[DNSOP] IETF 120 Call for Agenda Items DNSOP WG

2024-06-13 Thread Benno Overeinder

Dear WG,

This is a Call for Agenda Items for the IETF 120 in Vancouver, Canada.

DNSOP has requested two 1.5-hour sessions for IETF 120 and we expect to 
have ample time to discuss the various concepts.  The schedule of these 
sessions will be confirmed when the preliminary IETF 120 agenda is 
published next week on 21 June.


Please email the chairs  with your requests. 
*Or* drop us a pull request 
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/wg-materials/tree/main/dnsop-ietf120 
look for dnsop-ietf120-agenda-requests.md.


Please Note: Draft Submission Deadline is Monday 8 July 2024.

See https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/important-dates/:
2024-07-08	Monday	Internet-Draft submission cut-off (for all 
Internet-Drafts, including -00) by UTC 23:59. Upload using the I-D 
Submission Tool https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/.


Thanks,

Suzanne
Tim
Benno

___
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org


[DNSOP] Re: [DNSOP]Re: [Ext] Requesting final comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis

2024-06-13 Thread Paul Hoffman
One more nudge on this, before the deadline tomorrow.

--Paul Hoffman


On Jun 5, 2024, at 09:28, Paul Hoffman  wrote:
> 
> Tim jumped the gun by about an hour: we just submitted the -05. It 
> incorporates the suggested text from below; you can see the diff at:
>https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-05
> 
> FWIW, this new text is somewhat based on the findings from NLnetLabs and SIDN 
> on a project supported by ICANN. You can see the report, and an earlier 
> report on a related topic, at:
>   
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/octo-commissioned-documents-2020-11-05-en
> 
> Please let us know if you have any issues with the changed text in the new 
> version.   
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> 
> 
> On Jun 5, 2024, at 08:25, Tim Wicinski  wrote:
>> 
>> All
>> 
>> The chairs are requesting some final comments on 
>> draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis. As you might recall, this document has already 
>> been through WGLC and had consensus to advance, but our AD reviewed it and 
>> raised some additional questions. (Warren Kumari, “AD Review of 
>> draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis,” email to the list on 31 January.)

___
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org