Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance
Paul Hoffman writes: > One note: the first paragraph in Section 2.4 is misplaced. Section 2 > is about considerations while Section 3 is about recommendations. The > first paragraph of Section 2.4 should be moved to Section 3.1, > probably as the second paragraph there. Moved to the end of the 3.1 section, fyi, and integrated with other salt discussions there. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance
I have re-read this document after not reading it for a long time. It is in excellent shape and should be sent to the IETF to become a BCP. One note: the first paragraph in Section 2.4 is misplaced. Section 2 is about considerations while Section 3 is about recommendations. The first paragraph of Section 2.4 should be moved to Section 3.1, probably as the second paragraph there. I'm sending the authors some strictly-editorial proposals in the repo. --Paul Hoffman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
