[DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/ -- COMMENT: -- Thank you for the work put into this document. As a side note, I think it is the first I-D that I read that uses the RFC 6761 'test.' ;-) No specific comments but I wanted to thank two people in addition to the authors. Special thanks to Suzanne Woolf for the shepherd's detailed write-up including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status. Other thanks to Tim Winters, the Internet directorate reviewer (at my request), please consider this int-dir review: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08-intdir-telechat-winters-2023-05-31/ Regards, -éric ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
[DNSOP] dnsop - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 117
An update to a meeting session request has just been submitted by Tim Wicinski, a Chair of the DNSOP Working Group. - Working Group Name: Domain Name System Operations Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Tim Wicinski Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 2 Hours Number of Attendees: 160 Conflicts to Avoid: Chair conflict: dance add dprive dkim dbound2 Technology overlap: quic dinrg lamps maprg 6man dhc regext intarea dnssd dmarc mimi Participants who must be present: Resources Requested: Special Requests: - ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
[DNSOP] Fwd: NomCom 2023 Call for Volunteers
DNSOP/DPRIVE Martin Thompson is chairing this year's version of the IETF Nominating Committee. It's a good thing to volunteer, and I can speak strongly on the fact that 10+ years of volunteering, and I have not been selected(*). tim (8) Now that I've said that -- Forwarded message - From: NomCom Chair 2023 Date: Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 7:50 PM Subject: NomCom 2023 Call for Volunteers To: IETF Announcement List The IETF Nominating Committee (NomCom) appoints people to fill the open slots on the IETF LLC, IETF Trust, the IAB, and the IESG. Ten voting members for the NomCom are selected from a pool of volunteers. A large pool of volunteers helps make the process work better. CLICK HERE TO VOLUNTEER: https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/volunteer NomCom activity is expected to start in July and run through to November. The goal is to do the bulk of the work at IETF 117 and 118, with supplemental conference calls between those times. Remote participation will be supported. The NomCom activities involve collecting requirements from the community, reviewing candidate responses, reviewing feedback from community members about candidates, interviewing candidates, and nominating a slate of candidates. RFC 8713 details the NomCom process. With the recent publication of RFC 9389, this is the first year of new qualification criteria, after a few years of trials. People qualify for NomCom participation in one of three ways: attendance at IETF meetings (online or virtual), service as a working group chair or secretary, or publication of IETF RFCs. https://datatracker.ietf.org/accounts/profile/ lists your eligibility, but you can still volunteer even if that says "No". You can also volunteer by sending me an email. Within the next week or two, I will add more details on the timeline and the selection process. Thank you! Martin Thomson nomcom-chair-2...@ietf.org ___ IETF-Announce mailing list ietf-annou...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
[DNSOP] Domain Name System Operations (dnsop) WG Virtual Meeting: 2023-06-20
The Domain Name System Operations (dnsop) WG will hold a virtual interim meeting on 2023-06-20 from 20:00 to 21:00 Europe/Amsterdam (18:00 to 19:00 UTC). Agenda: ## Agenda ### Administrivia * Agenda Bashing, Blue Sheets, etc, 5 min ### Current Working Group Business * DNS Terminology and definition "lame delegation" - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis/ - WG Chairs, Paul Hoffman and Kazunori Fujiwara, 55 min - Chairs Action: Information about remote participation: https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=7e86a1ea-71f7-40c0-8c34-eb16a1a57a6e -- A calendar subscription for all dnsop meetings is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.ics?show=dnsop ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP WG Interim June 2023 planning: draft-ietf-dnsop rfc8499bis and lame delegation
Dear WG, From the Doodle poll, we have selected the following day and time: Tuesday June 20, 18:00-19:00 UTC. We will post the interim meetecho details to the mailing list later today. Best regards, Suzanne, Tim and Benno On 30/05/2023 17:31, Benno Overeinder wrote: Hi WG, Gentle reminder to fill in the doodle to schedule the interim in June. Will extend the poll until Thursday, June 1! -- Benno On 24/05/2023 16:11, Benno Overeinder wrote: Dear WG, As mentioned earlier on the mailing list, the chairs are planning an interim meeting in June to discuss the three options on how to proceed with draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis wrt. lame delegation: 1) Stick with the current text in the document – the original definition from RFC8499 plus a note that "These early definitions do not match the current use of the term "lame delegation", but there is no consensus on what a lame delegation is." A possible follow-up to this is for someone to start a WG consensus document on "lame", which can update 8499bis. 2) We still find a rough consensus on the definition proposed in the "Meaning of lame delegation" email thread, and the WG can agree that this is a definition useful to DNS engineers/operators. 3) Withdraw the document from WGLC so we can add definitions. Do not propose any new terms and definitions at this stage if we choose this option. Please fill in the Doodle poll to settle on a day and time: - https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/az7Z5AOb The options for the time slots are a compromise for CEST/EDT/PDT/AEST/JST. We will close the Doodle poll at the end of Tuesday 30 May. Best regards, Suzanne, Tim and Benno ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/ ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
