RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Sterling Ledet
While your prescience was off-base, it's obvious in retrospect that you had
actually been a bit confused as to just which product would be next to be
open-sourced. 

You need to increase your doses of melange. (Apologies to the non-Dune fans
who won't understand this reference.

Java is in my opinion, a lot closer tied to the future of ColdFusion than
just the ActionScript code previously discussed. So actually, in my opinion,
this announcement, while not in-any-way validating everything you said, does
indicate your point of view had at least some relevance. But, I would have
to venture that absolutely no one would ever dream that by outsourcing Java,
Sun is actually washing it's hands of the technology. 

So let's say you earned me buying the first round of drinks went the time
comes for you to actually pay up.

- Sterling



-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-





RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Quickbooks and CF

2006-11-10 Thread Sterling Ledet



Quickbooks is very open nowadays. Yes, you need to 
communicate with it via XML but there are lots of ways to do it. I haven't done 
so directly with ColdFusion yet but I've done a good bit with Filemaker and a 
little with .NET. It shouldn't be hard, for a capable developer. You just need 
to download the Quickbooks SDK for free from 
developer.intuit.com.



  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Andrew PowellSent: Friday, November 10, 2006 
  6:23 PMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG 
  Discuss] Quickbooks and CF
  I was under the impression that the QB database was somewhat 
  proprietary and no JDBC driver existed for it.
  
  ap
  
  
  
  On Nov 10, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Robert Reil wrote:
  

Has anyone ever found it 
possible to build an CF app that enables data in Quickbooks to be 
read?

My idea is that if I can take my 
Able Commerce app and Using Quickbooks is there a way to integrate between 
the two?

Just a thought I wanted to throw 
out there...

Robert P. Reil
Managing Director,
Motorcyclecarbs.com, 
Inc.
4292 Country 
Garden Walk 
NW
Kennesaw, Ga. 
30152
Office 
770-974-8851
Fax 770-974-8852
www.motorcyclecarbs.com




-

To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 

http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform



For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists

Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/

List hosted by FusionLink

-




RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: Adobe Donating Flash Scripting Engine to Mozilla

2006-11-08 Thread Sterling Ledet
Here's my read on it.

In a nutshell, it will make Mozilla's Javascript processing engine a lot
faster (I'd be willing to bet considerably faster than IE 7, although I
admit that's purely personal conjecture). While it wouldn't be extremely
difficult for the Mozilla project to develop an open source SWF player, this
announcement really is not about SWF. It's about Javascript processing
engines. It means more to Ajax development and similar JavaScript app
technology. Less relevant to SWF directly, although it is relevant in that
it will help developers who start in the Ajax world easily transfer skills
over to Flex/MXML, if and when those developers decide to.

- Sterling

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Precia
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 9:52 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: Adobe Donating Flash Scripting 
Engine to Mozilla

Coming back to the Flash scripting engine code.  What's the 
big picture with this?  What could this do in the Mozilla 
browser?  Shall we have a way to write AS for SWF files 
generating on the fly in that specific browser?

I don't know how this is useful to Mozilla.

Precia





-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-





RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Adobe Donating Flash Scripting Engine to Mozilla

2006-11-08 Thread Sterling Ledet



I wasn't in the least upset, Adam. I just thought the 
posting merited a rather strong response since I so vociferously 
disagree.

In the panel discussion you mentioned, I tried to clearly 
explain that my read was that Adobe would continue to push ColdFusion technology 
as a major part ofwhat at that time was called their "network publishing" 
initiativeand integrate it fully with LiveCycle since it was such a 
natural fit. The mobile pieces in ColdFusionhad already begun prior to the 
merger, and while Adobe continues to be a driving force in that area and is 
clearly not abandoning it, that industry is filled with it's own ecosystem 
challenges. History has made it clear that the conjectures I made at that panel 
have proven largely accurate.

LiveCycle is about as stagnant as IRS tax forms and FDA 
drug submittals. If the IRS never changes another tax form, the FDA never 
changes a drug submittal procedure, ACORD insurance forms never change again, 
and the hundreds of major enterprises that have adopted LiveCycle technology 
decide to rip and replace their solutions with purely Microsoft code, then 
perhaps it's fair to call LiveCycle stagnant. In my opinion, that's just another 
trolling attempt.

I know LiveCycle has never been more exciting. I'm glad I 
spent as much time with it as I did, and even well-respected ColdFusion tech 
shops like FigLeaf are clearly committing serious resources to it. LiveCycle is 
far from stagnant. LiveCycle 8 new features were shown at Max, and stagnant 
products don't receive millions in RD investment from publicly traded 
companies. Have you even purchased Acrobat 8 yet?

What's more, it's clear to me that the release of the 
XPAAJ.jar file (which previously was only available with a $50K and up LiveCycle 
server licensing fee, prior to the merger)and the ease of integration with 
ColdFusion, as well as the free license to deploy apps based on it on the 
Internet (if you own ColdFusion) make ColdFusion based PDF forms processing and 
workflowapplications one of the best areas for ColdFusion developers to 
focus on. Whether you want to call it LiveCycle or just the evolution of 
PDF-based workflow applications makes no difference, but it's 
totallyinaccurate to call LiveCycle stagnant. Livecycle and ColdFusion are 
both vibrant, highly relevant technologies and it's never, ever, been a better 
time to be a developer for either one of these two closely related 
technologies.

I wonder just how many actual users of InfoPath Microsoft 
has. I'd be willing to bet it's not even 1% of the users of Adobe Reader. I 
wouldn't venture to call InfoPath stagnant or irrelevant, it's just clear to me 
that Adobe PDF remains the de facto standard for unified document distribution 
and publishing both in professional prepress (the world where I come from) and 
on the web. LiveCycle server side technology, as well as ColdFusion, are clearly 
a very strong part of that business solution platform..

While you are right that occasionally publicly traded 
companies get some pressure from stockholders to show quarterly results, Adobe 
has never been a company to be overly concerned about such short term metrics, 
and it's stock is dong quite well. Bruce has more than enough control within 
that organization to see his strategicinitiatives through to completion 
without having to worry about some sort of imaginary shareholder revolt. As an 
Adobe shareholder myself, I'm delighted with the company's performance and I 
would venture to guess that most other shareholders are quite satisfied with 
it's approximately 400% increase in value since the dot come 
meltdown.

It's also worth mentioning that for some reason, my MSFT 
shares haven't gained much value at all over that sametime period. Some 
might even use the word "stagnant" to describe the long term performance of MSFT 
graphically displayed using Flex technology by somelittle company, I 
forgot, (oh yeah, I think they arecalled Yahoo!, but we all know a company 
like that would never adopt some clearly inferior technology like Flex, so I 
must be wrong on that one as well), at

http://finance.yahoo.com/charts#chart1:symbol=adbe;range=5y;compare=msft;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;logscale=on;source=

- Sterling

P.S. I still love octopus! When well done it's one of my 
favorite types of sushi. We shouldn't wait 3 years for another dinner! But I 
like all kinds of food, so I'm cool with wherever you pick if you want to get 
together again before another 3 years pass. In any case, I'll be looking forward 
to January 2010.




  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Adam ChurvisSent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 
  9:51 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG 
  Discuss] Adobe Donating Flash Scripting Engine to Mozilla
  
  Wow, Sterling -- I didn't mean to piss you off like 
  that!
  
  Do you remember that ACFUG meeting after the merger was 
  announced, where you were on the