Re: [DOLFIN-dev] [FEniCS-users] Question of Dolfin 0.9.2
Johan Hake wrote: > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:16:59 Marie Rognes wrote: > >> Jehanzeb Hameed wrote: >> >>> Attaching the files. >>> >> I get the same result for the two form files with a DOLFIN > 0.9.3: >> >> Curl error is 223.93 >> Alt Curl error is 223.93 >> >> In other words, try upgrading :) >> >> >> For future reference: Since the issue at hand was comparing the two >> curl implementations, the test could have been further simplified >> by for instance saving the solution u and just sending the solution, >> the two ResCurl*.form files and a simplified main.cpp >> > > While at it, could you take a look at the curl-curl demo too? On my computer > it produces highly different results for cpp and python. Python takes forever > and gives weird results. > > I'm sitting lazily at Dolfin 7173:fd4071fe9460. The curl-curl demo gives the same result for cpp and python there... -- Marie ___ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Re: [DOLFIN-dev] [FEniCS-users] Question of Dolfin 0.9.2
On Friday 09 October 2009 06:35:26 Marie Rognes wrote: > Johan Hake wrote: > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:16:59 Marie Rognes wrote: > >> Jehanzeb Hameed wrote: > >>> Attaching the files. > >> > >> I get the same result for the two form files with a DOLFIN > 0.9.3: > >> > >> Curl error is 223.93 > >> Alt Curl error is 223.93 > >> > >> In other words, try upgrading :) > >> > >> > >> For future reference: Since the issue at hand was comparing the two > >> curl implementations, the test could have been further simplified > >> by for instance saving the solution u and just sending the solution, > >> the two ResCurl*.form files and a simplified main.cpp > > > > While at it, could you take a look at the curl-curl demo too? On my > > computer it produces highly different results for cpp and python. Python > > takes forever and gives weird results. > > I'm sitting lazily at Dolfin 7173:fd4071fe9460. > > The curl-curl demo gives the same result for cpp and python there... Someone else that have problems with the python curl-curl demo? Johan ___ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Re: [DOLFIN-dev] [FEniCS-users] Question of Dolfin 0.9.2
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:20:24PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:35:26 Marie Rognes wrote: > > Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:16:59 Marie Rognes wrote: > > >> Jehanzeb Hameed wrote: > > >>> Attaching the files. > > >> > > >> I get the same result for the two form files with a DOLFIN > 0.9.3: > > >> > > >> Curl error is 223.93 > > >> Alt Curl error is 223.93 > > >> > > >> In other words, try upgrading :) > > >> > > >> > > >> For future reference: Since the issue at hand was comparing the two > > >> curl implementations, the test could have been further simplified > > >> by for instance saving the solution u and just sending the solution, > > >> the two ResCurl*.form files and a simplified main.cpp > > > > > > While at it, could you take a look at the curl-curl demo too? On my > > > computer it produces highly different results for cpp and python. Python > > > takes forever and gives weird results. > > > > I'm sitting lazily at Dolfin 7173:fd4071fe9460. > > > > The curl-curl demo gives the same result for cpp and python there... > > Someone else that have problems with the python curl-curl demo? Works very nicely in both C++ and Python for me. instant-clean? -- Anders signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Re: [DOLFIN-dev] [FEniCS-users] Question of Dolfin 0.9.2
On Thursday 08 October 2009 22:39:52 Anders Logg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:20:24PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:35:26 Marie Rognes wrote: > > > Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:16:59 Marie Rognes wrote: > > > >> Jehanzeb Hameed wrote: > > > >>> Attaching the files. > > > >> > > > >> I get the same result for the two form files with a DOLFIN > 0.9.3: > > > >> > > > >> Curl error is 223.93 > > > >> Alt Curl error is 223.93 > > > >> > > > >> In other words, try upgrading :) > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> For future reference: Since the issue at hand was comparing the two > > > >> curl implementations, the test could have been further simplified > > > >> by for instance saving the solution u and just sending the solution, > > > >> the two ResCurl*.form files and a simplified main.cpp > > > > > > > > While at it, could you take a look at the curl-curl demo too? On my > > > > computer it produces highly different results for cpp and python. > > > > Python takes forever and gives weird results. > > > > > > I'm sitting lazily at Dolfin 7173:fd4071fe9460. > > > > > > The curl-curl demo gives the same result for cpp and python there... > > > > Someone else that have problems with the python curl-curl demo? > > Works very nicely in both C++ and Python for me. > > instant-clean? Have done that... Output from Python (With all JIT calls removed): UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh Solving linear variational problem Matrix of size 21424 x 21424 has 872288 nonzero entries. Applying boundary conditions to linear system. Solving linear system of size 21424 x 21424 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). Solving linear variational problem Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). Plot active, press 'q' to continue. And output from C++: UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh Solving linear variational problem Matrix of size 4184 x 4184 has 61784 nonzero entries. Applying boundary conditions to linear system. Solving linear system of size 4184 x 4184 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). Solving linear variational problem Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). Plotting x (unnamed data), press 'q' to continue... As you can see is the assembled matrix ~12 times the size of the matrix in C++. Same size of Mesh, and same element degrees... I have latest everything... Johan > -- > Anders > ___ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Re: [DOLFIN-dev] [FEniCS-users] Question of Dolfin 0.9.2
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:19:23PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > On Thursday 08 October 2009 22:39:52 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:20:24PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:35:26 Marie Rognes wrote: > > > > Johan Hake wrote: > > > > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:16:59 Marie Rognes wrote: > > > > >> Jehanzeb Hameed wrote: > > > > >>> Attaching the files. > > > > >> > > > > >> I get the same result for the two form files with a DOLFIN > 0.9.3: > > > > >> > > > > >> Curl error is 223.93 > > > > >> Alt Curl error is 223.93 > > > > >> > > > > >> In other words, try upgrading :) > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> For future reference: Since the issue at hand was comparing the two > > > > >> curl implementations, the test could have been further simplified > > > > >> by for instance saving the solution u and just sending the solution, > > > > >> the two ResCurl*.form files and a simplified main.cpp > > > > > > > > > > While at it, could you take a look at the curl-curl demo too? On my > > > > > computer it produces highly different results for cpp and python. > > > > > Python takes forever and gives weird results. > > > > > > > > I'm sitting lazily at Dolfin 7173:fd4071fe9460. > > > > > > > > The curl-curl demo gives the same result for cpp and python there... > > > > > > Someone else that have problems with the python curl-curl demo? > > > > Works very nicely in both C++ and Python for me. > > > > instant-clean? > > Have done that... > > Output from Python (With all JIT calls removed): > > UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh > Solving linear variational problem > Matrix of size 21424 x 21424 has 872288 nonzero entries. > Applying boundary conditions to linear system. > Solving linear system of size 21424 x 21424 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > Solving linear variational problem > Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. > Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > Plot active, press 'q' to continue. Here's my Python outpout: UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh Solving linear variational problem Matrix of size 4184 x 4184 has 61784 nonzero entries. Applying boundary conditions to linear system. Solving linear system of size 4184 x 4184 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). Solving linear variational problem Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). Plot active, press 'q' to continue. Do you have the latest versions of all packages? -- Anders > And output from C++: > > UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh > Solving linear variational problem > Matrix of size 4184 x 4184 has 61784 nonzero entries. > Applying boundary conditions to linear system. > Solving linear system of size 4184 x 4184 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > Solving linear variational problem > Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. > Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > Plotting x (unnamed data), press 'q' to continue... > > As you can see is the assembled matrix ~12 times the size of the matrix in > C++. Same size of Mesh, and same element degrees... > > I have latest everything... > > Johan > > signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Re: [DOLFIN-dev] [FEniCS-users] Question of Dolfin 0.9.2
On Thursday 08 October 2009 23:28:29 Anders Logg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:19:23PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Thursday 08 October 2009 22:39:52 Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:20:24PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:35:26 Marie Rognes wrote: > > > > > Johan Hake wrote: > > > > > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:16:59 Marie Rognes wrote: > > > > > >> Jehanzeb Hameed wrote: > > > > > >>> Attaching the files. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I get the same result for the two form files with a DOLFIN > > > > > > >> 0.9.3: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Curl error is 223.93 > > > > > >> Alt Curl error is 223.93 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> In other words, try upgrading :) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> For future reference: Since the issue at hand was comparing the > > > > > >> two curl implementations, the test could have been further > > > > > >> simplified by for instance saving the solution u and just > > > > > >> sending the solution, the two ResCurl*.form files and a > > > > > >> simplified main.cpp > > > > > > > > > > > > While at it, could you take a look at the curl-curl demo too? On > > > > > > my computer it produces highly different results for cpp and > > > > > > python. Python takes forever and gives weird results. > > > > > > > > > > I'm sitting lazily at Dolfin 7173:fd4071fe9460. > > > > > > > > > > The curl-curl demo gives the same result for cpp and python > > > > > there... > > > > > > > > Someone else that have problems with the python curl-curl demo? > > > > > > Works very nicely in both C++ and Python for me. > > > > > > instant-clean? > > > > Have done that... > > > > Output from Python (With all JIT calls removed): > > > > UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh > > Solving linear variational problem > > Matrix of size 21424 x 21424 has 872288 nonzero entries. > > Applying boundary conditions to linear system. > > Solving linear system of size 21424 x 21424 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > > Solving linear variational problem > > Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. > > Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > > Plot active, press 'q' to continue. > > Here's my Python outpout: > > UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh > Solving linear variational problem > Matrix of size 4184 x 4184 has 61784 nonzero entries. > Applying boundary conditions to linear system. > Solving linear system of size 4184 x 4184 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > Solving linear variational problem > Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. > Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > Plot active, press 'q' to continue. > > Do you have the latest versions of all packages? Ahh... I thought so, but an upgrade of FIAT fixed it! Johan > -- > Anders > > > And output from C++: > > > > UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh > > Solving linear variational problem > > Matrix of size 4184 x 4184 has 61784 nonzero entries. > > Applying boundary conditions to linear system. > > Solving linear system of size 4184 x 4184 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > > Solving linear variational problem > > Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. > > Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > > Plotting x (unnamed data), press 'q' to continue... > > > > As you can see is the assembled matrix ~12 times the size of the matrix > > in C++. Same size of Mesh, and same element degrees... > > > > I have latest everything... > > > > Johan > ___ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Re: [DOLFIN-dev] [FEniCS-users] Question of Dolfin 0.9.2
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:37:25AM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > On Thursday 08 October 2009 23:28:29 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:19:23PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Thursday 08 October 2009 22:39:52 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:20:24PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:35:26 Marie Rognes wrote: > > > > > > Johan Hake wrote: > > > > > > > On Friday 09 October 2009 06:16:59 Marie Rognes wrote: > > > > > > >> Jehanzeb Hameed wrote: > > > > > > >>> Attaching the files. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I get the same result for the two form files with a DOLFIN > > > > > > > >> 0.9.3: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Curl error is 223.93 > > > > > > >> Alt Curl error is 223.93 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> In other words, try upgrading :) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> For future reference: Since the issue at hand was comparing the > > > > > > >> two curl implementations, the test could have been further > > > > > > >> simplified by for instance saving the solution u and just > > > > > > >> sending the solution, the two ResCurl*.form files and a > > > > > > >> simplified main.cpp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While at it, could you take a look at the curl-curl demo too? On > > > > > > > my computer it produces highly different results for cpp and > > > > > > > python. Python takes forever and gives weird results. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sitting lazily at Dolfin 7173:fd4071fe9460. > > > > > > > > > > > > The curl-curl demo gives the same result for cpp and python > > > > > > there... > > > > > > > > > > Someone else that have problems with the python curl-curl demo? > > > > > > > > Works very nicely in both C++ and Python for me. > > > > > > > > instant-clean? > > > > > > Have done that... > > > > > > Output from Python (With all JIT calls removed): > > > > > > UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh > > > Solving linear variational problem > > > Matrix of size 21424 x 21424 has 872288 nonzero entries. > > > Applying boundary conditions to linear system. > > > Solving linear system of size 21424 x 21424 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > > > Solving linear variational problem > > > Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. > > > Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > > > Plot active, press 'q' to continue. > > > > Here's my Python outpout: > > > > UnitSphere is experimental. It may be of poor quality mesh > > Solving linear variational problem > > Matrix of size 4184 x 4184 has 61784 nonzero entries. > > Applying boundary conditions to linear system. > > Solving linear system of size 4184 x 4184 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > > Solving linear variational problem > > Matrix of size 2187 x 2187 has 81873 nonzero entries. > > Solving linear system of size 2187 x 2187 (PETSc LU solver, mumps). > > Plot active, press 'q' to continue. > > > > Do you have the latest versions of all packages? > > Ahh... I thought so, but an upgrade of FIAT fixed it! Great. The meaning of the degree q of Nedelec elements has changed. This didn't happen in C++ because I have compiled the .h files with the correct version of FIAT. :-) -- Anders signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
