Well done! I feel that rough consensus must be close.

> On Dec 2, 2023, at 5:10 AM, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> 
> On Fri 01/Dec/2023 21:06:24 +0100 Steven M Jones wrote:
>> There are only four open items on the issue tracker - though I think the SPF 
>> question 
>> (https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/issues/116) was 
>> resolved. But is that really all there is to do?
> 
> 
> I'd hope most of the other questions are solved as well.  Aren't they?
> 
> *auth* https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/issues/118
> This was rehashed in the end of October, when Scott explained how the correct 
> way to fix SPF is appropriate usage of qualifiers.  There seemed to be 
> agreement that such clarification deserves its own paragraph in DMARCbis, but 
> it never made it to rev 29.
> 
> *reject* https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/issues/115
> This was discussed ad nauseam.  My understanding is that participants 
> convinced that MUST NOT is right finally consented to accept Barry's text.
> 
> *define* https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/issues/96
> To say when people can hold they implement or enforce DMARC.  Seth proposed 
> some text in the beginning of April.  Don't recall the conclusion.  Do we 
> need to add text for this?
> 
> 
> We should review *aggregate reporting*.  For one point, we should add XML 
> documents to the normative references:
> 
> Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition)
> https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/
> 
> W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 1: Structures
> https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/
> 
> W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes
> https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/
> 
> There are a few other points which deserve a review, summarized in a thread 
> started by Olivier about mid November.  Should I create a new ticket for that?
> 
> 
> Best
> Ale
> --
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to