[Dovecot] dovecot Mstone benchmark
Hello all, I would like to bench imap with mstone but the only thing I see is imap command read login logout banner but there is no write. So I can't stress as well as with imaptest. Does anyone have a dovecot.wld or a special configuration to test with mstone ? Thanks begin:vcard fn:Mathieu Kretchner n:Kretchner;Mathieu org:INRIA;Syslog adr;dom:;;2004 route des lucioles - BP93;Sophia Antipolis;;06902 CEDEX email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:04 92 38 76 67 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard
Re: [Dovecot] client certs with godaddy ssl cert
On 29 Sep 2008 at 8:40, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
What is important: you can not self-sign each client certificate, but you
need
a CA with a self-signed root instead. I think you understand that already,
just noting that for completeness.
Then you simply configure Dovecot as described in
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SSL/DovecotConfiguration
Followed those directions, enabled the client side certificate checking, but
no go.
Then configure client cert verification as described in the last section of
above mentioned wiki page.
ssl_ca_file is used for client cert verification only, and does not need to
cover the server certificate.
Done, I have the following enabled.
auth default {
# Space separated list of wanted authentication mechanisms:
# plain login digest-md5 cram-md5 ntlm rpa apop anonymous gssapi
mechanisms = plain
ssl_require_client_cert = yes
ssl_ca_file = /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot-clientcerts
ssl_verify_client_cert = yes
verbose_ssl = yes
ssl_require_client_cert = yes
Logs don't show anything of any interest, on the client side (windows mobile
5 phone running Web IS's Flexmail4.
When I asked their tech support about using a client cert, I got this
Greetings and thank you for contacting us.
It should be using the certs which the PDA has installed. Is the cert
installed (in the device settings System Certificates
We appreciate having the opportunity to help and service you. Please let
us know if there is anything more we can do.
I've verified that my root ca is installed on the pda and the personal cert
is also installed.
The following is all I see on the connection attempt from the pda
Oct 8 01:00:55 myserver dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.7 starting up
Oct 8 01:01:51 myserver dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: method=PLAIN,
rip=10.12.13.14, lip=10.12.13.14, TLS
At this point the client device is stuck asking to confirm account
credentials
--
Harondel J. Sibble
Sibble Computer Consulting
Creating solutions for the small business and home computer user.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (use pgp keyid 0x3AD5C11D) http://www.pdscc.com
(604) 739-3709 (voice/fax) (604) 686-2253 (pager)
[Dovecot] Something weird happening...
Hi to all, I use Dovecot dovecot11-1.1.3-5.1 from OpenSuSE 11, when i send a mail from the logs i read: Oct 8 10:36:31 mail postfix/pipe[17934]: A360A851: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dovecot, delay=0.22, delays=0.18/0/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: Can't open log file /var/log/dovecot-err.log: Permission denied ) But, log files seems ok: -rw--- 1 777 root 56 Oct 8 10:35 dovecot-err.log -rw--- 1 777 root 302 Oct 8 10:35 dovecot-inf.log Also processess seems right: root 17965 0.0 0.0 2052 584 ?Ss 10:35 0:00 /usr/sbin/dovecot root 17966 0.0 0.2 8564 2172 ?S10:35 0:00 dovecot-auth root 17967 0.0 0.2 8564 2356 ?S10:35 0:00 dovecot-auth -w dovecot 17969 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17970 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17971 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17972 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login dovecot 17973 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login dovecot 17974 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login Here is my config: log_path: /var/log/dovecot-err.log info_log_path: /var/log/dovecot-inf.log protocols: imap pop3 ssl_disable: yes disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3-login first_valid_uid: 51 last_valid_uid: 51 mail_location: maildir:/var/mail/virtual/[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail_executable(default): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap mail_executable(imap): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap mail_executable(pop3): /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugins(default): quota imap_quota mail_plugins(imap): quota imap_quota mail_plugins(pop3): quota mail_plugin_dir(default): /usr/lib64/dovecot/modules/imap mail_plugin_dir(imap): /usr/lib64/dovecot/modules/imap mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /usr/lib64/dovecot/modules/pop3 pop3_uidl_format(default): pop3_uidl_format(imap): pop3_uidl_format(pop3): %Mf auth default: passdb: driver: pam passdb: driver: sql args: /etc/dovecot/dovecot-mysql.conf userdb: driver: passwd userdb: driver: sql args: /etc/dovecot/dovecot-mysql.conf socket: type: listen master: path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master mode: 384 plugin: quota: maildir quota_warning: storage=80%% /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh 80 So, what can be the problem? Thanks, Claudio Prono. -- Claudio Prono Systems Development @ Atpss.net Srl, Divisione Implementazione Sistemi Via San Bernardino, 17 - 10137 Torino (TO) - IT Tel +39-011.32.72.100 Fax +39-011.32.46.497 PGP Fingerprint: 75C2 4049 E23D 2FBF A65F 40DB EA5C 11AC C2B0 3647 Disclaimer: http://atpss.net/disclaimer
Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus MailDir to Dovecot mbox
CJ Keist [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Anyone out there know of a tool that can convert a Cyrus MailDir format to Dovecot mbox? I have a user that I need to move over from a mail server running cyrus using MailDir format. At first I told him to setup second account with Thunderbird to our mail server and then use Thunderbird to move the messages over. But he has over 100K messages so not as easy to do. From server to server sync'ing, there's imapsync, which avoids having to pull the messages over manually. http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration I used it to pull around 30-40k messages from a cyrus imapd to a dovecot on a different machine (my dovecot used maildir, not mbox, but that shouldn't make any difference). The UIDs aren't preserved, but everything else seems to be. My MUA (Gnus with the nnimap backend) uses custom flags to store state and all of that state was preserved. Losing the UIDs in Gnus' case, only meant that the cached article information was useless, and that I would have to freshly download everything I wanted cached. And it also turned out to be mostly irrelevant, since the folder structure changed with dovecot. The only folder for which I could have preserved cached information would have been the INBOX.
[Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
After a few hours of running, I get tons of the following errors in my logs: dovecot: Oct 08 07:41:50 Error: auth(default): ldap([EMAIL PROTECTED],x.x.x.x): Request queue is full I removed the username and IP, obviously. Any idea how to stop this? I have about 5 Thousand users using horde that login ever 1-5 minutes to refresh their page. I assume it is a setting, but I am confused as to why it doesn't happen almost right away. It seems to take some time to build up. Please help! This is taking my webmail system down hourly.
Re: [Dovecot] Initial support for shared mailboxes
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote: [...] So I guess what is needed is a new userdb backend which is explicitly runs an arbitrary external program to get the user data (instead of caching the passdb results). Right. Perhaps the passdb checkpassword code could be used as userdb too, just with an added extra variable specifying if it's a passdb or a userdb lookup. I just started to work on this feature and for testing purpose I wrote a very simple dummy checkpassword program. But I have a problem setting the UID and GID: I'm using: userdb_uid=12345 userdb_gid=12345 EXTRA=userdb_uid userdb_gid export userdb_uid userdb_gid EXTRA according to http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/CheckPassword but then I get an internal login failure. From the dovecot log: Oct 08 12:42:02 burlywood3 info dovecot[3804]: auth(default): prefetch([EMAIL PROTECTED],192.168.11.254): success Oct 08 12:42:02 burlywood3 info dovecot[3804]: auth(default): master out: USER[EMAIL PROTECTED] home=/kolab/var/dovecot/spool/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home uid=0 gid=0 uid=19415 gid=19415 Oct 08 12:42:02 burlywood3 error dovecot[3804]: uid specified multiple times for [EMAIL PROTECTED] So am I missing something or is this dovecot extension currently broken? cheers sascha -- Sascha Wilde OpenPGP key: 4BB86568 http://www.intevation.de/~wilde/ http://www.intevation.de/ Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück; AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998 Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner pgpVpA0AkZ0jp.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] Something weird happening...
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:44:25 +0200, Claudio Prono wrote: Hi to all, I use Dovecot dovecot11-1.1.3-5.1 from OpenSuSE 11, when i send a mail from the logs i read: Oct 8 10:36:31 mail postfix/pipe[17934]: A360A851: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dovecot, delay=0.22, delays=0.18/0/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: Can't open log file /var/log/dovecot-err.log: Permission denied ) But, log files seems ok: -rw--- 1 777 root 56 Oct 8 10:35 dovecot-err.log -rw--- 1 777 root 302 Oct 8 10:35 dovecot-inf.log According to the below output, the above output is wrong. User with UID 777 does not exist, hence, the Permission denied. You should chown dovecot /var/log/dovecot-*.log Also processess seems right: root 17965 0.0 0.0 2052 584 ?Ss 10:35 0:00 /usr/sbin/dovecot root 17966 0.0 0.2 8564 2172 ?S10:35 0:00 dovecot-auth root 17967 0.0 0.2 8564 2356 ?S10:35 0:00 dovecot-auth -w dovecot 17969 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17970 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17971 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17972 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login dovecot 17973 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login dovecot 17974 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login -- Elisamuel Resto | GPG: 18615F19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Source Mage GNU/Linux Tome Lead http://simplysam.us/ | http://www.sourcemage.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] Something weird happening...
Very strange, i have tryied to chmod 666 all log files, like that: -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 681 Oct 8 11:08 dovecot-err.log -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1039 Oct 8 11:02 dovecot-inf.log (Is terrible i know, but only a test) Now i have another error (written in log of dovecot!) deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Oct 08 11:08:20 Error: Can't connect to auth server at /var/run/dovecot/auth-master: Permission denied Seems all a problem of user running dovecot...is not root? Dunno why... In config there isn't nothing to do so. Any suggestion? Thank you, Claudio. Claudio Prono ha scritto: Sorry, mine error. I have tried to make readable and writeble to all the files, so i have do wrongly chown 777 files. Now is fixed, but still recieve error: -rw--- 1 root root 224 Oct 8 10:57 dovecot-err.log -rw--- 1 root root 888 Oct 8 10:57 dovecot-inf.log The log is: Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/smtpd[18296]: C878485F: client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/cleanup[18288]: C878485F: message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/qmgr[3303]: C878485F: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1310, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/smtpd[18296]: disconnect from localhost[127.0.0.1] Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/pipe[18290]: 8E90385E: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dspam, delay=0.39, delays=0.1/0.01/0/0.28, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dspam service) Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/qmgr[3303]: 8E90385E: removed Oct 8 10:57:29 mail postfix/pipe[18298]: C878485F: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dovecot, delay=0.23, delays=0.17/0.01/0/0.05, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: Can't open log file /var/log/dovecot-err.log: Permission denied ) What can be? Elisamuel Resto ha scritto: On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:44:25 +0200, Claudio Prono wrote: Hi to all, I use Dovecot dovecot11-1.1.3-5.1 from OpenSuSE 11, when i send a mail from the logs i read: Oct 8 10:36:31 mail postfix/pipe[17934]: A360A851: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dovecot, delay=0.22, delays=0.18/0/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: Can't open log file /var/log/dovecot-err.log: Permission denied ) But, log files seems ok: -rw--- 1 777 root 56 Oct 8 10:35 dovecot-err.log -rw--- 1 777 root 302 Oct 8 10:35 dovecot-inf.log According to the below output, the above output is wrong. User with UID 777 does not exist, hence, the Permission denied. You should chown dovecot /var/log/dovecot-*.log Also processess seems right: root 17965 0.0 0.0 2052 584 ?Ss 10:35 0:00 /usr/sbin/dovecot root 17966 0.0 0.2 8564 2172 ?S10:35 0:00 dovecot-auth root 17967 0.0 0.2 8564 2356 ?S10:35 0:00 dovecot-auth -w dovecot 17969 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17970 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17971 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17972 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login dovecot 17973 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login dovecot 17974 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login -- Claudio Prono Systems Development @ Atpss.net Srl, Divisione Implementazione Sistemi Via San Bernardino, 17 - 10137 Torino (TO) - IT Tel +39-011.32.72.100 Fax +39-011.32.46.497 PGP Fingerprint: 75C2 4049 E23D 2FBF A65F 40DB EA5C 11AC C2B0 3647 Disclaimer: http://atpss.net/disclaimer
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
On Oct 8, 2008, at 8:01 AM, David Cunningham wrote: After a few hours of running, I get tons of the following errors in my logs: dovecot: Oct 08 07:41:50 Error: auth(default): ldap([EMAIL PROTECTED],x.x.x.x): Request queue is full I removed the username and IP, obviously. Any idea how to stop this? I have about 5 Thousand users using horde that login ever 1-5 minutes to refresh their page. I assume it is a setting, but I am confused as to why it doesn't happen almost right away. It seems to take some time to build up. Please help! This is taking my webmail system down hourly. dovecot -n? Hunch is login_max_processes_count is too low. http://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess hth, JL smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [Dovecot] sieve multi-line parser bug
Hello Timo, Thanks for the reply It was accidentally split when sending the mail. The actual lines are only 2: 1) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cotiatododia=20-=20O=20Jornal=20de=20Not=EDcias=20a=20Se?= 2)=?iso-8859-1?Q?rvi=E7o=20de=20Cotia=20e=20Regi=E3o=2E?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also attached) Timo Sirainen wrote: On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 14:38 -0300, info wrote: When a message header is split along several lines, it seems only the first one is parsed by sieve. The following header: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cotiatododia=20-=20O=20Jornal=20de=20Not=EDcias=20a=20Se?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?rvi=E7o=20de=20Cotia=20e=20Regi=E3o=2E?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is that really correct? Was there no space or tab before the =?iso.. ? Or was the line just accidentally split when sending the mail? If the above really is correct, then the header is broken and Dovecot is doing the right thing.. From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cotiatododia=20-=20O=20Jornal=20de=20Not=EDcias=20a=20Se?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?rvi=E7o=20de=20Cotia=20e=20Regi=E3o=2E?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Dovecot] Something weird happening...
Sorry, mine error. I have tried to make readable and writeble to all the files, so i have do wrongly chown 777 files. Now is fixed, but still recieve error: -rw--- 1 root root 224 Oct 8 10:57 dovecot-err.log -rw--- 1 root root 888 Oct 8 10:57 dovecot-inf.log The log is: Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/smtpd[18296]: C878485F: client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/cleanup[18288]: C878485F: message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/qmgr[3303]: C878485F: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1310, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/smtpd[18296]: disconnect from localhost[127.0.0.1] Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/pipe[18290]: 8E90385E: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dspam, delay=0.39, delays=0.1/0.01/0/0.28, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dspam service) Oct 8 10:57:28 mail postfix/qmgr[3303]: 8E90385E: removed Oct 8 10:57:29 mail postfix/pipe[18298]: C878485F: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dovecot, delay=0.23, delays=0.17/0.01/0/0.05, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: Can't open log file /var/log/dovecot-err.log: Permission denied ) What can be? Elisamuel Resto ha scritto: On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:44:25 +0200, Claudio Prono wrote: Hi to all, I use Dovecot dovecot11-1.1.3-5.1 from OpenSuSE 11, when i send a mail from the logs i read: Oct 8 10:36:31 mail postfix/pipe[17934]: A360A851: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=dovecot, delay=0.22, delays=0.18/0/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: Can't open log file /var/log/dovecot-err.log: Permission denied ) But, log files seems ok: -rw--- 1 777 root 56 Oct 8 10:35 dovecot-err.log -rw--- 1 777 root 302 Oct 8 10:35 dovecot-inf.log According to the below output, the above output is wrong. User with UID 777 does not exist, hence, the Permission denied. You should chown dovecot /var/log/dovecot-*.log Also processess seems right: root 17965 0.0 0.0 2052 584 ?Ss 10:35 0:00 /usr/sbin/dovecot root 17966 0.0 0.2 8564 2172 ?S10:35 0:00 dovecot-auth root 17967 0.0 0.2 8564 2356 ?S10:35 0:00 dovecot-auth -w dovecot 17969 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17970 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17971 0.0 0.1 3476 1572 ?S10:36 0:00 pop3-login dovecot 17972 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login dovecot 17973 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login dovecot 17974 0.0 0.1 3484 1584 ?S10:36 0:00 imap-login -- Claudio Prono Systems Development @ Atpss.net Srl, Divisione Implementazione Sistemi Via San Bernardino, 17 - 10137 Torino (TO) - IT Tel +39-011.32.72.100 Fax +39-011.32.46.497 PGP Fingerprint: 75C2 4049 E23D 2FBF A65F 40DB EA5C 11AC C2B0 3647 Disclaimer: http://atpss.net/disclaimer
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
Here is my dovecot -n: # 1.1.3: /etc/dovecot.conf log_path: /var/log/dovecot info_log_path: /var/log/dovecot-info login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login login_greeting: MECnet Mail System, Authorized Use Only, Please Log In. login_process_per_connection: no login_process_size: 1024 login_max_processes_count: 1024 login_max_connections: 1024 max_mail_processes: 5 verbose_proctitle: yes first_valid_uid: 50 mail_uid: 93 mail_gid: 12 mail_location: maildir:/var/spool/maildirs/%d/%n/Maildir mail_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3 mail_process_size: 1024 mail_plugins(default): quota imap_quota mail_plugins(imap): quota imap_quota mail_plugins(pop3): mail_plugin_dir(default): /usr/lib64/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(imap): /usr/lib64/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /usr/lib64/dovecot/pop3 namespace: type: private prefix: INBOX. inbox: yes list: yes subscriptions: yes auth default: verbose: yes passdb: driver: ldap args: /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf plugin: quota: maildir My buddy and I found #define DB_LDAP_MAX_QUEUE_SIZE 1024 in the db-ldap.h file in the source. We believe we hitting this threshold for some reason. So, we are looking to increase this to 8192. However, when trying to build the RPM source from atrpms, I get this: # rpmbuild -ba dovecot.spec error: line 1: Unknown tag: %bcond_without inotify Any help? Dave Quoting Jurvis LaSalle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Oct 8, 2008, at 8:01 AM, David Cunningham wrote: After a few hours of running, I get tons of the following errors in my logs: dovecot: Oct 08 07:41:50 Error: auth(default): ldap([EMAIL PROTECTED],x.x.x.x): Request queue is full I removed the username and IP, obviously. Any idea how to stop this? I have about 5 Thousand users using horde that login ever 1-5 minutes to refresh their page. I assume it is a setting, but I am confused as to why it doesn't happen almost right away. It seems to take some time to build up. Please help! This is taking my webmail system down hourly. dovecot -n? Hunch is login_max_processes_count is too low. http://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess hth, JL
Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
users after imap search, otherwise you always need some admin (
perhaps
with shell permissions ) for editing subcriptions and acls which not
Actually the SUBSCRIBE IMAP command is enough to make the mailboxes
visible, no admin/shell access needed.
This doesn't work for me.
Actually the whole new shared namespaces feature doesn't work as
expected for me. Using this namespace configuration:
namespace shared {
separator = /
# %%u gets expanded to the remote user. Instead of %%u you can
# also use %%n and %%d.
prefix = users/%%u/
location =
Maildir:/kolab/var/dovecot/spool/%%u/maildir:INDEX=/kolab/var/dovecot/spool/%u/maildir/shared_idx
#location = Maildir:/kolab/var/dovecot/spool/%%u/maildir
subscriptions = no
}
I get errors when using list:
l002 list *
* LIST (\HasChildren) / INBOX
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Calendar
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Contacts
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Journal
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Notes
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Tasks
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/bla
l002 NO Unknown internal list error
And cant subscribe or select an existing mailbox of another user:
s001 subscribe users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla
s001 NO Invalid mailbox name: users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla
FWIW referencing an non existent mailbox causes an different error:
s002 subscribe users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla
s002 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist: users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla
s102 select users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla
* OK [CLOSED]
s102 NO Invalid mailbox name
And IMAP ACL commands are (at least partially) already implemented by
Kolab people.
Yes, look at http://hg.intevation.de/kolab/dovecot-1.2_acl-branch as
announced... ;-)
cheers
sascha
--
Sascha Wilde OpenPGP key: 4BB86568
http://www.intevation.de/~wilde/ http://www.intevation.de/
Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück; AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
pgp5uXO78u9OK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question
On Oct 8, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote: s002 subscribe users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla s002 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist: users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ blablabla I think this should have worked, I'll look into it. s102 select users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla * OK [CLOSED] s102 NO Invalid mailbox name Assuming INBOX/ is the namespace prefix, you should have used users/[EMAIL PROTECTED] /blablabla here too. Does that work? PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
David Cunningham wrote: I have about 5 Thousand users using horde that login ever 1-5 minutes to refresh their page. I assume it is a setting, but I am confused as to This may not related to the real reason of your problem, but I recommend up-imapproxy (http://www.imapproxy.org/) for such setups, which caches connections (and therefore logins). You could try to enable dovecot's auth_cache instead.
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
David Cunningham schrieb: I have about 5 Thousand users using horde that login ever 1-5 minutes to refresh their page. Imapproxy can be configured to cache connections only for a defined amount of time, eg. close connections not used for more than a few minutes. Setting is cache_expiration_time in imapproxy.conf. Remember: Horde creates a new imap connection for every page click, imapproxy heavily reduces this login/logout noise. If your 5k users are all using webmail *simultaneously* I don't know how the proxy will perform.
Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 8, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote:
s002 subscribe users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla
s002 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist: users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
blablabla
I think this should have worked, I'll look into it.
IMO the other one:
s001 subscribe users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla
should have worked.
Or is the default namespace prefix INBOX/ instead of empty?
Furthermore, please notice the different error: when the mailbox exists
dovecot claims Invalid mailbox name otherwise it says [TRYCREATE]
Mailbox doesn't exist which is indeed true.
s102 select users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla
* OK [CLOSED]
s102 NO Invalid mailbox name
Assuming INBOX/ is the namespace prefix,
see above, I assume the namespace prefix is empty.
From the configuration:
namespace private {
separator = /
# Prefix required to access this namespace. This needs to be different for
# all namespaces. For example Public/.
#prefix =
inbox = yes
}
so prefix is not set, which means, it is set to the default. (Which I
believe to be empty, the comments suggest that, too).
cheers
sascha
--
Sascha Wilde OpenPGP key: 4BB86568
http://www.intevation.de/~wilde/ http://www.intevation.de/
Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück; AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
pgpt9TMxiCH7X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Dovecot] Dovecot-sieve processing optimizations
I'm working at the next part of the virtual domains mail server. I'm
moving this account ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a forwarder) which has a bunch
of procmail rules to file into folders.
My question is if it is more efficient is use?
if {
...
} elsif {
...
} elsif {
...
}
else
This seems to be the way many of the example scripts do it but I found
at least one that used
if {
...
}
if {
...
}
Which is more procmail like and for me reads easier.
If not here where should I ask?
Thanks,
Rod
--
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-sieve processing optimizations
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
I'm working at the next part of the virtual domains mail server. I'm
moving this account ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a forwarder) which has a bunch
of procmail rules to file into folders.
My question is if it is more efficient is use?
if {
...
} elsif {
...
} elsif {
...
}
else
This seems to be the way many of the example scripts do it but I found
at least one that used
if {
...
}
if {
...
}
Which is more procmail like and for me reads easier.
If not here where should I ask?
Well, both accomplish different things. In the first example, one and
only one of the conditions will be executed. In the second one, more
than one could possibly be executed.
I've never looked at Sieve's code, but the first will stop at the first
matching condition. In the second case, because you could make it do
more than one thing, it must check each condition.
~Seth
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-sieve processing optimizations
Seth Mattinen escreveu:
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
I'm working at the next part of the virtual domains mail server. I'm
moving this account ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a forwarder) which has a bunch
of procmail rules to file into folders.
My question is if it is more efficient is use?
if {
...
} elsif {
...
} elsif {
...
}
else
This seems to be the way many of the example scripts do it but I found
at least one that used
if {
...
}
if {
...
}
Which is more procmail like and for me reads easier.
If not here where should I ask?
Well, both accomplish different things. In the first example, one and
only one of the conditions will be executed. In the second one, more
than one could possibly be executed.
I've never looked at Sieve's code, but the first will stop at the first
matching condition. In the second case, because you could make it do
more than one thing, it must check each condition.
If in each if you put a finish statement (or whatever is used to stop
processing the file), then the second one can be more efficient, since
it does not have to continue checking the file to see if there are
further conditions after the if/elseif/.../else block.
But in practice I doubt there is a practical difference between both.
You should use the one that is more readable for you.
--
Eduardo M Kalinowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
Unfortantely, it just happened again! sigh I am going to implement my increased queue change and see what happens. Dave Quoting Jurvis LaSalle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Oct 8, 2008, at 8:01 AM, David Cunningham wrote: After a few hours of running, I get tons of the following errors in my logs: dovecot: Oct 08 07:41:50 Error: auth(default): ldap([EMAIL PROTECTED],x.x.x.x): Request queue is full I removed the username and IP, obviously. Any idea how to stop this? I have about 5 Thousand users using horde that login ever 1-5 minutes to refresh their page. I assume it is a setting, but I am confused as to why it doesn't happen almost right away. It seems to take some time to build up. Please help! This is taking my webmail system down hourly. dovecot -n? Hunch is login_max_processes_count is too low. http://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess hth, JL
Re: [Dovecot] Disabling global content_filter with an empty filter specified with an access table
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:36 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: an alternative is content_filter = smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_ok check_sender_access pcre:/etc/postfix/filter == dsn_ok OK == filter /./ FILTER filter:[1.2.3.4]:10024 where filter:[1.2.3 is what you used to put in content_filter. Yes, that's what I was thinking when I wrote workaround in my first mail: On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Diego Liziero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] I think that this solution is more readable than the only workaround I can imagine now (that is disabling global filtering and enabling it in a pcre table for everything except that particular case). So it's a bit less readable, I've to remember to disable sender restrictions in the content filter return transport to avoid filter loops, there will be one more line for each mail in the log stating that the filter is triggered, but apart from that it should work as I need. Thank you to everyone that helped me, tomorrow I'm going to test both methods. Regards, Diego.
Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Oct 8, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote: s002 subscribe users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla s002 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist: users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ blablabla I think this should have worked, I'll look into it. IMO the other one: s001 subscribe users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla should have worked. Or is the default namespace prefix INBOX/ instead of empty? Furthermore, please notice the different error: when the mailbox exists dovecot claims Invalid mailbox name otherwise it says [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist which is indeed true. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/c465b10a76fd signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:48 -0400, David Cunningham wrote:
I agree. In fact, I may have found a DNS issue that may have been
causing login sessions to hang and thus reach max too quickly. The
last few hours have been stable. So, I am keeping my fingers crossed.
I have also recompiled dovecot and changed the setting in db-ldap.h
that reads:
#define DB_LDAP_MAX_QUEUE_SIZE 1024
to
#define DB_LDAP_MAX_QUEUE_SIZE 8192
If you're getting more than 1024 requests queued, something's wrong or
you have hundreds or logins per second. Which one is it? (5000 users
logging in once per minute is still only 83/sec)
The queue keeps increasing if the LDAP server isn't replying to old
requests. So have you looked at the LDAP server side if it's running too
slow?
Anyway two things you could do here:
1) Enable auth cache with large enough size so Dovecot doesn't consult
LDAP server nearly as much.
2) Increase the number of auth processes (auth { .. count=5 }), so that
you'll use more connections and hopefully the LDAP server likes that
better than one connection sending lots of requests. Or maybe not.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Something weird happening...
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:12 +0200, Claudio Prono wrote: Very strange, i have tryied to chmod 666 all log files, like that: -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 681 Oct 8 11:08 dovecot-err.log -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1039 Oct 8 11:02 dovecot-inf.log (Is terrible i know, but only a test) Now i have another error (written in log of dovecot!) deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Oct 08 11:08:20 Error: Can't connect to auth server at /var/run/dovecot/auth-master: Permission denied Seems all a problem of user running dovecot...is not root? Dunno why... In config there isn't nothing to do so. deliver isn't normally run as root, unless you've made it setuid-root. So the log files and the auth-master socket need to be writable by the user who runs deliver (as defined in Postfix's master.cf). (Of course the user running deliver also needs to have access to all users' mails. If you're using system users you'll need to make deliver setuid-root.) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
Thank you, I will try the caching.
Dave
Quoting Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:48 -0400, David Cunningham wrote:
I agree. In fact, I may have found a DNS issue that may have been
causing login sessions to hang and thus reach max too quickly. The
last few hours have been stable. So, I am keeping my fingers crossed.
I have also recompiled dovecot and changed the setting in db-ldap.h
that reads:
#define DB_LDAP_MAX_QUEUE_SIZE 1024
to
#define DB_LDAP_MAX_QUEUE_SIZE 8192
If you're getting more than 1024 requests queued, something's wrong or
you have hundreds or logins per second. Which one is it? (5000 users
logging in once per minute is still only 83/sec)
The queue keeps increasing if the LDAP server isn't replying to old
requests. So have you looked at the LDAP server side if it's running too
slow?
Anyway two things you could do here:
1) Enable auth cache with large enough size so Dovecot doesn't consult
LDAP server nearly as much.
2) Increase the number of auth processes (auth { .. count=5 }), so that
you'll use more connections and hopefully the LDAP server likes that
better than one connection sending lots of requests. Or maybe not.
Re: [Dovecot] sieve multi-line parser bug
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 07:29 -0300, info wrote: Hello Timo, Thanks for the reply It was accidentally split when sending the mail. The actual lines are only 2: 1) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cotiatododia=20-=20O=20Jornal=20de=20Not=EDcias=20a=20Se?= OK, Cotiatododia is already in the first line, so the problem isn't about reading multi-line. What Dovecot version do you use? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus MailDir to Dovecot mbox
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 15:02 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo,
Thanks. The cyrus2dovecot looks to have worked. So if I understand
the process I now just move the MailDir folder that was created to the
users home directory on our mail server. I will try the dovecot convert
plugin. Just make sure I'm doing this correct in the config file:
If you do it only once, you don't need to use convert plugin. There's
also a convert-tool binary included.
mail_location = mbox:~/:INBOX=/userM/mail/%u
protocol imap {
mail_plugins = convert
}
plugin {
convert_mail = Maildir:~/Maildir:INBOX=/userM/mail/%u
}
Is this correct? The example on the website only shows how to convert
from mbox to MailDir.
That looks also correct.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-sieve processing optimizations
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: Seth Mattinen escreveu: snip / Seth, Eduardo; Thanks. Seth, As I read your post -- slap went my hand to my forehead. I knew that! That was the subconsciouses reason I asked I'm sure. :-) Eduardo, You're right. What I'm doing, currently, isn't all that complicated. In fact mail sieve will make it easier, simpler, and cleaner to do. I only once really got into doing anything complex using procmail and I'm not using it now. Again thanks to you both, Rod -- Well, both accomplish different things. In the first example, one and only one of the conditions will be executed. In the second one, more than one could possibly be executed. I've never looked at Sieve's code, but the first will stop at the first matching condition. In the second case, because you could make it do more than one thing, it must check each condition. If in each if you put a finish statement (or whatever is used to stop processing the file), then the second one can be more efficient, since it does not have to continue checking the file to see if there are further conditions after the if/elseif/.../else block. But in practice I doubt there is a practical difference between both. You should use the one that is more readable for you.
Re: [Dovecot] postfix/dovecot/mysql quotas not working, default dovecot.conf does.
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 20:03 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been testing using telnet and getquotaroot. when I define the
quota in dovecot.conf
quota = dirsize
Note that dirsize is superslow with maildir. quota=maildir is much
better.
user_query = \
SELECT 1015 as uid, 105 as gid, '/var/spool/mail/%d/%n' as home, \
'maildir:/var/spool/mail/%d/%n/Maildir' as mail, \
'dirsize' as quota, \
There's no need to duplicate quota here. It's already in plugin
section.
concat('*:storage=', quota, 'B') as quota_rule, \
Looks correct. A bit simpler would be concat('*:bytes=',quota)
Enable auth_debug=yes and mail_debug=yes and look at the logs. It should
show quota_rule being sent as part of master out line.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Initial support for shared mailboxes
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 12:54 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote: I just started to work on this feature and for testing purpose I wrote a very simple dummy checkpassword program. But I have a problem setting the UID and GID: I'm using: userdb_uid=12345 userdb_gid=12345 EXTRA=userdb_uid userdb_gid export userdb_uid userdb_gid EXTRA according to http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/CheckPassword but I guess it worked more or less accidentally at some point. Changed now so it should really work: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/a38778911fa9 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] 1.1.4 and trouble over NFS
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 22:19 +0200, Igor Colombi wrote: Timo Sirainen wrote: On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:57 PM, Igor Colombi wrote: Hello, I have some trouble with the current setup (it's a testing environment): 2 server with Dovecot 1.1.4 from source (OS Debian testing 2.6.26) (name: exim and exim2) 1 NFS server (OS Debian testing 2.6.26) I use NFS v.4, indexes shared over NFS. The relavant part of Dovecot configuration: Or probably also running imaptest (http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest) on both machines? Could you run http://www.dovecot.org/tools/nfstest.c and tell me what it outputs? Hello, this is the output of nftest on exim2 (client) vs exim (the other client) ./nfstest 192.168.0.70 50 /mnt/nfs1/pippo/pluto That looks correct. So either something's changed in Dovecot since I last tested it with NFS, or something's changed in Linux kernel. Or there's something else weird going on. I don't really have any good suggestions for solutions and I don't really have time to debug NFS problems right now.. Or you could of course always try if disabling NFS attribute cache fixes things, but that'll most likely also make your performance a lot worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Lots of assertion PANICs in error log
Timo Sirainen wrote: I also get the occasional error of Next message unexpectedly lost from ... for some users. I've added some debugging code to my code to figure out why this is happening. Unfortunately I've been reading my mails over a week without it happening.. We've been seeing this for a few users also with both 1.1.3 and 1.1.4. When it happens, the user can still see the mail in all clients EXCEPT Outlook, where it shows up as some permeation of blank headers/good body, no body/good headers, etc. This has only happened to mbox users, same as others who've reported it. It is reproducible for a given message; if the user logs out of Outlook and back in, it still shows up malformed. But: using pine or mutt to bounce the message results in a message that does NOT trigger the problem for the bounce recipient. Any thoughts, Timo? We're hesitating to go live with the 1.1x series for this reason. We could just convert affected folks to Maildir, but we're not really ready for that conversion on a large scale yet. -Brian
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
Simply changing auth_cache_size to a non-zero number enables caching, correct?
How big is too big?
Where does it cache it?
Here is what I set:
auth_cache_size = 1048576
I was hoping for 1GB worth of cache.
I have 16GB of memory on the system, so memory is not an issue if it
stores it in memory as opposed to disk.
Dave
Quoting David Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you, I will try the caching.
Dave
Quoting Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:48 -0400, David Cunningham wrote:
I agree. In fact, I may have found a DNS issue that may have been
causing login sessions to hang and thus reach max too quickly. The
last few hours have been stable. So, I am keeping my fingers crossed.
I have also recompiled dovecot and changed the setting in db-ldap.h
that reads:
#define DB_LDAP_MAX_QUEUE_SIZE 1024
to
#define DB_LDAP_MAX_QUEUE_SIZE 8192
If you're getting more than 1024 requests queued, something's wrong or
you have hundreds or logins per second. Which one is it? (5000 users
logging in once per minute is still only 83/sec)
The queue keeps increasing if the LDAP server isn't replying to old
requests. So have you looked at the LDAP server side if it's running too
slow?
Anyway two things you could do here:
1) Enable auth cache with large enough size so Dovecot doesn't consult
LDAP server nearly as much.
2) Increase the number of auth processes (auth { .. count=5 }), so that
you'll use more connections and hopefully the LDAP server likes that
better than one connection sending lots of requests. Or maybe not.
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:13 -0400, David Cunningham wrote: Simply changing auth_cache_size to a non-zero number enables caching, correct? How big is too big? If it uses up too much of your memory. Although you'll probably also need to change auth_process_size then, because by default it kills the process if it grows larger than 256 MB. You could also disable it by setting it to 0. Where does it cache it? Here is what I set: auth_cache_size = 1048576 I was hoping for 1GB worth of cache. I think you could do with a lot less :) I think a single user takes maybe 50-100 bytes normally. Even with 200 bytes your 5000 users would fit into 1 MB. Of course negative hits are also cached, so the rest of the memory would go to them. I'd decrease it to 10 MB or so :) Also you might want to increase auth_cache_ttl from the default hour. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] postfix/dovecot/mysql quotas not working, default dovecot.conf does.
(and oops forgot to get my last post on the list)
Hmm, I pulled a cleaner log file and got this:
Oct 8 16:44:51 webmail dovecot: auth(default): new auth connection: pid=14573
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth(default): client in:
AUTH^I1^IPLAIN^Iservice=imap^Isecured^Ilip=127.0.0.1^Irip=127.0.0.1^Ilport=143^Irport=50346^Iresp=hidden
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth-worker(default):
sql([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): query: SELECT username, domain,
password FROM mailbox WHERE username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND
domain = 'example.com' AND active = '1'
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth(default): client out:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth(default): master in:
REQUEST^I28^I14248^I1
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth(default):
passwd([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): lookup
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth(default):
passwd([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): unknown user
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth-worker(default):
sql([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): SELECT 1015 as uid, 105 as gid,
'/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111' as home,
'maildir:/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir' as mail,
concat('maildir:storage=', quota) as quota, concat('*:storage=',
quota, '') as quota_rule, FROM mailbox WHERE username =
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND domain = 'example.com' and active = '1'
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth-worker(default):
sql([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): User query failed: You have an
error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your
MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'FROM mailbox
WHERE username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND domain = 'exampl' at line 1
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth(default): master out:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: imap-login: Login:
user=[EMAIL PROTECTED], method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Loading
modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Module
loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Module
loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib11_imap_quota_plugin.so
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Effective
uid=1015, gid=105, home=
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
root: name=storage=10240 backend=maildir args=
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
rule: root=storage=10240 mailbox=* bytes=104857600 (0%) messages=0 (0%)
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
warning: bytes=99614720 (95%) messages=0 (0%)
command=/usr/local/sbin/quota_notify 95
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
warning: bytes=83886080 (80%) messages=0 (0%)
command=/usr/local/sbin/quota_notify 80
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): maildir:
data=/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
maildir++: root=/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir, index=,
control=, inbox=/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir
I see a sql error in there, but it doesn't make any sense. Why would
it hack off the last part of the domain? (domain names have been
changed to protect the innocent, it was truncated at 9 characters)
rick
At 04:29 PM 10/8/2008, Rick Steeves wrote:
At 03:27 PM 10/8/2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Note that dirsize is superslow with maildir. quota=maildir is much
better.
Yeah, I knew that, but was trying the simplest option. I've now
switched everything over to maildir.
concat('*:storage=', quota, 'B') as quota_rule, \
Looks correct. A bit simpler would be concat('*:bytes=',quota)
Enable auth_debug=yes and mail_debug=yes and look at the logs. It should
show quota_rule being sent as part of master out line.
I enabled both of those. in /var/log/maillog I'm don't see a master line.
Here's the log files:
Oct 8 16:30:32 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Module
loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so
Oct 8 16:30:32 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Module
loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib11_imap_quota_plugin.so
Oct 8 16:30:32 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Effective uid=1015, gid=105, home=
Oct 8 16:30:32 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
root: name=storage=10240 backend=maildir args=
Oct 8 16:30:32 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
rule: root=storage=10240 mailbox=* bytes=104857600 (0%) messages=0 (0%)
Oct 8 16:30:32 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
warning: bytes=99614720 (95%) messages=0 (0%)
command=/usr/local/sbin/quota_notify 95
Oct 8 16:30:32 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
warning: bytes=83886080 (80%) messages=0 (0%)
command=/usr/local/sbin/quota_notify 80
Oct 8 16:30:32 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Re: [Dovecot] postfix/dovecot/mysql quotas not working, default dovecot.conf does.
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'maildir:/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir' as mail,
concat('maildir:storage=', quota) as quota, concat('*:storage=',
quota, '') as quota_rule, FROM mailbox WHERE username =
You've a comma between quota_rule and FROM.
sql([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): User query failed: You have an
error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your
MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'FROM mailbox
WHERE username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND domain = 'exampl' at line 1
Oct 8 16:44:55 webmail dovecot: auth(default): master out:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since the primary userdb failed, Dovecot continued by trying the second
one which is static userdb. It's not really a very safe secondary
choice, since this can happen any time the SQL server is down..
(plus see my other mail I replied to privately)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Auth Issues - Urgent - Help!
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 08:01 -0400, David Cunningham wrote: After a few hours of running, I get tons of the following errors in my logs: dovecot: Oct 08 07:41:50 Error: auth(default): ldap([EMAIL PROTECTED],x.x.x.x): Request queue is full BTW. I improved this error message slightly to also tell how many seconds old data is in the queue. http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/0329dc4df5ed I guess you're using auth binds? If you weren't, I think it wouldn't be possible to fill the queue. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] postfix/dovecot/mysql quotas not working, default dovecot.conf does.
dovecot-sql.conf:
driver = mysql
connect = host=localhost dbname=postfix user=postfix password=postfix
default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT
password_query = \
SELECT username, domain, password \
FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND domain = '%d' AND active = '1'
user_query = \
SELECT 1015 as uid, 105 as gid, '/var/spool/mail/%d/%n' as home, \
'maildir:/var/spool/mail/%d/%n/Maildir' as mail, \
concat('*:storage=', quota, 'B') as quota_rule, \
FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND domain = '%d' and active = '1'
dovecot.conf
quota = maildir
quota_rule = *:storage=102400
quota_warning = storage=95%% /usr/local/sbin/quota_notify 95
quota_warning2 = storage=80%% /usr/local/sbin/quota_notify 80
Telnet:
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK Dovecot ready.
. login [EMAIL PROTECTED] Test111
. OK Logged in.
. getquotaroot inbox
* QUOTAROOT inbox
* QUOTA (STORAGE 67 102400)
. OK Getquotaroot completed.
Quota still shows what's in dovecot.conf
/var/log/maillog
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth(default): client in:
AUTH^I1^IPLAIN^Iservice=imap^Isecured^Ilip=127.0.0.1^Irip=127.0.0.1^Ilport=143^Irport=49601^Iresp=hidden
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth-worker(default):
sql([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): query: SELECT username, domain,
password FROM mailbox WHERE username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND
domain = 'example.com' AND active = '1'
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth(default): client out:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth(default): master in:
REQUEST^I11^I23281^I1
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth(default):
passwd([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): lookup
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth(default):
passwd([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): unknown user
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth-worker(default):
sql([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): SELECT 1015 as uid, 105 as gid,
'/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111' as home,
'maildir:/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir' as mail,
concat('*:storage=', quota, 'B') as quota_rule, FROM mailbox WHERE
username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND domain = 'example.com' and active = '1'
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth-worker(default):
sql([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): User query failed: You have an
error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your
MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'FROM mailbox
WHERE username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND domain = 'example.c' at line 1
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth(default): master out:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Loading
modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Module
loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Module
loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib11_imap_quota_plugin.so
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Effective
uid=1015, gid=105, home=
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
root: name= backend=maildir args=
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
rule: root= mailbox=* bytes=104857600 (0%) messages=0 (0%)
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
warning: bytes=99614720 (95%) messages=0 (0%)
command=/usr/local/sbin/quota_notify 95
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Quota
warning: bytes=83886080 (80%) messages=0 (0%)
command=/usr/local/sbin/quota_notify 80
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): maildir:
data=/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
maildir++: root=/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir, index=,
control=, inbox=/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: imap-login: Login:
user=[EMAIL PROTECTED], method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured
It looks like the error is in all likelihood here:
'/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111' as home,
'maildir:/var/spool/mail/example.com/test111/Maildir' as mail,
concat('*:storage=', quota, 'B') as quota_rule, FROM mailbox WHERE
username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND domain = 'example.com' and active = '1'
Oct 8 17:16:23 webmail dovecot: auth-worker(default):
sql([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): User query failed: You have an
error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your
MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'FROM mailbox
WHERE username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' AND domain = 'example.c' at line 1
What's interesting is that it's not truncated in the line above it
wt?
Rick
At 04:46 PM 10/8/2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:29 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enable auth_debug=yes and mail_debug=yes and look at the logs. It should
show quota_rule being sent as part of master out line.
I enabled both of those. in /var/log/maillog I'm don't see a
Re: [Dovecot] Something weird happening...
Claudio Prono wrote: Very strange, i have tryied to chmod 666 all log files, like that: -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 681 Oct 8 11:08 dovecot-err.log -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1039 Oct 8 11:02 dovecot-inf.log (Is terrible i know, but only a test) I think you should follow the suggestion already provided: You should chown dovecot /var/log/dovecot-*.log Now i have another error (written in log of dovecot!) deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Oct 08 11:08:20 Error: Can't connect to auth server at /var/run/dovecot/auth-master: Permission denied Seems all a problem of user running dovecot...is not root? Dunno why... In config there isn't nothing to do so. Any suggestion? The auth-master permission problem is different, but the configuration you provided does not give enough information to identify a certain solution. It does imply that you have not followed the relevant documentation for using the LDA: http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix You need to make sure that whatever user you are running *deliver* as (which is a function of your postfix config) has read/write access to the master socket, which has its user, group, and permissions set by the dovecot config.
Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question
Sascha Wilde schrieb:
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
users after imap search, otherwise you always need some admin (
perhaps
with shell permissions ) for editing subcriptions and acls which not
Actually the SUBSCRIBE IMAP command is enough to make the mailboxes
visible, no admin/shell access needed.
This doesn't work for me.
Actually the whole new shared namespaces feature doesn't work as
expected for me. Using this namespace configuration:
namespace shared {
separator = /
# %%u gets expanded to the remote user. Instead of %%u you can
# also use %%n and %%d.
prefix = users/%%u/
location =
Maildir:/kolab/var/dovecot/spool/%%u/maildir:INDEX=/kolab/var/dovecot/spool/%u/maildir/shared_idx
#location = Maildir:/kolab/var/dovecot/spool/%%u/maildir
subscriptions = no
}
I get errors when using list:
l002 list *
* LIST (\HasChildren) / INBOX
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Calendar
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Contacts
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Journal
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Notes
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/Tasks
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX/bla
l002 NO Unknown internal list error
And cant subscribe or select an existing mailbox of another user:
s001 subscribe users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla
s001 NO Invalid mailbox name: users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla
FWIW referencing an non existent mailbox causes an different error:
s002 subscribe users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla
s002 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist: users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla
s102 select users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX/blablabla
* OK [CLOSED]
s102 NO Invalid mailbox name
And IMAP ACL commands are (at least partially) already implemented by
Kolab people.
Yes, look at http://hg.intevation.de/kolab/dovecot-1.2_acl-branch as
announced... ;-)
cheers
sascha
Hi Sascha,
why you need an extra branch for that ?
why not just code into dovecot directly
or is it ment as temp split and later merge ?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
[Dovecot] Folders within folders?
I'm trying to migrate my emails from an existing server (University of Washington IMAP toolkit) to dovecot. My clients are all using Thunderbird. I'm moving to a new Ubuntu based server (old one was Centos4) and selected dovecot solely because it was the default option. I'm not committed to it if it isn't the right tool for my application. My existing server allows hierarchical folders and these are used to organize 20 years worth of carefully sorted emails. I can create a new folders on the dovecot server but Thunderbird doesn't allow me to create new sub-folders within them. I think T-bird is configured OK since this works on the old server. Is this a dovecot limitation or have I configured it incorrectly?
Re: [Dovecot] Folders within folders?
ed beers wrote: I'm trying to migrate my emails from an existing server (University of Washington IMAP toolkit) to dovecot. My clients are all using Thunderbird. I'm moving to a new Ubuntu based server (old one was Centos4) and selected dovecot solely because it was the default option. I'm not committed to it if it isn't the right tool for my application. I very much doubt Dovecot is not the right tool for the job, if IMAP is what you're after :) My existing server allows hierarchical folders and these are used to organize 20 years worth of carefully sorted emails. I can create a new folders on the dovecot server but Thunderbird doesn't allow me to create new sub-folders within them. I think T-bird is configured OK since this works on the old server. Is this a dovecot limitation or have I configured it incorrectly? This is a mail store limitation, somewhat. If you've opted for mbox, things can be tricky. I've found for one server I use I have to create folders with a trailing / in order to be able to create sub-folders in them. However, they then can not contain messages as well. Maildir does not suffer this limitation, as it doesn't use a hierarchy of filesystem directories to denote mail folders. Each folder is its own directory. -- Curtis Maloney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Dovecot] Folders within folders?
On Oct 8 2008, ed beers wrote: I'm trying to migrate my emails from an existing server (University of Washington IMAP toolkit) to dovecot. My clients are all using Thunderbird. I'm moving to a new Ubuntu based server (old one was Centos4) and selected dovecot solely because it was the default option. I'm not committed to it if it isn't the right tool for my application. My existing server allows hierarchical folders and these are used to organize 20 years worth of carefully sorted emails. I can create a new folders on the dovecot server but Thunderbird doesn't allow me to create new sub-folders within them. I think T-bird is configured OK since this works on the old server. Is this a dovecot limitation or have I configured it incorrectly? You have something configured incorrectly. Dovecot allows creating folders within folders out of the box (as does any non-idiotic IMAP server). I'd double-check the Thunderbird config for your test Dovecot account against one that you know will create subfolders on your UW server. They worked exactly the same when we tested this functionality during our conversion from UW. -- Brian Hayden UMN OIT Internet Services
