subject:"Re\: \[ACFUG Discuss\] CF serving platform"

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-27 Thread Justin Haygood

My employer uses a mixture of Windows 2000 AS and Windows Server 2003 to serve 
from, though we customize it a bit and run it on top of Java 5.0 (which has 
significant performance increases from the bundled Java, even on older server 
hardware).

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Alex Pilson
Sent: Mon 11/27/2006 8:11 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a question
to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform of choice for
most CF developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? Or something else?

Thank you for your time.
--
<-->
 Alex Pilson  FlagShip Hosting, LLC
 800.592.6781  >
<-->

-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform 

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com  
-

-

To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 

http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists

Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/

List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com

-

<>

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-28 Thread Anthony Mathis

For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we
decided to try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with Debian base
linux, for me anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever since.

On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:
> I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a question 
> to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform of choice for 
> most CF developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? Or something else?
> 
> Thank you for your time.



-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-28 Thread phi1281

As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option.  On  
windows & linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance  
is about 1.25GB.  That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris.  I'm not  
going to get into the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the  
performance difference I've seen.


ap


On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Anthony Mathis wrote:


For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we
decided to try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with Debian  
base

linux, for me anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever since.

On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:

I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a question
to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform of choice for
most CF developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? Or something  
else?


Thank you for your time.




-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-







-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-28 Thread Justin Haygood

I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can reference up to 4 GB of memory (which
should allow more memory for the JVM instance)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:34 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option.  On  
windows & linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance  
is about 1.25GB.  That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris.  I'm not  
going to get into the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the  
performance difference I've seen.

ap


On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Anthony Mathis wrote:

> For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we
> decided to try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with Debian  
> base
> linux, for me anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever since.
>
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:
>> I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a question
>> to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform of choice for
>> most CF developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? Or something  
>> else?
>>
>> Thank you for your time.
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
> -
>
>
>



-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-






-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-28 Thread John Mason

That is correct, it is higher on the 64 bit systems. It's only in 32-bit
systems that the JVM limit goes up to 2 GB.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Haygood
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:14 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can reference up to 4 GB of memory (which
should allow more memory for the JVM instance)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:34 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option.  On windows
& linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance is about
1.25GB.  That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris.  I'm not going to get into
the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the performance difference
I've seen.

ap


On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Anthony Mathis wrote:

> For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we 
> decided to try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with Debian 
> base linux, for me anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever since.
>
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:
>> I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a question 
>> to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform of choice for 
>> most CF developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? Or something 
>> else?
>>
>> Thank you for your time.
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
> -
>
>
>



-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-






-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=gin.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-





-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-29 Thread Tom Chambers

i run cf 1.51 on a windows NT 3.51 box with SQL server 6.5 


sorry...had a 10 yr flashback  hehe

John Mason wrote:

That is correct, it is higher on the 64 bit systems. It's only in 32-bit
systems that the JVM limit goes up to 2 GB.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Haygood
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:14 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can reference up to 4 GB of memory (which
should allow more memory for the JVM instance)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:34 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option.  On windows
& linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance is about
1.25GB.  That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris.  I'm not going to get into
the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the performance difference
I've seen.

ap


On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Anthony Mathis wrote:

  
For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we 
decided to try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with Debian 
base linux, for me anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever since.


On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:

I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a question 
to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform of choice for 
most CF developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? Or something 
else?


Thank you for your time.
  


-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/

List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-








-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-






-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=gin.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-





-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-






  





-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-29 Thread Derrick Peavy

Blue Dragon Server JX on Mac OS X Server 10.4.8 and Dual G5 X Serve,  
8 GB RAM.


Have handled as many as 600,000 user sessions per day with no hiccup.

_
Derrick Peavy
Sales and Web Services
Universal Advertising
Phone: 404-786-5036
Fax: 404-370-0470
http://www.universaladvertising.com
http://www.collegeadvertising.com
http://www.collegeclassifieds.com
___

On Nov 29, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Tom Chambers wrote:


i run cf 1.51 on a windows NT 3.51 box with SQL server 6.5
sorry...had a 10 yr flashback  hehe

John Mason wrote:
That is correct, it is higher on the 64 bit systems. It's only in  
32-bit

systems that the JVM limit goes up to 2 GB.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin  
Haygood

Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:14 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory  
space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can reference up to 4 GB of memory  
(which

should allow more memory for the JVM instance)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:34 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option.   
On windows

& linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance is about
1.25GB.  That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris.  I'm not going to  
get into
the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the performance  
difference

I've seen.

ap


On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Anthony Mathis wrote:


For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we  
decided to try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with  
Debian base linux, for me anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever  
since.


On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:

I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a  
question to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform  
of choice for most CF developers to serve from? Windows or  
Linux? Or something else?


Thank you for your time.



-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http:// 
www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @  
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/

List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-








-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-






-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=gin.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-





-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http:// 
www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-












-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http:// 
www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-29 Thread Tom Chambers


braggart! :)

hehe

Derrick Peavy wrote:
Blue Dragon Server JX on Mac OS X Server 10.4.8 and Dual G5 X Serve, 8 
GB RAM.


Have handled as many as 600,000 user sessions per day with no hiccup.


_ 


*Derrick Peavy*

*Sales and Web Services *

*Universal Advertising*

*Phone: 404-786-5036*

*Fax: 404-370-0470 *

http://www.universaladvertising.com 

http://www.collegeadvertising.com 

http://www.collegeclassifieds.com 


*___*


On Nov 29, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Tom Chambers wrote:

i run cf 1.51 on a windows NT 3.51 box with SQL server 6.5 
sorry...had a 10 yr flashback  hehe


John Mason wrote:

That is correct, it is higher on the 64 bit systems. It's only in 32-bit
systems that the JVM limit goes up to 2 GB.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin 
Haygood

Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:14 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org <mailto:discussion@acfug.org>
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can reference up to 4 GB of memory (which
should allow more memory for the JVM instance)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:34 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org <mailto:discussion@acfug.org>
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option.  On 
windows

& linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance is about
1.25GB.  That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris.  I'm not going to 
get into

the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the performance difference
I've seen.

ap


On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Anthony Mathis wrote:

  

For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we 
decided to try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with Debian 
base linux, for me anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever since.


On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:



I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a 
question to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform 
of choice for most CF developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? 
Or something else?


Thank you for your time.

  



-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/

List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-









-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-






-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=gin.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-





-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-






  






-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-











-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-28 Thread Steven Ross


Just remember if you pick Sun you cant run a supported copy of CF on
the x86 architecture. You have to run Sparc on Solaris.

On 11/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option.  On
windows & linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance
is about 1.25GB.  That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris.  I'm not
going to get into the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the
performance difference I've seen.

ap


On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Anthony Mathis wrote:

> For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we
> decided to try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with Debian
> base
> linux, for me anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever since.
>
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:
>> I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a question
>> to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform of choice for
>> most CF developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? Or something
>> else?
>>
>> Thank you for your time.
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
> -
>
>
>



-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-







--
Steven Ross
web application & interface developer
http://www.zerium.com
[mobile] 404-488-4364
[fax] 928-484-4364


-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-28 Thread Gerrey . Mary-Catherine

Honestly it depends on your environment and what your team knows best.  If 
you are a Windows shop, throwing in a *nix box may not be the best thing, 
unless you have a uber *nix weenie in house.  On the opposite side of the 
fence, if you have a *nix shop, go with that.  It all boils down to cost. 
Cost can be support, purchases, training or time.  You may have to hire 
new employees to support your server(s) as well.  Cost.

mcg





Steven Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/28/2006 09:44 AM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org


To
discussion@acfug.org
cc

Subject
Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform






Just remember if you pick Sun you cant run a supported copy of CF on
the x86 architecture. You have to run Sparc on Solaris.

On 11/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option.  On
> windows & linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance
> is about 1.25GB.  That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris.  I'm not
> going to get into the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the
> performance difference I've seen.
>
> ap
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Anthony Mathis wrote:
>
> > For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we
> > decided to try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with Debian
> > base
> > linux, for me anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever since.
> >
> > On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:
> >> I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a question
> >> to the CF community here. What seems to be the platform of choice for
> >> most CF developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? Or something
> >> else?
> >>
> >> Thank you for your time.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> > http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
> >
> > For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> > Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> > List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
> > -
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
> -
>
>
>
>


-- 
Steven Ross
web application & interface developer
http://www.zerium.com
[mobile] 404-488-4364
[fax] 928-484-4364


-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-







-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

2006-11-30 Thread Steven Ross


hehe... what does myspace run on?

On 11/29/06, Derrick Peavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Blue Dragon Server JX on Mac OS X Server 10.4.8 and Dual G5 X Serve, 8 GB
RAM.

Have handled as many as 600,000 user sessions per day with no hiccup.





_

Derrick Peavy

Sales and Web Services

Universal Advertising

Phone: 404-786-5036

Fax: 404-370-0470

http://www.universaladvertising.com

http://www.collegeadvertising.com

http://www.collegeclassifieds.com

___


On Nov 29, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Tom Chambers wrote:

i run cf 1.51 on a windows NT 3.51 box with SQL server 6.5
sorry...had a 10 yr flashback  hehe

John Mason wrote:
That is correct, it is higher on the 64 bit systems. It's only in 32-bit
systems that the JVM limit goes up to 2 GB.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Haygood
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:14 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

I think its only that low on 32-bit Windows though (due to memory space
limitations). X64 Windows apps can reference up to 4 GB of memory (which
should allow more memory for the JVM instance)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:34 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

As a matter of performance, Solaris seems to be the best option.  On windows
& linux the max amount of memory available to a JVM instance is about
1.25GB.  That number goes up to 3GB on Solaris.  I'm not going to get into
the Sun conspiracy theories here, but that is the performance difference
I've seen.

ap


On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Anthony Mathis wrote:





For four years it was windows 2000 Advanced server.  Last year we decided to
try Linux (Ubuntu).  Coldfusion works better with Debian base linux, for me
anyway.  Been loving cf on linux ever since.

On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:11 -0500, Alex Pilson wrote:



I am looking at new opportunities and thought I would pose a question to the
CF community here. What seems to be the platform of choice for most CF
developers to serve from? Windows or Linux? Or something else?

Thank you for your time.




-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-










-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-






-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=gin.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-





-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-














-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-









--
Steven Ross
web application & interface developer
http://www.zerium.com
[mobile] 404-488-4364
[fax] 928-484-4364


-
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform


For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

Re: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF serving platform

11 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information