On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Ralf Weber <d...@fl1ger.de> wrote: > Yes. I used the term hidden primary in the past, and technically there > would be no reason for a setup hidden primary -> primary -> secondaries, as > you have two single point of failure (SPOF) there. I wouldn't deploy that. > For me these words (master/primary, slave/secondary) alway have been > synonyms.
hidden primary (with failover in place) --> signer (again with failover in place) --> Published authoritative nameservers Just to provide a technical context in which that configuration does make technical sense. Scott
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
