Re: [Dovecot] Converting a POP3 client to IMAP

2013-02-12 Thread Steffen Kaiser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Kristen J. Webb wrote:


Our current email is outsourced and so we
have used POP3 to keep all email on our
systems for many years.

Is there a best practice for moving mail
such that we can take advantage of the
hard link feature for all those older copies
that are currently in POP3 files?

It would also be nice to be able to auto file
things.  I don't see the sieve filters being
activated when I copy mail in Thunderbird.


you could use fetchmail to get the messages from the POP3 box and 
pass them to Dovecot deliver. So you can use Sieve filters (or not, if you 
turn Sieve off for this).


Then let the messages spool to Maildir.

Then use fdupes to find duplicates and hardlink them.

Kind regards,

- -- 
Steffen Kaiser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBURtHEV3r2wJMiz2NAQLv7wf/afBQrT5EvVzXux4zoPo/ZJTt8upHaueV
fQiuIdqmzGSiOgrXpZyxOcL9fsBFOQYuYVzPDyISbOdUj8Pf+9pjTdkDlRDKiOYC
IXBWj/7I5x64V1Mpy+4TkSnqA8NSB3Tzu0Rp0xOwTa73QwSqjuVw7oO0oqD4nLWj
5CEvk6laEmEsEO/XrlEcuA9OzK32oztx+CxCnTWPrH30ARL4GfckObFkiPOR57XD
JXKVJ+PigvPdsUK7aT1/V8ow4an9cjfsCwr4uxeMprfdHfoyu6ghphVl1iB8wCDi
Gt7kDU70hR4eK7wArl9J3RLnsr0Ap5o8EHXl+OqLFkM5NCsKYdqjDQ==
=9qoB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [Dovecot] backing up maildir dovecot files

2013-02-12 Thread Steffen Kaiser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, David Mehler wrote:


Thanks, if I did:

rsync --force --delete-after -tPrlHpogEAXz /folder/ /backups/newmailstore/

could I then tar up the newmailstore folder with something like tar
zcf without messing anything up?


keep in mind, that the backup of the Maildir with rsync is no 100% 
consistent snapshot, because of the filename renames; otherwise: yes.



On 2/12/13, Steffen Kaiser  wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:


Am 11.02.2013 22:37, schrieb Steve Litt:

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:47:57 +0100
Reindl Harald  wrote:

Am 11.02.2013 21:34, schrieb David Mehler:

I'm having to migrate servers. Both are dovecot2 systems. I'm
wanting to copy over my mail store from one system to the other.
I'd like to preserve dates/times of emails. These are maildir
setups on both boxes, I'd like to be as transparent to the end user
as possible. I currently have the first dovecot system offline and
the second dovecot system is offline.


assuming that BOTH servers are down as fro any other transfers
like mysql-datadirs and any critical things which should go
save and fast by preserve attributes:

rsync --force --delete-after -tPrlHpogEAXz /folder/
root@newserver:/folder/

# -z compress
# -t timestamps
# -P progress
# -r recursive
# -l links
# -H hard-links
# -p permissions
# -o owner
# -g group
# -E executability
# -A acls
# -X xtended attributes


That's how I'd do it also. I think if you didn't mind including -D,
which from my understanding is --special and --devices, neither of
which I'd expect in a maildir, and if you wanted to do your deletion
manually after the fact, would this be equivalent?


well, i have them ususally in my "rsync.sh" but did not expect
such files in a maildir, but yes it does not hurt


rsync  -PaHAX /folder/

The man page says -a (--archive) is equivalent to -rlptgoD, and you
have all but D listed up there.

My thinking on later manually deleting the old maildir, instead of
letting rsync do it, is that if somehow, some weird thing goes wrong, I
have the old one for backup. Who knows, maybe I copied the thing on top
of the wrong other maildir and have to back it out -- I'd have the old
maildir as a reference of which files.


you missunderstand "--delete-after"

this is for delete files in the TARGET folder which is not
or no longer in the source and IMHO very very important
if you want sync folders 1:1 because old artefacts can have
very bad effects

without you merge folders and if i know "hey my source contains
exactly what i need, not more and lot less" this is not what i
would like and never did in 10 years IT


If you use "--delete-after" you could add "--fuzzy", which theoretically
could save transfers because of filename renames.

Anyway: Any form of "--delete" is required for Maildir, IMHO, because
Labels, Tags, Keywords (or whatever the MUA calls it) and status
information (seen, read, deleted) are reflected by the filename. Hence, if
one does not "--delete", the _same_ message might pop up in the Maildir
multiple times but with different status and/or tags. Same applies to new
messages, because they are storred in /new and later moved to
/cur. So one ends with the same message in "new" and in "cur".

- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBURn+wV3r2wJMiz2NAQJYnwgAwGfCHBFglm800nbaHFhsdWeuVkhGJjnW
l0QtbmQLaSdQOkWwdVkmNEQkJLmwvfhddG0a9GblofI/zn8EBN+3EDR/CM0d5Y8f
jy1yqemT26sFTVC6NlTqhDF8zq/Oi5WK7ftUfYfrt90MtmMD1rzmBQ5Q/N+Tteae
TeE0jeHNL0rHl9DoAV9AkBzhJPnYYodSK2lA1oewazlzRpzJSiHYmgVh4RiSmsyk
4DAtch5ZrqLnsx1A/mUHAfDvdk66j2Os0bLXqbHu9ZAzz5Xb9bbNfpu52u1Ukg/o
TfXfiGA4aRix6I1OGePdXmi/qXTzPVLBzhhIZdMiJ2CKCWNFbIYC7w==
=ugv1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





- -- 
Steffen Kaiser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBURs+tV3r2wJMiz2NAQIvngf/c37Hbg30lIq0wFPCif9IAG+BO8yDRAa3
lYY2t7DlszWopeEBvV22HjUC8SlzywECYEhBFRWhJVfqNyu55oI867of+RZ6lO0A
lNcThmNixX5IsFiUnN9S9NYrTENC2qhccPdrTCAcm6A6CtaR1ydyeZDxlmvmTWe4
Za60LVqlsIVoZQ146yGE5nSIctix8JOE5kfGO5NurYXTfHt9CrPj5JvlPmRUdasp
Mtn+QpxaxzFa8NGECSThKDVilMPFvqfT+JrhjWnkM1v31hNjJj4F3DYhk1L0YlAL
4wUjskXq1ytoM8+k9c8rqCy5DvM7g8N2ip0c0Buvjt+RctaHE4F9jg==
=moaG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [Dovecot] FreeBSD, Dovecot and ZFS

2013-02-12 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 12.02.2013 22:25, schrieb Jason Lock:
> Mail Issues - FreeBSD
> 
> Hello, my apologies if this may be the wrong forum but hoping that maybe 
> someone might be able to provide some insight.
> 
> Have a very sporadic and strange issue with our mail servers running Dovecot 
> on FreeBSD.  There are three servers hosting Dovecot with FreeBSD as the 
> underlying operating system.  All three connect to a NAS server, again 
> running FreeBSD and ZFS.
> 
> When the specific issue occurs, clients connecting to check mail via POP3 or 
> IMAP experience long delays and timeouts.  To the point where POP3 Logins 
> fail due to the timeouts.  The issue is further compounded by clients 
> increasing the number of attempts to check mail.
> 
> Part of the frustration in attempting to diagnose the issue is not knowing 
> the root cause or symptom that initates the issue.
> 
> Wondering if anyone has experienced anything similar, or suggestions on ways 
> to help identify the root cause
> 

show your debug logs, dovecot confs, nfs setups are special, what did
you setup to honor nfs


Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer

-- 
[*] sys4 AG

http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München

Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Joerg Heidrich


Re: [Dovecot] FreeBSD, Dovecot and ZFS

2013-02-12 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2/12/13 1:25 PM, Jason Lock wrote:
> Mail Issues - FreeBSD
> 
> Hello, my apologies if this may be the wrong forum but hoping that 
> maybe someone might be able to provide some insight.
> 
> Have a very sporadic and strange issue with our mail servers
> running Dovecot on FreeBSD.  There are three servers hosting
> Dovecot with FreeBSD as the underlying operating system.  All three
> connect to a NAS server, again running FreeBSD and ZFS.

Speaking for NFS on FreeBSD, please note that the FreeBSD NFS client
and server generally respects application's sync() operations which
could cause delays, if the backing pool is not configured with any
fast ZIL device, ideally a SSD.  Normally a 'gstat -I 1s' on the NFS
server will give you busy disks with small throughput, in this case, a
ZIL would be helpful.  Before buying a SSD, you may want to try
disabling 'sync' on dataset (be careful though, that doing so would
increase the chance of data loss in the event of power loss, make sure
to revert the change with 'zfs inherit sync' on the datasets once you
are done with experiments) and see if that helps, if so, then a SSD
ZIL would be helpful; higher end systems can use a Fusion IO or
ZeusRAM for that purpose.

Another possible cause is compression, at this time, FreeBSD's ZFS
compression thread runs at kernel priority and that would cause the
system to do ZFS compression before doing everything else.  If you use
compression=gzip, you will see stalls more often, for short term,
please consider using compression=lzjb or have dovecot to do the
compression; for mid term, please use my recent LZ4 port that would
consume way less CPU and have better compression ratio than lzjb; for
long term, we are going to implement a scheduling policy which is
similar to Solaris's System Duty Cycle and have the compatibility
shims to emulate that.

Lastly, try increasing your NFS iod numbers.  The system default is
very conservative and may become a bottleneck when you have a lot of
users on one system.

Hope this helps...  If you have further questions about FreeBSD please
consider posting to freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org .

Cheers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRGuGyAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzWdYH/iybDczQnLzvlzKfrGn/Kdm7
197P2wK4phktNJVrNjYKFYc8CqelcLoSfZiRGDc3CxpmKnrwRkUWnZMXfpYUVJVL
3SSpmNY73h4atrEpyyoKmz4tIxJp7c24IB8201j/vc09yEaooy2dc9pJrJ5cAcjz
d7eSidcQQk8VdqCBk8haDpB2igZZXWz8zgZ8mKPcqSkGuxZkzZwZCkZc7XfPsCGK
GKswLtXutHA19mKs+wBLJ1r+ZQxabI8ZwQi1V2+VBFz4a5edkQJVbW6VvFSmzjO9
HfbW0uO+wJztSHiceKEUiJ7bIm5ygolhA2BvZ5WlY2VkejXbN6nfQkOlvmDeS0s=
=sMYy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [Dovecot] Marking messages read / retaining date with Sieve

2013-02-12 Thread Ben Morrow
At  3PM -0500 on 12/02/13 you (Bret Martin) wrote:
> 
> To close the loop on this, I ended up doing the following, although it
> seems to fail on mailboxes with large numbers of messages (on the
> order of 10,000 or so; I didn't test carefully enough to find the
> exact number)
> 
> use Mail::IMAPClient;
> use Socket;
> use strict;
> 
> socketpair( my $dovecot, my $client, AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, PF_UNSPEC );
> 
> unless ( fork() ) {
> open( STDIN,  '<&', $client );
> open( STDOUT, '>&', $client );
> exec( '/usr/lib/dovecot/imap' );
> }
> close( $client );
> 
> my $imap = Mail::IMAPClient->new( Socket => $dovecot );
> 
> foreach my $folder( sort $imap->folders() ) {
> print( "$folder\n" );
> $imap->select( $folder );
> $imap->set_flag( 'Seen', $imap->search( 'ALL' ) );
> }

You're not specifying Ranges in the ->new call, and you're calling
->search in list context; either of these will force ->search to return
a complete list of message numbers, which you are then trying to pass
back in a single IMAP command. You want to either loop through the
messages or set Ranges and call ->search in scalar context to get an
(object which stringifies to an) IMAP range specification, which will be
much shorter than the whole list.

Ben



Re: [Dovecot] FreeBSD, Dovecot and ZFS

2013-02-12 Thread Ben Morrow
At  9PM + on 12/02/13 you (Jason Lock) wrote:
> Mail Issues - FreeBSD
> 
> Hello, my apologies if this may be the wrong forum but hoping that
> maybe someone might be able to provide some insight.

This may turn out to be something better addressed on freebsd-stable,
but this is a perfectly good place to start.

> Have a very sporadic and strange issue with our mail servers running
> Dovecot on FreeBSD.  There are three servers hosting Dovecot with
> FreeBSD as the underlying operating system.  All three connect to a
> NAS server, again running FreeBSD and ZFS.

Over NFS, I assume? What version, what mount options, and what type of
authentication? What locking strategies is Dovecot using? Are there any
suspicious messages in syslog on either machine?

> When the specific issue occurs, clients connecting to check mail via
> POP3 or IMAP experience long delays and timeouts.  To the point where
> POP3 Logins fail due to the timeouts.  The issue is further compounded
> by clients increasing the number of attempts to check mail.

Are the delays happening before or after login?

If you can provoke this and get a 'procstat -k' for the relevant dovecot
process this might be helpful. If 'long' delays means several minutes,
running something along the lines of 'procstat -k $(pgrep -U dovecot -U
doveauth)' every minute or so for a while might be one way to catch
this, though this will collect a lot of data rather fast so you will
need some way to locate the relevant entry.

Ben



[Dovecot] Converting a POP3 client to IMAP

2013-02-12 Thread Kristen J. Webb

I have a dovecot 2.0 dovecot server
set up for https/imap with
spam, av, and some preliminary sieve filters
in place.

Our current email is outsourced and so we
have used POP3 to keep all email on our
systems for many years.

I have run tests to move mail to the new
imap server and that seems to work pretty well.

However, we have lots of mail going back over
a decade and used a lot of aliases that
forwarded email to many users.  I find the
moving mail multiple times using Thunderbird
results in multiple copies of the same email.

Is there a best practice for moving mail
such that we can take advantage of the
hard link feature for all those older copies
that are currently in POP3 files?

It would also be nice to be able to auto file
things.  I don't see the sieve filters being
activated when I copy mail in Thunderbird.

Many thanks in advance for any guidance.

Kris
--
This message is NOT encrypted

Mr. Kristen J. Webb
Chief Technology Officer
Teradactyl LLC.
2450 Baylor Dr. S.E.
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106
Phone: 1-505-338-6000
Email: kw...@teradactyl.com
Web: http://www.teradactyl.com

Providers of Scalable Backup Solutions
   for Unique Data Environments


NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS: Any information contained in or attached to this message 
is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the 
intended recipient of this transmittal, you are hereby notified that you 
received this transmittal in error, and we request that you please delete and 
destroy all copies and attachments in your possession, notify the sender that 
you have received this communication in error, and note that any review or 
dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on, this communication 
is expressly prohibited.



Regular internet e-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or 
error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or 
accurate, and it should not be relied upon as such. If you prefer to communicate 
with Teradactyl LLC. using secure (i.e., encrypted and/or digitally signed) 
e-mail transmission, please notify the sender. Otherwise, you will be deemed to 
have consented to communicate with Teradactyl via regular internet e-mail 
transmission. Please note that Teradactyl reserves the right to intercept, 
monitor, and retain all e-mail messages (including secure e-mail messages) sent 
to or from its systems as permitted by applicable law.






Re: [Dovecot] sieve /editheader / addheader :last crash

2013-02-12 Thread Stephan Bosch

On 2/9/2013 8:20 PM, Peter Rindfuss wrote:

Am 2013-02-09 09:27, schrieb Stephan Bosch:


I'm unable to reproduce this so far. Could you show me more details of
your setup?

* Output from: dovecot -n
* Your exact test message
* Your exact test Sieve script
* The sieve-test command line



Hi Stephan,

attached are "dovecot -n", a test message, and three very similar 
scripts one of which causes the crash and two not.


I'm inclined to say that the message itself does not matter.

This ist the sieve-test cmd line:
 sieve-test -t - -a 'b...@wzb.eu' -l /wzb/mail/brot/Maildir -e -x 
+editheader /wzb/mail/brot/sieve/{bad|good1|good2}.sieve mail


Initially I encountered the problem in real deliveries, not in 
sieve-test. It is always reproducible.


I will take another look at this in a few days.

Regards,

Stephan.



[Dovecot] Is there any way to mask or hide the INBOX label for Dovecot 1.2.x Shared Mailboxes?

2013-02-12 Thread Jason Discount
Hello,

I'm setting up a new Dovecot sever to replace an old Cyrus server, and need to 
keep things as consistent as possible. I have a couple local accounts, like 
junkmail and notjunkmail that users get shared access to, and can drop things 
in to train sa-update. However, when users share over junkmail's inbox, it's 
displayed in the hierarchy:

• Other Users
• junkmail
• INBOX

Is there any way to get junkmail's INBOX to just show up at Other 
Users/junkmail and not require that extra depth?

• Other Users
• junkmail

I'm running Debian Squeeze and the standard dovecot package available therein:

> # uname -a
> Linux internet.digitalquay.com.au 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 
> 13:49:30 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> #dovecot --version
> 1.2.15

I'm running in a configuration where all mail is owned by the vmail user, due 
to the impression I'm under, that it's a better way if there is to be shared 
mailboxes.

Relevant bits of dovecot -n:

> mail_uid: vmail
> mail_gid: vmail
> mail_location: maildir:/var/spool/dovecot/user/%u
> mail_plugins: acl imap_acl
> namespace:
>   type: private
>   separator: /
>   inbox: yes
>   list: yes
>   subscriptions: yes
> namespace:
>   type: shared
>   separator: /
>   prefix: Other Users/%%u/
>   location: 
> maildir:/var/spool/dovecot/user/%%u:INDEX="/var/spool/dovecot/user/%u/Other\ 
> Users/%%u"
>   list: children
> auth default:
>   passdb:
> driver: ldap
> args: /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf
>   userdb:
> driver: passwd
> args: uid=vmail gid=vmail blocking=yes 
> mail=maildir:/var/spool/dovecot/user/%u


Am I barking up the wrong tree, or is this possible?

Thanks,

Jay

Re: [Dovecot] FreeBSD, Dovecot and ZFS

2013-02-12 Thread Charles Marcus

On 2013-02-12 4:25 PM, Jason Lock  wrote:

When the specific issue occurs, clients connecting to check mail via POP3 or 
IMAP experience long delays and timeouts.  To the point where POP3 Logins fail 
due to the timeouts.  The issue is further compounded by clients increasing the 
number of attempts to check mail.


WAG would be similar issues you can face when using NFS with multiple 
servers accessing it (file locking issues).


The solution would be to use Director to make sure users are always 
directed to the same server.


http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director

If that isn't the problem, then much more info would be needed (ie, 
doveconf -n output, logs exhibiting the problem, etc)...


--

Best regards,

*/Charles /*



Re: [Dovecot] Imap process crash: assertion failed: (full_fs_access)

2013-02-12 Thread Joseph Tam

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Joseph Tam wrote:


Timo Sirainen  writes:


> Any guess at what would cause this?
> >   Feb  7 21:20:53 server dovecot: imap(user): Panic: file
>mailbox-list-fs-iter.c: line 447 (fs_list_get_roots): assertion
>failed: (full_fs_access)

LIST command that had invalid parameters that somehow got through the
first validity check. What namespace config do you have?


I got more info from the user that had this problem.  He reported that he
was was setting up a new Email client (Nexus4 Android) and he sent me a
screenshot of his setup.  Everything look ordinary except perhaps the
IMAP prefix set to "mail".
...
I've asked the user to change his prefix, and he'll probably report back.


He reported that removing the mail prefix solved it for him.  I then
proceeded to update dovecot from 2.1.14 -> 2.1.15, and asked him to
change it back to the previoux prefix ("mail").  That also worked.
So I don't know what unwedged him, but it's working now.

Joseph Tam 


[Dovecot] FreeBSD, Dovecot and ZFS

2013-02-12 Thread Jason Lock
Mail Issues - FreeBSD

Hello, my apologies if this may be the wrong forum but hoping that maybe 
someone might be able to provide some insight.

Have a very sporadic and strange issue with our mail servers running Dovecot on 
FreeBSD.  There are three servers hosting Dovecot with FreeBSD as the 
underlying operating system.  All three connect to a NAS server, again running 
FreeBSD and ZFS.

When the specific issue occurs, clients connecting to check mail via POP3 or 
IMAP experience long delays and timeouts.  To the point where POP3 Logins fail 
due to the timeouts.  The issue is further compounded by clients increasing the 
number of attempts to check mail.

Part of the frustration in attempting to diagnose the issue is not knowing the 
root cause or symptom that initates the issue.

Wondering if anyone has experienced anything similar, or suggestions on ways to 
help identify the root cause


Re: [Dovecot] Marking messages read / retaining date with Sieve

2013-02-12 Thread Bret Martin
On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:39 PM, Ben Morrow  wrote:
[...]
> Mail::IMAPClient (which I usually prefer) will work with a
> preauthenticated socket, but you need to create a socketpair explicitly,
> fork and exec dovecot/imap with one end of the pair on STDIN/STDOUT,
> then pass the other end to Mail::IMAPClient->new as the Socket
> parameter. Something like this (I've left out error checking)
[...]

Thanks again for your help!

To close the loop on this, I ended up doing the following, although it seems to 
fail on mailboxes with large numbers of messages (on the order of 10,000 or so; 
I didn't test carefully enough to find the exact number)

use Mail::IMAPClient;
use Socket;
use strict;

socketpair( my $dovecot, my $client, AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, PF_UNSPEC );

unless ( fork() ) {
open( STDIN,  '<&', $client );
open( STDOUT, '>&', $client );
exec( '/usr/lib/dovecot/imap' );
}
close( $client );

my $imap = Mail::IMAPClient->new( Socket => $dovecot );

foreach my $folder( sort $imap->folders() ) {
print( "$folder\n" );
$imap->select( $folder );
$imap->set_flag( 'Seen', $imap->search( 'ALL' ) );
}

For the moment the failure on large folders was easier to handle by just doing 
those folders manually, although I'm curious if anyone knows the reason that 
might fail.

--Bret



Re: [Dovecot] POLL: v2.2 to allow one mail over quota?

2013-02-12 Thread Axel Luttgens
Le 11 févr. 2013 à 02:16, Timo Sirainen a écrit :

> [...]
> 
> I wonder if there's a better name for this than "last_extra"..

Hello Timo,

If I've correctly understood, the idea is to accept an additional message 
provided there is some free space AND the size of that message additional 
doesn't exceed above last_extra.

An additional message, even if over-quota strictly speaking, might thus be 
tolerated.
Or the idea of an absolute quota may thus come with some tolerance.

quota_tolerance?

Axel




Re: [Dovecot] backing up maildir dovecot files

2013-02-12 Thread David Mehler
Hello,

Thanks, if I did:

rsync --force --delete-after -tPrlHpogEAXz /folder/ /backups/newmailstore/

could I then tar up the newmailstore folder with something like tar
zcf without messing anything up?

Thanks.
Dave.



On 2/12/13, Steffen Kaiser  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 11.02.2013 22:37, schrieb Steve Litt:
>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:47:57 +0100
>>> Reindl Harald  wrote:
 Am 11.02.2013 21:34, schrieb David Mehler:
> I'm having to migrate servers. Both are dovecot2 systems. I'm
> wanting to copy over my mail store from one system to the other.
> I'd like to preserve dates/times of emails. These are maildir
> setups on both boxes, I'd like to be as transparent to the end user
> as possible. I currently have the first dovecot system offline and
> the second dovecot system is offline.

 assuming that BOTH servers are down as fro any other transfers
 like mysql-datadirs and any critical things which should go
 save and fast by preserve attributes:

 rsync --force --delete-after -tPrlHpogEAXz /folder/
 root@newserver:/folder/

 # -z compress
 # -t timestamps
 # -P progress
 # -r recursive
 # -l links
 # -H hard-links
 # -p permissions
 # -o owner
 # -g group
 # -E executability
 # -A acls
 # -X xtended attributes
>>>
>>> That's how I'd do it also. I think if you didn't mind including -D,
>>> which from my understanding is --special and --devices, neither of
>>> which I'd expect in a maildir, and if you wanted to do your deletion
>>> manually after the fact, would this be equivalent?
>>
>> well, i have them ususally in my "rsync.sh" but did not expect
>> such files in a maildir, but yes it does not hurt
>>
>>> rsync  -PaHAX /folder/
>>>
>>> The man page says -a (--archive) is equivalent to -rlptgoD, and you
>>> have all but D listed up there.
>>>
>>> My thinking on later manually deleting the old maildir, instead of
>>> letting rsync do it, is that if somehow, some weird thing goes wrong, I
>>> have the old one for backup. Who knows, maybe I copied the thing on top
>>> of the wrong other maildir and have to back it out -- I'd have the old
>>> maildir as a reference of which files.
>>
>> you missunderstand "--delete-after"
>>
>> this is for delete files in the TARGET folder which is not
>> or no longer in the source and IMHO very very important
>> if you want sync folders 1:1 because old artefacts can have
>> very bad effects
>>
>> without you merge folders and if i know "hey my source contains
>> exactly what i need, not more and lot less" this is not what i
>> would like and never did in 10 years IT
>
> If you use "--delete-after" you could add "--fuzzy", which theoretically
> could save transfers because of filename renames.
>
> Anyway: Any form of "--delete" is required for Maildir, IMHO, because
> Labels, Tags, Keywords (or whatever the MUA calls it) and status
> information (seen, read, deleted) are reflected by the filename. Hence, if
> one does not "--delete", the _same_ message might pop up in the Maildir
> multiple times but with different status and/or tags. Same applies to new
> messages, because they are storred in /new and later moved to
> /cur. So one ends with the same message in "new" and in "cur".
>
> - --
> Steffen Kaiser
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEVAwUBURn+wV3r2wJMiz2NAQJYnwgAwGfCHBFglm800nbaHFhsdWeuVkhGJjnW
> l0QtbmQLaSdQOkWwdVkmNEQkJLmwvfhddG0a9GblofI/zn8EBN+3EDR/CM0d5Y8f
> jy1yqemT26sFTVC6NlTqhDF8zq/Oi5WK7ftUfYfrt90MtmMD1rzmBQ5Q/N+Tteae
> TeE0jeHNL0rHl9DoAV9AkBzhJPnYYodSK2lA1oewazlzRpzJSiHYmgVh4RiSmsyk
> 4DAtch5ZrqLnsx1A/mUHAfDvdk66j2Os0bLXqbHu9ZAzz5Xb9bbNfpu52u1Ukg/o
> TfXfiGA4aRix6I1OGePdXmi/qXTzPVLBzhhIZdMiJ2CKCWNFbIYC7w==
> =ugv1
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>


[Dovecot] I can't sync with dsync and imapc

2013-02-12 Thread Angel L. Mateo

Hello,

	I am deploying a new dovecot server to replace and old one, both of the 
with dovecot 2.1.9. Now I want to synchronize imap mailbox from the old 
to the new one.


So, in my new server I run (whith a

$ sudo dsync -v -D -o imapc_host="" -o 
imapc_password="" -o imapc_features=rfc822.size backup 
-R -f -u myu...@um.es imapc:
doveadm(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib01_acl_plugin.so
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib02_lazy_expunge_plugin.so
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib10_quota_plugin.so
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib20_zlib_plugin.so
doveadm(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so
doveadm(root): Debug: Skipping module doveadm_expire_plugin, because 
dlopen() failed: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so: 
undefined symbol: expire_set_deinit (this is usually intentional, so 
just ignore this message)
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_quota_plugin.so
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_zlib_plugin.so
doveadm(root): Debug: Skipping module doveadm_fts_plugin, because 
dlopen() failed: 
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib20_doveadm_fts_plugin.so: undefined 
symbol: fts_backend_rescan (this is usually intentional, so just ignore 
this message)
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: Added userdb setting: 
plugin/quota_rule=*:storage=10G
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: Effective uid=2012, gid=204, 
home=/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl: No acl_shared_dict setting - shared 
mailbox listing is disabled
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: Quota root: name=User quota backend=dict 
args=:file:/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/quota
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: Quota rule: root=User quota mailbox=* 
bytes=10737418240 messages=0
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: Quota rule: root=User quota mailbox=Trash 
bytes=+1073741824 messages=0
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: dict quota: user=myu...@um.es, 
uri=file:/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/quota, noenforcing=0
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: Namespace : type=private, prefix=, sep=., 
inbox=yes, hidden=no, list=yes, subscriptions=yes 
location=mdbox:/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/mdbox:INDEX=/home/indexes/i1/an/myuser:ALT=/home/alt/a1/an/myuser
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: fs: root=/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/mdbox, 
index=/home/indexes/i1/an/myuser, control=, inbox=, 
alt=/home/alt/a1/an/myuser
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: Namespace : Using permissions from 
/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/mdbox: mode=0700 gid=-1

doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl: initializing backend with data: vfile
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl: acl username = myu...@um.es
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl: owner = 1
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl vfile: Global ACL directory: (none)
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: Namespace : type=private, 
prefix=BORRADOS., sep=., inbox=no, hidden=yes, list=no, 
subscriptions=yes location=mdbox:/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/expunged
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: fs: 
root=/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/expunged, index=, control=, inbox=, alt=
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: Namespace BORRADOS.: Using permissions 
from /home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/expunged: mode=0700 gid=-1

doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl: initializing backend with data: vfile
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl: acl username = myu...@um.es
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl: owner = 1
doveadm(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl vfile: Global ACL directory: (none)
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: Effective uid=2012, gid=204, 
home=/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: acl: No acl_shared_dict setting - shared 
mailbox listing is disabled
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: Quota root: name=User quota backend=dict 
args=:file:/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/quota
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: Quota rule: root=User quota mailbox=* 
bytes=10737418240 messages=0
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: Quota rule: root=User quota mailbox=Trash 
bytes=+1073741824 messages=0
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: dict quota: user=myu...@um.es, 
uri=file:/home/buzones/b1/an/myuser/quota, noenforcing=0
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: Namespace : type=private, prefix=, sep=., 
inbox=yes, hidden=no, list=yes, subscriptions=yes location=imapc:

dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: imapc: root=, index=, control=, inbox=, alt=
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: imapc(myotis30.um.es:143): Looking up IP address
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: imapc(myotis30.um.es:143): Connecting to 
155.54.211.169:143
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: imapc(myotis30.um.es:143): Server 
capabilities: IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE 
AUTH=PLAIN
dsync(myu...@um.es): Debug: imapc(myotis30.um.es:143): Authenticating 

[Dovecot] Authentication with many Windows AD

2013-02-12 Thread Antonio Alberola
Dear All,

I'm a new user of Dovecot and I need support with the authentication
process.
I use Dovecot 2.0.9 and Postfix 2.6.6 on host x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64 CentOS release 6.3 (Final)

I need to select the validation method depending on the user. I have users
that have to be authenticate with UNIX account, and I have others thats have
to be authenticate with Windows AD. For example, some sysadmins and special
accounts needs validate with Unix accounts. Other normal users have to
authenticate with Windows AD, I have many Windows controllers. Some users
authenticate to a specific Windows AD and other users are validated in
another one.

How I can do this?

Thank you very much.
 
Antonio Alberola



[Dovecot] Dict quota timeout error: Has anything changed in the latest versions?

2013-02-12 Thread Alessio Cecchi

Hi,

I'm using dict quota with mysql for track them via SQL query instead of 
read maildirsize file. Primary quota and enforcing is provided via 
userdb and is "maildir" type.


Since dovecot 2.1.10-13 (but perhaps even before) when a new user log in 
via POP/IMAP or receive an email for the first time dovecot created the 
entry for the users in the table "quota" of dovecot database with quota 
usage and number of messages (before of this login/delivery the user has 
no entry in the quota table of dovecot DB).


After the update to 2.1.14 when a new user login or receive an email for 
the first time dovecot was unable to create (immediately) the entry in 
quota table and in the log print these errors:


Feb 12 11:03:49 master: Info: Dovecot v2.1.15 starting up (core dumps 
disabled)
Feb 12 11:04:02 auth-worker(31421): Info: mysql(localhost): Connected to 
database vpopmail
Feb 12 11:04:02 pop3-login: Info: Login: user=, 
method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=31422, secured, 
session=
Feb 12 11:04:08 pop3(ales...@domain.com): Info: Disconnected: Logged out 
top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/9, size=18618
Feb 12 11:04:41 pop3-login: Info: Login: user=, 
method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=31424, secured, 
session=
Feb 12 11:05:11 pop3(ales...@domain.com): Info: Disconnected: Logged out 
top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=1/9, size=18618

Feb 12 11:05:11 dict: Info: mysql(10.10.3.19): Connected to database dovecot


[ here is when I "quit" from telnet session]

Feb 12 11:05:41 pop3(ales...@domain.com): Error: 
read(/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/var/run/dovecot/dict) failed: Timeout after 
30 seconds
Feb 12 11:06:11 pop3(ales...@domain.com): Error: 
read(/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/var/run/dovecot/dict) failed: Timeout after 
30 seconds
Feb 12 11:06:41 pop3(ales...@domain.com): Error: 
read(/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/var/run/dovecot/dict) failed: Timeout after 
30 seconds
Feb 12 11:07:11 pop3(ales...@domain.com): Error: 
read(/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/var/run/dovecot/dict) failed: Timeout after 
30 seconds
Feb 12 11:07:41 pop3(ales...@domain.com): Error: 
read(/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/var/run/dovecot/dict) failed: Timeout after 
30 seconds
Feb 12 11:08:11 pop3(ales...@domain.com): Error: 
read(/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/var/run/dovecot/dict) failed: Timeout after 
30 seconds
Feb 12 11:08:41 pop3(ales...@domain.com): Error: 
read(/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/var/run/dovecot/dict) failed: Timeout after 
30 seconds


[ only now telnet close the session ]

This is the telnet session:

# telnet 0 110
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK Dovecot ready.
user ales...@domain.com
+OK
pass ciao
+OK Logged in.
list
+OK 8 messages:
1 1594
2 1594
3 1594
4 1594
5 1594
6 1594
7 3755
8 3714
.
dele 8
+OK Marked to be deleted.
quit

[ here dovecot wait about 3 minuts before close the connecctions ]

+OK Logging out, messages deleted.
Connection closed by foreign host.

After 3 minutes of wait in the mysql database dovecot insert the entry 
for the new users:


mysql> use dovecot
Database changed
mysql> select * from quota where username='ales...@domain.com';
+--+-+--+
| username | bytes   | messages |
+--+-+--+
| ales...@domain.com   | 2144030 |   15 |
+--+-+--+

Errors like

Error: read(/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/var/run/dovecot/dict) failed: Timeout 
after 30 seconds


were present also before the upgrade but they were occasional, now I had 
to disable "dict quota".


Can this be fixed?

My dovecot configuration:

# cat /usr/local/dovecot-2.1/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext
connect = host=10.10.3.19 dbname=dovecot user=dovecot password=XXX
map {
  pattern = priv/quota/storage
  table = quota
  username_field = username
  value_field = bytes
}
map {
  pattern = priv/quota/messages
  table = quota
  username_field = username
  value_field = messages
}
map {
  pattern = shared/expire/$user/$mailbox
  table = expires
  value_field = expire_stamp

  fields {
username = $user
mailbox = $mailbox
  }
}


# dovecot -n
# 2.1.15: /usr/local/dovecot-2.1/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.6
auth_cache_size = 512 k
auth_worker_max_count = 60
default_login_user = nobody
dict {
  acl = mysql:/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/etc/dovecot/dovecot-share-folder.conf
  sqlquota = 
mysql:/usr/local/dovecot-2.1/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext

}
disable_plaintext_auth = no
dotlock_use_excl = no
first_valid_gid = 89
first_valid_uid = 89
last_valid_gid = 89
last_valid_uid = 89
lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes
lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes
log_path = /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
mail_fsync = always
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir
mail_nfs_index = yes
mail_nfs_storage = yes
mail_plugins = quota acl zlib
maildir_very_dirty_syncs = yes
managesieve_notify_capability = mailto
managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope 
encoded-character vacation subaddress com

[Dovecot] dsync 2.1.10 does not correctly handle renames of mailbox subtrees

2013-02-12 Thread Karol Jurak
Hi,

It seems that dsync 2.1.10 does not correctly handle renames of mailbox
subtrees. The scenario is as follows.

There are two servers, A and B, both running dovecot 2.1.10 and configured
to use mdbox. Automatic replication between them is disabled, ie.
replication plugin is not active and replicator service
has process_min_avail = 0. I perform the following actions:

1. On A: doveadm mailbox create -u test_user a a/b a/b/c d
2. On A: doveadm sync -u test_user -d

The result is as expected: on both A and B there are a/b/c and d mailboxes.

Now I connect to A via IMAP and rename a/b to d/b. The result is as
expected: on A there are a and d/b/c mailboxes. Next I execute on A
'doveadm sync -u mailstoragetest -d' and now the result is not as expected:
there are a/b/c and d/b subtrees on both A and B and a/b is just a
directory, ie. it does not contain dbox-Mails (the rest are proper
mailboxes).

dovecot.mailbox.logs have the following records appended to them:

A:
#2112: rename 33259783092361d18c60ba1c7cfe973c (2013-02-12 10:42:55) - this
probably is the rename of a/b to d/b (recursive, ie. including children -
in this case a/b/c => d/b/c) by the IMAP client
#2136: rename ee2be6da91ae879476b152d7ca041f1b (1970-01-01 01:00:00) -
rename of d/b/c to a/b/c by dsync (unexpected/incorrect)

B:
#1104: rename 33259783092361d18c60ba1c7cfe973c (1970-01-01 01:00:00) -
rename of a/b to d/b (non recursive) by dsync

What seems to be missing is the record in A's dovecot.mailbox.log
describing the rename of a/b/c to d/b/c (or in general case the set of
records describing the renames of all the children of a/b). Would appending
such records allow dsync to make correct decisions as to which mailboxes
and on which servers to rename?

Thanks for any help.

# 2.1.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.1
auth_master_user_separator = *
auth_username_format = %Ln
default_vsz_limit = 2 G
dotlock_use_excl = no
dsync_remote_cmd = ssh -l%{login} %{host} doveadm dsync-server -u%u -l5
log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log
log_timestamp = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S "
mail_access_groups = mail
mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox:ALT=/var/vmail/alt/%n
mail_plugins = acl
namespace inbox {
  inbox = yes
  location =
  mailbox Drafts {
special_use = \Drafts
  }
  mailbox Junk {
special_use = \Junk
  }
  mailbox Sent {
special_use = \Sent
  }
  mailbox "Sent Messages" {
special_use = \Sent
  }
  mailbox Trash {
special_use = \Trash
  }
  prefix =
  separator = /
}
passdb {
  args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf
  driver = ldap
}
plugin {
  acl = vfile
}
protocols = imap lmtp pop3
service aggregator {
  fifo_listener replication-notify-fifo {
mode = 0666
  }
  unix_listener replication-notify {
mode = 0666
  }
}
service auth {
  executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/auth
  unix_listener auth-client {
mode = 0660
  }
  unix_listener auth-master {
mode = 0600
  }
  unix_listener auth-userdb {
mode = 0666
  }
  user = root
}
service dict {
  unix_listener dict {
mode = 0666
  }
}
service doveadm {
  process_min_avail = 1
  service_count = 1024
}
service imap-login {
  chroot = login
  executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login
  inet_listener imap {
address = *
port = 143
  }
  service_count = 0
  user = dovecot
}
service imap {
  executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/imap
}
service lmtp {
  inet_listener lmtp {
port = 24
  }
  process_limit = 48
}
service pop3-login {
  chroot = login
  executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3-login
  inet_listener pop3 {
address = *
port = 110
  }
  service_count = 0
  user = dovecot
}
service pop3 {
  executable = /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3
}
ssl = no
userdb {
  args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf
  driver = ldap
}
protocol imap {
  imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep
  mail_plugins = acl
}
protocol lmtp {
  mail_plugins = acl
}
protocol pop3 {
  pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv
}
protocol lda {
  mail_plugins = acl
}

-- 
Karol Jurak


Re: [Dovecot] backing up maildir dovecot files

2013-02-12 Thread Steffen Kaiser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:


Am 11.02.2013 22:37, schrieb Steve Litt:

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:47:57 +0100
Reindl Harald  wrote:

Am 11.02.2013 21:34, schrieb David Mehler:

I'm having to migrate servers. Both are dovecot2 systems. I'm
wanting to copy over my mail store from one system to the other.
I'd like to preserve dates/times of emails. These are maildir
setups on both boxes, I'd like to be as transparent to the end user
as possible. I currently have the first dovecot system offline and
the second dovecot system is offline.


assuming that BOTH servers are down as fro any other transfers
like mysql-datadirs and any critical things which should go
save and fast by preserve attributes:

rsync --force --delete-after -tPrlHpogEAXz /folder/
root@newserver:/folder/

# -z compress
# -t timestamps
# -P progress
# -r recursive
# -l links
# -H hard-links
# -p permissions
# -o owner
# -g group
# -E executability
# -A acls
# -X xtended attributes


That's how I'd do it also. I think if you didn't mind including -D,
which from my understanding is --special and --devices, neither of
which I'd expect in a maildir, and if you wanted to do your deletion
manually after the fact, would this be equivalent?


well, i have them ususally in my "rsync.sh" but did not expect
such files in a maildir, but yes it does not hurt


rsync  -PaHAX /folder/

The man page says -a (--archive) is equivalent to -rlptgoD, and you
have all but D listed up there.

My thinking on later manually deleting the old maildir, instead of
letting rsync do it, is that if somehow, some weird thing goes wrong, I
have the old one for backup. Who knows, maybe I copied the thing on top
of the wrong other maildir and have to back it out -- I'd have the old
maildir as a reference of which files.


you missunderstand "--delete-after"

this is for delete files in the TARGET folder which is not
or no longer in the source and IMHO very very important
if you want sync folders 1:1 because old artefacts can have
very bad effects

without you merge folders and if i know "hey my source contains
exactly what i need, not more and lot less" this is not what i
would like and never did in 10 years IT


If you use "--delete-after" you could add "--fuzzy", which theoretically 
could save transfers because of filename renames.


Anyway: Any form of "--delete" is required for Maildir, IMHO, because 
Labels, Tags, Keywords (or whatever the MUA calls it) and status 
information (seen, read, deleted) are reflected by the filename. Hence, if 
one does not "--delete", the _same_ message might pop up in the Maildir 
multiple times but with different status and/or tags. Same applies to new 
messages, because they are storred in /new and later moved to 
/cur. So one ends with the same message in "new" and in "cur".


- -- 
Steffen Kaiser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBURn+wV3r2wJMiz2NAQJYnwgAwGfCHBFglm800nbaHFhsdWeuVkhGJjnW
l0QtbmQLaSdQOkWwdVkmNEQkJLmwvfhddG0a9GblofI/zn8EBN+3EDR/CM0d5Y8f
jy1yqemT26sFTVC6NlTqhDF8zq/Oi5WK7ftUfYfrt90MtmMD1rzmBQ5Q/N+Tteae
TeE0jeHNL0rHl9DoAV9AkBzhJPnYYodSK2lA1oewazlzRpzJSiHYmgVh4RiSmsyk
4DAtch5ZrqLnsx1A/mUHAfDvdk66j2Os0bLXqbHu9ZAzz5Xb9bbNfpu52u1Ukg/o
TfXfiGA4aRix6I1OGePdXmi/qXTzPVLBzhhIZdMiJ2CKCWNFbIYC7w==
=ugv1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-