Re: [DNSOP] review of draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help-00
Dean Anderson wrote: It seems obvious, that when faced with significant problems in the current approach, it is relevant to consider whether that approach still makes sense. Blindly continuing a practice merely because it was done before is the essense of foolhardiness. [I suspect that should be attributed to someone, but I can't think who] Most relevant quote I know: It is revolting to have no better reason for a rule of law than that so it was laid down in the time of Henry IV. It is still more revolting if the grounds upon which it was laid down have vanished long since, and the rule simply persists from blind imitation of the past. Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law - Kevin ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Re: [DNSOP] review of draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help-00
On 23-Mar-2007, at 23:53, Dean Anderson wrote: There is a much simpler way to get around all these problems: Delegate these zones to 127.0.0.1. There are arguments for and against both approaches. However, the working group's AS112 drafts which are currently under discussion aim to document operational aspects of an existing service, not to assess the effectiveness of or provide justification for the AS112 project as a whole. As such, in the context of working group review of the two currently- active AS112 drafts, I don't believe your comments are relevant. Joe ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
