Re: [pfSense-discussion] Benchmarks (was Re: Clients... ugh)
Chris Buechler wrote: Alex DiMarco wrote: Does anyone have benchmarks on the WRAP running fpsense? about 25 Mb is the most you can expect. I wouldn't use one if you need constant throughput of over 15 Mb for extended periods. I assume this is Ethernet-Ethernet. About the only thing I've noticed thusfar is that the webgui is 'pokey' compared to m0n0wall on the same hardware. Don't know why though.
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Benchmarks (was Re: Clients... ugh)
The web GUI is no longer pokey on anything newer than beta 1. On 2/6/06, Jim Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Buechler wrote: Alex DiMarco wrote: Does anyone have benchmarks on the WRAP running fpsense? about 25 Mb is the most you can expect. I wouldn't use one if you need constant throughput of over 15 Mb for extended periods. I assume this is Ethernet-Ethernet. About the only thing I've noticed thusfar is that the webgui is 'pokey' compared to m0n0wall on the same hardware. Don't know why though.
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Benchmarks (was Re: Clients... ugh)
Jim Thompson wrote: Chris Buechler wrote: Alex DiMarco wrote: Does anyone have benchmarks on the WRAP running fpsense? about 25 Mb is the most you can expect. I wouldn't use one if you need constant throughput of over 15 Mb for extended periods. I assume this is Ethernet-Ethernet. yes. Though I would assume wireless would perform about equally (i.e. it could just barely hit 100% of a .11g connection). I haven't had the chance to test that just yet though. About the only thing I've noticed thusfar is that the webgui is 'pokey' compared to m0n0wall on the same hardware. as Scott said, that's really changed dramatically. In some instances, post-beta 1 releases take 20% of the time to load pages that b1 does. the latest testing snapshot can be found here: http://pfsense.org/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-5-06/
RE: [pfSense-discussion] Benchmarks (was Re: Clients... ugh)
I got 15mbit/s with my ath card going to wan. That benchmark was with a lot older version though. Holger -Original Message- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 12:04 AM To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Benchmarks (was Re: Clients... ugh) Jim Thompson wrote: Chris Buechler wrote: Alex DiMarco wrote: Does anyone have benchmarks on the WRAP running fpsense? about 25 Mb is the most you can expect. I wouldn't use one if you need constant throughput of over 15 Mb for extended periods. I assume this is Ethernet-Ethernet. yes. Though I would assume wireless would perform about equally (i.e. it could just barely hit 100% of a .11g connection). I haven't had the chance to test that just yet though. About the only thing I've noticed thusfar is that the webgui is 'pokey' compared to m0n0wall on the same hardware. as Scott said, that's really changed dramatically. In some instances, post-beta 1 releases take 20% of the time to load pages that b1 does. the latest testing snapshot can be found here: http://pfsense.org/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-5-06/ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
