Re: [Dovecot] Post-login scripting - Trash cleanup
Am 28.02.2012 20:26, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:26:11 +0100, Robert Schetterer > wrote: >> Am 28.02.2012 19:11, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net: >>> We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older >>> than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did >>> this >>> cause logins to slow down too much waiting for the trash to purge? One >>> idea was to execute the trash purge script once a day by tracking their >>> logins and seeing that it has already ran that day. Another idea was > to >>> call the trash purge script in the background and continue without >>> acknowledging that it has finished to keep logins speedy. >> >> look here if this match/solve your problem >> >> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Expire > > Expire looks to be useful, but it appears to be something that enhances > expunging of messages rather than automates the process if I am reading > correctly. We would like to make the process for expunging old Trash > messages as automated and inline as possible. wouldnt doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 90d as cron job do what you want ? -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.1 with custom OpenSSL fails to build
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> There seems to be a new dependency in some modules (eg, lib-storage,
>> libdovecot-lda, libdovecot-ssl) on OpenSSL. In Dovecot 2.0, those
>> modules didn't require OpenSSL, but 2.1 does.
>>
>> For the linking process the path to the OpenSSL library isn't
>> specified properly (SSL_LIBS). Dovecot fails to build if OpenSSL
>> is in a non-standard path. (Haven't checked if SSL_CFLAGS isn't
>> properly used as well.)
>
> Maybe http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/c07415305d9e fixes
> everything?
That's the way to go. Makes things better, but I've found three more
dependencies. This patch is against the daily snapshot 20120228.
(Sorry for the changes to Makefile.in which you won't need. But this way
I don't have to rebuild Makefile.in from Makefile.am when compiling. ;-)
diff -ur dovecot-20120228.original/src/auth/Makefile.am
dovecot-20120228/src/auth/Makefile.am
--- dovecot-20120228.original/src/auth/Makefile.am 2012-02-26
04:00:02.0 +0100
+++ dovecot-20120228/src/auth/Makefile.am 2012-02-29 01:38:41.0
+0100
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@
libauthdb_imap_la_LIBADD = \
../lib-imap-client/libimap_client.la \
../lib-ssl-iostream/libssl_iostream.la \
- $(LIBDOVECOT)
+ $(LIBDOVECOT) $(SSL_LIBS)
libauthdb_imap_la_CPPFLAGS = \
$(AM_CPPFLAGS) \
-I$(top_srcdir)/src/lib-imap \
diff -ur dovecot-20120228.original/src/auth/Makefile.in
dovecot-20120228/src/auth/Makefile.in
--- dovecot-20120228.original/src/auth/Makefile.in 2012-02-28
04:00:12.0 +0100
+++ dovecot-20120228/src/auth/Makefile.in 2012-02-29 01:38:44.0
+0100
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@
libauthdb_imap_la_LIBADD = \
../lib-imap-client/libimap_client.la \
../lib-ssl-iostream/libssl_iostream.la \
- $(LIBDOVECOT)
+ $(LIBDOVECOT) $(SSL_LIBS)
libauthdb_imap_la_CPPFLAGS = \
$(AM_CPPFLAGS) \
diff -ur dovecot-20120228.original/src/lib-storage/Makefile.am
dovecot-20120228/src/lib-storage/Makefile.am
--- dovecot-20120228.original/src/lib-storage/Makefile.am 2012-02-10
04:00:02.0 +0100
+++ dovecot-20120228/src/lib-storage/Makefile.am2012-02-29
01:38:21.0 +0100
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = libdovecot-storage.la
libdovecot_storage_la_SOURCES =
-libdovecot_storage_la_LIBADD = $(shlibs) $(MODULE_LIBS)
+libdovecot_storage_la_LIBADD = $(shlibs) $(MODULE_LIBS) $(SSL_LIBS)
libdovecot_storage_la_DEPENDENCIES = $(shlibs)
libdovecot_storage_la_LDFLAGS = -export-dynamic
diff -ur dovecot-20120228.original/src/lib-storage/Makefile.in
dovecot-20120228/src/lib-storage/Makefile.in
--- dovecot-20120228.original/src/lib-storage/Makefile.in 2012-02-28
04:00:15.0 +0100
+++ dovecot-20120228/src/lib-storage/Makefile.in2012-02-29
01:38:21.0 +0100
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = libdovecot-storage.la
libdovecot_storage_la_SOURCES =
-libdovecot_storage_la_LIBADD = $(shlibs) $(MODULE_LIBS)
+libdovecot_storage_la_LIBADD = $(shlibs) $(MODULE_LIBS) $(SSL_LIBS)
libdovecot_storage_la_DEPENDENCIES = $(shlibs)
libdovecot_storage_la_LDFLAGS = -export-dynamic
test_programs = \
diff -ur dovecot-20120228.original/src/login-common/Makefile.am
dovecot-20120228/src/login-common/Makefile.am
--- dovecot-20120228.original/src/login-common/Makefile.am 2011-11-09
04:00:01.0 +0100
+++ dovecot-20120228/src/login-common/Makefile.am 2012-02-29
01:38:21.0 +0100
@@ -40,6 +40,6 @@
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = libdovecot-login.la
libdovecot_login_la_SOURCES =
-libdovecot_login_la_LIBADD = liblogin.la
../lib-ssl-iostream/libssl_iostream.la ../lib-dovecot/libdovecot.la
+libdovecot_login_la_LIBADD = liblogin.la
../lib-ssl-iostream/libssl_iostream.la ../lib-dovecot/libdovecot.la $(SSL_LIBS)
libdovecot_login_la_DEPENDENCIES = liblogin.la
libdovecot_login_la_LDFLAGS = -export-dynamic
diff -ur dovecot-20120228.original/src/login-common/Makefile.in
dovecot-20120228/src/login-common/Makefile.in
--- dovecot-20120228.original/src/login-common/Makefile.in 2012-02-28
04:00:18.0 +0100
+++ dovecot-20120228/src/login-common/Makefile.in 2012-02-29
01:38:21.0 +0100
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
pkginc_lib_HEADERS = $(headers)
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = libdovecot-login.la
libdovecot_login_la_SOURCES =
-libdovecot_login_la_LIBADD = liblogin.la
../lib-ssl-iostream/libssl_iostream.la ../lib-dovecot/libdovecot.la
+libdovecot_login_la_LIBADD = liblogin.la
../lib-ssl-iostream/libssl_iostream.la ../lib-dovecot/libdovecot.la $(SSL_LIBS)
libdovecot_login_la_DEPENDENCIES = liblogin.la
libdovecot_login_la_LDFLAGS = -export-dynamic
all: all-am
Re: [Dovecot] Master user
On 02/28/2012 08:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.2.2012, at 21.04, Emiliano Rago wrote: USER#0113607363585#011rago#011uid=5000#011gid=5000#011home=/#011master_user=rago#011master_user=admin Oh, right, it doesn't work because there are two master_users and the second one overrides the first one. This might be fixed in a newer version (maybe only in v2.1), since I remember doing something related to this. Another possibility for fixing this would be to use post-login script that sets MASTER_USER environment to same as USER, that'll definitely fix it. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting Great, with postlogin script it works! Thanks a lot, Emiliano
Re: [Dovecot] quota warning script not working after upgrade to 2.1.1
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > With 2.0.18 I was using a quota warning script like this: Must have been a PEBKAC - I fixed my installation by harmonising $PREFIX (seperate $PREFIX for 2.0 and 2.1, removig an old installation along the way) as well as cleaning up some old scripts and alas: Feb 28 22:13:15 postamt quota-warning2(lscxxxk) 90%: delivered! Feb 28 22:15:40 postamt quota-warning2(sxxxwart) 85%: delivered! Feb 28 22:17:39 postamt quota-warning2.1(sxxxwart) 90%: delivered! Feb 28 22:27:55 postamt quota-warning2.1(rxxxid) 85%: delivered! -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot clustering with dsync-based replication
On 2012-02-28 9:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:27 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-02-28 9:03 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster. Wow, talk about timing... this looks like a perfect answer to my previous question about setting up two servers in two different locations to serve two different sets of users locally... Yeah, I was delaying answering it until I posted this. Cool, thanks - I look forward to any comments you might have on my current plan. Looks like it wouldn't really matter which server they connected to externally, as any changes would simply be replicated. Well, preferably users would connect to the same server. If both servers have done changes at the same time, there can be some temporary (possibly user-visible) confusion. Point taken - and thinking about it, the amount of traffic would be negligible, since users accessing emails remotely is much less than internally. But a question out of curiosity: can the Director be configured to redirect userA to private IP #.#.#.# when connecting from a local subnet, but connect them to Public IP ##.##.##.##.## when accessing remotely? I don't know enough about routing to answer this myself... but if it is possible, then I could minimize traffic on the inter-office link - but there really is not enough remote traffic to worry about this too much I think. Timo, state above that this 'describes a design'... does this mean that this is doable right now? Which of the following terms would you use to describe it at this point in time? Potentially problematic Not finished yet, so closest to this. :) I'm planning on making our own mails use this within a few weeks (currently it's a dsync in crontab every 5 minutes). Cool, it sounds like it may be safe to set this up then in say 2 or 3 months? Since I'll most likely be contracting with your company to help with this, I'll wait and see what you say once we're ready to roll this out - and maybe you'll be willing to give us a deal on the implementation and/or support costs if we're willing to serve as guinea pigs. ;) Thanks! -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] Post-login scripting - Trash cleanup
On 28/02/2012 18:11, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote: We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did this cause logins to slow down too much waiting for the trash to purge? One idea was to execute the trash purge script once a day by tracking their logins and seeing that it has already ran that day. Another idea was to call the trash purge script in the background and continue without acknowledging that it has finished to keep logins speedy. I think you can also use doveadm to achieve this? So you could schedule something for all accounts at some out of hours period - should speed up backups also? Ed W
Re: [Dovecot] Post-login scripting - Trash cleanup
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:26:11 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 28.02.2012 19:11, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net: >> We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older >> than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did >> this >> cause logins to slow down too much waiting for the trash to purge? One >> idea was to execute the trash purge script once a day by tracking their >> logins and seeing that it has already ran that day. Another idea was to >> call the trash purge script in the background and continue without >> acknowledging that it has finished to keep logins speedy. > > look here if this match/solve your problem > > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Expire Expire looks to be useful, but it appears to be something that enhances expunging of messages rather than automates the process if I am reading correctly. We would like to make the process for expunging old Trash messages as automated and inline as possible.
Re: [Dovecot] Master user
On 28.2.2012, at 21.04, Emiliano Rago wrote: > USER#0113607363585#011rago#011uid=5000#011gid=5000#011home=/#011master_user=rago#011master_user=admin Oh, right, it doesn't work because there are two master_users and the second one overrides the first one. This might be fixed in a newer version (maybe only in v2.1), since I remember doing something related to this. Another possibility for fixing this would be to use post-login script that sets MASTER_USER environment to same as USER, that'll definitely fix it. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting
Re: [Dovecot] Master user
On 02/28/2012 07:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 20.45, Emiliano Rago wrote:
userdb {
args = uid=mailreader gid=mailreader allow_all_users=yes master_user=%u
driver = static
}
Thanks,
but nothing has changed.
Set auth_debug=yes. What does it log when you login?
That's the log:
Feb 28 19:57:48 oneprivvm-239 dovecot: auth: Debug: client in:
AUTH#0111#011PLAIN#011service=imap#011secured#011lip=127.0.0.1#011rip=127.0.0.1#011lport=143#011rport=60873#011resp=
Feb 28 19:57:48 oneprivvm-239 dovecot: auth: Debug:
auth(admin,127.0.0.1,master): Master user lookup for login: rago
Feb 28 19:57:48 oneprivvm-239 dovecot: auth: Debug:
passwd-file(admin,127.0.0.1,master): lookup: user=admin
file=/etc/dovecot/master-shared
Feb 28 19:57:48 oneprivvm-239 dovecot: auth:
passdb(admin,127.0.0.1,master): Master user logging in as rago
Feb 28 19:57:48 oneprivvm-239 dovecot: auth: Debug: client out:
OK#0111#011user=rago
Feb 28 19:57:48 oneprivvm-239 dovecot: auth: Debug: master in:
REQUEST#0113607363585#0112591#0111#0114d6e591e980edb0fabccfa9c1cd4e198
Feb 28 19:57:48 oneprivvm-239 dovecot: auth: Debug: master out:
USER#0113607363585#011rago#011uid=5000#011gid=5000#011home=/#011master_user=rago#011master_user=admin
Feb 28 19:57:48 oneprivvm-239 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=2596, secured
Thanks for answering,
Emiliano
[Dovecot] quota warning script not working after upgrade to 2.1.1
With 2.0.18 I was using a quota warning script like this:
plugin {
...
# Quota
quota = maildir
quota_rule = INBOX.Trash:storage=+2048M
quota_warning = storage=99%% quota-warning 99 %u
quota_warning2 = storage=95%% quota-warning 95 %u
quota_warning3 = storage=90%% quota-warning 90 %u
quota_warning4 = storage=85%% quota-warning 85 %u
}
# der schickt die Quota warnmails
service quota-warning {
executable = script /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning2.1
user = root
unix_listener quota-warning {
mode = 0666
user = vmail
group = users
}
}
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 3081 Feb 28 16:56 /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning2.1
But now I'm gettting this in my log:
Feb 28 19:19:03 postamt quota-warning2(phxxxpsu): writing message failed
Feb 28 19:19:03 postamt dovecot: quota-warning: Fatal: master:
service(quota-warning): child 15065 returned error 1
Feb 28 19:40:13 postamt quota-warning2(lxxxve): writing message failed
Feb 28 19:40:13 postamt dovecot: quota-warning: Fatal: master:
service(quota-warning): child 3318 returned error 1
What is failing here?
#!/bin/sh
#
# Should be run by the Local Delivery Agent
#
#set -x
SCRIPT_NAME="quota-warning2"
MAIL_TO=$2
MAIL_FROM="postmas...@charite.de"
MAIL_QUOTA_PERCENT=$1
MAIL_SUBJECT="Ihre Mailbox ist zu "$1"% voll!"
BIN_CAT="/bin/cat"
BIN_DATE="/bin/date"
BIN_HOSTNAME="/bin/hostname"
BIN_LOGGER="/usr/bin/logger"
BIN_MV="/bin/mv"
BIN_STAT="/usr/bin/stat"
#set -x
# set misc values
HOSTNAME="`${BIN_HOSTNAME}`"
# set mail value
MAIL_DATE="`${BIN_DATE} '+%a, %d %b %Y %T %z (%Z)'`"
MAIL_MESSAGE_ID="`${BIN_DATE} '+%Y%m%d%H%M%S'`@${HOSTNAME}"
#To: ${MAIL_TO}
# write out message
${BIN_CAT} << EOF | /usr/local/dovecot-2.1/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d
$MAIL_TO -o "plugin/quota=maildir::noenforcing"
From: ${MAIL_FROM}
Subject: ${MAIL_SUBJECT}
Message-Id: <${MAIL_MESSAGE_ID}>
Date: ${MAIL_DATE}
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
some warning in german
EOF
[ "$?" -gt 0 ] && \
${BIN_LOGGER} -p mail.error -t "${SCRIPT_NAME}(${MAIL_TO})" \
"writing message failed" && exit 1
# log warning attempt
${BIN_LOGGER} -p mail.info -t "${SCRIPT_NAME}(${MAIL_TO})
${MAIL_QUOTA_PERCENT}%" "delivered!"
echo "${MAIL_DATE}: ${SCRIPT_NAME}(${MAIL_TO}) ${MAIL_QUOTA_PERCENT}%
delivered!" >> /home/${SCRIPT_NAME}.log
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
#!/bin/sh
#
# Should be run by the Local Delivery Agent
#
#set -x
SCRIPT_NAME="quota-warning2"
MAIL_TO=$2
MAIL_FROM="postmas...@charite.de"
MAIL_QUOTA_PERCENT=$1
MAIL_SUBJECT="Ihre Mailbox ist zu "$1"% voll!"
BIN_CAT="/bin/cat"
BIN_DATE="/bin/date"
BIN_HOSTNAME="/bin/hostname"
BIN_LOGGER="/usr/bin/logger"
BIN_MV="/bin/mv"
BIN_STAT="/usr/bin/stat"
#set -x
# set misc values
HOSTNAME="`${BIN_HOSTNAME}`"
# set mail value
MAIL_DATE="`${BIN_DATE} '+%a, %d %b %Y %T %z (%Z)'`"
MAIL_MESSAGE_ID="`${BIN_DATE} '+%Y%m%d%H%M%S'`@${HOSTNAME}"
#To: ${MAIL_TO}
# write out message
${BIN_CAT} << EOF | /usr/local/dovecot-2.1/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d
$MAIL_TO -o "plugin/quota=maildir::noenforcing"
From: ${MAIL_FROM}
Subject: ${MAIL_SUBJECT}
Message-Id: <${MAIL_MESSAGE_ID}>
Date: ${MAIL_DATE}
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Was ist los?
Wir haben festgestellt, dass Ihre Mailbox auf dem Server
postamt.charite.de das erlaubte Grössenlimit zu mindestens
${MAIL_QUOTA_PERCENT}%
ausschöpft.
D.h. die maximal erlaubte Gesamtgröße der Mailbox wird bald erreicht
sein oder ist es sogar schon!
Was kann ich nun tun?
=
Bitte schaffen Sie Platz in Ihrer Mailbox, indem Sie die Mails z.B.
auf dem Server löschen oder in Ihre lokale Mailbox auf Ihrem eigenen
Rechner verschieben und so wieder Platz auf dem Server schaffen!
Wie kann ich die Füllung meines Postfaches auf dem Server überprüfen?
=
Sie können die Füllung Ihres Postfaches über Webmail
https://webmail.charite.de/
leicht überprüfen: Nach dem Anmelden erscheint im linken Rahmen unter
Ihrer Ordnerliste ein Link namens "Ordnergrößen".
Sie können in Webmail ggf. auch gleich die Mails löschen (vergessen
Sie hinterher nicht, den Papierkorb / Trash Ordner zu leeren!).
Warum ist mein Postfach überhaupt so voll?
==
Dies kann z.B. passieren, wenn Sie mehrere Rechner nutzen um Ihre Mail
zu lesen und statt des IMAP Protokolls das POP3-Protokoll mit der
aktivierten Option "Leave Mail on Server" / "Mail auf Server belassen"
in Ihrem Mailprogramm verwenden.
Oft wird auch vergessen, daß der Ordner mit den "G
Re: [Dovecot] Master user
On 28.2.2012, at 20.45, Emiliano Rago wrote:
>> userdb {
>> args = uid=mailreader gid=mailreader allow_all_users=yes master_user=%u
>> driver = static
>> }
>
> Thanks,
> but nothing has changed.
Set auth_debug=yes. What does it log when you login?
[Dovecot] 2.1.1: subscriptions: Removing invalid entry
Admittedly, it's not a valid folder name and dovecot is right in removing it: Feb 28 17:50:05 postamt dovecot: imap(kbaessle): Warning: Subscriptions file /home/k/b/kbaessle/Maildir/subscriptions: Removing invalid entry: Entw�rfe ...but when looking at the subscription file AFTER the removal, that file contained an empty line. I don't think that's correct. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Re: [Dovecot] Master user
On 02/28/2012 04:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:11 +, Emiliano Rago wrote:
I'd like to have a master user that can read the other users mailboxes.
I have only one user who read and write the mail (i.e. I use the static
userdb) and I use namespace for public and shared mailboxes.
I can authenticate to the server but I am not able to list the mailboxes:
With ACL plugin enabled, the master user's ACLs are used. And your
master user has no ACLs, so nothing is shown. The proper fix for this
would be to set a default ACL for the master user, but default ACLs
don't exist yet. So you'll have to kludge this, by changing the master
user back to the login username. Try if this works:
userdb {
args = uid=mailreader gid=mailreader allow_all_users=yes master_user=%u
driver = static
}
Thanks,
but nothing has changed.
Emiliano
Re: [Dovecot] Question: Is Server Side Search announced somehow via the IMAP CAPABILITY string?
On 28.2.2012, at 20.29, Charles Marcus wrote: > Off the top of your head, do you know if Cyrus or GMail (I guess the two > other most popular IMAP servers that support server side indexes) advertise > SEARCH=FUZZY? Neither. Probably no servers besides Dovecot. But it is less than a year old RFC..
Re: [Dovecot] Question: Is Server Side Search announced somehow via the IMAP CAPABILITY string?
On 2012-02-28 11:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.2.2012, at 18.38, Timo Sirainen wrote: Well, okay, actually if server advertises FUZZY extension you can be quite certain that it supports indexed server side searches. I meant SEARCH=FUZZY Thanks for the replies Timo... Off the top of your head, do you know if Cyrus or GMail (I guess the two other most popular IMAP servers that support server side indexes) advertise SEARCH=FUZZY? Thanks again... hopefully something will comes of this for Thunderbird. -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] Post-login scripting - Trash cleanup
Am 28.02.2012 19:11, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net: > We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older > than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did this > cause logins to slow down too much waiting for the trash to purge? One > idea was to execute the trash purge script once a day by tracking their > logins and seeing that it has already ran that day. Another idea was to > call the trash purge script in the background and continue without > acknowledging that it has finished to keep logins speedy. look here if this match/solve your problem http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Expire -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
[Dovecot] Post-login scripting - Trash cleanup
We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did this cause logins to slow down too much waiting for the trash to purge? One idea was to execute the trash purge script once a day by tracking their logins and seeing that it has already ran that day. Another idea was to call the trash purge script in the background and continue without acknowledging that it has finished to keep logins speedy.
[Dovecot] migrating/converting from system users -> virtual users
Hello all, We currently have a traditional mail server where all users have system accounts (ie entries in the NIS passwd map) and mbox-format mail folders in their (system) home directories. I'm trying to setup a dovecot server in which we want all users to have "virtual" accounts (in dovecot) and no entry in the passwd file at all (ie no access to the mail server). This is for security reasons, we want to imagine that users connecting to the mail server in future will not be able to access any resources on the server other than access their email messages. To this end we've set up a "vmail" user that owns all the messages in the Maildir directories. Most of this is working but I'm stuck on how to convert users' mail folders from the existing setup to the new one. I'm using the convert plugin but of course the problem is that the plugin executes as the "vmail" user and cannot access the existing mail folders that belong to the users: and I'd be worried if it could, of course! So I've converted a few users already by making copies of their old-world mailboxes, changing the ownership of the copies and pointing the convert plugin to these copies, instead of the originals. This works (modulo the dreaded "timeouted" error messages) but is very ugly. So I tried looking at the convert-tool but can't find a man page for it so am not sure what I'm doing with it! I have the idea that I should be able to run some command (as a privileged user) on the mail server and have it do the conversion for me, changing the ownership/permissions on the way. Can convert-tool do this? I'd prefer to go with the automatic (plugin) conversion if I can bodge the ownership issues somehow. Failing that, some tool or script may be the next best answer. This is Dovecot 1.2 by the way on Solaris 10. Any suggestions would be welcome! Steve Platt
Re: [Dovecot] Question: Is Server Side Search announced somehow via the IMAP CAPABILITY string?
On 28.2.2012, at 18.38, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Well, okay, actually if server advertises FUZZY extension you can be quite > certain that it supports indexed server side searches. I meant SEARCH=FUZZY > And that reminds me, I should hide that extension when FTS isn't enabled in > Dovecot.. v2.1.2 will no longer advertise it unless fts=solr or fts=lucene: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/bdc881838b00
Re: [Dovecot] Question: Is Server Side Search announced somehow via the IMAP CAPABILITY string?
On 28.2.2012, at 18.33, Charles Marcus wrote: > This question is a result of an ongoing discussion on the mozilla enterprise > list... > > Is there a standard/reliable way for an IMAP client to determine that an IMAP > server supports server side search All IMAP servers are required to support SEARCH command. Some crappy ones don't, but I think all widely used ones do. > (with indexes)? No way to know that. Well, okay, actually if server advertises FUZZY extension you can be quite certain that it supports indexed server side searches. And that reminds me, I should hide that extension when FTS isn't enabled in Dovecot.. (I don't know if there are any other servers besides Dovecot implementing FUZZY.)
[Dovecot] Question: Is Server Side Search announced somehow via the IMAP CAPABILITY string?
Hey Timo, Subject says it all... This question is a result of an ongoing discussion on the mozilla enterprise list... Is there a standard/reliable way for an IMAP client to determine that an IMAP server supports server side search (with indexes)? Thanks, -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
On 2012-02-28 11:05 AM, kfx wrote: Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the problem :( Sorry for the noise and thank you for dovecot So... you're saying that Thunderbird now correctly uses server side search? -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the problem :( Sorry for the noise and thank you for dovecot
Re: [Dovecot] Master user
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:11 +, Emiliano Rago wrote:
> I'd like to have a master user that can read the other users mailboxes.
> I have only one user who read and write the mail (i.e. I use the static
> userdb) and I use namespace for public and shared mailboxes.
> I can authenticate to the server but I am not able to list the mailboxes:
With ACL plugin enabled, the master user's ACLs are used. And your
master user has no ACLs, so nothing is shown. The proper fix for this
would be to set a default ACL for the master user, but default ACLs
don't exist yet. So you'll have to kludge this, by changing the master
user back to the login username. Try if this works:
userdb {
args = uid=mailreader gid=mailreader allow_all_users=yes master_user=%u
driver = static
}
Also don't set your home to /. Better not to set it at all.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/VirtualUsers/Home
[Dovecot] Master user
Hi,
I'd like to have a master user that can read the other users mailboxes.
I have only one user who read and write the mail (i.e. I use the static
userdb) and I use namespace for public and shared mailboxes.
I can authenticate to the server but I am not able to list the mailboxes:
emiliano@dovecot:~$ telnet localhost imap
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE
IDLE AUTH=PLAIN] Dovecot ready.
1 login user*master password
1 OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE
IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS MULTIAPPEND
UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE
QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS ACL
RIGHTS=texk] Logged in
5 LIST "" *
* LIST (\Unmarked) "." "INBOX"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasNoChildren) "." "shared"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "public"
5 OK List completed.
* BYE Server shutting down.
Connection closed by foreign host.
This is my conf:
# 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-131.0.15.el6.x86_64 x86_64 Scientific Linux
release 6.1 (Carbon) ext4
auth_master_user_separator = *
disable_plaintext_auth = no
mail_location =
maildir:/data/MAIL/MAILDIR/%u:INBOX=/data/MAIL/INBOX/%u:INDEX=/data/MAIL/METADATA/%u
mbox_write_locks = fcntl
namespace {
inbox = yes
location =
prefix =
separator = .
type = private
}
namespace {
list = yes
location =
maildir:/data/MAIL/MAILDIR/%%u:INDEX=/data/MAIL/MAILDIR/shared/%u/%%u
prefix = shared.%%u.
separator = .
subscriptions = no
type = shared
}
namespace {
list = yes
location = maildir:/data/MAIL/SHARED
prefix = public.
separator = .
subscriptions = no
type = public
}
passdb {
driver = pam
}
passdb {
args = /etc/dovecot/master-shared
driver = passwd-file
master = yes
}
plugin {
acl = vfile:/etc/dovecot/global-acls:cache_secs=300
acl_anyone = allow
acl_shared_dict = file:/var/lib/dovecot/shared-mailboxes.db
}
protocols = imap
service auth {
unix_listener auth-userdb {
group = mailreader
mode = 0600
user = mailreader
}
}
ssl = no
ssl_cert =
And in /etc/dovecot/master-shared:
master:{PLAIN}password
What I did wrong?
Thanks,
Emiliano
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 15:47 +0100, kfx wrote: > > Did you enable the 'Run search on server' option in the Advanced Search > > window? Doing this *should* result in Thunderbird using dovecots indexes > > server side. > > > > Yes I did. > > Some more info: > > by telnet'ing directly and issuing: > c search text pattern > * SEARCH 1208 > c OK Search completed (0.003 secs). So, Solr in Dovecot works perfectly. > But the same search in thunderbird return "No matches found" :( Thunderbird problem, nothing you can do about it from Dovecot's side.
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
On 02/28/2012 03:23 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-28 8:41 AM, kfx wrote:
Dovecot 2.1.1 and latest solr. Indexing seems ok because the size of the
solr's data directory is growing and log shows things like this:
Feb 28 14:30:45 indexer-worker(username): Info: Indexed 12239 messages
in SubFolder
but thunderbird returns nothing (it says not match found for "hello"
for example).
*How* are you testing with Thunderbird?
Did you enable the 'Run search on server' option in the Advanced Search
window? Doing this *should* result in Thunderbird using dovecots indexes
server side.
Yes I did.
Some more info:
by telnet'ing directly and issuing:
c search text pattern
* SEARCH 1208
c OK Search completed (0.003 secs).
But the same search in thunderbird return "No matches found" :(
Here are the solr logs, first search is the "c search text pattern"
second is from thunderbird:
Feb 28, 2012 3:26:21 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={fl=uid,score&sort=uid+asc&fq=%2Bbox:d8f5c7250ed14c4f1a5d3ea484a8+%2Buser:"username"&q=(hdr:"pattern"+OR+body:"pattern")&rows=108227}
hits=1 status=0 QTime=1
Feb 28, 2012 3:27:49 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={fl=uid,score&sort=uid+asc&fq=%2Bbox:d8f5c7250ed14c4f1a5d3ea484a8+%2Buser:"username"&q=body:"pattern"&rows=108227}
hits=0 status=0 QTime=1
It seems thunderbird is only searching in the body and not the header
unlike the "c search text" method and that the pattern was found in the
header of some random email. So none of the two method is working when
searching in the body of the emails but work for the headers (???).
fts_solr module seems to be correctly launched:
Feb 28 15:07:53 imap: Debug: Module loaded:
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib20_fts_plugin.so
Feb 28 15:07:53 imap: Debug: Module loaded:
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib21_fts_solr_plugin.so
[root@server log]# grep -R mail_plugins /usr/local/etc/dovecot/ | grep -v \#
/usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf:mail_plugins = autocreate fts
fts_solr quota
/usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/15-lda.conf: mail_plugins = $mail_plugins
sieve
[root@server log]# grep fts /usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/90-plugin.conf
fts = solr
fts_solr = url=http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/ break-imap-search
Don't know where to search :(
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot clustering with dsync-based replication
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:27 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-02-28 9:03 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster. > > > > Wow, talk about timing... this looks like a perfect answer to my > previous question about setting up two servers in two different > locations to serve two different sets of users locally... Yeah, I was delaying answering it until I posted this. > Looks like it wouldn't really matter which server they connected to > externally, as any changes would simply be replicated. Well, preferably users would connect to the same server. If both servers have done changes at the same time, there can be some temporary (possibly user-visible) confusion. > Timo, state above that this 'describes a design'... does this mean that > this is doable right now? Which of the following terms would you use to > describe it at this point in time? > > Potentially problematic Not finished yet, so closest to this. :) I'm planning on making our own mails use this within a few weeks (currently it's a dsync in crontab every 5 minutes).
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot clustering with dsync-based replication
On 2012-02-28 9:03 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster. Wow, talk about timing... this looks like a perfect answer to my previous question about setting up two servers in two different locations to serve two different sets of users locally... Looks like it wouldn't really matter which server they connected to externally, as any changes would simply be replicated. Timo, state above that this 'describes a design'... does this mean that this is doable right now? Which of the following terms would you use to describe it at this point in time? Potentially problematic Reliable Rock-solid Thanks!! -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] fts size
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 15:02 +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > Does anybody have any numbers for how large storage one will need for > the fts indexing server? I see the wiki says 30% of mailbox size for > Squat (partial=4 full=4). Is it similar for lucene/solr? My initial tests for CLucene were that it would take 30% of mailbox size (compared to 50% for Xapian). But this was before I actually implemented it to Dovecot.. I haven't really looked at how large the indexes actually are. Looking at Lucene indexes now for all of Dovecot and Dovecot-cvs mailing list archives, the indexes are 29.1% of the original mbox sizes. > Do I understand correctly if I think > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Lucene > will create an index for each user in his home directory? Yes. > Will this be accounted for in the users' quota? Only if you're using filesystem quota.
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
On 2012-02-28 8:41 AM, kfx wrote: Dovecot 2.1.1 and latest solr. Indexing seems ok because the size of the solr's data directory is growing and log shows things like this: Feb 28 14:30:45 indexer-worker(username): Info: Indexed 12239 messages in SubFolder but thunderbird returns nothing (it says not match found for "hello" for example). *How* are you testing with Thunderbird? Did you enable the 'Run search on server' option in the Advanced Search window? Doing this *should* result in Thunderbird using dovecots indexes server side. -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 14:41 +0100, kfx wrote: > but thunderbird returns nothing (it says not match found for "hello" > for example). Test by talking IMAP protocol, not by using Thunderbird.
[Dovecot] Dovecot clustering with dsync-based replication
This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster. This design can be used to build at least two different types of dsync clusters, which are both described here. Ville has also drawn overview pictures of these two setups, see http://www.dovecot.org/img/dsync-director-replication.png and http://www.dovecot.org/img/dsync-director-replication-ssh.png First of all, why dsync replication instead of block level filesystem replication? - dsync won't replicate filesystem corruption. - A cold restart of replication won't go through all of the data in the disks, but instead quickly finds out what has changed. - Split brain won't result in downtime or losing any data. If both sides did changes, the changes are merged without data loss. - If using more than 2 storages, the users' replicas can be divided among the other storages. So if one storage goes down, the extra load is shared by all the other storages, not just one. Replication mail plugin --- This is a simple plugin based on notify plugin. It listens for all changes that happen to mailboxes (new mails, flag changes, etc.) Once it sees a change, it sends an asynchronous (username, priority) notification to replication-notify-fifo. The priority can be either high (new mails) or low (everything else). Optionally the replication plugin can also support synchronous replication of new mail deliveries. In this way it connects to replication-notify UNIX socket, tells it to replicate the user with sync (=highest) priority and waits until it is done or replication_sync_timeout occurs. The IMAP/LMTP client won't see an "OK" reply until the mail is replicated (or the replication has failed). The synchronous replication probably adds a noticeable delay, so it might not be acceptable for IMAP, but might be for LMTP. So, what is listening in those replication-notify* sockets? It depends on if Dovecot is running on director-based setup or not. Aggregator -- When running in Dovecot director-based setup, all of the Dovecot backends (where replication plugin runs) also run "aggregator" process. Its job is very simple: It proxies the notifications from mail plugin and sends them via a single TCP connection to the replicator process running in Dovecot proxies. This is simply an optimization to avoid tons of short lived TCP connections directly from replication plugin to director server. When not running in Dovecot director setup (i.e. there is only a single Dovecot instance that handles all of the users), there is no point in having an aggregator proxy, because the replicator process is running on the same server. In this kind of setup the replicator process directly listens on the replication-notify* sockets. Replicator -- The initial design for replicator isn't very complex either: It keeps a priority queue of all users, and replicates those users at the top of the queue. Notifications about changes to user's mailboxes (may) move the user up in the priority queue. If the user at the top of the queue already has been replicated "recently enough", the replicator stops its work until new changes arrive or the "recently enough" is no longer that. dsync can do two types of syncs: quick syncs and full syncs. A quick sync trusts indexes and does the replication with the least amount of work and network traffic. A quick sync is normally enough to replicate all changes, but just in case something has gone wrong there's also the full sync option, which guarantees that the mailboxes end up being fully synced. A full sync is slower though, and uses more network traffic. The priority queue is sorted by: 1. Priority (updated by a notification from replication plugin) 2. If priority!=none: Last fast sync (those users are replicated first whose last replication time is oldest) 2. If priority=none: Last full sync (these users should already be fully synced, but do a full sync for them once in a while anyway) All users get added to the replication queue at replicator startup with "none" priority. The list of users is looked up via userdb iteration. If the previous replication state is found from a disk dump, it's used to update the priorities, last_*_sync timestamps and other replication state. Replicator process creates such dumps periodically [todo: every few mins? maybe a setting?]. Replicator starts replicating users at the top of the queue, setting their priorities to "none" before starting. This means that if another change notification arrives during replication, the priority is bumped up and no changes get lost. replication_max_conns setting specifies how many users are replicated simultaneously. If the user's last_full_sync is older than replication_full_sync_interval setting, a full sync is done instead of a fast sync. If the user at the top of the queue has "none" priority and the last_full_sync is newer than replication_full_sync_interval, the replication stops. [todo: it would be nice to prefer doin
[Dovecot] fts size
Does anybody have any numbers for how large storage one will need for the fts indexing server? I see the wiki says 30% of mailbox size for Squat (partial=4 full=4). Is it similar for lucene/solr? Do I understand correctly if I think http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Lucene will create an index for each user in his home directory? Will this be accounted for in the users' quota? -jf
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
On 02/28/2012 03:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.2.2012, at 2.14, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote: Ok, I had to fix a few things. First of all, I had to declare mail_plugins = fts fts_solr in global file (dovecot.conf). After doing that, running doveadm fts optimize stopped giving me errors. I ran doveadm index -user INBOX (and other folders). I'm assuming this actually did something because java/tomcat6 were really busy for a few mins and I could see the solr logs going nuts (/var/log/tomcat6/catalina.out). OK, so it's indexing. Dovecot 2.1.1 and latest solr. Indexing seems ok because the size of the solr's data directory is growing and log shows things like this: Feb 28 14:30:45 indexer-worker(username): Info: Indexed 12239 messages in SubFolder but thunderbird returns nothing (it says not match found for "hello" for example). I dont know what more can I do to debug this... Solr is working as the nobody user, is it OK for dovecot ? Does dovecot need to be have write access to the solr's data directory ? Thanks
Re: [Dovecot] Deny create folders
On 2012-02-28 6:14 AM, Jacek Osiecki wrote: Some IMAP clients (especially outlooks) create junk/sent/etc. folders with various names, depending on national settings. Is it possible to provide a - let's say - dictionary, which would always return the same folder (like Sent) no matter if client asks for "Sent", "Sent Mail" or "Elementy wys&AUI-ane"? This has been discussed before, this is probably the most recent thread about it, but it is quite long: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-December/062327.html -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
On 2012-02-27 9:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.2.2012, at 2.14, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote: However, whenever I run a search thru thunderbird (searching the from/to/subject/body fields), I think Thunderbird does this search internally, not via IMAP. You could test by opening the Advanced Search window (CTRL-SHIFT-F or Edit > Find > Search Messages), check the box to 'Run search on server', make sure the right account is selected, then perform a search... There are 2 bugs open for Thunderbird dealing with server side IMAP searches, please feel free to go vote for one or both of them: Main one: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564168 and one that is tangentially related: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543416 -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] Deny create folders
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:31:35 +0100 S. Kremer articulated: Every user's mailbox has a directory called Spam and Ham. I scan this two folders by a script to learn my spamassassin database. This script does not scan folders like spam, ham, junk-email etc. But some users have such folders in their mailbox so spamassassin does not learn from these folders. [...] Couldn't you just make a soft link between the two folders and save yourself and your clientele a lot of trouble? I have not messed with "spamassassin" in years; however, I thought it was configurable on what it scans. Oh, it reminds me of one thing I would like to have - maybe it is possible? Some IMAP clients (especially outlooks) create junk/sent/etc. folders with various names, depending on national settings. Is it possible to provide a - let's say - dictionary, which would always return the same folder (like Sent) no matter if client asks for "Sent", "Sent Mail" or "Elementy wys&AUI-ane"? Hmm... Now, when I formed the question it seems that this MIGHT be a problem :) What should dovecot provide when client asks for list of subscribed folders? If I know that there is a polish version of MS Outlook, I should provide "Elementy wys&AUI-ane", but "Sent" if it is roundcube... Greetings, -- Jacek Osiecki jos...@ceti.pl GG:3828944 I don't want something I need. I want something I want.
[Dovecot] ANN: automx - automated mail account provisioning
automx I am pleased to announce automx a tool that makes setting up a mail account easy. All your users need to provide is real name, mail address and password. Their mail client and automx will safely handle the rest. Say goodbye to mistyped server settings! Put an end to endless phone calls trying to coach users to configure settings, whose dialogs they can't find. Raise user satisfaction, relieve support and regain time to work on other issues. automx unifies Microsofts and Mozillas mail account provisioning standards in one powerful Open Source tool. Choose from many backends, including LDAP and SQL, and let automx create standard and individualized profiles for multiple domains on the fly! See the details on http://automx.org. p@rick -- state of mind () Digitale Kommunikation http://www.state-of-mind.de Franziskanerstraße 15 Telefon +49 89 3090 4664 81669 München Telefax +49 89 3090 4666 Amtsgericht MünchenPartnerschaftsregister PR 563 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
On 28.2.2012, at 12.15, Robin wrote: > I too was bitten by the configuration issue. The wiki/docs suggest that you > only need to put the fts fts_solr plugin spec into imap "section", which > never worked for me, unlike fts_squat which did). Putting it into the > "global" plugin list made it all work for me. That reads only in wiki1 docs, in wiki2 docs it should only talk about globals.. I wonder if it would be a bad idea to show some kind of a popup in wiki1 asking if you really want to be reading it or not, and use a cookie to remember it?..
Re: [Dovecot] POP/IMAP on proxy rip issue
Mhm, thanks for the answer. I wanted to upgrade to 2.1 anyway because of the LMTP. t. Urban Loesch-2 wrote: > > Same here on 2.0.x. > But I think this is because it's only implemented for IMAP. > > See e-mail from Timo 2 days ago: > > ... > > Subject: Proxying improvements in v2.1.2 > > I just committed a couple of features that will make life easier for some > types of proxying setups: > > 1. IMAP proxying has already for a while supported sending local/remote > IP/port to backend server, which can use it for logging and other > purposes. > I've now implemented this for POP3 as well, although only the remote > IP/port is forwarded, not local IP/port. I implemented this also for LMTP > in v2.2 > tree, but haven't bothered to backport that change. Both POP3 and LMTP > uses XCLIENT command that is compatible to Postfix's (XCLIENT ADDR=1.2.3.4 > PORT=110). > > 2. proxy_maybe=yes + host=host.example.com actually works now. As long as > host.example.com DNS lookup returns one IP that belongs to the current > server the proxying is skipped. > > 3. auth_proxy_self = 1.2.3.4 setting means that if proxy_maybe=yes and > host=1.2.3.4 then Dovecot assumes that this is a local login and won't > proxy > it, even if 1.2.3.4 isn't the actual local IP. This can be helpful if the > host field contains load balancer's IP address instead of the server's. > You > can add more than one IP (space separated) and of course everything > related to this works just as well with hostnames as with IPs (even when > hostname > expands to multiple IPs). > > > > regards > Urban > > > On 27.02.2012 16:30, Tomislav Mihalicek wrote: >> >> I have a proxy setup for pop/imap. The proxies are defined in >> login_trusted_networks = x.x.x.x and for the imap it works fine but for >> pop3 >> connections displays the ip address of proxy IP... Dovecots are both 1.2 >> from the debian repo deb http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ >> stable-auto/dovecot-1.2 main >> >> thanks > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/POP-IMAP-on-proxy-rip-issue-tp33400491p33405654.html Sent from the Dovecot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?
I think Thunderbird does this search internally, not via IMAP. You can test this by talking IMAP protocol directly: telnet localhost 143 a login user pass b select inbox c search text hello Yes, you definitely want to check things are being accelerated by issuing direct IMAP commands via telnet. Many clients try to "help" by performing local searches, which will only obfuscate things for you. Even with 150K+ messages, it shouldn't take fts_solr more than 20ms or so to give you results. I too was bitten by the configuration issue. The wiki/docs suggest that you only need to put the fts fts_solr plugin spec into imap "section", which never worked for me, unlike fts_squat which did). Putting it into the "global" plugin list made it all work for me. You can check your solr index data directory too. A freshly installed solr index occupies almost no space, but that grows QUICKLY once it's indexed anything. =R=
Re: [Dovecot] POP/IMAP on proxy rip issue
Mhm, thanks for the answer. I wanted to upgrade to 2.1 anyway because of the LMTP. t. Urban Loesch-2 wrote: > > Same here on 2.0.x. > But I think this is because it's only implemented for IMAP. > > See e-mail from Timo 2 days ago: > > ... > > Subject: Proxying improvements in v2.1.2 > > I just committed a couple of features that will make life easier for some > types of proxying setups: > > 1. IMAP proxying has already for a while supported sending local/remote > IP/port to backend server, which can use it for logging and other > purposes. > I've now implemented this for POP3 as well, although only the remote > IP/port is forwarded, not local IP/port. I implemented this also for LMTP > in v2.2 > tree, but haven't bothered to backport that change. Both POP3 and LMTP > uses XCLIENT command that is compatible to Postfix's (XCLIENT ADDR=1.2.3.4 > PORT=110). > > 2. proxy_maybe=yes + host=host.example.com actually works now. As long as > host.example.com DNS lookup returns one IP that belongs to the current > server the proxying is skipped. > > 3. auth_proxy_self = 1.2.3.4 setting means that if proxy_maybe=yes and > host=1.2.3.4 then Dovecot assumes that this is a local login and won't > proxy > it, even if 1.2.3.4 isn't the actual local IP. This can be helpful if the > host field contains load balancer's IP address instead of the server's. > You > can add more than one IP (space separated) and of course everything > related to this works just as well with hostnames as with IPs (even when > hostname > expands to multiple IPs). > > > > regards > Urban > > > On 27.02.2012 16:30, Tomislav Mihalicek wrote: >> >> I have a proxy setup for pop/imap. The proxies are defined in >> login_trusted_networks = x.x.x.x and for the imap it works fine but for >> pop3 >> connections displays the ip address of proxy IP... Dovecots are both 1.2 >> from the debian repo deb http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ >> stable-auto/dovecot-1.2 main >> >> thanks > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/POP-IMAP-on-proxy-rip-issue-tp33400491p33405413.html Sent from the Dovecot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Dovecot] remove messages once downloaded
Am 28.02.2012 um 09:46 schrieb Thomas Leuxner: > Assuming this is the task you could also use: > > $ doveadm expunge -u jane@example.org before 2012-02-01 unseen > > Play around with the scope a bit before you actually run it: > > $ doveadm search -u jane@example.org before 2012-02-01 unseen | wc -l Of course this was supposed to read 'seen' :/ signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [Dovecot] remove messages once downloaded
Am 28.02.2012 um 09:17 schrieb Nick Warr: > Il 28/02/2012 9.09, Jacek Osiecki ha scritto: >> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Michael Sidoric wrote: >> I need some help with the dovecot configuration. I want to remove downloaded messages from Mail Server once the messages have been successfully downloaded by pop3-clients, even when the clients have been configured to save copy of messages in the Server. > I'd suggest this: > > http://archivemail.sourceforge.net/ > > You can chose to skip unread email, and decide when read mail gets > archived/deleted, it suports mbox/maildir, etc.. Assuming this is the task you could also use: $ doveadm expunge -u jane@example.org before 2012-02-01 unseen Play around with the scope a bit before you actually run it: $ doveadm search -u jane@example.org before 2012-02-01 unseen | wc -l signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [Dovecot] remove messages once downloaded
Il 28/02/2012 9.09, Jacek Osiecki ha scritto: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Michael Sidoric wrote: I need some help with the dovecot configuration. I want to remove downloaded messages from Mail Server once the messages have been successfully downloaded by pop3-clients, even when the clients have been configured to save copy of messages in the Server. timo is quite correct -- consider imap instead, that's why the protocol exists. This rather seems like anti-imap - kind of desperate search for free disk space... IMAP does quite the opposite thing, since users acutally never remove emails :) Greetings, I'd suggest this: http://archivemail.sourceforge.net/ You can chose to skip unread email, and decide when read mail gets archived/deleted, it suports mbox/maildir, etc..
Re: [Dovecot] remove messages once downloaded
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Michael Sidoric wrote: I need some help with the dovecot configuration. I want to remove downloaded messages from Mail Server once the messages have been successfully downloaded by pop3-clients, even when the clients have been configured to save copy of messages in the Server. timo is quite correct -- consider imap instead, that's why the protocol exists. This rather seems like anti-imap - kind of desperate search for free disk space... IMAP does quite the opposite thing, since users acutally never remove emails :) Greetings, -- Jacek Osiecki jos...@ceti.pl GG:3828944 I don't want something I need. I want something I want.
