Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP over 2 NICs
Hallo, Oliver, Du meintest am 28.02.12: dnsmasq finds the right interface with the static address automaticly. If you write interface=.. you discard the use of the others. Simply delete the interface=.. line and your dnsmasq should run fine. Doesn't help - sorry. One detail: with the interface=lo lines mailing with Thunderbird (from the clients) works. Without it: no mailing. Viele Gruesse! Helmut ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP over 2 NICs
Hallo Helmut! On 29 Feb 2012 11:14:00 +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote: [..] Additional experiments: the system needs interface=lo interface=eth0 interface=eth1 Otherwise mailing with Thunderbird (over eth0) doesn't work, getting a DHCP IP address (for the eth0 net) doesn't work. Im not sure, what your intention is for the use of dnsmasq. What do you want to acchieve? How many computers are in your network? What is the error from thunderbird? Is it an IP-error or an DNS-error? How is your routing table? What stands in /etc/resolv.conf? Regards, Oliver ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP over 2 NICs
Hi Helmut, It looks like you dont need the dns-functionality of dnsmasq. So maybe you would feel more comfortable with the original dhcp-server (version 3), where the configuration language is more explizit as in dnsmasq (@dnsmasq-develoopers: your program is great, Im using it excessivly, especially the script triggering, but in this special case the alternative dhcpd could be the better decision). Especially you can determine the interface explicitly in conjunction with the range. Hth Oliver ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP over 2 NICs
Hallo, Oliver, Du meintest am 28.02.12: dnsmasq finds the right interface with the static address automaticly. If you write interface=.. you discard the use of the others. Simply delete the interface=.. line and your dnsmasq should run fine. Just for curiosity: a) should we delete a line interface=lo too? b) what about a line for the special NIC for the router/modem: no-dhcp-interface=eth2 Viele Gruesse! Helmut ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP over 2 NICs
Hallo, Oliver, Du meintest am 28.02.12: Just for curiosity: a) should we delete a line interface=lo too? Yes, of course. [...] b) what about a line for the special NIC for the router/modem: no-dhcp-interface=eth2 This is the opposite option of interface=.. Here you can explicitly exclude interfaces from _DHCP_ service (not DNS service!). This can be senseful in some cases. Thank you! Viele Gruesse! Helmut ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
