Re: [Dng] Building Postfix 3.0.1
On 06/06/15 12:37, Anto wrote: Hello Everybody, I have been trying to adapt the Debian build script of Postfix 2.11.3 for Postfix 3.0.1, but I still cannot have it compiled so far. Is there any of you manage to do that? If so, would you care to share the build script? Or do you have any information related to this? Thanks in advance for your help. Cheers, Anto I just found out that somebody has already done this for Ubuntu, https://launchpad.net/~mamarley/+archive/ubuntu/updates/+sourcepub/4943122/+listing-archive-extra. I will play around with tonight. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
[Dng] Building Postfix 3.0.1
Hello Everybody, I have been trying to adapt the Debian build script of Postfix 2.11.3 for Postfix 3.0.1, but I still cannot have it compiled so far. Is there any of you manage to do that? If so, would you care to share the build script? Or do you have any information related to this? Thanks in advance for your help. Cheers, Anto ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [Dng] straw poll, non-free firmware for installers
When we have to install a distro on special hardware (an old dell server?) it's always an annoying thing to use a second pc to download the ethernet drivers, copy them to an USB key and so on. Having them in on the same media, with the option to opt-out (so it's not mandatory for the user to install it if not wanted), IMHO it's a thing that can help the diffusion of our distro. Alberto On 06/06/15 19:29, Joel Roth wrote: On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:13:51AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote: From a legal point of view, I would also carefully refrain from redistributing any non-free firmware in Devuan, the main reason being that usually you *don't* have the right to redistribute it, and even if you have got this right from the HW constructor, such right can be withdrawn any moment at their own will, which might be a quite unpleasent surprise for Devuan... Hi KatolaZ and others, Since many other Linux distributions include firmware without any special agreement, I think there is a reasonable precedent for including such files, although certainly this could be more thoroughly researched. If, for considerations regarding free software, Devuan releases *two* boot disk images, I would suggest they be named something like DevuanWorksBetter.iso and DevuanMayWork.iso so that people will know what to expect. In which case, for manpower reasons, Devuan may opt to release only the WorksBetter version, and develop MayWork in response to future user demand or legal requirement. IMO, the decision will ultimately rest on those actually doing the work. Regards, Joel HND KatolaZ -- [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ] [ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ] [ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ] ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [Dng] straw poll, non-free firmware for installers
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:13:51AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote: From a legal point of view, I would also carefully refrain from redistributing any non-free firmware in Devuan, the main reason being that usually you *don't* have the right to redistribute it, and even if you have got this right from the HW constructor, such right can be withdrawn any moment at their own will, which might be a quite unpleasent surprise for Devuan... Hi KatolaZ and others, Since many other Linux distributions include firmware without any special agreement, I think there is a reasonable precedent for including such files, although certainly this could be more thoroughly researched. If, for considerations regarding free software, Devuan releases *two* boot disk images, I would suggest they be named something like DevuanWorksBetter.iso and DevuanMayWork.iso so that people will know what to expect. In which case, for manpower reasons, Devuan may opt to release only the WorksBetter version, and develop MayWork in response to future user demand or legal requirement. IMO, the decision will ultimately rest on those actually doing the work. Regards, Joel HND KatolaZ -- [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ] [ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ] [ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ] ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng -- Joel Roth ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
