Re: [Dorset] Next Meeting - COVID-19 Situation
Hi Hamish On 17/03/2020 22:35, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote: I think a remote meetup would be nice. We could also use something like Discord potentially. WhatsApp requires that they have your phone number I believe - I won't be using that. Count me in. Just need a decision on what to use. Cheers Tim -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] Next Meeting - COVID-19 Situation
Are people interested in getting this going? I could make us a poll to sort out how we're doing it. I like the idea of subgroups - I think it'd be difficult otherwise cos we often have subgroups having mini-conversations. That way we could also switch between conversations at will. I was also wondering if people might like to do these more often, seeing as we're all pretty much stuck at home for the foreseeable future? Hamish On 17/03/2020 16:42, PeterMerchant wrote: > >> I was wondering about some kind of virtual meeting at the normal date >> and time, given homes now have fast Internet connections, but it would >> need some experimentation beforehand by someone who has time or >> experience. :-) >> > I wonder if we could set up a WhatsApp group, and whether it could > split off into sub-groups for different conversations. We use it at > home, but only one-to-one so I don't know if this is possible. Think > I can link it from the small screen phone to my PC, but I haven't had > too much luck with that. > > Also just saw a tweet for Zoom.us and my son says he has been using it > for his lectures as he is teaching from home at the moment. Once again > I know nothing about it. > > Peter M. > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 12:19:12 BST Ralph Corderoy wrote: > I haven't been following closely, but ‘Credit reporting and display’ in > https://boinc.berkeley.edu/boinc_papers/credit/text.php may be relevant > to Terry's question. Ralph, Whenever I can't find the answer in Google, you pop up and show the answer in Google... :-) From the link: In BOINC, recent average credit (RAC) is computed as an exponentially weighted average with a half-life of one week. In other words, if an entity is not granted any credit for one week, its RAC will decline by 50%. An entity's RAC is updated whenever credit is granted. To avoid expensive database queries, the update is not able to scan the history of previous credit grants. The only information available is the previous RAC, and the time it was computed. BOINC uses the following approximation (all times are in days). -- Terry Coles -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
Hi Patrick, I haven't been following closely, but ‘Credit reporting and display’ in https://boinc.berkeley.edu/boinc_papers/credit/text.php may be relevant to Terry's question. -- Cheers, Ralph. -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 12:04:53 BST Terry Coles wrote: > As far as I know, I don't have an account and presumably am computing as > 'Anonymous'. I don't recall being asked to set one up. Correction. I do have an account; I'm very forgetful these days. -- Terry Coles -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 11:53:27 BST Patrick Wigmore wrote: > As best I can tell by looking at my own figures, the "Work done for > this project" figure shown in your screenshot corresponds to the total > amount of credit awarded to your user account. The terms "work done" > and "credit" seem to be interchangeable. There are two sources of > delay in this figure: Yes. That seems to be what I have understood. I just assumed that 'Credits' meant Tasks completed! > 1. Credit is only awarded after an individual work unit/task has been >completed, not during the processing. > > 2. The actual statistics display is infrequently updated. The client >is not in constant contact with the server. It seems the statistics >are only updated when the client completes work and requests more >work to download, but it seems it requests the latest statistics >*before* telling the server about the work it has just completed, >so that that work doesn't get reflected in the statistics until the >*next* update, many hours later! ? > Under "Project Commands", there is an "Update" command, which, among > other things, brings in the latest statistics if you really must have > them, but I get the impression it might be best not to bother the > server too much by pressing it a lot. I've pressed this button several times since I started the client with no change at all. > You can also see the most up-to-date figures (but not a graph) on your > online account in a Web browser. As far as I know, I don't have an account and presumably am computing as 'Anonymous'. I don't recall being asked to set one up. -- Terry Coles -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:53:27 +0100, Patrick Wigmore wrote: > it seems it requests the latest statistics *before* telling the > server about the work it has just completed Or, possibly, it requests the statistics after telling the server about the work done, but the server hasn't updated the statistics at that point. I'm speculating and haven't actually analysed the traffic between the client and server! -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
Hi Terry On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 10:26:46 +0100, Terry Coles wrote: > For several days the 'Work done for this project' read 0 because the > first Task was yet to complete. Yesterday morning I was informed > that the work done was 1, as expected, but I definitely didn't > expect to log in this morning and be told that the work done was > now 762! As best I can tell by looking at my own figures, the "Work done for this project" figure shown in your screenshot corresponds to the total amount of credit awarded to your user account. The terms "work done" and "credit" seem to be interchangeable. There are two sources of delay in this figure: 1. Credit is only awarded after an individual work unit/task has been completed, not during the processing. 2. The actual statistics display is infrequently updated. The client is not in constant contact with the server. It seems the statistics are only updated when the client completes work and requests more work to download, but it seems it requests the latest statistics *before* telling the server about the work it has just completed, so that that work doesn't get reflected in the statistics until the *next* update, many hours later! Under "Project Commands", there is an "Update" command, which, among other things, brings in the latest statistics if you really must have them, but I get the impression it might be best not to bother the server too much by pressing it a lot. You can also see the most up-to-date figures (but not a graph) on your online account in a Web browser. Patrick -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 11:44:39 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote: > There is a delay, so it might be you were awarded 2 days of work at once > or something? So the Statistics don't directly reflect how many Tasks that have been completed, but are calculated by the server every now and then? -- Terry Coles -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
I can't remember, but I ran it for years on a raspberry pi. There is a delay, so it might be you were awarded 2 days of work at once or something? Hamish On 29/03/2020 11:39, Terry Coles wrote: > On Sunday, 29 March 2020 11:33:22 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote: >> Work done is more of a measure of the computational difficulty of the >> tasks you completed, not the number of tasks - some tasks are >> shorter/simpler than others :) > Where does it say that? I couldn't find anything. > > Even accepting that, how did my work done increase by a factor of 762 over 2 > days :-) > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 11:33:22 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote: > Work done is more of a measure of the computational difficulty of the > tasks you completed, not the number of tasks - some tasks are > shorter/simpler than others :) Where does it say that? I couldn't find anything. Even accepting that, how did my work done increase by a factor of 762 over 2 days :-) -- Terry Coles -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] BOINC Statistics
Terry, Work done is more of a measure of the computational difficulty of the tasks you completed, not the number of tasks - some tasks are shorter/simpler than others :) Hamish On 29/03/2020 10:26, Terry Coles wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone else out there using the BOINC client? As related a few days ago I > had problems > with F@H (which Tim is using) so I installed BOINC from the repository and > have been > running it ever since. > > As also related, I found it initially overworked my CPUs and caused serious > overheating so > I throttled back. For several days the 'Work done for this project' read 0 > because the first > Task was yet to complete. Yesterday morning I was informed that the work > done was 1, as > expected, but I definitely didn't expect to log in this morning and be told > that the work > done was now 762! > > I've opened the Help, but the Views shown see https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/ > Simple_view[1] do not match what I get and the Help is not particularly > helpful. In > particular I can't find anything that explains what the Work done number > actually means. > > Here (http://hadrian-way.co.uk/Misc/[2]) are screenshots of what my Views > look like, > including the remarkable change in Statistics since Friday. > > Can anyone shed any light on this? > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
[Dorset] BOINC Statistics
Hi, Is anyone else out there using the BOINC client? As related a few days ago I had problems with F@H (which Tim is using) so I installed BOINC from the repository and have been running it ever since. As also related, I found it initially overworked my CPUs and caused serious overheating so I throttled back. For several days the 'Work done for this project' read 0 because the first Task was yet to complete. Yesterday morning I was informed that the work done was 1, as expected, but I definitely didn't expect to log in this morning and be told that the work done was now 762! I've opened the Help, but the Views shown see https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/ Simple_view[1] do not match what I get and the Help is not particularly helpful. In particular I can't find anything that explains what the Work done number actually means. Here (http://hadrian-way.co.uk/Misc/[2]) are screenshots of what my Views look like, including the remarkable change in Statistics since Friday. Can anyone shed any light on this? -- Terry Coles [1] https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Simple_view [2] http://hadrian-way.co.uk/Misc/ -- Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
