[dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries
hi, I hope you can help me on a not-so-related-to-DNS question. does the SLD .gov.* within european countries' ccTLDs identify only central government bodies and not local government or other public administrations as well? thank you -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries
On 6/12/18 1:32 PM, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > There are links to central government departments, local authorities, > statutory bodies, > state-supported services, and tourist attractions. I can't find any city as third level under .gov.ie. www.gov.ie seems a directory of links. so may I assume that just central government (and its departments of course) uses third level domains under .gov.ie? thank you -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries
On 6/12/18 1:43 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I guess most answers will be "it depends" :-) ok, just to recap: .gov.uk --> central and local .gov.ie --> central .gov.nl --> neither central nor local .go(u)v.fr --> central .gov.it --> central and local (to cancel local by the end of 2018) any other colleague from other countries wants to contribute? thank you -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries
On 6/13/18 9:27 AM, Rafał Galiński wrote: > The gov.pl domain is reserved for registration only for designated entities. > Subscribers of names in .gov.pl domain may be public authorities, > professional self-government bodies, etc .. hi, is it possible to sum that .gov.pl is not for central governments only, but also local (ie municipalities)? thank you -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries
On 6/14/18 7:09 AM, Peter Koch wrote: > I'm really curious what this little survey is really up to. hi, a 2009 law forced any italian public administration to acquire a domain name under the SLD .gov.it. instead, last february 2018 the italian digital agency (at the prime minister's office) determined that the domain name SLD .gov.it was dedicated to the exclusive use of the central government by premising that: 'the second level domain (SLD) ".gov", when used, identifies only the administrations within the EU and the USA (as the first level) central government, with the exception of the United Kingdom, and not without distinction any central and local public administration including educational institutions (for which the SLD ".edu" is used) as is the case today in Italy.' so now it happens that tens of thousands of institutions must abandon, by 2018, the domain name * .gov.it with the imaginable amount of issues that will last over time and with a series of unexpected costs. I would just like to clarify whether it is true that among the EU countries the SLD .gov.it is used EXCLUSIVELY for central government departments. at the moment it seems that: .gov.ie --> central .go(u)v.fr --> central .gov.gr --> central .gov.hu --> central .gov.uk --> central and local .gov.pl --> central and local .gov.tr --> central and local .gov.it --> central and local (to cancel local by the end of 2018) .gov.nl --> neither central nor local .gov.se --> neither central nor local .gov.de --> neither central nor local thank you -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries
On 6/25/18 12:38 AM, Peter Koch wrote: > Colleagues within CENTR (representing ccTLDs within Europe, but also > beyond as shown below) were kind enough to provide first hand information > for the following list of TLDs: Peter, thank you for this useful summary. I took a parallel survey during the two last weeks which I merged with your findings and put on this sheet: https://goo.gl/Hfb8Sc At the moment I had no reply from .at and .be thank you to everybody who helped -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
On 6/11/19 11:10 PM, Jonas Frey wrote: > This whole BCP (whatever that includes in detail) is nowhere > documented. hi, to be honest there is a meaningful BCP about the topic: RFC 5358, BCP 140, Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks. under "Recommended configuration" paragraph: In general, it is a good idea to keep recursive and authoritative services separate as much as practical. -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer to co-chair the DNS wg
On 10/1/19 9:07 AM, Dave Knight wrote: >> If selected again you have my commitment for the next 3-years. support -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] DNS reverse configuration
On 10/6/21 8:45 AM, ANTONETTI Gilles wrote: So, my question is it possible to declare 2 different DNS for delegation only for the /24 ? hi, NS delegations (at /16 or /24 for IPv4; at each nibble for IPv6) have no constraints. so you can differentiate at will your declarations in domain: objects. -- antonio OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
