One more nudge on this, before the deadline tomorrow.
--Paul Hoffman
On Jun 5, 2024, at 09:28, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> Tim jumped the gun by about an hour: we just submitted the -05. It
> incorporates the suggested text from below; you can see the diff at:
>https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-05
>
> FWIW, this new text is somewhat based on the findings from NLnetLabs and SIDN
> on a project supported by ICANN. You can see the report, and an earlier
> report on a related topic, at:
>
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/octo-commissioned-documents-2020-11-05-en
>
> Please let us know if you have any issues with the changed text in the new
> version.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2024, at 08:25, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>
>> All
>>
>> The chairs are requesting some final comments on
>> draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis. As you might recall, this document has already
>> been through WGLC and had consensus to advance, but our AD reviewed it and
>> raised some additional questions. (Warren Kumari, “AD Review of
>> draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis,” email to the list on 31 January.)
___
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org