Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

[Rob Sayre]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 8:17 AM Olli Vanhoja  wrote:

>
> SVCB is active almost every day of the week in GitHub.
>

If someone wanted to follow this work, which GitHub repo is relevant?

I found this one: https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc

But I'm not sure that's the right one.

thanks,
Rob
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

[Tommy Pauly]

+1 to the liveness of SVCB. As seen in the work on GitHub, there’s engagement 
from people working on ESNI and other use cases. I’ve been following the draft 
on GitHub and testing implementations, for example.

Tommy

> On Feb 18, 2020, at 10:07 AM, Eric Orth 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hasn't been discussed much lately on this list (I keep meaning to get back to 
> the chain-length discussion from a month or so back), but SVCB is definitely 
> very much still alive.  Lots of work is going on in its github to prepare the 
> next draft, so I assume we'll have another round of discussions here soon 
> whenever that is ready.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:17 AM Olli Vanhoja  > wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 16:20 Klaus Malorny  > wrote:
> 
> I asked myself about the status of the two drafts. I got the impression a 
> little 
> bit that the svcb/httpsvc draft successfully killed the aname draft, but is 
> now 
> dying slowly itself. It would be great if somebody could give me some insight 
> whether the one or the other has still a measurable heartbeat, to stay with 
> the 
> allegories ;-)
> 
> SVCB is active almost every day of the week in GitHub.
> 
> I can't talk on behalf of the authors of the ANAME draft, but to me it seems 
> that SVCB is getting more traction and it addresses the core problems that 
> ANAME was supposed to solve.
> 
> ___
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop 
> 
> ___
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

[Olli Vanhoja]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 16:20 Klaus Malorny  wrote:

>
> I asked myself about the status of the two drafts. I got the impression a
> little
> bit that the svcb/httpsvc draft successfully killed the aname draft, but
> is now
> dying slowly itself. It would be great if somebody could give me some
> insight
> whether the one or the other has still a measurable heartbeat, to stay
> with the
> allegories ;-)
>

SVCB is active almost every day of the week in GitHub.

I can't talk on behalf of the authors of the ANAME draft, but to me it
seems that SVCB is getting more traction and it addresses the core problems
that ANAME was supposed to solve.
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

[DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

[Klaus Malorny]

Hi all,

I asked myself about the status of the two drafts. I got the impression a little 
bit that the svcb/httpsvc draft successfully killed the aname draft, but is now 
dying slowly itself. It would be great if somebody could give me some insight 
whether the one or the other has still a measurable heartbeat, to stay with the 
allegories ;-)


Thanks & greetings,

Klaus

___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop