[Distutils] Twine 1.11.0 released

[Sumana Harihareswara]

https://pypi.org/project/twine/1.11.0/ Twine 1.11.0 is now out
(changelog at https://twine.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changelog.html ).

Thanks in particular to Dustin Ingram, Jon Wayne Parrott, Donald Stufft,
Ian Stapleton Cordasco, Leonard Richardson, Matthew Planchard, Holger
Krekel, Jason R. Coombs, Maurits van Rees, and Florian Schulze for code,
testing, review, documentation, and advice.

On 03/18/2018 08:59 AM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
subject: prepping PEP 566 support in Twine for tomorrow
> Per
> https://dustingram.com/articles/2018/03/16/markdown-descriptions-on-pypi
> , currently, Markdown support for a package long_description depends on
> a pre-release of Twine. I released Twine 1.11.0rc1 a few days ago. Today
> I'm fixing more bugs and putting out another release candidate, and then
> tomorrow I plan to release 1.11.0. Code review and testing is welcome,
> as is camaraderie in #pypa-dev on Freenode.

-- 
Sumana Harihareswara
Changeset Consulting
https://changeset.nyc
___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Re: [Distutils] Renaming this list to python-packaging

[Paul Moore]

Good point. I agree that not disrupting list users is more important
than the list name.

Paul

On 19 March 2018 at 21:03, Alex Walters  wrote:
> There is a technical limitation that we would not be renaming the list as
> much as closing this one, and opening a new one.  That creates any number of
> social problems, for little to no benefit – the name is slightly more
> relevant at the cost of breaking everyone’s subscriptions, and the mail
> filters of anyone who filters.  There are any number of glitches and
> headaches for what end?
>
>
>
> It sounds nice but, it causes more real pain than the theoretical pain the
> current name causes.
>
>
>
> From: Distutils-SIG
>  On Behalf Of
> Pradyun Gedam
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 1:30 PM
> To: DistUtils Mailing List"" 
> Subject: [Distutils] Renaming this list to python-packaging
>
>
>
> Hey all!
>
>
>
> Given the direction we're moving with PEP 517/518, I propose that we rename
> this list to something like python-packaging or something similar, to make
> it a more relavantly named place for having discussions related to Python
> Packaging in general.
>
>
>
> I'm curious what others think about this. I'm definitely open to thoughts
> and other ideas. :)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pradyun
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>
___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Re: [Distutils] Renaming this list to python-packaging

[Alex Walters]

There is a technical limitation that we would not be renaming the list as much 
as closing this one, and opening a new one.  That creates any number of social 
problems, for little to no benefit – the name is slightly more relevant at the 
cost of breaking everyone’s subscriptions, and the mail filters of anyone who 
filters.  There are any number of glitches and headaches for what end?

 

It sounds nice but, it causes more real pain than the theoretical pain the 
current name causes.

 

From: Distutils-SIG  
On Behalf Of Pradyun Gedam
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 1:30 PM
To: DistUtils Mailing List"" 
Subject: [Distutils] Renaming this list to python-packaging

 

Hey all!

 

Given the direction we're moving with PEP 517/518, I propose that we rename 
this list to something like python-packaging or something similar, to make it a 
more relavantly named place for having discussions related to Python Packaging 
in general.

 

I'm curious what others think about this. I'm definitely open to thoughts and 
other ideas. :)

 

Cheers,

Pradyun

 

___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Re: [Distutils] Renaming this list to python-packaging

[Donald Stufft]

I don’t think we can rename a mailing list easily, we can create a new one and 
archive the old one but that has a lot of churn and breaks people’s filters, 
etc.

> On Mar 19, 2018, at 1:39 PM, Paul Moore  wrote:
> 
> On 19 March 2018 at 17:30, Pradyun Gedam  wrote:
>> Hey all!
>> 
>> Given the direction we're moving with PEP 517/518, I propose that we rename
>> this list to something like python-packaging or something similar, to make
>> it a more relavantly named place for having discussions related to Python
>> Packaging in general.
>> 
>> I'm curious what others think about this. I'm definitely open to thoughts
>> and other ideas. :)
> 
> Maybe packaging-sig, to fit in with the other SIGs? See
> https://www.python.org/community/sigs/
> 
> Paul
> ___
> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Re: [Distutils] Renaming this list to python-packaging

[Pradyun Gedam]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 at 23:09 Paul Moore  wrote:

> On 19 March 2018 at 17:30, Pradyun Gedam  wrote:
> > Hey all!
> >
> > Given the direction we're moving with PEP 517/518, I propose that we
> rename
> > this list to something like python-packaging or something similar, to
> make
> > it a more relavantly named place for having discussions related to Python
> > Packaging in general.
> >
> > I'm curious what others think about this. I'm definitely open to thoughts
> > and other ideas. :)


> Maybe packaging-sig, to fit in with the other SIGs? See
> https://www.python.org/community/sigs/
>
> Paul
>

Yes. That sounds like a good idea!

Pradyun
___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Re: [Distutils] Renaming this list to python-packaging

[Paul Moore]

On 19 March 2018 at 17:30, Pradyun Gedam  wrote:
> Hey all!
>
> Given the direction we're moving with PEP 517/518, I propose that we rename
> this list to something like python-packaging or something similar, to make
> it a more relavantly named place for having discussions related to Python
> Packaging in general.
>
> I'm curious what others think about this. I'm definitely open to thoughts
> and other ideas. :)

Maybe packaging-sig, to fit in with the other SIGs? See
https://www.python.org/community/sigs/

Paul
___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

[Distutils] Renaming this list to python-packaging

[Pradyun Gedam]

Hey all!

Given the direction we're moving with PEP 517/518, I propose that we rename
this list to something like python-packaging or something similar, to make
it a more relavantly named place for having discussions related to Python
Packaging in general.

I'm curious what others think about this. I'm definitely open to thoughts
and other ideas. :)

Cheers,
Pradyun
___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Re: [Distutils] timeline for 3.7 distribution testing

[Trishank Kuppusamy]

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Robin Becker  wrote:

> Anyone here know approximately when the manylinux docker or appveyor ci
> will be upgraded to supprt Python 3.7?


It's really easy to send a PR to update CPython to the manylinux repo:

https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/pull/138

They are very friendly and receptive, by the way!
___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

[Distutils] timeline for 3.7 distribution testing

[Robin Becker]

Anyone here know approximately when the manylinux docker or appveyor ci will be 
upgraded to supprt Python 3.7?
--
Robin Becker
___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Re: [Distutils] PyPI support for linux_ppc64le

[Thomas Kluyver]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018, at 2:12 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Mark was OK with changing PEP 571 over to manylinux2010, but there are
> also some fixes needed for the current Platform Detection section,
> which isn't spelling out the version of glibc used as the baseline
> marker:
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2018-February/031971.html> 
> Cheers,
> Nick.
> P.S. If folks would like to nudge that process along a bit, I suspect
>  Mark may find it easier to find time to review a PR making those
>  changes than he would to draft the changes himself. I don't
>  actually know that for sure though - I'm just generalising from
>  an approach that often works on me :)
I've made a PR to change the naming to manylinux2010, and add a
paragraph about the change:https://github.com/python/peps/pull/596

If we're happy with that, I can also look at changing the glibc version
thing, but that will probably involve a bit more actual thought. ;-)
___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Re: [Distutils] Cannot install pyopencl

[Nick Coghlan]

On 19 March 2018 at 06:50, Alex Grönholm  wrote:

> This mailing list is for packaging development discussion. Questions on
> how to install packages should be directed to either #pypa or #python on
> Freenode IRC, or sites like StackOverflow.
>
For problems installing particular projects, I'd also suggest investigating
the assistance options for *that project*. In many cases, installation
challenges are project specific, and it sounds like that may be the case
here.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncogh...@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
___
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig