Re: [DNG] routine ascii upgrade mysteriously on hold

2021-08-01 Thread Rod Rodolico via Dng
May not mean anything, but I quit using aptitude back with Jessie, I
think. Maybe ASCII. The main reason was exactly what you describe. There
was a major difference between what apt/apt-get did and what aptitude
did. It may not be maintained anymore, or maybe maintained, but not as
strongly, but appears to have settings that are not consistent with
apt/apt-get.

Recommend you just use apt update/apt [dist]upgrade and all your
problems could (maybe, possibly) go way.

Rod

On 8/1/21 10:33 AM, Bernard Rosset via Dng wrote:
> On 31/07/2021 22:03, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> I'm practicing upgrades on my spare laptop, getting ready for doing my
>> server
>> upgrade from ascii to beowulf..
>>
>> They are both running ascii.
>>
>> Starting, of course, by making the ascii up to date still as ascii,
>> before I try tye
>> upgrade to beowulf.
>>
>> Having trouble doing even this innocuous act.
>>
>> I tried starting by using interactive aptitude to just update and
>> upgrade.
> 
> After changing your sources to point to the new release, have you run
> "apt-get upgrade" or "apt-get dist-upgrade"?
> It looks to me as if you did the former.
> 
>> Only to discover that *every* package that might be upgraded was
>> "held", and could
>> therefore not be upgraded even though newer packages were available.
>>
>> What could be causing this?  Or rather, how should I go about trying
>> to track down
>> the origin of these holds/this mass hold?
> Packages might be held back in several situations, for instance when
> download fails or checksum mismatches. In your case I would guess it is
> because dependencies of the held back packages have changed.
> The "dist-upgrade" action handles that, not "upgrade".
> 
> To check your current state, you could always run "apt-get check" or
> "aptitude why-not ".
> 
> To fix the current situation, you could run the "dist-upgrade" action,
> which is the official, documented way of doing release upgrades (cf.
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.en.html#apt).
> That will also take care of the cleanup, ie will offer to remove packages.
> Check what it tells you to do before accepting (and maybe run it with
> the "--simulate" option?), especially having a look at the proposed
> packages removal.
> 
> You could also try "apt-get --with-new-pkgs upgrade", which should
> download the new dependencies (in case that is your problem), but I
> suspect it will leave litter behind.
> I suggest this only as a possibility, but would encourage you to follow
> the best practice stated above.
> 
> Bernard (Beer) Rosset
> https://rosset.net/
> ___
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

-- 
Rod Rodolico
Daily Data, Inc.
POB 140465
Dallas TX 75214-0465 US
http://dailydata.net
214.827.2170
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] routine ascii upgrade mysteriously on hold

2021-08-01 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 05:33:23PM +0200, Bernard Rosset via Dng wrote:
> On 31/07/2021 22:03, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > I'm practicing upgrades on my spare laptop, getting ready for doing my 
> > server
> > upgrade from ascii to beowulf..
> > 
> > They are both running ascii.
> > 
> > Starting, of course, by making the ascii up to date still as ascii, before 
> > I try tye
> > upgrade to beowulf.
> > 
> > Having trouble doing even this innocuous act.
> > 
> > I tried starting by using interactive aptitude to just update and upgrade.
> 
> After changing your sources to point to the new release,

I have not yet changed my sources.  I figured I should make sure the 
ascii system is up-to-date as an ascii system before I start to upgrade 
to beowulf.

> have you run
> "apt-get upgrade" or "apt-get dist-upgrade"?
> It looks to me as if you did the former.

I used the update and upgrade inside the interactive aptitude.

I guess I have to do dist-upgrade outside the interacctive aptitude.

> 
> > Only to discover that *every* package that might be upgraded was "held", 
> > and could
> > therefore not be upgraded even though newer packages were available.
> > 
> > What could be causing this?  Or rather, how should I go about trying to 
> > track down
> > the origin of these holds/this mass hold?
> Packages might be held back in several situations, for instance when
> download fails or checksum mismatches. In your case I would guess it is
> because dependencies of the held back packages have changed.
> The "dist-upgrade" action handles that, not "upgrade".
> 
> To check your current state, you could always run "apt-get check" or
> "aptitude why-not ".
> 
> To fix the current situation, you could run the "dist-upgrade" action, which
> is the official, documented way of doing release upgrades (cf.
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.en.html#apt). That
> will also take care of the cleanup, ie will offer to remove packages.
> Check what it tells you to do before accepting (and maybe run it with the
> "--simulate" option?), especially having a look at the proposed packages
> removal.
> 
> You could also try "apt-get --with-new-pkgs upgrade", which should download
> the new dependencies (in case that is your problem), but I suspect it will
> leave litter behind.
> I suggest this only as a possibility, but would encourage you to follow the
> best practice stated above.
> 
> Bernard (Beer) Rosset
> https://rosset.net/
> ___
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] routine ascii upgrade mysteriously on hold

2021-08-01 Thread Bernard Rosset via Dng

On 31/07/2021 22:03, Hendrik Boom wrote:

I'm practicing upgrades on my spare laptop, getting ready for doing my server
upgrade from ascii to beowulf..

They are both running ascii.

Starting, of course, by making the ascii up to date still as ascii, before I 
try tye
upgrade to beowulf.

Having trouble doing even this innocuous act.

I tried starting by using interactive aptitude to just update and upgrade.


After changing your sources to point to the new release, have you run 
"apt-get upgrade" or "apt-get dist-upgrade"?

It looks to me as if you did the former.


Only to discover that *every* package that might be upgraded was "held", and 
could
therefore not be upgraded even though newer packages were available.

What could be causing this?  Or rather, how should I go about trying to track 
down
the origin of these holds/this mass hold?
Packages might be held back in several situations, for instance when 
download fails or checksum mismatches. In your case I would guess it is 
because dependencies of the held back packages have changed.

The "dist-upgrade" action handles that, not "upgrade".

To check your current state, you could always run "apt-get check" or 
"aptitude why-not ".


To fix the current situation, you could run the "dist-upgrade" action, 
which is the official, documented way of doing release upgrades (cf. 
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.en.html#apt). 
That will also take care of the cleanup, ie will offer to remove packages.
Check what it tells you to do before accepting (and maybe run it with 
the "--simulate" option?), especially having a look at the proposed 
packages removal.


You could also try "apt-get --with-new-pkgs upgrade", which should 
download the new dependencies (in case that is your problem), but I 
suspect it will leave litter behind.
I suggest this only as a possibility, but would encourage you to follow 
the best practice stated above.


Bernard (Beer) Rosset
https://rosset.net/
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] routine ascii upgrade mysteriously on hold

2021-07-31 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 10:32:55AM +1000, terryc wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:03:53 -0400
> Hendrik Boom  wrote:
> 
> > I'm practicing upgrades on my spare laptop, getting ready for doing
> > my server upgrade from ascii to beowulf..
> > 
> > They are both running ascii.
> > 
> > Starting, of course, by making the ascii up to date still as ascii,
> > before I try tye upgrade to beowulf.
> > 
> > Having trouble doing even this innocuous act.
> > 
> > I tried starting by using interactive aptitude to just update and
> > upgrade. 
> > 
> > Only to discover that *every* package that might be upgraded was
> > "held", and could therefore not be upgraded even though newer
> > packages were available.
> > 
> > What could be causing this?  Or rather, how should I go about trying
> > to track down the origin of these holds/this mass hold?
> > 
> > 55 packagesin the list of packages held back.
> > and
> > 282 packages being "automatically held in their current state".
> 
> Could they require a  "dist-upgrade"
> IME, that usually deals with held packages.

I'll try that.

But I would like to get some idea why all the 
apparently upgradable packages are held.  I certainly don't
remember asking anything to be held.

-- hendrik

> 
> >
> ___
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] routine ascii upgrade mysteriously on hold

2021-07-31 Thread terryc
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:03:53 -0400
Hendrik Boom  wrote:

> I'm practicing upgrades on my spare laptop, getting ready for doing
> my server upgrade from ascii to beowulf..
> 
> They are both running ascii.
> 
> Starting, of course, by making the ascii up to date still as ascii,
> before I try tye upgrade to beowulf.
> 
> Having trouble doing even this innocuous act.
> 
> I tried starting by using interactive aptitude to just update and
> upgrade. 
> 
> Only to discover that *every* package that might be upgraded was
> "held", and could therefore not be upgraded even though newer
> packages were available.
> 
> What could be causing this?  Or rather, how should I go about trying
> to track down the origin of these holds/this mass hold?
> 
> 55 packagesin the list of packages held back.
> and
> 282 packages being "automatically held in their current state".

Could they require a  "dist-upgrade"?
IME, that usually deals with held packages.

>
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng