Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-23 Thread Eric Holscher 
Happy to help with this. We can move the RTD builds to using Sphinx 
HTMLDir, and then redirects won't be necessary for the page titles, at 
least. 

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 12:58:03 PM UTC-4, Florian Apolloner 
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 4:24:09 PM UTC+1, Tim Graham wrote:
>>
>> I guess I'm not strongly opposed if someone wants to do that, but I don't 
>> think I can justify spending time on the DSF's dime to help out users of 
>> unsupported versions.
>>
>
> +1
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/cf9fed8a-e41c-4f99-9326-2f17c0a18827%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-18 Thread Florian Apolloner 


On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 4:24:09 PM UTC+1, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> I guess I'm not strongly opposed if someone wants to do that, but I don't 
> think I can justify spending time on the DSF's dime to help out users of 
> unsupported versions.
>

+1

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/2baf4917-d427-4d65-b6cb-e14b91a532b3%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-18 Thread Tim Graham 
I guess I'm not strongly opposed if someone wants to do that, but I don't 
think I can justify spending time on the DSF's dime to help out users of 
unsupported versions.

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:33:52 AM UTC-5, Fred Stluka wrote:
>
> I vote for a 301 to the matching ReadTheDocs page.
>
> I recently had to manually update these bookmarks:
>
> - Django 1.4 Docs
>   - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/
>   - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/
>
> - Django 1.4 API Ref
>   - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/ref/
>   - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/ref/
>
> - Django 1.4 Doc Detailed TOC
>   - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/contents/
>   - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/contents.html
>
> - Django 1.4 Doc Index
>   - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/genindex/
>   - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/genindex.html
>
> - Django 1.4 Module Index
>   - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/py-modindex/
>   - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/py-modindex.html
>
> - Django 1.4 Testing
>   - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/topics/testing/
>   - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/topics/testing.html
>
> - Django 1.4 Testing Assertions
>   - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/topics/testing/#assertions
>   - New: 
> https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/topics/testing.html#assertions
>
> - Django 1.5 Docs
>   - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.5/
>   - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.5.x/
>
> - Django 1.6 Docs
>   - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/
>   - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.6.x/
>
> --Fred 
> --
> Fred Stluka -- mailt...@bristle.com  -- 
> http://bristle.com/~fred/ 
> Bristle Software, Inc -- http://bristle.com -- Glad to be of service! 
> Open Source: Without walls and fences, we need no Windows or Gates. 
> --
> On 2/17/16 5:21 AM, Daniel Chimeno wrote:
>
> IMHO We should keep the older version of docs somewhere, ReadTheDocs it's 
> fine. 
> But we can't only remove them. We may notice the users instead of 
> returning a simple 404.
> There are a lot of people still using those versions.
> To keep happy search engines, we should give a 301 to somewhere, not sure 
> if we should do it or not.
>
>
>
> El jueves, 7 de agosto de 2014, 13:32:25 (UTC+2), Areski Belaid escribió: 
>>
>> Hi Folks, 
>>
>> I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket 
>> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042
>>
>> To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for Django 
>> version 1.2 (for example 
>> 
>> https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the links 
>> in the result won't work.
>>
>>
>> As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach to 
>> solve this problem:
>>
>> 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the 
>> doc-building process is broken on old branches due to different version of 
>> Sphinx)
>>
>> 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy regarding 
>> doc hosting
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> //Areski
>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com .
> To post to this group, send email to django-d...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/ba425446-63fb-4039-b238-443adac456ed%40googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/afa7c7db-ed85-400b-b1dd-c2d9789151d5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-18 Thread Fred Stluka 

I vote for a 301 to the matching ReadTheDocs page.

I recently had to manually update these bookmarks:

- Django 1.4 Docs
  - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/
  - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/

- Django 1.4 API Ref
  - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/ref/
  - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/ref/

- Django 1.4 Doc Detailed TOC
  - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/contents/
  - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/contents.html

- Django 1.4 Doc Index
  - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/genindex/
  - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/genindex.html

- Django 1.4 Module Index
  - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/py-modindex/
  - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/py-modindex.html

- Django 1.4 Testing
  - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/topics/testing/
  - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/topics/testing.html

- Django 1.4 Testing Assertions
  - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/topics/testing/#assertions
  - New: 
https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.4/topics/testing.html#assertions


- Django 1.5 Docs
  - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.5/
  - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.5.x/

- Django 1.6 Docs
  - Old: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/
  - New: https://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.6.x/

--Fred

Fred Stluka -- mailto:f...@bristle.com -- http://bristle.com/~fred/
Bristle Software, Inc -- http://bristle.com -- Glad to be of service!
Open Source: Without walls and fences, we need no Windows or Gates.

On 2/17/16 5:21 AM, Daniel Chimeno wrote:
IMHO We should keep the older version of docs somewhere, ReadTheDocs 
it's fine.
But we can't only remove them. We may notice the users instead of 
returning a simple 404.

There are a lot of people still using those versions.
To keep happy search engines, we should give a 301 to somewhere, not 
sure if we should do it or not.




El jueves, 7 de agosto de 2014, 13:32:25 (UTC+2), Areski Belaid escribió:

Hi Folks,

I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042


To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for
Django version 1.2 (for example
https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4
) but
the links in the result won't work.


As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2
approach to solve this problem:

1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the
doc-building process is broken on old branches due to different
version of Sphinx)

2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy
regarding doc hosting


What do you think?


-- 
//Areski


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To post to this group, send email to 
django-developers@googlegroups.com 
.

Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/ba425446-63fb-4039-b238-443adac456ed%40googlegroups.com 
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django 
developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/56C5D635.9020500%40bristle.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-17 Thread Noemi 
Well, that made me sad (and confused) yesterday when I suddenly couldn't 
find docs via either djangoproject.com OR Google for some topics for 1.4 
(we're in the process of upgrading a large and crufty codebase from 1.4 to 
1.8 via 1.6).

Please at least don't eliminate the readthedocs versions in favor of 
downloads -- searchability is extremely important for those of us trying to 
work with older codebases and bring them up to date!

On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 11:11:00 PM UTC-5, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> I removed the 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 docs from docs.djangoproject.com today. 
> They are still available on readthedocs. I've spent more than a couple 
> hours recently debugging some problems related to documentation builds 
> there. Some are described in 
> https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/issues/627, otherwise are 
> related to elasticsearch (timeouts due to indexing so many documents, I 
> think). I hope removing old docs versions will help to reduce the 
> maintenance overhead of these tasks. Also, a stale link in the docs was 
> pointing to a site with adult content. I backported the fix as far back as 
> 1.4 today.
>
> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 11:08:59 AM UTC-4, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>>
>> As long as it doesn't hurt we can keep em there -- remove as soon as they 
>> cause a problem ;)
>>
>> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:30:01 PM UTC+2, Tim Graham wrote:
>>>
>>> I just discontinued the 1.3 docs on docs.djangoproject.com, they are 
>>> still available on django.readthedocs.org. Do you think we should keep 
>>> it there or not?
>>>
>>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 7:45:15 AM UTC-4, Tim Graham wrote:

 I'm in favor of discontinuing older version of the docs. I recently 
 fixed the 1.3 documentation builder since there were several complaints, 
 but no one has complained about 1.2.

 On Thursday, August 7, 2014 7:32:25 AM UTC-4, Areski Belaid wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket 
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042
>
> To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for Django 
> version 1.2 (for example 
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the 
> links in the result won't work.
>
>
> As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach 
> to solve this problem:
>
> 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the 
> doc-building process is broken on old branches due to different version 
> of 
> Sphinx)
>
> 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy regarding 
> doc hosting
>
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> -- 
> //Areski
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/fcd25f52-5614-4cea-86ea-fb6963d3334a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-17 Thread Sergei Maertens 
+1

Yes, you should upgrade, but the reality is that some people have old 
versions lying around. They should be _somewhere_, be it 'hard' to find. A 
PDF or Epub is fine as well, that removes the need to maintain the build of 
the docs for unsupported versions.

On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 10:30:57 AM UTC+1, Marc Tamlyn wrote:
>
> I see no reason to remove old versions from readthedocs.
>
> On 17 February 2016 at 04:22, Felipe Prenholato  > wrote:
>
>> I was catch by that change today and found the docs in 
>> http://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.5.x/.
>>
>> I wan't to suggest that for documentations that Django will remove from 
>> docs.djangoproject.com and from django.readthedocs.org we keep instead 
>> links to download PDFs / epubs / HTML zips in some place that is easy to 
>> find and so users can download it. Maybe some page like "Older versions" 
>> inside documentation.
>>
>> Well, just a thought :).
>>
>> Thx, Felipe.
>>
>> Felipe Prenholato.
>> Home page: http://devwithpassion.com | http://chronosbox.org/blog
>> GitHub: http://github.com/chronossc/ | Twitter: 
>> http://twitter.com/chronossc
>> LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/in/felipeprenholato/
>>
>> 2016-02-17 2:10 GMT-02:00 Tim Graham :
>>
>>> I removed the 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 docs from docs.djangoproject.com today. 
>>> They are still available on readthedocs. I've spent more than a couple 
>>> hours recently debugging some problems related to documentation builds 
>>> there. Some are described in 
>>> https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/issues/627, otherwise are 
>>> related to elasticsearch (timeouts due to indexing so many documents, I 
>>> think). I hope removing old docs versions will help to reduce the 
>>> maintenance overhead of these tasks. Also, a stale link in the docs was 
>>> pointing to a site with adult content. I backported the fix as far back as 
>>> 1.4 today.
>>>
>>> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 11:08:59 AM UTC-4, Florian Apolloner wrote:

 As long as it doesn't hurt we can keep em there -- remove as soon as 
 they cause a problem ;)

 On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:30:01 PM UTC+2, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> I just discontinued the 1.3 docs on docs.djangoproject.com, they are 
> still available on django.readthedocs.org. Do you think we should 
> keep it there or not?
>
> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 7:45:15 AM UTC-4, Tim Graham wrote:
>>
>> I'm in favor of discontinuing older version of the docs. I recently 
>> fixed the 1.3 documentation builder since there were several complaints, 
>> but no one has complained about 1.2.
>>
>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 7:32:25 AM UTC-4, Areski Belaid wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket 
>>> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042
>>>
>>> To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for 
>>> Django version 1.2 (for example 
>>> https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the 
>>> links in the result won't work.
>>>
>>>
>>> As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach 
>>> to solve this problem:
>>>
>>> 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the 
>>> doc-building process is broken on old branches due to different version 
>>> of 
>>> Sphinx)
>>>
>>> 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy 
>>> regarding doc hosting
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> //Areski
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com .
>>> To post to this group, send email to django-d...@googlegroups.com 
>>> .
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/8c2638b5-6604-4bd4-b470-9096aee14b69%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com .
>> To post to this group, send email to django-d...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-17 Thread Daniel Chimeno 
IMHO We should keep the older version of docs somewhere, ReadTheDocs it's 
fine.
But we can't only remove them. We may notice the users instead of returning 
a simple 404.
There are a lot of people still using those versions.
To keep happy search engines, we should give a 301 to somewhere, not sure 
if we should do it or not.



El jueves, 7 de agosto de 2014, 13:32:25 (UTC+2), Areski Belaid escribió:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket 
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042
>
> To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for Django 
> version 1.2 (for example 
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the links 
> in the result won't work.
>
>
> As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach to 
> solve this problem:
>
> 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the doc-building 
> process is broken on old branches due to different version of Sphinx)
>
> 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy regarding doc 
> hosting
>
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> -- 
> //Areski
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/ba425446-63fb-4039-b238-443adac456ed%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-17 Thread Marc Tamlyn 
I see no reason to remove old versions from readthedocs.

On 17 February 2016 at 04:22, Felipe Prenholato 
wrote:

> I was catch by that change today and found the docs in
> http://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.5.x/.
>
> I wan't to suggest that for documentations that Django will remove from
> docs.djangoproject.com and from django.readthedocs.org we keep instead
> links to download PDFs / epubs / HTML zips in some place that is easy to
> find and so users can download it. Maybe some page like "Older versions"
> inside documentation.
>
> Well, just a thought :).
>
> Thx, Felipe.
>
> Felipe Prenholato.
> Home page: http://devwithpassion.com | http://chronosbox.org/blog
> GitHub: http://github.com/chronossc/ | Twitter:
> http://twitter.com/chronossc
> LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/in/felipeprenholato/
>
> 2016-02-17 2:10 GMT-02:00 Tim Graham :
>
>> I removed the 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 docs from docs.djangoproject.com today.
>> They are still available on readthedocs. I've spent more than a couple
>> hours recently debugging some problems related to documentation builds
>> there. Some are described in
>> https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/issues/627, otherwise are
>> related to elasticsearch (timeouts due to indexing so many documents, I
>> think). I hope removing old docs versions will help to reduce the
>> maintenance overhead of these tasks. Also, a stale link in the docs was
>> pointing to a site with adult content. I backported the fix as far back as
>> 1.4 today.
>>
>> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 11:08:59 AM UTC-4, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>>>
>>> As long as it doesn't hurt we can keep em there -- remove as soon as
>>> they cause a problem ;)
>>>
>>> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:30:01 PM UTC+2, Tim Graham wrote:

 I just discontinued the 1.3 docs on docs.djangoproject.com, they are
 still available on django.readthedocs.org. Do you think we should keep
 it there or not?

 On Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 7:45:15 AM UTC-4, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> I'm in favor of discontinuing older version of the docs. I recently
> fixed the 1.3 documentation builder since there were several complaints,
> but no one has complained about 1.2.
>
> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 7:32:25 AM UTC-4, Areski Belaid wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket
>> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042
>>
>> To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for
>> Django version 1.2 (for example
>> https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the
>> links in the result won't work.
>>
>>
>> As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach
>> to solve this problem:
>>
>> 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the
>> doc-building process is broken on old branches due to different version 
>> of
>> Sphinx)
>>
>> 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy
>> regarding doc hosting
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> --
>> //Areski
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/8c2638b5-6604-4bd4-b470-9096aee14b69%40googlegroups.com
>> 
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CADdUj3G%3DWaG7G3KJM-yZ_e21UsakW6K5ap3%2Brd1ScOxS8rqQWA%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-16 Thread Felipe Prenholato 
I was catch by that change today and found the docs in
http://django.readthedocs.org/en/1.5.x/.

I wan't to suggest that for documentations that Django will remove from
docs.djangoproject.com and from django.readthedocs.org we keep instead
links to download PDFs / epubs / HTML zips in some place that is easy to
find and so users can download it. Maybe some page like "Older versions"
inside documentation.

Well, just a thought :).

Thx, Felipe.

Felipe Prenholato.
Home page: http://devwithpassion.com | http://chronosbox.org/blog
GitHub: http://github.com/chronossc/ | Twitter: http://twitter.com/chronossc
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/in/felipeprenholato/

2016-02-17 2:10 GMT-02:00 Tim Graham :

> I removed the 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 docs from docs.djangoproject.com today.
> They are still available on readthedocs. I've spent more than a couple
> hours recently debugging some problems related to documentation builds
> there. Some are described in
> https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/issues/627, otherwise are
> related to elasticsearch (timeouts due to indexing so many documents, I
> think). I hope removing old docs versions will help to reduce the
> maintenance overhead of these tasks. Also, a stale link in the docs was
> pointing to a site with adult content. I backported the fix as far back as
> 1.4 today.
>
> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 11:08:59 AM UTC-4, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>>
>> As long as it doesn't hurt we can keep em there -- remove as soon as they
>> cause a problem ;)
>>
>> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:30:01 PM UTC+2, Tim Graham wrote:
>>>
>>> I just discontinued the 1.3 docs on docs.djangoproject.com, they are
>>> still available on django.readthedocs.org. Do you think we should keep
>>> it there or not?
>>>
>>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 7:45:15 AM UTC-4, Tim Graham wrote:

 I'm in favor of discontinuing older version of the docs. I recently
 fixed the 1.3 documentation builder since there were several complaints,
 but no one has complained about 1.2.

 On Thursday, August 7, 2014 7:32:25 AM UTC-4, Areski Belaid wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042
>
> To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for Django
> version 1.2 (for example
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the
> links in the result won't work.
>
>
> As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach
> to solve this problem:
>
> 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the
> doc-building process is broken on old branches due to different version of
> Sphinx)
>
> 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy regarding
> doc hosting
>
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> --
> //Areski
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/8c2638b5-6604-4bd4-b470-9096aee14b69%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CADdUj3G%3DWaG7G3KJM-yZ_e21UsakW6K5ap3%2Brd1ScOxS8rqQWA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2016-02-16 Thread Tim Graham 
I removed the 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 docs from docs.djangoproject.com today. 
They are still available on readthedocs. I've spent more than a couple 
hours recently debugging some problems related to documentation builds 
there. Some are described in 
https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/issues/627, otherwise are 
related to elasticsearch (timeouts due to indexing so many documents, I 
think). I hope removing old docs versions will help to reduce the 
maintenance overhead of these tasks. Also, a stale link in the docs was 
pointing to a site with adult content. I backported the fix as far back as 
1.4 today.

On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 11:08:59 AM UTC-4, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>
> As long as it doesn't hurt we can keep em there -- remove as soon as they 
> cause a problem ;)
>
> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:30:01 PM UTC+2, Tim Graham wrote:
>>
>> I just discontinued the 1.3 docs on docs.djangoproject.com, they are 
>> still available on django.readthedocs.org. Do you think we should keep 
>> it there or not?
>>
>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 7:45:15 AM UTC-4, Tim Graham wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm in favor of discontinuing older version of the docs. I recently 
>>> fixed the 1.3 documentation builder since there were several complaints, 
>>> but no one has complained about 1.2.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 7:32:25 AM UTC-4, Areski Belaid wrote:

 Hi Folks,

 I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket 
 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042

 To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for Django 
 version 1.2 (for example 
 https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the 
 links in the result won't work.


 As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach to 
 solve this problem:

 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the 
 doc-building process is broken on old branches due to different version of 
 Sphinx)

 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy regarding 
 doc hosting


 What do you think?


 -- 
 //Areski



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/8c2638b5-6604-4bd4-b470-9096aee14b69%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2015-04-13 Thread Florian Apolloner 
As long as it doesn't hurt we can keep em there -- remove as soon as they 
cause a problem ;)

On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:30:01 PM UTC+2, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> I just discontinued the 1.3 docs on docs.djangoproject.com, they are 
> still available on django.readthedocs.org. Do you think we should keep it 
> there or not?
>
> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 7:45:15 AM UTC-4, Tim Graham wrote:
>>
>> I'm in favor of discontinuing older version of the docs. I recently fixed 
>> the 1.3 documentation builder since there were several complaints, but no 
>> one has complained about 1.2.
>>
>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 7:32:25 AM UTC-4, Areski Belaid wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket 
>>> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042
>>>
>>> To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for Django 
>>> version 1.2 (for example 
>>> https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the links 
>>> in the result won't work.
>>>
>>>
>>> As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach to 
>>> solve this problem:
>>>
>>> 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the 
>>> doc-building process is broken on old branches due to different version of 
>>> Sphinx)
>>>
>>> 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy regarding 
>>> doc hosting
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> //Areski
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/cb58fb7c-deaa-4da4-a426-3ecc182540ea%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2015-04-13 Thread Tim Graham 
I just discontinued the 1.3 docs on docs.djangoproject.com, they are still 
available on django.readthedocs.org. Do you think we should keep it there 
or not?

On Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 7:45:15 AM UTC-4, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> I'm in favor of discontinuing older version of the docs. I recently fixed 
> the 1.3 documentation builder since there were several complaints, but no 
> one has complained about 1.2.
>
> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 7:32:25 AM UTC-4, Areski Belaid wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket 
>> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042
>>
>> To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for Django 
>> version 1.2 (for example 
>> https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the links 
>> in the result won't work.
>>
>>
>> As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach to 
>> solve this problem:
>>
>> 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the 
>> doc-building process is broken on old branches due to different version of 
>> Sphinx)
>>
>> 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy regarding 
>> doc hosting
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> //Areski
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/9b9f6f5b-6d02-44cd-94ee-45ecd3ce49b6%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Discussion] Legacy documentation / Boken docs Django v1.2

2014-08-07 Thread Tim Graham 
I'm in favor of discontinuing older version of the docs. I recently fixed 
the 1.3 documentation builder since there were several complaints, but no 
one has complained about 1.2.

On Thursday, August 7, 2014 7:32:25 AM UTC-4, Areski Belaid wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I wanted to open a discussion regarding the following ticket 
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23042
>
> To summarize briefly, you may notice that we can search doc for Django 
> version 1.2 (for example 
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/search/?q=forms=4) but the links 
> in the result won't work.
>
>
> As Baptiste (IRC bmispelon) explained on IRC, we may have 2 approach to 
> solve this problem:
>
> 1) Fix the docs builder for versions < 1.2 (at the moment the doc-building 
> process is broken on old branches due to different version of Sphinx)
>
> 2) Discontinue older Django docs version and decide a policy regarding doc 
> hosting
>
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> -- 
> //Areski
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/cbcc51fd-cb90-49b7-9c2d-c215a6e48cc0%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.