Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: DOCBOOK: Minutes: DocBookTechnicalCommitteeMeeting: 21 Aug 2001

[Bob Stayton]

> From: Jirka Kosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Norman Walsh wrote:
> > 
> > / Jirka Kosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > | But if we stay with DTDs how many variants we should produce?
> > 
> > When the TC adopts a linking proposal, we will have DocBook+Linking.
> > Then MathML, SVG, etc. will just be bolt-on modules. It'll all work
> > more-or-less OK. (The caveat being mixed prefixes for the same namespace.)
> 
> OK. Sounds reasonably. But if I would want use both MathML and SVG with
> DocBook, I will need to combine these two customizations manually and
> create new one. Right?  

Perhaps this is getting too far ahead of the TC, but
could someone please address the document portability
issues for this idea of bolt-on components for the DTD?
The nice thing about a single DocBook DTD is that documents
are portable.  Are you suggesting that each document turn
on the extra DTD components it needs by setting an INCLUDE
parameter entity in its DOCTYPE declaration?  And will the
stylesheets support all of the components simulaneously, or
will parameters have to be passed at runtime to get the
appropriate templates?

bobs
Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect  Santa Cruz, CA  95060
Technical Publications  voice: (831) 427-7796
Caldera International, Inc. fax:   (831) 429-1887
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: 

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: DOCBOOK: Minutes: DocBookTechnicalCommitteeMeeting: 21 Aug 2001

[Norman Walsh]

/ Jirka Kosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| OK. Sounds reasonably. But if I would want use both MathML and SVG with
| DocBook, I will need to combine these two customizations manually and
| create new one. Right?  

Yes, but it's as simple as turning on two PEs.

Be seeing you,
  norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  | To what excesses will men not go
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | for the sake of a religion in
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | which they believe so little and
   | which they practice so
   | imperfectly!--La Bruy\`ere


To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: 

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: DOCBOOK: Minutes: DocBookTechnicalCommitteeMeeting: 21 Aug 2001

[Jirka Kosek]

Norman Walsh wrote:
> 
> / Jirka Kosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | But if we stay with DTDs how many variants we should produce?
> 
> When the TC adopts a linking proposal, we will have DocBook+Linking.
> Then MathML, SVG, etc. will just be bolt-on modules. It'll all work
> more-or-less OK. (The caveat being mixed prefixes for the same namespace.)

OK. Sounds reasonably. But if I would want use both MathML and SVG with
DocBook, I will need to combine these two customizations manually and
create new one. Right?  

-
  Jirka Kosek
  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.kosek.cz


To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: