Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Whitelist again, git bisect

2022-04-11 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:45:38PM +0200, William Edwards wrote:
> Kovács József via Dnsmasq-discuss schreef op 2022-04-11 13:28:
> > 
> > I downgraded the dnsmasq from 2.86 to 2.80 and whitelist is working.
> > 
> > What could be the difference, if the configuration files are same?
> > 
   ...
> > 
> > Could somebody help me?
> 
> You could help yourself by binary searching for the commit that caused the
> change in behaviour ;)
 
Use `git bisect` for it.  Here a snippet from `man git bisect`

   Basic bisect commands: start, bad, good
   As an example, suppose you are trying to find the commit that
   broke a feature that was known to work in version v2.6.13-rc2 of
   your project. You start a bisect session as follows:

   $ git bisect start
   $ git bisect bad # Current version is bad
   $ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2# v2.6.13-rc2 is known to be good

   Once you have specified at least one bad and one good commit, git
   bisect selects a commit in the middle of that range of history,
   checks it out, and outputs something similar to the following:

   Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this (roughly 10 steps)

   You should now compile the checked-out version and test it. If
   that version works correctly, type

   $ git bisect good

   If that version is broken, type

   $ git bisect bad



> > Thank you very much, in advance!

Yes, we are looking forward  you reporting back.



Groeten
Geert Stappers

P.S.
@József your system clock is some hours ahead, please adjust it.
-- 
Silence is hard to parse

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Whitelist again

2022-04-11 Thread William Edwards

Kovács József via Dnsmasq-discuss schreef op 2022-04-11 13:28:

Hello All,

I downgraded the dnsmasq from 2.86 to 2.80 and whitelist is working.

What could be the difference, if the configuration files are same?

These are is my configuration files:

kovacsj@laptop:~# cat /tmp/cmr/ap_dnsmasq_v1p1.5.conf
no-hosts
except-interface=lo
bind-interfaces
pid-file=/var/run/dnsmasq_v1p1.5.pid
dhcp-leasefile=/var/run/dnsmasq_v1p1.5.leases
log-facility=/var/log/lwuci/dnsmasq_v1p1.5.log
interface=v1p1.5
dhcp-range=192.168.5.11,192.168.5.91,255.255.255.0
servers-file=/tmp/cmr/filtering.conf

kovacsj@laptop:~# cat /tmp/cmr/filtering.conf
server=/robotszoft.hu/#
server=/#/
kovacsj@laptop:~#

The robotszoft.hu website is reachable, but the any others are not.

This is the desired result, but in the 2.86 version, it is not
working.

Could somebody help me?


You could help yourself by binary searching for the commit that caused 
the change in behaviour ;)




Thank you very much, in advance!
--
Üdvözlettel:
Kovács József

-
 villamosmérnök
informatikus
programozó
PLC programozó
etikus hacker
Cert:ECC7512963840
Tel: +36703146459
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


--
With kind regards,

William Edwards


___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


[Dnsmasq-discuss] Whitelist again

2022-04-11 Thread Kovács József via Dnsmasq-discuss

Hello All,

I downgraded the dnsmasq from 2.86 to 2.80 and whitelist is working.

What could be the difference, if the configuration files are same?

These are is my configuration files:

kovacsj@laptop:~# cat /tmp/cmr/ap_dnsmasq_v1p1.5.conf
no-hosts
except-interface=lo
bind-interfaces
pid-file=/var/run/dnsmasq_v1p1.5.pid
dhcp-leasefile=/var/run/dnsmasq_v1p1.5.leases
log-facility=/var/log/lwuci/dnsmasq_v1p1.5.log
interface=v1p1.5
dhcp-range=192.168.5.11,192.168.5.91,255.255.255.0
servers-file=/tmp/cmr/filtering.conf

kovacsj@laptop:~# cat /tmp/cmr/filtering.conf
server=/robotszoft.hu/#
server=/#/
kovacsj@laptop:~#

The robotszoft.hu website is reachable, but the any others are not.

This is the desired result, but in the 2.86 version, it is not working.

Could somebody help me?

Thank you very much, in advance!

--
Üdvözlettel:
Kovács József

villamosmérnök
informatikus
programozó
PLC programozó
etikus hacker
Cert:ECC7512963840
Tel: +36703146459___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss