Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
I think so. I have been speaking with Microsoft Office in Portugal and they told me that we could use for training purposes. Luis. >From: Marko Milisavljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source >Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 03:02:50 -0400 > >I read ROTOR licence and I'm somewhat confused on one point. > >Can a company install ROTOR on FreeBSD and run their own C# applications >other then for training purposes? I'm not sure if licence means, cannot >benefit from it commercially by enhancing and selling it, or cannot >benefit from it in any way whatsoever other then as bedtime reading >material. > >Thanks, >Marko > >-Original Message- >From: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Alverson >Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:41 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source > >... > >Shared Source: >You can make any changes you want, and you can distribute those changes >in binary and/or source form at your discretion. You may not remove the >license, and you may not commercially gain from the code (exceptions for >training). > >... > >Ken Luis Miguel Silva _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
I read ROTOR licence and I'm somewhat confused on one point. Can a company install ROTOR on FreeBSD and run their own C# applications other then for training purposes? I'm not sure if licence means, cannot benefit from it commercially by enhancing and selling it, or cannot benefit from it in any way whatsoever other then as bedtime reading material. Thanks, Marko -Original Message- From: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Alverson Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source ... Shared Source: You can make any changes you want, and you can distribute those changes in binary and/or source form at your discretion. You may not remove the license, and you may not commercially gain from the code (exceptions for training). ... Ken
Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
> From: Paolo Molaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Saturday, June 22, 2002 6:20 AM > Subject: Re: Shared Source > > On 06/22/02 Sobolev Sergei wrote: > > Could you please explain me what difference between "Open Source" and > > "Shared Source"? > > Shared Source is: > "Look but don't touch. Touch but don't taste. Taste but don't swallow. > And while you're jumping on one foot to the next, what is he doing? He's > laughing his sick f***ing *ss off. He's a tight*ss. He's a sadist. He's > an absentee-landlord!" That's not really very accurate at all...the basic gist is: Shared Source: You can make any changes you want, and you can distribute those changes in binary and/or source form at your discretion. You may not remove the license, and you may not commercially gain from the code (exceptions for training). GPL: You can make any changes you want, and you can distribute those changes at your discretion. However, if you distribute your changes in binary form, you must distribute your source code as well. You may not remove the license. BSD: You may not remove the license. All else is fair game. Ken
Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
Um. This seems a BIT over the top, but maybe that's just me. And I'm not
sure it answered the question, to boot.
Short answer: Shared Source is yet another license model for software whose
source code you can look at; it's a parallel to the BSD license, or the
Apache license.
Long answer: Go read the Microsoft Shared Source License agreement for full
details. :-)
Ted Neward
{.NET || Java} Course Author & Instructor, DevelopMentor
(http://www.develop.com)
http://www.javageeks.com/tneward
http://www.clrgeeks.com/tneward
- Original Message -
From: "Paolo Molaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
> On 06/22/02 Sobolev Sergei wrote:
> > Could you please explain me what difference between "Open Source" and
> > "Shared Source"?
>
> Shared Source is:
> "Look but don't touch. Touch but don't taste. Taste but don't swallow.
> And while you're jumping on one foot to the next, what is he doing? He's
> laughing his sick f***ing *ss off. He's a tight*ss. He's a sadist. He's
> an absentee-landlord!"
>
> Free software is the full monty!
>
> Open Source is the same, you just can't tell your boss about it.
>
> lupus
>
> --
> -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian/rules
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monkeys do it better
>
Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
I think this is a good place to start : http://linux.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2001/08/09/oscon_debate.html Regards, -- Christophe Lauer -Original Message- From: Sobolev Sergei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: samedi 22 juin 2002 10:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source Could you please explain me what difference between "Open Source" and "Shared Source"? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Purdy Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source Yeah. -Original Message- From: Sobolev Sergei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source Does anyone find Shared Source CLI useful? Sergei
Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
On 06/22/02 Sobolev Sergei wrote: > Could you please explain me what difference between "Open Source" and > "Shared Source"? Shared Source is: "Look but don't touch. Touch but don't taste. Taste but don't swallow. And while you're jumping on one foot to the next, what is he doing? He's laughing his sick f***ing *ss off. He's a tight*ss. He's a sadist. He's an absentee-landlord!" Free software is the full monty! Open Source is the same, you just can't tell your boss about it. lupus -- - [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian/rules [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monkeys do it better
Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
Could you please explain me what difference between "Open Source" and "Shared Source"? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Purdy Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source Yeah. -Original Message- From: Sobolev Sergei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source Does anyone find Shared Source CLI useful? Sergei
Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
Yeah. -Original Message- From: Sobolev Sergei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source Does anyone find Shared Source CLI useful? Sergei
[DOTNET-ROTOR] Shared Source
Does anyone find Shared Source CLI useful? Sergei
