Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
-+-
 Reporter:  adrian   |Owner:  barbuza
 Type:  New feature  |   Status:  closed
Component:  contrib.admin|  Version:  SVN
 Severity:  Normal   |   Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:  nfa-someday nfa- | Triage Stage:  Accepted
  changelist |  Needs documentation:  0
Has patch:  1|  Patch needs improvement:  1
  Needs tests:  0|UI/UX:  0
Easy pickings:  0|
-+-

Comment (by lea):

 [http://www.cafe24.com/support/help/supportHelpList.html?category=60
 cafe24 partners]

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
-+-
   Reporter:  adrian |  Owner:  barbuza
   Type:  New| Status:  closed
  feature|  Component:  contrib.admin
  Milestone: |   Severity:  Normal
Version:  SVN|   Keywords:  nfa-someday nfa-
 Resolution:  fixed  |  changelist
   Triage Stage:  Accepted   |  Has patch:  1
Needs documentation:  0  |Needs tests:  0
Patch needs improvement:  1  |  Easy pickings:  0
  UI/UX:  0  |
-+-
Changes (by jacob):

 * status:  reopened => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed


Comment:

 Results of a discussion with Russ:

 This ticket has basically been "fixed" by Zain's GSoC project adding
 dynamic add/remove. Since then it's sorta become a dumping ground for
 slightly related features, but there really isn't anything that can be
 done to move this ticket forward any more. It's become a laundry list.
 Thus, I'm closing this as fixed; the various relation issues here should
 be moved (and in most part have been already moved) to new tickets.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
-+-
   Reporter:  adrian |  Owner:  barbuza
   Type:  New| Status:  reopened
  feature|  Component:  contrib.admin
  Milestone: |   Severity:  Normal
Version:  SVN|   Keywords:  nfa-someday nfa-
 Resolution: |  changelist
   Triage Stage:  Accepted   |  Has patch:  1
Needs documentation:  0  |Needs tests:  0
Patch needs improvement:  1  |  Easy pickings:  0
  UI/UX:  0  |
-+-
Changes (by mhf@…):

 * cc: mhf@… (removed)
 * ui_ux:   => 0
 * easy:   => 0


-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
-+-
   Reporter:  adrian |  Owner:  barbuza
   Type:  New| Status:  reopened
  feature|  Component:  contrib.admin
  Milestone: |   Severity:  Normal
Version:  SVN|   Keywords:  nfa-someday nfa-
 Resolution: |  changelist
   Triage Stage:  Accepted   |  Has patch:  1
Needs documentation:  0  |Needs tests:  0
Patch needs improvement:  1  |  Easy pickings:  0
  UI/UX:  0  |
-+-
Changes (by lea):

 * ui_ux:   => 0
 * easy:   => 0


Comment:

 I thought all wiki pages are editable? hmm. I put one in my
 [http://seoph1.cafe24.com/wordpress/ Blog in SEO]

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
-+-
   Reporter:  adrian |Owner:  barbuza
   Type:  New|   Status:  reopened
  feature|Component:  contrib.admin
  Milestone: | Severity:  Normal
Version:  SVN| Keywords:  nfa-someday nfa-
 Resolution: |  changelist
   Triage Stage:  Accepted   |Has patch:  1
Needs documentation:  0  |  Needs tests:  0
Patch needs improvement:  1  |
-+-
Changes (by obeattie):

 * cc: oliver@… (removed)


-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
-+-
   Reporter:  adrian |Owner:  barbuza
   Type:  New|   Status:  reopened
  feature|Component:  contrib.admin
  Milestone: | Severity:  Normal
Version:  SVN| Keywords:  nfa-someday nfa-
 Resolution: |  changelist
   Triage Stage:  Accepted   |Has patch:  1
Needs documentation:  0  |  Needs tests:  0
Patch needs improvement:  1  |
-+-
Changes (by lrekucki):

 * type:  defect => New feature
 * severity:  normal => Normal


-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
+---
   Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza   

 Status:  reopened  | Milestone:

  Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN   

 Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
   Triage Stage:  Accepted  | Has patch:  1 

Needs documentation:  0 |   Needs tests:  0 

Patch needs improvement:  1 |  
+---

Comment (by dokterbob):

 @jezdez Apparently I could not attach my patch to the message itself. It
 should have become clear in this last edit. :)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
+---
   Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza   

 Status:  reopened  | Milestone:

  Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN   

 Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
   Triage Stage:  Accepted  | Has patch:  1 

Needs documentation:  0 |   Needs tests:  0 

Patch needs improvement:  1 |  
+---

Comment (by jezdez):

 Which patch are you referring to?

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
+---
   Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza   

 Status:  reopened  | Milestone:

  Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN   

 Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
   Triage Stage:  Accepted  | Has patch:  1 

Needs documentation:  0 |   Needs tests:  0 

Patch needs improvement:  1 |  
+---
Changes (by dokterbob):

 * cc: mathijs@… (added)
  * has_patch:  0 => 1


Comment:

 So far, it seems that no work has been done on this issue for a long time.
 Meanwhile, I am sure that it is still a feature that many users would like
 to see integrated into the Django admin. Given that, by now, people have
 made the wise decision to ship jQuery with the Django admin, it seems to
 me as about time to start fixing this issue.

 Currently, if `order_with_respect_to` is specifeid in a Model's Meta field
 is specified, a cute `_order` field is indeed added to the Model's
 database table. However (AFAIK because of the underscore), this field is
 not represented at all in the Admin interface. This implies that - for now
 - it is still easier to explicitly add some Integer ordering field to a
 Model rather than using  the much more elegant, available, but
 disfunctional, API that ships with Django.

 As fixing/completing this feature should be fairly easy for someone who's
 used to getting into the debts of the (very scarcely documented)
 Admin/Model internals, it might not even be too unrealistic to have this
 fixed before 1.3 or the first point release after.

 To make it a bit easier, I have made a start by providing this patch which
 fixes at least the `get_ordered_objects` method of Model's `_meta`. This
 causes the Admin to load a non-existant file `dom-drag.js` which should be
 replaced by a jQuery equivalent thereof. Furthermore, the
 InlineModelAdmin's formset should have it's `can_order` parameter set to
 `True`, I believe, to allow for the ordering to get through to the Admin
 in the first place.

 Meanwhile, I have spotted the following tickets relating to this same
 issue - parts of which I used for writing the - still very incomplete -
 patch:
 * #13296
 * #9338
 * #2137

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by anonymous):

  * status:  closed => reopened
  * resolution:  fixed =>

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  closed| Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:  fixed |  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by anonymous):

  * status:  reopened => closed
  * resolution:  => fixed

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by anonymous):

 Who do I need to talk to [http://www.guccishopping.com/ ed hardy]if I want
 to help implement this?
 That would be me. I go by "coderanger" on IRC, and can be found there most
 of the time.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by anonymous):

 Who do I need to talif I want

 to help implement this?
 That would be me. I go by "coderanger" on IRC, and can be found there most

 of thA (simple) ticket can be attached

 to an (aggregate) ticket:
 •to a milestone, as it is done now (display in the combobox only available

 milestone tickets)
 •to a master ticket (display in that combobox only available master

 tickets)
 [http://www.maslou.com/ louis vuitton]It remains to be seen if an

 (aggregate) ticket could itself be attached to another (aggregate)
 You're quite right - reworking the modules and

 breaking down the tickets into different types seems a good solution, and

 more flexible than simply 'bolting on' master tickets.
 Master tickets should be children of Milestone tickets, but not other

 Master tickets.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by anonymous):

 Who do I need to talif I want

 to help implement this?
 That would be me. I go by "coderanger" on IRC, and can be found there most

 of the time.A (simple) ticket can be attached

 to an (aggregate) ticket:
 •to a milestone, as it is done now (display in the combobox only available

 milestone tickets)
 •to a master ticket (display in that combobox only available master

 tickets) It remains to be seen if an

 (aggregate) ticket could itself be attached to another (aggregate)

 ticket... A master ticket attached to a milestone makes sense.
 [http://www.cc1c.com/ micro bikini]You're quite right - reworking the
 modules and

 breaking down the tickets into different types seems a good solution, and

 more flexible than simply 'bolting on' master tickets.
 Master tickets should be
  children of Milestone tickets, but not other

 Master tickets.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by anonymous):

 Who do I need to talk to if I want

 to help implement this?
 That would be me. I go by "coderanger" on IRC, and can be found there most

 of the time.
 [http://www.gln2008.com/ ed hardy]A (simple) ticket can be attached

 to an (aggregate) ticket:
 •to a milestone, as it is done now (display in the combobox only available

 milestone tickets)
 •to a master ticket (display in that combobox only available master

 tickets)
 It remains to be seen if an

 (aggregate) ticket could itself be attached to another (aggregate)

 ticket... A master ticket attached to a milestone makes seYou're quite
 right - reworking the modules and

 breaking down the tickets into different types seems a good solution, and

 more flexible than simply 'bolting on' master tickets.
 Master tickets should be children of Milestone tickets, but not other

 Master tickets.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by anonymous):

 Who do I need to talk to [http://www.guccishopping.com/ ed hardy]if I want

 to help implement this?
 That would be me. I go by "coderanger" on IRC, and can be found there most

 of the time.
 A (simple) ticket can be attached

 to an (aggregate) ticket:
 •to a milestone, as it is done now (display in the combobox only available

 milestone tickets)
 •to a master ticket (display in that combobox only available master

 tickets)
 It remains to be seen if an

 (aggregate) ticket could itself be attached to another (aggregate)

 ticket... A master ticket attached to a milestone makes sense.
 You're quite right - reworking the modules and

 breaking down the tickets into different types seems a good solution, and

 more flexible than simply 'bolting on' master tickets.
 Master tickets should be children of Milestone tickets, but not other

 Master tickets.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by juriejan):

 * cc: juriejanbo...@gmail.com (removed)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by anonymous):

 * cc: b...@usagebot.com (added)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by test):

 test

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by velmont):

 * cc: velmont (added)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=.

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by anonymous):

 Not choosing a js lib just wastes human resource.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by James Wheare):

 Um, hate to break it to you but... the admin already is a contrib app so
 I'm not sure choosing a JS library would suggest any sort of core
 endorsement of a library. It's possible to get too shackled to ideals of
 impartiality sometimes. Occasionally you know... building things is good.
 :)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by anonymous):

 "That's the way it seems to me too. But I believe there is a whole
 discussion on using too much Javascript in the standard shipment of
 Django. It seems to me that this would be better suited for distribution
 as a separate application. "

 Well obviously django doesnt want to favor any js lib but on the other
 hand it would be rather stupid to reinvent the wheel. I guess this is why
 this issue is still open. Obiviously this is a bad circle. We want nice js
 and ajax bells and whistles but we dont want to favor  any js lib (even if
 jquery is the best ;) the result? the admin will remain rigid. third party
 admins like http://code.google.com/p/sorl-curator/ will take over.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by juriejan):

 That's the way it seems to me too. But I believe there is a whole
 discussion on using too much Javascript in the standard shipment of
 Django. It seems to me that this would be better suited for distribution
 as a separate application.

 Let's continue the discussion at [http://groups.google.co.za/group/django-
 developers/browse_thread/thread/50dd66128b2f486f]

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by CollinAnderson):

 Correct me if I am wrong, but there are already some implementations out
 there using jQuery, and we just need to make our own implementation
 without requiring a library.

 http://www.arnebrodowski.de/blog/507-Add-and-remove-Django-Admin-Inlines-
 with-JavaScript.html

 http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/1053/ (Simon's Orderable inlines
 using drag and drop with jQuery UI)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by juriejan):

 * cc: juriejanbo...@gmail.com (added)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone: 
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by juriejan):

 i'm looking at implementing this. anyone made any progress that i can
 possibly build upon? should i start a discussion on django-developers
 about this?

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone:  post-1.0   
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by apollo13):

  * status:  closed => reopened
  * resolution:  fixed =>

Comment:

 anonymous having fun?!

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  closed| Milestone:  post-1.0   
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:  fixed |  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by anonymous):

  * status:  reopened => closed
  * resolution:  => fixed

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone:  post-1.0   
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by anonymous):

 * cc: steph...@harobed.org (added)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone:  post-1.0   
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by benhasek219):

 [http://six-pack-abs.0mbt.com/article/10/Does-Diet-Soda-Make-You-Fat%2C-
 or-is-it-Really-Good-for-Weight-Loss%3F.html Does Diet Soda Make You Fat,
 or is it Really Good for Weight Loss?]
 the nasty chemicals, the gut-fattening high fructose corn syrup, and a
 myriad of health problems caused by this carbonated cocktail worshipped by
 those that don't care about their health or body. Surprisingly, many
 people falsely believe that "diet" soda is in some way a good thing for
 losing body fat.
 Unusual bulges will always be distracting to the eyes.
 In fact, I hear people all the time proudly state that they eat so healthy
 and only drink diet soda.
 Cardiovascular training helps us lose weight and get fit.
 So let's set the record straight...

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone:  post-1.0   
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Comment (by patrickk):

 about a year ago, the status was "This ticket is not fixed, but very close
 ;)".
 any updates on this?

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: [Django] #13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)

[Django]

#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
---+
  Reporter:  adrian| Owner:  barbuza
   
Status:  reopened  | Milestone:  post-1.0   
   
 Component:  django.contrib.admin  |   Version:  SVN
   
Resolution:|  Keywords:  nfa-someday 
nfa-changelist
 Stage:  Accepted  | Has_patch:  0  
   
Needs_docs:  0 |   Needs_tests:  0  
   
Needs_better_patch:  1 |  
---+
Changes (by Guilherme M. Gondim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):

 * cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (added)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Django 
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---