Re: [Dovecot] fd limit 1024 is lower in dovecot-1.1.1
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:53:54 pm Zhang Huangbin wrote: Hi, all. I just upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.1.1 in a test box(RHEL 5.2, x86_64). after upgrade, i got this warning msg: 8 # /etc/init.d/dovecot restart Stopping Dovecot Imap: [ OK ] Starting Dovecot Imap: Warning: fd limit 1024 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 1280). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings [ OK ] 8 but i changed either login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes to 2048, it raised the same msg. change may not mean increase How can i solove this issue? /etc/security/limits.conf to increase the nofiles or possibly decrese the process counts. -- Daniel Black -- Proudly a Gentoo Linux User. Gnu-PG/PGP signed and encrypted email preferred http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x76677097 GPG Signature D934 5397 A84A 6366 9687 9EB2 861A 4ABA 7667 7097 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[Dovecot] quota_warning script
Hello. I'm reading http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/1.1 one last time before my upgrade, and I have a question about quota_warning option. Which type of script must we use for this example: quota_warning = storage=95%% /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh 95 What the script must doing? It sends an email? It deletes some emails? Thanks! -- -Nicolas.
Re: [Dovecot] quota_warning script
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:02:19 +0200 Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nicolas Letellier wrote: What the script must doing? It sends an email? It deletes some emails? http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-June/031456.html Anders Thanks! Now, it could be a good idea to add this example in dovecot wiki. -- -Nicolas.
Re: [Dovecot] fd limit 1024 is lower in dovecot-1.1.1
Zhang Huangbin wrote: Hi, all. I just upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.1.1 in a test box(RHEL 5.2, x86_64). after upgrade, i got this warning msg: 8 # /etc/init.d/dovecot restart Stopping Dovecot Imap: [ OK ] Starting Dovecot Imap: Warning: fd limit 1024 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 1280). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings [ OK ] 8 but i changed either login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes to 2048, it raised the same msg. How can i solove this issue? I'm just guessing - but reading that warning it appears to me that Dovecot is saying that as it is configured, it can consume more O/S resources (I assume fd is file descriptors) than the O/S is currently configured for. So you need to DECREASE your dovecot max processes to decrease the (potential) system demands - or increase your O/S settings. Daniel
[Dovecot] Quota Check: fs with multiple noenforcing mount point
Hi,
It seems my previous mail has been lost, I apologize if this is a duplicate.
I am using Dovecot 1.1.1 with user's INBOX in /var/mail and other
folders in their home directories. I have setup file system quota on
/var/mail to limit their usage. I would like dovecot to display such
information in IMAP client and ignore all others.
OS: Solaris 10
Dovecot version : 1.1.1
file system of /var/mail : NFS from Solaris
file system of /home : other NFS server that not support rquotad.
Here is my setting that works:
plugin {
quota = fs:INBOX:mount=/var/mail
quota2 = fs:home:noenforcing:mount=/home/h1
}
--
Unfortunately, I have many different mount points for different users,
so I changed my settings to:
---
plugin {
quota = fs:INBOX:mount=/var/mail
quota2 = fs:home:noenforcing:mount=/home/h1
quota3 = fs:home:noenforcing:mount=/home/h2
quota4 = fs:home:noenforcing:mount=/home/h3
}
--
The result is... Devocolt is not able to get quota information anymore.
Any suggestions?
Re: [Dovecot] fd limit 1024 is lower in dovecot-1.1.1
Daniel L. Miller wrote: Zhang Huangbin wrote: Hi, all. I just upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.1.1 in a test box(RHEL 5.2, x86_64). after upgrade, i got this warning msg: 8 # /etc/init.d/dovecot restart Stopping Dovecot Imap: [ OK ] Starting Dovecot Imap: Warning: fd limit 1024 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 1280). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings [ OK ] 8 but i changed either login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes to 2048, it raised the same msg. How can i solove this issue? I'm just guessing - but reading that warning it appears to me that Dovecot is saying that as it is configured, it can consume more O/S resources (I assume fd is file descriptors) than the O/S is currently configured for. So you need to DECREASE your dovecot max processes to decrease the (potential) system demands - or increase your O/S settings. Daniel I think so. I just decrease the processes, it works now. Thanks Daniel and all replies. :) -- Best Regards. Zhang Huangbin - Mail Server Solution for Red Hat(R) Enterprise Linux CentOS 5.x: http://rhms.googlecode.com/
Re: [Dovecot] Search over big folder hierarchy (was: Global FTS index?)
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote: Hmm. Or v1.2 has virtual mailboxes - you could create a single virtual mailbox from all your other mailboxes and then search it. I think if Squat is enabled it'll create a single index from all the mails. I'm not sure if I want to leave it like that though.. I hope that the index is shared - that you index the index by inode number, not filename or message UID in a mailbox, since that way you can avoid duplicate storage of index data between virtual mailboxes and normal ones. I have also been thinking about making Squat indexes global for all mailboxes. If done well it should reduce disk space as well as enable fast multi-mailbox searches, but I'm a bit worried about memory usage and other slowness when updating the index. The Squat building/updating could use more work, but I haven't yet figured out a great solution for it. Well, I think it would be okay - deploy it and we'll all tell you. (-; (As always, thanks for this amazing software.) -- Asheesh. -- The wonderful thing about a dancing bear is not how well he dances, but that he dances at all.
