Re: [DNSOP] Moving WG documents forward
On 31/07/2021 18:38, Paul Hoffman wrote: On Jul 31, 2021, at 4:45 AM, Benno Overeinder wrote: For the individual drafts, the DNSOP chairs will contact the authors and discuss the way forward with the WG. During the meeting, there was a call for more transparency, and co-chair Tim strongly agreed with it. Please strongly consider reversing those two steps: discuss the way forward with the WG, *then* contact the authors (who should be following the WG anyway...). In the unlikely-but-possible case where the WG wants to move forward on a draft and none of the current authors want to do so, the chairs can ask the list for new volunteer editors. Agree that the WG determines what happens to a document and that is discussed by the WG, that is clear. It was merely a sign of courtesy to contact the authors of the document first to let them know that it will be discussed. -- Benno ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Re: [DNSOP] Moving WG documents forward
> 31 июля 2021 г., в 19:38, Paul Hoffman написал(а): > > On Jul 31, 2021, at 4:45 AM, Benno Overeinder wrote: >> For the individual drafts, the DNSOP chairs will contact the authors and >> discuss the way forward with the WG. > > During the meeting, there was a call for more transparency, and co-chair Tim > strongly agreed with it. > > Please strongly consider reversing those two steps: discuss the way forward > with the WG, *then* contact the authors (who should be following the WG > anyway...). In the unlikely-but-possible case where the WG wants to move > forward on a draft and none of the current authors want to do so, the chairs > can ask the list for new volunteer editors. Funny thing when authors are alive, but cannot understand the reason why draft is silently postponed until no time… Really more transparency is welcome… dol@ > > --Paul Hoffman___ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
[DNSOP] Moving WG documents forward
On Jul 31, 2021, at 4:45 AM, Benno Overeinder wrote: > For the individual drafts, the DNSOP chairs will contact the authors and > discuss the way forward with the WG. During the meeting, there was a call for more transparency, and co-chair Tim strongly agreed with it. Please strongly consider reversing those two steps: discuss the way forward with the WG, *then* contact the authors (who should be following the WG anyway...). In the unlikely-but-possible case where the WG wants to move forward on a draft and none of the current authors want to do so, the chairs can ask the list for new volunteer editors. --Paul Hoffman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Re: [DNSOP] Moving forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-tld
On 30/07/2021 19:29, Paul Wouters wrote: > We are seeing the WG dropping actual protocol work because of these > discussions. If only we had a working group for discussing DNS Extensions... Ray ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Re: [DNSOP] Moving forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-tld
Hi Paul, Working Group, On 30/07/2021 20:43, Paul Wouters wrote: So was draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-only until it was killed yesterday due to lack of time because we had to spend it on political discussions with ISO liaisons. To be clear, the discussion of the poll and priorities was informative and no decisions have been made about dropping WG documents yet. Your argument that the document got delayed due to other more pressing drafts is acknowledged. We also hold off the suggestion to raise hands for alt-tld draft in a similar way. The poll helped the discussion, but is only part of the discussion. For the individual drafts, the DNSOP chairs will contact the authors and discuss the way forward with the WG. Best regards, -- Benno ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
