Re: [DNSOP] New version of the DNS terminology draft

2015-02-04 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
A few years ago at ISC, we spent some hours discussing that the generic 
term "forwarders" really had multiple different meanings:

https://www.isc.org/blogs/dns-forwarders/

(To give credit, I think most of that is from Jelte and Shane.)

___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00

2009-09-02 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:

> Now, I'm testing "On the Fly" generation of PTR and  RRs and "On
> the Fly" signing using perl + Net::DNS::SEC.

I notice it creates a new signature for same look up everytime. So the 
inception and expiration is increased immediately. Would it make sense to 
possibly attempt to cache these generated signatures for the most 
frequent requests? Or is it better to just have a caching server in front 
of the "On the Fly" DNS server? Or just rely on others to cache (since we 
assume that won't hit the authoritative again for same query).

Also any benchmarks on how fast it can sign on the fly?

It would be great if you can make the newer script available too (the one 
using Net::DNS::SEC).

Thanks
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop