[Dnsmasq-discuss] Multiple TLDs pointing to the same IP

2019-12-18 Thread john doe
Hi,

I'm planning to implement RFC 8375 on my home network.

For now I'm using '.home', I'm not sure how during the transition faze
the use of '.home' and '.home.arpa' can be use at the same time?

Assuming that it is possible, a general way to do it is prefered.

In other words, how can I make dnsmasq resolve 'box.try.home' and
'box.try.home.arpa' to the same IP, that is, useing '.home' and
'.home.arpa' interchangeably.

Any help is appriciated.

--
John Doe

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RFC 8735 and Dnsmasq

2019-12-18 Thread john doe
On 12/18/2019 11:29 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:46:22AM +0100, john doe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering what is the state of (1) with regard to Dnsmasq?
>>
>> Any help is appriciated.
>>
>> 1)  https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8375
>
> It works.
>
> Are you looking for something in particular?
>

As far as I understand it, HNCP will automatically manage IPv4/6 and I'm
not sure how Dnsmasq will come into play?

As the RFC suggest, for my home network I will change to '.home.arpa'.

Thanks for confirming that Dnsmasq works with '.home.arpa'.

--
John Doe

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RFC 8735 and Dnsmasq

2019-12-18 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:46:22AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering what is the state of (1) with regard to Dnsmasq?
> 
> Any help is appriciated.
> 
> 1)  https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8375

It works.

Are you looking for something in particular?

khm

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


[Dnsmasq-discuss] RFC 8735 and Dnsmasq

2019-12-18 Thread john doe
Hi,

I was wondering what is the state of (1) with regard to Dnsmasq?

Any help is appriciated.

1)  https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8375

--
John Doe

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss