RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote
What if you have already written your own framework to use the cfproperty tag for this very thing? I guess I'll have to wait and see. Gerry Gurevich Application Development NIEHS ITSS Contractor Lockheed Martin Information Technology 919-361-5444 ext 311 -Original Message- From: John Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:55 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote Yes, so if you have your own getters/setters then CF will use those. If they are not present, then the implicit ones will take effect. I can only imagine how much code this will save everyone from typing. John Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770.337.8363 www.FusionLink.com - ColdFusion and Flex hosting Now offering VPS Plans running with VMware technology Now offering ColdFusion 8 Enterprise hosting FREE Subversion hosting This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Knudsen Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:39 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFUnited Report - Adobe Keynote Implicit getters/setters The cfproperty will generate the implicit getters and setters on the backend to save you from writing the code. nice! Was overriding mentioned for these? DK On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:28 AM, John Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just posted my notes from the keynote this morning at my blog, www.codfusion.com The keynote covered a lot of new features coming in the next release of Coldfusion. John Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770.337.8363 www.FusionLink.com - ColdFusion and Flex hosting Now offering VPS Plans running with VMware technology Now offering ColdFusion 8 Enterprise hosting FREE Subversion hosting - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - -- Douglas Knudsen http://www.cubicleman.com this is my signature, like it? - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Negative plus positive equals less than zero?
I think I would write a UDF that would round all of your floating point
calculations. Don't forget that you have to worry about +- 0.001
as well as +- 0.001
Try playing around with this
cfset val=-0.91
cfset decimal=3
Make this part a UDF with val and decimal as arguments.
cfset multiplier=10^decimal
cfset newval=round(multiplier*val)/multiplier
Output or return this new value
cfoutput#newval#/cfoutput
Gerry Gurevich
Application Development
NIEHS ITSS Contractor
Lockheed Martin Information Technology
919-361-5444 ext 311
From: Howard Fore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 12:55 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Negative plus positive equals less than
zero?
I may try that. My hackish solution was that if the resulting number was
less than 0 but greater than -0.01 to just return zero. I'm dealing with
money amounts here with no partial cents so I'm not really losing any
significant data. Decimalformat takes care of this but I need to have
the negative sign to the right of the number (client request) so I have
to use numberFormat instead, Thanks.
On 12/28/07, Cameron Childress [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran into this a number of times on a eCom system I was working on
recently. Gerry is right in that it's just a really small floating
point number. I've seen some financial systems deal with this problem
by shifting the decimal when dealing with numbers and shifting it back
only for display. In that case.
For example 62355.57 would be stored as 6235557 or even as 623555700
in financial systems that use 4 decimal points. You'd conduct all
math on these whole numbers and avoid floating point problems and then
just x/100 or x/1 to get it back to a decimal format (maybe in a
UDF) for display.
Another more hackish solution I've seen is to numberFormat() all
inputs to any math operation, which will strip off all the extra float
and give you a straighter answer. I'm not sure I would actually
suggest this cause it makes your code look like crap - but if you do
it the problem goes away. Try this out and see if your problem goes
away...
cfscript
total = 0;
numberList = 62355.57,-62355.57,-333.01,261.09 ,17.98,35.96,17.98;
for (i = 1;i lte listLen(numberList);i = i + 1)
{
writeOutput(#total# + #ListGetAt(numberList,i)# = );
total = numberFormat(total,9.99) +
numberFormat(ListGetAt(numberList,i),9.99);
writeOutput(#total#br);
}
writeOutput('numberFormat(total,999,999,999.99) = '
numberFormat(total,999,999,999.99));
/cfscript
-Cameron
On Dec 28, 2007 11:20 AM, Howard Fore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Can someone confirm this seemingly odd behavior? If I execute the
following
code:
cfscript
total = 0;
numberList = 62355.57,-62355.57,-333.01,261.09 ,17.98,35.96,17.98;
for (i = 1;i lte listLen(numberList);i = i + 1)
{
writeOutput(#total# + #ListGetAt(numberList,i)# = );
total = total + ListGetAt(numberList,i);
writeOutput(#total#br);
}
writeOutput('numberFormat(total,999,999,999.99) = '
numberFormat(total,999,999, 999.99));
/cfscript
I get the following output:
0 + 62355.57 = 62355.57
62355.57 + -62355.57 = 0
0 + -333.01 = -333.01
-333.01 + 261.09 = -71.92
-71.92 + 17.98 = -53.94
-53.94 + 35.96 = -17.98
-17.98 + 17.98 = -1.06581410364E-014
numberFormat(total,999,999, 999.99) = -0.00
I've tried using javacasts to make sure that there wasn't some odd
string to
number conversion thing going on too and still got the same result.
Any
ideas?
--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whether you believe you can do a thing or not, you are right. --
Henry
Ford
-
Annual Sponsor - Figleaf Software
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by FusionLink
-
--
Cameron Childress
Sumo Consulting Inc
http://www.sumoc.com
---
cell: 678.637.5072
aim: cameroncf
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-
--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whether you believe you can do a thing or not, you are right. -- Henry
Ford
-
Annual Sponsor - Figleaf Software http://www.figleaf.com
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Running a system command from ColdFusion
Is this something you could run from a command line? If so, then you
can set it all up in a batch file to trigger it and also direct output
to another file (maybe). Then you would use cfexecute to kick off the
batch file.
Gerry Gurevich
Application Development
NIEHS ITSS Contractor
Lockheed Martin Information Technology
919-361-5444 ext 311
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 4:21 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: re: [ACFUG Discuss] Running a system command from ColdFusion
Worth a shot, but no. Same error. I'm pretty sure it's choking on the
Exec keyword.
ed
--
Ed Szwedo
Web Development Team Lead
CSC
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
919-541-3955 (Voice)
919-685-3395 (Fax)
Mischa
Uppelschoten ext
10 To
Mischa.Uppelsch Web Site discussion@acfug.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc
m
Sent by: Subject
[EMAIL PROTECTED] re: [ACFUG Discuss] Running a
system command from ColdFusion
09/06/2007 04:17
PM
Please respond
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org
: cfset variables.plsql = exec DBMS_WM.GoToWorkspace('edsWorkspace')
SWAG: throw in a PreserveSingleQuotes?
/m
-
Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-
-
Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-
-
Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-
[ACFUG Discuss] CFPOP and SSL
Any free CFPOP tags or any recommended for purchase? Has anyone actually used a custom CFPOP tag with SSL and had a positive result? Thanks for your recommendations. Gerry Gurevich Application Development NIEHS ITSS Contractor Lockheed Martin Information Technology 919-361-5444 ext 311 - Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Bad CFQuery Results
Just a blind stab in the dark here but... Are you returning your results in the same request as the cfquery? I have inherited code that stuffs queries into session or even application scope and then you may have all kinds of things happening that cause you to output something different from what you thought you were sending. I tend to agree that using the debug feature to get a copy of the query is the way to go. If you always get what is expected from the debug query when you stick run it directly against the database. And if your results on the screen are wrong. Then there must be something wrong with the processing of the query when you do your output. My recommendation above is only one of the things that could be wrong. It's also possible that you are processing the output in some way and not outputting every single field. Good luck. Gerry Gurevich Application Development NIEHS ITSS Contractor Lockheed Martin Information Technology 919-361-5444 ext 311 -Original Message- From: Greg Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 6:08 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Bad CFQuery Results Thanks Dusty, but I'm afraid I already tried that. It all came out how I expected it to. I ran the results directly through the database and it came out fine. For that matter, I ran the results back through the cfquery tag and it came out fine. Mischa, Debugging was a good idea. I never think of using that feature. However, it seems to be returning exactly what I would expect as well. Of course this time the cfqueryparam tags are all replaced with question marks and defined at the bottom. I still can't figure out what I'm missing here. I was really hoping that it was a common thing that I'd just never heard of before. On 5/21/07, Dusty Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You may have tried this already or perhaps the query is rather complex (it sounds like) but: 1. make a copy of it. 2. remove all the cfqueryparam tags and replace with normal variables or values. 3. replace the cfquery tags with cfouputprecode here/precfabort/cfouput 4. output the actual query text so you can see what is really being queried and run the query out put manually to see if you get the results you're looking for. Not sure if this is helpful for your situation or not but thought it wouldn't hurt to suggest. Best of luck with the issue. Dusty -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Drake Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:20 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Bad CFQuery Results Has anyone else ever run into a situation where cfquery does not return the same records as a direct query on the database? I have a rather large query joining 5 tables and 2 derived tables. The 'where' clause is cluttered with dynamically loaded conditions. There are some cfqueryparam tags that keep me from easily inserting the query as a single string. The 'order by' clause is handled by a custom tag. The point is this: under certain circumstances the query does not respond properly, but I am sure that the query should be making it to the cfquery tag properly. If the query is run directly against the database it works fine, and if it is run with certain options it works fine, but other options make it return a result set that is too small. It doesn't through an error, though, so If not for careful testing it wouldn't have even been noticed. I am using ColdFusion 7 and SQL Server. Sorry for not posting any code, but I'm thinking you have either run into this before or you haven't. I can't find anything online, perhaps because the issue is difficult to describe. - Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - - Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - - Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Error handling, I have request, exception, validation templates.
I believe this is a compile time error. Error handling doesn't come into play until you get an execution time error. Gerry Gurevich Application Development NIEHS ITSS Contractor Lockheed Martin Information Technology 919-361-5444 ext 311 From: Ajas Mohammed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:13 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Error handling, I have request, exception, validation templates. Hi, I was working on some stuff and I have request, exception, validation templates in the same order I mentioned here. Form required fields by _required method is caught by validation template, query errors like object not found is caught by exception template. But then I tried this some cfoutput #some var#/cfoutput /cfoutput i.e. extra closing cfoutput and I thought my exception template will catch it but it doesnt. I get the screen where in CF shows some code in grey background saying matching cfoutput not found. My question is : what I am missing over here? how can I handle these errors? I know there is another template calling missing template handler which you could set in CF Admin but will it help? Thanks, -- Ajas Mohammed / http://ajashadi.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink http://www.fusionlink.com - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] dynamic structs/variable
Well I would want to ask and argue not to do this...but I'll bite my tongue. Why not create a superstructure to hold this. Then you could do something like: cfset superstruct=structnew() cfset structVarName = myStruct / cfset superstruct[structVarName] = StructNew()/ cfset keyVariable = steven.ross / cfset theValue = a name / cfset superstruct[structVarName][keyVariable] = theValue / I have not tested this, but it should be close to right. Come to think of it, you might even see if you could use variables instead of the superstruct. I think that might work. Gerry Gurevich Application Development NIEHS ITSS Contractor Lockheed Martin Information Technology 919-361-5444 ext 311 -Original Message- From: Steven Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:21 PM To: ACFUG ColdFusion Discussion Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] dynamic structs/variable ok so for whatever reason (I'd rather not hear arguments why not to do this) I want to try to do this: cfset structVarName = myStruct / cfset #structVarName# = StructNew()/ cfset keyVariable = steven.ross / cfset theValue = a name / cfset structVarName[keyVariable] = theValue / the last part is the part I can't get to work... tired all sorts of flavors of evaluate, and I would have included a few examples of what I have tried but, figured that would confuse the issue. Any help would be appreciated. -Steven -- Steven Ross web application interface developer http://www.zerium.com [mobile] 404-488-4364 [fax] 267-482-4364 - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: askcharlie, getting live help when you're stumped (was RE: [ACFUG Discuss] WebDAV, Tortoise SubVersion, DWMX8, and CFMX7)
I'm not a hired flak and I've never used the product, but Fog Creek Software (see: Joel On Software) has a product that appears to be pretty good for this type of situation: https://www.copilot.com/ Gerry Gurevich Application Development NIEHS ITSS Contractor Lockheed Martin Information Technology 919-361-5444 ext 311 From: Robert Reil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 3:09 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: askcharlie, getting live help when you're stumped (was RE: [ACFUG Discuss] WebDAV, Tortoise SubVersion, DWMX8, and CFMX7) Nice idea. Im sure I will hit you up sometime for that. Though what are the methods you would use as I have a firewall to configure. You and I can discuss this off list. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com http://www.motorcyclecarbs.com/ From: Charlie Arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 2:57 PM To: Carbs SalesService Subject: askcharlie, getting live help when you're stumped (was RE: [ACFUG Discuss] WebDAV, Tortoise SubVersion, DWMX8, and CFMX7) This seems like a situation where you may need someone to look over your shoulder to get things working right in your environment, rather than work through it by emails. Of course, with tools like Breeze/Connect, GotoMeeting, Windows remote assistance, and others, the person need not actually be there with you but instead can see your screen remotely and talk you through the challenges. The challenge is simply the time. It's one thing to fire off an email, but another to spend possibly several minutes or more trying to help, especially when those who might help have real jobs or are consultants normally paid by the hour. :-) This may be an opportune moment to share with folks that I've created a new service to be able to offer just such assistance. It's very low cost and at a per minute rate (first-time callers get 10 minutes free). Check it out at: http://www.carehart.org/askcharlie/ I'd welcome your thoughts on what you think of the idea. /Charlie http://www.carehart.org/blog/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Reil Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 12:34 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] WebDAV, Tortoise SubVersion, DWMX8, and CFMX7 you're making me chortle Charlie! Congratulations.. You are right. It IS my day... It is watch Robert go down the wrong trail day. Here is all I know, and for some of you it may be old news but I want to give a 100% regroup and bring it back to high level view. snip - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink http://www.fusionlink.com - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - attachment: image001.jpg
