it's to allow a package to be
installed into a different location at make install time.



Thats fine, but is it fine that configure.ac sets PKG_CONFIG_PATH to 
NONE/lib/pkgconfig when --prefix is not specified. Thats not a problem?


-Josh

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Josh Blum



Fair enough, Eric.  So do you suggest another approach that allows
boostrap/configure/make to just work, or simply more notes
   about this in the build instructions when you're using UHD?




The issue being that all the gnuradio dependencies are distribution 
installable (on linux) so you dont need to set special paths and 
environment variables. However, UHD is not ready to be handed out as 
rpms and debs (though it can be) so it may need special paths set to use 
on operating system X.


However, it looks like gnuradio wants to set your PKG_CONFIG_PATH to 
include the ${prefix}/lib${lib_suffix}/pkgconfig. So, if you happen to 
use the same prefix and lib_suffix as you built for UHD, gnuradio should 
be able to find the uhd.pc file without you needing to set 
PKG_CONFIG_PATH by hand.


The problem with this being, if --prefix is not set, gnuradio sets this 
to NONE/lib${lib_suffix}/pkgconfig which isnt going to work. Maybe 
${ac_default_prefix} can be used when ${prefix} is set to NONE


-Josh

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:23:19PM -0700, Josh Blum wrote:
 
 
 On 09/25/2010 12:01 PM, Eric Blossom wrote:
 On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:24:18AM -0700, Josh Blum wrote:
 This turns out to be a bug in gnuradio configure  - when --prefix is
 not specified with ./configure, the ${prefix} variable is set to
 NONE
 
 Listen guys, you may not like this behavior, but it's not a bug.
 If you read the makefile standards, it's to allow a package to be
 installed into a different location at make install time.
 
 
 Thats fine, but is it fine that configure.ac sets PKG_CONFIG_PATH to
 NONE/lib/pkgconfig when --prefix is not specified. Thats not a
 problem?

I agree with you it's not exactly right.

I'm not sure about the right action.

This issue should probably go onto the list of things to be considered
in the grand build restructuring that was discussed by some of us a
couple of weeks ago.

Eric

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:32:36PM -0700, Josh Blum wrote:
 
 Fair enough, Eric.  So do you suggest another approach that allows
 boostrap/configure/make to just work, or simply more notes
about this in the build instructions when you're using UHD?
 
 
 
 The issue being that all the gnuradio dependencies are distribution
 installable (on linux) so you dont need to set special paths and
 environment variables. However, UHD is not ready to be handed out as
 rpms and debs (though it can be) so it may need special paths set to
 use on operating system X.
 
 However, it looks like gnuradio wants to set your PKG_CONFIG_PATH to
 include the ${prefix}/lib${lib_suffix}/pkgconfig. So, if you happen
 to use the same prefix and lib_suffix as you built for UHD, gnuradio
 should be able to find the uhd.pc file without you needing to set
 PKG_CONFIG_PATH by hand.
 
 The problem with this being, if --prefix is not set, gnuradio sets
 this to NONE/lib${lib_suffix}/pkgconfig which isnt going to work.
 Maybe ${ac_default_prefix} can be used when ${prefix} is set to NONE

That would probably be better than what we've got.

Independent of the use case you brought up, there's a couple of other
places we run afoul the same issue (prefix == NONE).  IIRC it gets
baked into some C/C++ strings somewhere too.

Eric

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-25 Thread Josh Blum




I agree with you it's not exactly right.

I'm not sure about the right action.

This issue should probably go onto the list of things to be considered
in the grand build restructuring that was discussed by some of us a
couple of weeks ago.



Autotools is trying to be helpful by setting the unspecified prefix to 
NONE during configure. But since gnuradio is using it as if it was 
always set I suggest we do the following at the top of configure.ac


if test ${prefix} = NONE; then
prefix=${ac_default_prefix}
fi

We can put it on the next branch and hope it fixes more things than it 
breaks... at least until the grand rebuild structuring comes along. :-)


-Josh

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-24 Thread Marcus D. Leech
 Hello List,

 I have pushed a bunch of code to the uhd repo and gnuradio next branch.
 http://ettus-apps.sourcerepo.com/redmine/ettus/projects/uhd/wiki

 -
 USRP1 multi-channel support has been completed. Multiple channels can
 be access through the new single usrp API which supersedes the
 simple usrp API. The equivalent gnuradio blocks(uhd single usrp
 source and sink), and grc wrappers have been created as well.

 http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/doxygen/html/classuhd_1_1usrp_1_1single__usrp.html


 The simple usrp interface is now deprecated but will continue to
 work. In the single channel case, all API calls are identical; to
 switch any code that was written for simple usrp, just change the
 include header and instantiation to the following:

 #include uhd/usrp/single_usrp.hpp
 single_usrp::sptr sdev = single_usrp::make(args);

 If you are running in GRC, just drag and drop the new blocks and swap
 the connections. :-)

 -
 In other news,
 UHD can now compile against pre-built libusb1.0 windows binaries:
 http://www.libusb.org/wiki/windows_backend#LatestBinarySnapshots
 Runtime operation has yet to be confirmed.

 Thanks!
 -Josh


 ___

OK, so I just updated a two-weeks-old gnuradio and uhd via GIT, and
while UHD builds properly and installs correctly, gnuradio
  can't find uhd when it goes to do a configure, because pkg-config
can't find uhd--and therefore doesn't build gr-uhd.
  This is a change from circa two weeks ago.

So, either Fedora 12 has done something to the default paths for
pkg-config, or the Gnu Radio build environment has changed slightly
  in the last two weeks.  The fix was for me to manually put
/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig into PKG_CONFIG_PATH before running the Gnu Radio
  configure/make/sudo make install  cycle, but I haven't had to do that
previously.

-- 
Marcus Leech
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-24 Thread Marcus D. Leech


 http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?h=nextid=71c193ad5380829e20af533ed89903d8d7abcd2c


 -Josh

Ok, so all Eric's fault :-)

So, since the let's be nice and add /usr/local/lib to PKG_CONFIG_PATH
code got removed from the .m4 file, so perhaps a note
  needs to be added to the build instructions for UHD for systems that
don't by default have /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig in PKG_CONFIG_PATH?



-- 
Marcus Leech
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-24 Thread Josh Blum



On 09/24/2010 10:18 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:



http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?h=nextid=71c193ad5380829e20af533ed89903d8d7abcd2c


-Josh


Ok, so all Eric's fault :-)

So, since the let's be nice and add /usr/local/lib to PKG_CONFIG_PATH
code got removed from the .m4 file, so perhaps a note
   needs to be added to the build instructions for UHD for systems that
don't by default have /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig in PKG_CONFIG_PATH?


heres the mention of the package config stuff:
http://ettus-apps.sourcerepo.com/redmine/ettus/projects/uhd/wiki#Gnuradio-UHD

you can also manipulate the installation dirs like so:
http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/manual/html/build.html#generate-makefiles-with-cmake

:-)
-Josh

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UHD Announcement - September 23rd 2010

2010-09-24 Thread Josh Blum



On 09/24/2010 10:18 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:



http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?h=nextid=71c193ad5380829e20af533ed89903d8d7abcd2c


-Josh


Ok, so all Eric's fault :-)



The problem being that /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig isnt honoring the users 
prefix and possibly libdir. Perhaps we can still make this right... Does 
this patch work for you?


-Josh

diff --git a/config/grc_gr_uhd.m4 b/config/grc_gr_uhd.m4
index 090187c..a3d3aff 100644
--- a/config/grc_gr_uhd.m4
+++ b/config/grc_gr_uhd.m4
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ AC_DEFUN([GRC_GR_UHD],[
 GRC_CHECK_DEPENDENCY(gr-uhd, gnuradio-core)
 
 if test $passed = yes; then
+dnl setup the pkg config path with uhd configuration variables
+export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$PKG_CONFIG_PATH:${prefix}/lib${LIB_SUFFIX}/pkgconfig
 dnl Don't do gr-uhd if the 'uhd' package is not installed
 PKG_CHECK_MODULES(
 [UHD], [uhd], [],
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio