Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GPS L2C transmissions?

2008-08-10 Thread Carles Fernandez
Maybe little bit off-topic in this list, but any of you have tried gpstk (
http://www.gpstk.org/bin/view/Documentation/WebHome)?

I'm trying to use it in combination with gps-sdr. I'll keep you updated on
my progress!

BR,
Carles




On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Peter Monta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  From my knowledge all the semi-codeless tracking algorithms are heavily
 patented, and hence cannot be found in textbooks or in any open forum.


 But the patents themselves contain pretty good descriptions of the
 techniques;
 also there is this paper:


 http://www.navcomtech.com/Support/Download/Optimum%20Semi-Codeless%20Carrier%20Phase%20Tracking%20of%20L2.pdf

 which summarizes all the options and adds a soft-decision refinement to
 Z-tracking.  Some of the patents will expire pretty soon, probably before
 L2C is fully usable.

 There ought to be a fully open-source, geodetic-quality, dual-frequency (or
 tri-frequency once we have L5, or quad- or quint-frequency once we have
 Galileo and Glonass and accurate IGS orbits and clock ties for these other
 GNSS systems), software receiver.  I have no real connection with any of
 this (just a hobbyist), but I'd enjoy having access to state-of-the-art
 timing
 and survey solutions.

 Finally snagged a dual-frequency antenna on Ebay a few weeks ago, so
 only software sits between me and centimeter positioning and subnanosecond
 UTC (or UTC(GPS) or UTC(IGS) anyway).


 Cheers,
 Peter



 ___
 Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
 Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
 http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GPS L2C transmissions?

2008-08-09 Thread Peter Monta


From my knowledge all the semi-codeless tracking algorithms are 
heavily patented, and hence cannot be found in textbooks or in any 
open forum.




But the patents themselves contain pretty good descriptions of the 
techniques;

also there is this paper:

http://www.navcomtech.com/Support/Download/Optimum%20Semi-Codeless%20Carrier%20Phase%20Tracking%20of%20L2.pdf

which summarizes all the options and adds a soft-decision refinement to
Z-tracking.  Some of the patents will expire pretty soon, probably before
L2C is fully usable.

There ought to be a fully open-source, geodetic-quality, dual-frequency (or
tri-frequency once we have L5, or quad- or quint-frequency once we have
Galileo and Glonass and accurate IGS orbits and clock ties for these other
GNSS systems), software receiver.  I have no real connection with any of
this (just a hobbyist), but I'd enjoy having access to state-of-the-art 
timing

and survey solutions.

Finally snagged a dual-frequency antenna on Ebay a few weeks ago, so
only software sits between me and centimeter positioning and subnanosecond
UTC (or UTC(GPS) or UTC(IGS) anyway).

Cheers,
Peter



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GPS L2C transmissions?

2008-08-08 Thread Carles Fernandez
Hi Peter,

maybe you could be interested on this: at www.gps-sdr.com there is a C
driver for the USRP that manages a couple of DBSRX daughterboards, one
centered at L1 and the other one at L2, just what you are mentioning for
building a dual-frequency GPS software receiver.

Cheers,
Carles.



On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Peter Monta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On the chance that there are GPS folks here that are
 familiar with the status of the new L2C signals:  is there
 a currently-maintained list of which satellite is emitting
 what?  In particular, PRN 29 seems to have no L2C (or
 at least none that I can acquire), while PRN 31 has a nice
 strong carrier (tracked with L2CM) but no NAV or CNAV data
 modulation---it's apparently sending only carrier.  I'd
 like to find a signal with CNAV data.

 While I haven't tried it yet, the USRP should be capable
 of saving to disk both L1 and L2C using a pair of dbsrx
 daughtercards.  That should permit dual-frequency
 receiver software.  It would be nice to have a
 waveform-pair-to-RINEX tool to allow use of the various
 web services for dual-frequency solutions.

 Cheers,
 Peter



 ___
 Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
 Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
 http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GPS L2C transmissions?

2008-08-08 Thread Gregory W Heckler

Peter:

I've been tracking L2C this summer also. I can verify that there is NO 
DATA on any of the L2C capable SVs. The US Coast Guard has a great GPS 
status site at http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/. The GPS constellation status 
is listed at:


http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/navinfo/Gps/ActiveNanu.aspx

Block IIR-M SVs are L2C capable. Right now in my software receiver the 
USRP client can record L1 and L2C using a USRP with 2 DBS-RXs. Check out 
www.gps-sdr.com for more info. The L2C tracking capability will be 
included in the code after a couple more bugs have been ironed out. Feel 
free to email me directly if you need more help or info.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
AETD - Mission Engineering and Systems Analysis
Component and Hardware Systems Branch
Mail Code 596, Greenbelt Rd.
Greenbelt, MD 20771
(301) 286-6565
(301) 286-3823 (fax)


___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GPS L2C transmissions?

2008-08-08 Thread Peter Monta



 I can verify that there is NO DATA on any of the L2C capable SVs.


Ah.  I'd thought from the ICD that the only valid options were legacy 
data or

new data.  While I understand that this is all pre-operational, it would be
nice to have some rough guidelines from the GPS people about what to
expect with the on-orbit L2C signals over the next year or two.



Check out www.gps-sdr.com for more info.


Very interesting---thanks!

Would you know if there are any open implementations of P/Y semicodeless?

Cheers,
Peter



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] GPS L2C transmissions?

2008-08-08 Thread Heckler, Gregory W. (GSFC-596.0)
Peter:

Yeah, it really sucks. If you look at IS-GPS-200D at table 20-VIII the 6 bit SV 
health message has a value that indicates L2C Signal Has No Data Modulation, 
unfortunately the Air Force is not following their own ICD. From my knowledge 
all the semi-codeless tracking algorithms are heavily patented, and hence 
cannot be found in textbooks or in any open forum.

-Original Message-
From: Peter Monta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 8/8/2008 6:50 PM
To: Heckler, Gregory W. (GSFC-596.0)
Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GPS L2C transmissions?
 

  I can verify that there is NO DATA on any of the L2C capable SVs.

Ah.  I'd thought from the ICD that the only valid options were legacy 
data or
new data.  While I understand that this is all pre-operational, it would be
nice to have some rough guidelines from the GPS people about what to
expect with the on-orbit L2C signals over the next year or two.


 Check out www.gps-sdr.com for more info.

Very interesting---thanks!

Would you know if there are any open implementations of P/Y semicodeless?

Cheers,
Peter


___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio