[Dovecot] FTS Plugin design

2009-04-13 Thread Rui Carneiro
Hi all,

Currently I am developing some changes on the solr plugin. I want this
plugin indexing also the attachment's content. I have already started to
look on plugin's source but I am having some problems understanding how it
works.

I didn't understood yet what is the plugin's design and how the plugins are
called from the core system and I was wondering if anyone could help me with
that.

Sorry if this doubts sound stupid but I am newcomer on Dovecot.

Regards,
Rui Carneiro


Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot+Sieve

2009-04-13 Thread Andrey Garkin

Hi All!!!
I have successfully configure my mail server. Dovecot+Postfix+Mysql.
It is work.
In the mail.log I see:
postfix/pipe[19520]: DFCCC640048: to=u...@domain.ru, relay=dovecot, 
delay=0.19, delays=0.06/0.07/0/0.07, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered 
via dovecot service)

But the sieve plugin isn't work. :'(
My dovecot.conf:
plugin {
sieve = /home/vmail/domain.ru/u...@domain.ru/dovecot.sieve
}
/In the dovecot.log I see:/
Error: 
sieve_execute_bytecode(/home/vmail/domain.ru/u...@domain.ru/dovecot.sievec) 
failed

/In the dovecot-info.log I see:/
Info: cmusieve: Using sieve path: 
/home/vmail/domain.ru/u...@domain.ru/dovecot.sieve

deliver(u...@domain.ru):
Info: cmusieve: Executing script 
/home/vmail/domain.ru/u...@domain.ru/dovecot.sievec



Please Help Me... :'(


Re: [Dovecot] Issue with converting users from cyrus user.domain.com

2009-04-13 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:47:22AM -0600, Preston Lord wrote:

[...]

 dovecot --version
 1.0.15

Hmmm. The newest avaliable packaged version to etch seems to be 1.0.15,
that's from backports [1], it seems. The standard etch package is
1.0.rc15 [2]

Even Lenny (stable by now) has 1.0.15 as default [3].

If you go to squeeze (aka testing), you'd get 1.1.13 [4].

So even upgrading to lenny (which I would recommend, if there are no
reasons holding you back) would't bring you a newer Dovecot version. And
upgrading to testing... well, it depends very much on what you are
doing.

So if you want a newer version on etch or lenny, you'll have to compile
it for yourself. With Debian, you have two options: just downloading the
original sources and compiling (whicshould be fairly easy with
dovecot!) or letting APT do it for you. The advantage of the second
approach would be that the package comes already configured in a way
that it fits the rest of the system, that the package database knows
about the installed package (and would be willing to upgrade it with a
later version) and that APT can do for you the legwork of geetting
whatever packages needed to actually do the build (the so-called build
dependencies). See [5] for some instructions on how to do that.


[1] http://packages.debian.org/etch-backports/dovecot-imapd
[2] http://packages.debian.org/etch/dovecot-imapd
[3] http://packages.debian.org/lenny/dovecot-imapd
[4] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/dovecot-imapd
[5] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-sourcehandling.en.html

Regards
- -- tomás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJ40F1Bcgs9XrR2kYRAorWAJ0fPNl4aIuZ2REEu8Bj2EX8cSE/BwCfVnz/
VqKHR2PvpaC8+9GFf8lLNH0=
=p7HC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


[Dovecot] How can I skip EOH in headers?

2009-04-13 Thread Konstantin Lepa

Hello.

My callback for get_stream is called from mail_get_stream in  
mail_storage_copy. Further, mbox_save_init is called and it called  
mbox_save_get_input_stream.



backtrace (A) for my callback:
#0  i_stream_header_filter_read (stream=0x8147e00) at istream-header- 
filter.c:314
#1  0x080cdbaa in parse_header (mstream=0x8147e00) at istream-header- 
filter.c:356
#2  0x080cdc0c in i_stream_header_filter_seek (stream=0x8147e00,  
v_offset=0, mark=false) at istream-header-filter.c:370
#3  0x080dea5b in i_stream_seek (stream=0x8147e28, v_offset=0) at  
istream.c:155
#4  0x080dfeae in i_stream_create_concat (input=0x8115528) at istream- 
concat.c:260
#5  0x2831e03d in rarules_get_stream (mail=0x8141860, hdr_size=0x0,  
body_size=0x0, stream_r=0xbfbfe920)

at /home/pitman/work/rarules/src/rarules-plugin.c:181
#6  0x0809d830 in mail_get_stream (mail=0x8141860, hdr_size=0x0,  
body_size=0x0, stream_r=0xbfbfe920) at mail.c:149
#7  0x0809d936 in mail_storage_copy (t=0x811b980, mail=0x8141860,  
flags=0, keywords=0x0, dest_mail=0x0) at mail-copy.c:17
#8  0x080a0632 in mailbox_copy (t=0x811b980, mail=0x8141860, flags=0,  
keywords=0x0, dest_mail=0x0) at mail-storage.c:763
#9  0x0805960d in deliver_save (namespaces=0x8121c68,  
storage_r=0xbfbfeb94, mailbox=0x811a360 Draft, mail=0x8141860,

flags=0, keywords=0x0) at deliver.c:234
...


backtrace (B) for mbox_save_init:
#0  mbox_save_get_input_stream (ctx=0x811bb00, input=0x814c728) at  
mbox-save.c:384
#1  0x08078165 in mbox_save_init (_t=0x811b980, flags=0, keywords=0x0,  
received_date=1239634649, timezone_offset=0,
from_envelope=0x80f292b MAILER-DAEMON, input=0x814c728,  
dest_mail=0x8150060, ctx_r=0xbfbfe924) at mbox-save.c:512
#2  0x080a0560 in mailbox_save_init (t=0x811b980, flags=0,  
keywords=0x0, received_date=-1, timezone_offset=0,
from_envelope=0x80f292b MAILER-DAEMON, input=0x814c728,  
dest_mail=0x0, ctx_r=0xbfbfe924) at mail-storage.c:728
#3  0x0809d9c4 in mail_storage_copy (t=0x811b980, mail=0x8141860,  
flags=0, keywords=0x0, dest_mail=0x0) at mail-copy.c:28
#4  0x080a0632 in mailbox_copy (t=0x811b980, mail=0x8141860, flags=0,  
keywords=0x0, dest_mail=0x0) at mail-storage.c:763
#5  0x0805960d in deliver_save (namespaces=0x8121c68,  
storage_r=0xbfbfeb94, mailbox=0x80f2af9 INBOX, mail=0x8141860,

flags=0, keywords=0x0) at deliver.c:234
...


The function mbox_save_get_input_stream calls  
i_stream_create_header_filter and i_stream_create_concat.
The function read_header (istream-header-filter.c) finds EOH for call  
of i_stream_seek (backtrace B), but my calls of  
i_stream_create_header_filter and i_stream_create_concat doesn't find   
EOH (backtrace A). Why? I don't understand.


I want to call rarules_header_callback for disable eoh so as to add my  
headers.


Thanks

P.S. Sorry for my bad english :-(


It's  mbox_save_get_input_stream:

mbox_save_get_input_stream(struct mbox_save_context *ctx, struct  
istream *input)

{
struct istream *filter, *ret, *cache_input, *streams[3];

/* filter out unwanted headers and keep track of headers' MD5  
sum */
filter = i_stream_create_header_filter(input,  
HEADER_FILTER_EXCLUDE |

   HEADER_FILTER_NO_CR |

HEADER_FILTER_ADD_MISSING_EOH,

   mbox_save_drop_headers,

mbox_save_drop_headers_count,
   save_header_callback,  
ctx);


if ((ctx-mbox-storage-storage.flags 
 MAIL_STORAGE_FLAG_KEEP_HEADER_MD5) != 0) {
/* we're using MD5 sums to generate POP3 UIDLs.
   clients don't like it much if there are duplicates,
   so make sure that there can't be any by appending
   our own X-Delivery-ID header. */
const char *hdr;

T_BEGIN {
mbox_save_x_delivery_id(ctx);
} T_END;
hdr = ctx-x_delivery_id_header;

streams[0] = i_stream_create_from_data(hdr,  
strlen(hdr));

streams[1] = filter;
streams[2] = NULL;
ret = i_stream_create_concat(streams);
i_stream_unref(filter);
filter = ret;
}

It's my callback for get_stream:
---
static int rarules_get_stream(struct mail *mail, struct message_size  
*hdr_size,

  struct message_size *body_size,
  struct istream **stream_r)
{
struct rarules_mail *m = RA_MAIL_CONTEXT(mail);
struct istream *stream = NULL;

unsigned int deleted = 0;
unsigned int added = 0;

int ret = 0;

DPRINT(func is called);

/* standard get_stream for mail storage format */

Re: [Dovecot] help with ldap config

2009-04-13 Thread Ricardo Kleemann

Thank you.


Ricardo Kleemann wrote:

user_filter = ((objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u,ou=%d))


Do you mean '((objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u)(ou=%d))'? or 
'((objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u))'?


Or you can just use '(objectClass=posixAccount)' for test.



This seems to have worked (using only (objectClass=posixAccount)).

Now I have another question... I'm currently using courier-imap, Maildir 
files.


Do I need to run conversion, or can I simply let dovecot run and create its 
own indexing without attempting to convert anything from courier?


Ricardo 



[Dovecot] Suggestion: deliver should honor mail_log_prefix

2009-04-13 Thread Mike Abbott
I can set the log prefix for imap/pop3 processes using mail_log_prefix  
but the log prefix for deliver is hard-coded.  (I'm using 1.1.13.)   
Deliver should either honor mail_log_prefix or have its own setting  
(deliver_log_prefix?).  What do you think?


[Dovecot] Handling ENFILE

2009-04-13 Thread Mike Abbott
My mail server consumed all of its configured file table slots and  
started returning ENFILE (Too many open files in system) for many  
operations.  This wreaked havoc with dovecot-1.1.13.  Here are some  
areas where dovecot should detect and more gracefully handle ENFILE  
error returns:


1.  Deliver should report an error more helpful than Unknown internal  
error when fdatasync_path fails:
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:53:20 Error: fdatasync_path(/Volumes/MailData/ 
user/new) failed: Too many open files in system
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:53:20 Info: msgid=...: save failed to  
INBOX: BUG: Unknown internal error


2.  Index files should not be fscked when they could not be opened due  
to ENFILE:
Error: IMAP(user): open() failed with index file /Volumes/MailData/ 
user/.Deleted Messages/dovecot.index: Too many open files in system
Warning: IMAP(user): fscking index file /Volumes/MailData/ 
user/.Deleted Messages/dovecot.index


3.  Dovecot should not crash when mail transaction logs become  
corrupt, or appear to have become corrupt due to ENFILE.  Here is a  
sequence of error messages from the log but I can't tell whether the  
IMAP ones up through the panic in the middle are all from the same  
process, or from different processes.

deliver(user): Apr 10 14:55:32 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:55:54 Error: open() failed with index file / 
Volumes/MailData/user/dovecot.index: Too many open files in system
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:55:54 Error: open() failed with file /Volumes/ 
MailData/user/dovecot.index.log.2: Too many open files in system
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:55:57 Error: open() failed with index cache  
file /Volumes/MailData/user/dovecot.index.cache: Too many open files  
in system
dovecot: Apr 10 14:56:08 Warning: IMAP(user): fscking index file / 
Volumes/MailData/user/dovecot.index
dovecot: Apr 10 14:56:16 Error: IMAP(user): Fixed index file /Volumes/ 
MailData/user/dovecot.index: log_file_seq 15 - 2

deliver(user): Apr 10 14:56:19 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:56:20 Error: Corrupted transaction log file / 
Volumes/MailData/user/dovecot.index.log seq 2: record size too small  
(type=0x0, offset=23088, size=0) (sync_offset=36848)
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:56:20 Warning: fscking index file (in-memory  
index)
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:56:21 Info: msgid=...: save failed to  
INBOX: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more  
information. [2009-04-10 14:56:20]
dovecot: Apr 10 14:56:40 Panic: IMAP(user): file mail-transaction-log- 
view.c: line 103 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed:  
(min_file_seq = max_file_seq)
dovecot: Apr 10 14:56:40 Error: IMAP(user): Raw backtrace: [see below  
for better backtrace]
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:56:45 Error: Transaction log file /Volumes/ 
MailData/user/dovecot.index.log: marked corrupted

deliver(user): Apr 10 14:57:04 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:57:23 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:57:49 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:58:21 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:58:41 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:59:09 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:59:28 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 14:59:43 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 15:00:57 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 15:03:01 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
deliver(user): Apr 10 15:03:27 Info: msgid=...: saved mail to INBOX
dovecot: Apr 10 15:21:41 Error: IMAP(user): Corrupted transaction log  
file /Volumes/MailData/user/dovecot.index.log seq 2: Invalid  
transaction log size (36848 vs 23088): /Volumes/MailData/user/ 
dovecot.index.log (sync_offset=36848)
dovecot: Apr 10 15:21:42 Info: imap-login: Login: user=user,  
method=CRAM-MD5, rip=..., lip=..., TLS


The backtrace for the assertion failure was:
0   libSystem.B.dylib   0x7fff8007c102 __kill + 10
1   libSystem.B.dylib   0x7fff800f7ffc abort + 83
2   imap  	0x00010006a22e  
default_fatal_finish + 70
3   imap  	0x00010006a27c  
i_syslog_fatal_handler + 0

4   imap0x0001000699db i_info + 0
5   imap  	0x000100058542  
mail_transaction_log_view_set + 104
6   imap  	0x000100053b4c  
view_sync_set_log_view_range + 125
7   imap  	0x000100053fc5  
mail_index_view_sync_begin + 378
8   imap  	0x00010003c26e  
index_mailbox_sync_init + 129
9   imap  	0x000100018457  
maildir_storage_sync_init + 229
10  imap  	0x0001c6bb imap_sync_init +  
132
11  imap  	0x0001c90d cmd_sync_delayed  
+ 477
12  imap   

Re: [Dovecot] Handling ENFILE

2009-04-13 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 14:29 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
 My mail server consumed all of its configured file table slots and  
 started returning ENFILE (Too many open files in system) for many  
 operations.  This wreaked havoc with dovecot-1.1.13.  Here are some  
 areas where dovecot should detect and more gracefully handle ENFILE  
 error returns:

I also just tried making nfs_safe_open() fail randomly and reproducing
these.

 1.  Deliver should report an error more helpful than Unknown internal  
 error when fdatasync_path fails:
 deliver(user): Apr 10 14:53:20 Error: fdatasync_path(/Volumes/MailData/ 
 user/new) failed: Too many open files in system
 deliver(user): Apr 10 14:53:20 Info: msgid=...: save failed to  
 INBOX: BUG: Unknown internal error

http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/576e77047959

 2.  Index files should not be fscked when they could not be opened due  
 to ENFILE:
..
 3.  Dovecot should not crash when mail transaction logs become  
 corrupt, or appear to have become corrupt due to ENFILE.  

I made nfs_safe_open() return failures randomly and found all kinds of
bugs with it. I committed several fixes to hg, but I still get some
weird errors once in a while, I'll try to debug more later..


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] auth-master: Permission denied [sigh]

2009-04-13 Thread James Butler
My latest test:

spam:dovecot = user: spam
user1:dovecot = user: user1
root:dovecot = binary: /usr/local/libexec/deliver
root:dovecot 777 = dir: /var/run/dovecot/

Still getting:

deliver(user1): Can't connect to auth server at \
 /var/run/dovecot/auth-master: Permission denied

What's the key to this problem?

If I set spam, user1, deliver and /var/run/dovecot/ to the same group, and
give read/write permission in that directory to that group, why can't they
all use auth-master?

1) User 'spam:dovecot' runs Smapassassin
2) Hands off to deliver (root:dovecot)
3) Deliver assumes 'user1:dovecot' identity
4) Can't access auth-master in 'root:dovecot' directory (777)

So it's 'auth-master' that is (a) not available to 'user1' AND (b) not
available to group 'dovecot'. Huh? Why not?

I'm obviously missing info about the temporary 'auth-master'.
Can anyone please give me a hand? I'd really appreciate it.
Thank you.

James

 Thank you! Even setting the /var/run/dovecot tree to all chmod 777s
 doesn't help. I'm probably mis-remembering the ownership of auth-master,
 in my original note. I haven't seen it since I left my notes at work.

 With regard to this maillog entry:

 postfix/pipe[29452]: 60990FA01BA: to=recipi...@example-receive.com, \
  relay=spamassassin, delay=6, delays=0.33/0.01/0/5.7, dsn=4.3.0, \
  status=deferred (temporary failure)

 It IS a (temporary failure), because soon after I revert to the simple:
  mailbox_command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
 the message arrives to the recipient user's mailbox.

 It's the spamassassin = deliver handoff and user SWITCH that seems to be
 problematic.

 But then, my brain is all garbled, at this point, so I can't really trust
 any of my logic. I'll check back in, tomorrow.

 Thanks, again.

 James

 Hi,

 I was having problems with permissions on auth-master too. I solve them
 creating manually the folder /var/run/dovecot with correct permissions
 but
 i
 see you already did that :\

 On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:27 PM, James Butler
 jbut...@thebestdefense.comwrote:

 I've been messing with this for too long, now, and I'm blind to
 whatever's
 wrong. Or I'm simply being dense. Either way, I need help with a common
 issue.

 I'm trying to get Postfix+Spamassassin+Dovecot going on Fedora 10.
 (I'll
 get back to the global Sieve thingy soon, but I need to get this going,
 first.)

 When using the simple:
  mailbox_command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
 everything is cool, except there's no Spamassassin involvement,
 obviously.

 The problem shows itself when the Spamassassin user hands off to the
 recipient user and Deliver + the recipient user tries to access
 /var/run/dovecot/auth-master.

 Thank you for any insight you can provide.

 /var/run/dovecot: 755 root:dovecot
 /var/run/dovecot/login: 750 root:dovecot
 /var/run/dovecot/auth-master: 750 root:dovecot
 (I think. auth-master is a temporary file? Comes and goes.)

 From /etc/postfix/main.cf

 mailbox_transport = spamassassin

 From /etc/postfix/master.cf:

 spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
  user=spam argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
  -f ${sender} -d ${user} -m ${extension}

 Here's my 'socket listen' section from /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf:

 socket listen {
  master {
  path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
  mode = 0666
  #user =
  group = dovecot
  }
  client {
  path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
  mode = 0666
  #user =
  group = dovecot
  }
 }

 From /var/log/maillog:

 Postfix receives the message:

 postfix/smtpd[29447]: connect from \
  IP-ADD-RE-SS.ptr.example-send.com[IP.ADD.RE.SS]
 postfix/smtpd[29447]: 60990FA01BA: \
  client=IP-ADD-RE-SS.ptr.example-send.com[IP.ADD.RE.SS]
 postfix/cleanup[29451]: 60990FA01BA: \
  message-id=49e20bf2.4090...@example-send.com
 postfix/qmgr[29441]: 60990FA01BA: from=sen...@example-send.com, \
  size=812, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
 postfix/smtpd[29447]: disconnect from \
  IP-ADD-RE-SS.ptr.example-send.com[IP.ADD.RE.SS]

 Spamassassin processes the message as user 'spam':

 spamd[4121]: spamd: processing message\
  49e20bf2.4090...@example-send.com for spam:653
 spamd[4121]: spamd: clean message (3.0/5.0) for spam:653 in 5.2
 seconds,\
  793 bytes.
 spamd[4121]: spamd: result: . 2 - RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_SPACE_RATIO \
  scantime=5.2,size=793,user=spam,uid=653,required_score=5.0, \
  rhost=localhost.localdomain,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=42493, \
  mid=49e20bf2.4090...@example-send.com,autolearn=no

 Spamassassin pipes result to Deliver which runs as recipient user.

 Deliver as recipient user doesn't have permission to auth:

 deliver(recipient): Can't connect to auth server at \
  /var/run/dovecot/auth-master: Permission denied
 postfix/pipe[29452]: 60990FA01BA: to=recipi...@example-receive.com, \
  relay=spamassassin, delay=6, delays=0.33/0.01/0/5.7, dsn=4.3.0, \
  status=deferred (temporary failure)

 1) I must use the 'user=' arg for spamc
 2) Can't use 'user=${user}' or $user:
   fatal: get_service_attr: unknown username: ${user}
 3) Must 

Re: [Dovecot] auth-master: Permission denied [sigh]

2009-04-13 Thread Noel Butler
Unless they've changed something, doesn't the S.A method as you are
using generate backscatter, I'd be using something more efficient like
MailScanner or amavisd-new
either will take you no more than 15 minutes to setup and avoid the past
several days of your problems, pf and dovecot work well together.


On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 08:48, James Butler wrote:

 My latest test:
 
 spam:dovecot = user: spam
 user1:dovecot = user: user1
 root:dovecot = binary: /usr/local/libexec/deliver
 root:dovecot 777 = dir: /var/run/dovecot/
 
 Still getting:
 
 deliver(user1): Can't connect to auth server at \
  /var/run/dovecot/auth-master: Permission denied
 
 What's the key to this problem?
 
 If I set spam, user1, deliver and /var/run/dovecot/ to the same group, and
 give read/write permission in that directory to that group, why can't they
 all use auth-master?
 
 1) User 'spam:dovecot' runs Smapassassin
 2) Hands off to deliver (root:dovecot)
 3) Deliver assumes 'user1:dovecot' identity
 4) Can't access auth-master in 'root:dovecot' directory (777)
 
 So it's 'auth-master' that is (a) not available to 'user1' AND (b) not
 available to group 'dovecot'. Huh? Why not?


Re: [Dovecot] auth-master: Permission denied [sigh]

2009-04-13 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 15:48 -0700, James Butler wrote:
 1) User 'spam:dovecot' runs Smapassassin
 2) Hands off to deliver (root:dovecot)

Have you set up some kind of setuid-root deliver, or why is it running
as root:dovecot here instead of spam:dovecot?

 3) Deliver assumes 'user1:dovecot' identity
 4) Can't access auth-master in 'root:dovecot' directory (777)

4) happens before 3).

 So it's 'auth-master' that is (a) not available to 'user1' AND (b) not
 available to group 'dovecot'. Huh? Why not?

My guess is that deliver isn't really started with dovecot group
permission.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] why not install utils (idxview logview ...) with dovecot in bin/sbin dir?

2009-04-13 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 10:37 +0800, Xueron Nee wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I just found these useful tools :) they were installed in libexec dir :)

If they were installed to bin/ or sbin/, they would have to be renamed
so people would know they're part of Dovecot. I don't think it's really
worth the effort. What do you use them for anyway? For me they're mainly
for debugging what went wrong.

But I am considering on moving dovecot-lda (ex. deliver) to bin/.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] why not install utils (idxview logview ...) with dovecot in bin/sbin dir?

2009-04-13 Thread Noel Butler
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:19, Timo Sirainen wrote:


 But I am considering on moving dovecot-lda (ex. deliver) to bin/.

Move?  Maybe a soft symlink be better?


Re: [Dovecot] why not install utils (idxview logview ...) with dovecot in bin/sbin dir?

2009-04-13 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:23 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
 On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:19, Timo Sirainen wrote:
 
 
  But I am considering on moving dovecot-lda (ex. deliver) to bin/.
 
 Move?  Maybe a soft symlink be better?

For backwards compatibility or why?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] why not install utils (idxview logview ...) with dovecot in bin/sbin dir?

2009-04-13 Thread Noel Butler
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:26, Timo Sirainen wrote:

 On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:23 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
  On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:19, Timo Sirainen wrote:
  
  
   But I am considering on moving dovecot-lda (ex. deliver) to bin/.
  
  Move?  Maybe a soft symlink be better?
 
 For backwards compatibility or why?


Yes, for backwards compatibility.