[DNSOP] AS112 and IPv6

2010-03-08 Thread William F. Maton Sotomayor


Greetings all,

	There's some light discussion on the as112-ops mailing list about 
whether or not AS112 should start doing a further two things:


- start replying using IPv6 transport
- amass more delegations for network blocks, like those enumerated in
  rfc5735.

Given that the other two drafts on AS112 are already along the path to 
getting considered beyond the WGLC, would it be prudent to generate a 
third draft specific to these issues?


Thanks,

wfms
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


Re: [DNSOP] AS112 and IPv6

2010-03-08 Thread Alfred Hönes
At Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:27:20 -0500 (EST), William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:

 ...

 Given that the other two drafts on AS112 are already along the path
 to getting considered beyond the WGLC, would it be prudent to
 generate a third draft specific to these issues? 

Nicely said.
This indeed again raises the question where these drafts actually are.
If we don't understand that, it is difficult to answer such questions.

And *I* don't understand, actually; I thought they ought to have
passed the IESG since months, but the datatracker does not even
indicate Publication requested.  
Where's the problem?

Kind regards,
  Alfred.

___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


Re: [DNSOP] AS112 and IPv6

2010-03-08 Thread William F. Maton Sotomayor

On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Alfred HÎnes wrote:


At Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:27:20 -0500 (EST), William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:

Given that the other two drafts on AS112 are already along the path
to getting considered beyond the WGLC, would it be prudent to
generate a third draft specific to these issues?


Nicely said.
This indeed again raises the question where these drafts actually are.


As I recall one had gone to WGLC, the other was pending.


And *I* don't understand, actually; I thought they ought to have
passed the IESG since months, but the datatracker does not even
indicate Publication requested.
Where's the problem?


I think it's still in limbo somewhere between the above.  I know the WG 
Chairs were pretty apoloetic about their status about 18 months ago.


wfms___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop