Re: [Django] #34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as flags for the Django `test` command

2023-12-23 Thread Django
#34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as 
flags
for the Django `test` command
-+-
 Reporter:  Natalia Bidart   |Owner:  Sulabh
 |  Katila
 Type:  New feature  |   Status:  assigned
Component:  Testing framework|  Version:  dev
 Severity:  Normal   |   Resolution:
 Keywords:   | Triage Stage:  Accepted
Has patch:  1|  Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0|  Patch needs improvement:  1
Easy pickings:  0|UI/UX:  0
-+-
Changes (by Sulabh Katila):

 * needs_better_patch:  0 => 1


-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018c9a40f2be-84282039-cee0-4867-ab9a-415afb07765e-00%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.


Re: [Django] #34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as flags for the Django `test` command

2023-12-23 Thread Django
#34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as 
flags
for the Django `test` command
-+-
 Reporter:  Natalia Bidart   |Owner:  Sulabh
 |  Katila
 Type:  New feature  |   Status:  assigned
Component:  Testing framework|  Version:  dev
 Severity:  Normal   |   Resolution:
 Keywords:   | Triage Stage:  Accepted
Has patch:  1|  Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0|  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0|UI/UX:  0
-+-
Changes (by Sulabh Katila):

 * has_patch:  0 => 1


-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018c9a1ab092-2a7f6334-f893-4999-8e7f-ac7a5e768d4a-00%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.


Re: [Django] #33277: SimpleTestCase does not block database connections in threads

2023-12-23 Thread Django
#33277: SimpleTestCase does not block database connections in threads
-+-
 Reporter:  Daniel Hahler|Owner:  David
 |  Wobrock
 Type:  New feature  |   Status:  assigned
Component:  Testing framework|  Version:  3.2
 Severity:  Normal   |   Resolution:
 Keywords:   | Triage Stage:  Accepted
Has patch:  1|  Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0|  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0|UI/UX:  0
-+-
Changes (by David Wobrock):

 * owner:  Sulabh Katila => David Wobrock
 * needs_better_patch:  1 => 0


Comment:

 I picked up the existing patch and opened a new
 [https://github.com/django/django/pull/17639 PR].

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018c98e12fd2-00447d81-c658-4467-bdab-779b821aa72b-00%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.


Re: [Django] #35050: Issue filtering on FilteredRelation with F object

2023-12-23 Thread Django
#35050: Issue filtering on FilteredRelation with F object
-+-
 Reporter:  Mark Zorn|Owner:  David
 |  Wobrock
 Type:  Bug  |   Status:  closed
Component:  Database layer   |  Version:  5.0
  (models, ORM)  |
 Severity:  Release blocker  |   Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:  FilteredRelation | Triage Stage:  Ready for
 |  checkin
Has patch:  1|  Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0|  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0|UI/UX:  0
-+-

Comment (by Mariusz Felisiak ):

 In [changeset:"9aad44150fa7632b894c8b1d1cb9c6dde131b577" 9aad441]:
 {{{
 #!CommitTicketReference repository=""
 revision="9aad44150fa7632b894c8b1d1cb9c6dde131b577"
 [5.0.x] Fixed #35050 -- Fixed prefixing field names in FilteredRelation().

 Thanks Mark Zorn for the report.

 Regression in 59f475470494ce5b8cbff816b1e5dafcbd10a3a3.

 Backport of 14917c9ae272f47d23401100faa6cefa8e1728bf from main
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018c97bd852c-3983c128-2452-421f-a574-704c4fc1c69e-00%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.


Re: [Django] #35050: Issue filtering on FilteredRelation with F object

2023-12-23 Thread Django
#35050: Issue filtering on FilteredRelation with F object
-+-
 Reporter:  Mark Zorn|Owner:  David
 |  Wobrock
 Type:  Bug  |   Status:  closed
Component:  Database layer   |  Version:  5.0
  (models, ORM)  |
 Severity:  Release blocker  |   Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:  FilteredRelation | Triage Stage:  Ready for
 |  checkin
Has patch:  1|  Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0|  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0|UI/UX:  0
-+-
Changes (by Mariusz Felisiak ):

 * status:  assigned => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed


Comment:

 In [changeset:"14917c9ae272f47d23401100faa6cefa8e1728bf" 14917c9a]:
 {{{
 #!CommitTicketReference repository=""
 revision="14917c9ae272f47d23401100faa6cefa8e1728bf"
 Fixed #35050 -- Fixed prefixing field names in FilteredRelation().

 Thanks Mark Zorn for the report.

 Regression in 59f475470494ce5b8cbff816b1e5dafcbd10a3a3.
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018c97bc985a-bb7cf19e-00d4-4fe4-b26d-b9baf65411b2-00%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.


Re: [Django] #35058: Update GDAL integration

2023-12-23 Thread Django
#35058: Update GDAL integration
--+
 Reporter:  David Smith   |Owner:  nobody
 Type:  Cleanup/optimization  |   Status:  new
Component:  GIS   |  Version:  4.2
 Severity:  Normal|   Resolution:
 Keywords:| Triage Stage:  Accepted
Has patch:  0 |  Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0 |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0 |UI/UX:  0
--+

Comment (by GitHub ):

 In [changeset:"623597c786e89daae15a52dccfcdded7f808da9f" 623597c7]:
 {{{
 #!CommitTicketReference repository=""
 revision="623597c786e89daae15a52dccfcdded7f808da9f"
 Refs #35058 -- Added support for WKB > 2GB with GDAL 3.3+.

 GDAL 3.3.0 added OGR_G_WkbSizeEx() and OGR_G_CreateFromWkbEx() to handle
 WKB > 2GB. Prefer these new functions when available.

 https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/master/NEWS.md#ogr-330---overview-of-
 changes
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018c977fde80-c9f65f46-7b5e-4c4c-be6d-e686d5287067-00%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.


Re: [Django] #35056: admin.E013 on ManyToManyField with related_name crashes.

2023-12-23 Thread Django
#35056: admin.E013 on ManyToManyField with related_name crashes.
-+
 Reporter:  Thomas Feldmann  |Owner:  nobody
 Type:  Bug  |   Status:  new
Component:  contrib.admin|  Version:  5.0
 Severity:  Release blocker  |   Resolution:
 Keywords:   | Triage Stage:  Accepted
Has patch:  0|  Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0|  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0|UI/UX:  0
-+

Comment (by Hrushikesh Vaidya):

 Could this be fixed with a simple `hasattr(field.remote_field, 'through')`
 check before accessing `through`?

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018c96a2b053-38fe070a-c3c1-461f-ae36-f1758043f267-00%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.


Re: [Django] #34277: Add where clause in QuerySet.bulk_create() when update_conflicts=True

2023-12-23 Thread Django
#34277: Add where clause in QuerySet.bulk_create() when update_conflicts=True
-+-
 Reporter:  Alain Delplanque |Owner:  HAMA
 |  Barhamou
 Type:  New feature  |   Status:  assigned
Component:  Database layer   |  Version:  dev
  (models, ORM)  |
 Severity:  Normal   |   Resolution:
 Keywords:   | Triage Stage:  Accepted
Has patch:  1|  Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0|  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0|UI/UX:  0
-+-
Changes (by HAMA Barhamou):

 * needs_better_patch:  1 => 0
 * needs_tests:  1 => 0
 * needs_docs:  1 => 0


-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018c969ebcc8-3144978e-8bb8-4df1-8805-6ca1691fefbb-00%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.


Re: [Django] #35056: admin.E013 on ManyToManyField with related_name crashes.

2023-12-23 Thread Django
#35056: admin.E013 on ManyToManyField with related_name crashes.
-+
 Reporter:  Thomas Feldmann  |Owner:  nobody
 Type:  Bug  |   Status:  new
Component:  contrib.admin|  Version:  5.0
 Severity:  Release blocker  |   Resolution:
 Keywords:   | Triage Stage:  Accepted
Has patch:  0|  Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0|  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0|UI/UX:  0
-+

Comment (by Salvo Polizzi):

 Can i help with this issue? If anyone can give me some advice or reference
 to other similar issues, I would like to contribute

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018c964b3d01-4d5823fa-a64d-47b0-8197-3639feb4e9bf-00%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.