Re: Dovecot + Postfix postmulti SASL
On 09/05/2014 04:30 PM, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
Hello,
Our Postfix setup uses multi-instance feature. I would like to enable
dovecot SASL mechanisms in postfix. Open two unix sockets is not a
problem for us:
service auth {
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix-instance1/private/auth {
mode = 0660
user = postfix
group = postfix
}
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix-instance2/private/auth {
mode = 0660
user = postfix
group = postfix
}
}
Lets assume, that postfix-instance1 uses LDAP1, and postfix-instance2
uses LDAP2. How can I use different userdb and passdb databases for
those sockets?
Hi again,
After long googling we have found this link:
http://dovecot.2317879.n4.nabble.com/multiple-passdbs-and-auth-sockets-td43780.html
Ajusted my configs, and now I'm facing this problem:
2014-09-09T08:57:19.954477+03:00 mail-gw1 dovecot: ktu: Error: doveconf:
Fatal: execvp(/run/dovecot/dovecot/auth) failed: No such file or directory
That is strange, because our dovecot is 2.2.9 from debian
wheezy-backports and auth executable is in /usr/lib/dovecot/auth. Source
lines responsible for this error is in doveconf.c:
$ grep -n execvp src/config/doveconf.c
850:execvp(exec_args[0], exec_args);
851:i_fatal(execvp(%s) failed: %m, exec_args[0]);
$
Somehow exec_args[0] comes not as /usr/lib/dovecot/auth, but
/run/dovecot/dovecot/auth. Not sure how is that possible.
As author states, Dovecot v1.x is better working with multiple auth {}
sections. I'm working with postfix multiple instances and SASL. I would
be glad to see such capability in dovecot v2.x. Maybe my case is 1 out
of the million?
--
Sincerely,
Nerijus Kislauskas
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Creating a backup of incoming mail
On 06 Sep 2014, at 18:20 , Will Yardley dovecot@veggiechinese.net wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:33:52AM +0200, Patrick De Zordo wrote: To backup all mail (incoming and outgoing), BCC all mails, you could do the following.. Add to your /etc/postfix/main.cf the following: ---8- # Auto-Backup all mails transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport backuplmtp_destination_recipient_limit = 1 lmtp_destination_recipient_limit = 1 recipient_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre sender_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre Why not just use $always_bcc? Does that apply to INCOMING mail? (that's what I am trying to backup) -- 'I warn you, dragon, the human spirit is-' They never found out what it was, or at least what he thought it was, although possibly in the dark hours of a sleepless night some of them might have remembered the subsequent events and formed a pretty good and gut-churning insight, to whit, that one of the things sometimes forgotten about the human spirit is that while it is, in the right conditions, noble and brave and wonderful, it is also, when you get right down to it, only human.
Re: Creating a backup of incoming mail
Am 09.09.2014 um 09:05 schrieb LuKreme: On 06 Sep 2014, at 18:20 , Will Yardley dovecot@veggiechinese.net wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:33:52AM +0200, Patrick De Zordo wrote: To backup all mail (incoming and outgoing), BCC all mails, you could do the following.. Add to your /etc/postfix/main.cf the following: ---8- # Auto-Backup all mails transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport backuplmtp_destination_recipient_limit = 1 lmtp_destination_recipient_limit = 1 recipient_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre sender_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre Why not just use $always_bcc? Does that apply to INCOMING mail? (that's what I am trying to backup) optional to recipient_bcc_maps sender_bcc_maps you may use http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html ... always_bcc (default: empty) Optional address that receives a blind carbon copy of each message that is received by the Postfix mail system. Note: with Postfix 2.3 and later the BCC address is added as if it was specified with NOTIFY=NONE. The sender will not be notified when the BCC address is undeliverable, as long as all down-stream software implements RFC 3461. Note: with Postfix 2.2 and earlier the sender will be notified when the BCC address is undeliverable. Note: automatic BCC recipients are produced only for new mail. To avoid mailer loops, automatic BCC recipients are not generated after Postfix forwards mail internally, or after Postfix generates mail itself. ... Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
Re: vsz_limit is 18,447 PB
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 04:41:18PM -0700, Robert L Mathews wrote: On 9/8/14 3:38 PM, Jiri Bourek wrote: Hm, I can only guess (someone with more knowledge of dovecot source code probably knows better), but it seems like that value is magic number for not set. My doveconf outputs the same thing on services which don't have vsz_limit set explicitly, but when I list /proc/[pid]/limits on such a service, the row called Max address space (which is - AFAIK - limit on vsz) shows 2GB, a value of default_vsz_limit setting. I'd say don't overthink it, just put explicit vsz_limit = 512M into service imap section (if your machine's RAM allows) and be done with it. Right. According to my notes from when I upgraded to 2.x, 18446744073709551615 means it's not set and that the default_vsz_limit will apply, which is 256 MB. That seems sensible to me. 2^64 bytes is 18446744073709551616 (18.45EB), so the number shown is (2^64 - 1). As a *limit* for a 64-bit program, that seems about as close to no limit as you're going to get :) To avoid the problem the original poster had, I used: default_vsz_limit = 1 G -- Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies, http://www.tigertech.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
My Dsync isn't replicating 'EXPUNGE' IMAP command
Hi!
I have two Dovecot-2.2.13 servers with Dsync Replication: server1 and
server2.
When I execute 'EXPUNGE' on server1 side, the messages with FLAG
\Deleted are expunged only on server1. The message is still present in
Server2.
Could someone give me a hint reason for this ?
Thanks in advance!
--
Thiago Henrique
==
How I reproduce:
== ON SERVER1 ==
Client: $ telnet IP server1 143
Trying IP server1...
Connected to IP server1.
Escape character is '^]'.
Server: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID
ENABLE IDLE AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN] MAILBOX1 IMAP/POP3 server
Client: AUTH LOGIN user pass
Server: AUTH OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS
ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN
NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH
ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS SPECIAL-USE BINARY
MOVE QUOTA] Logged in
Client: A002 SELECT INBOX
Server: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft nonjunk)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft nonjunk
\*)] Flags permitted.
* 2 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 1] First unseen.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1410284221] UIDs valid
* OK [UIDNEXT 16] Predicted next UID
* OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 56] Highest
A002 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed (0.000 secs).
Client: A003 FETCH 1:* (UID FLAGS)
Server: * 1 FETCH (UID 13 FLAGS (nonjunk))
* 2 FETCH (UID 15 FLAGS (nonjunk))
A003 OK Fetch completed.
Client: A005 STORE 1 +FLAGS \Deleted
Server: * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Deleted nonjunk))
A005 OK Store completed.
Client: A003 FETCH 1:* (UID FLAGS)
Server: * 1 FETCH (UID 13 FLAGS (\Deleted nonjunk))
* 2 FETCH (UID 15 FLAGS (nonjunk))
A003 OK Fetch completed.
Client: A006 EXPUNGE
Server: * 1 EXPUNGE
A006 OK Expunge completed.
Client: A007 FETCH 1:* (UID FLAGS)
Server: * 1 FETCH (UID 15 FLAGS (nonjunk))
A007 OK Fetch completed.
Client: A008 LOGOUT
Server: * BYE Logging out
A008 OK Logout completed.
Connection closed by foreign host.
== ON SERVER2 ==
Client: $ telnet IP server2 143
Trying IP server2...
Connected to IP server2.
Escape character is '^]'.
Server: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID
ENABLE IDLE AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN] MAILBOX2 IMAP/POP3 server
Client: AUTH LOGIN user pass
Server: AUTH OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS
ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN
NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH
ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS SPECIAL-USE BINARY
MOVE QUOTA] Logged in
Client: A002 SELECT INBOX
Server: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft nonjunk)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft nonjunk
\*)] Flags permitted.
* 2 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 1] First unseen.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1410284221] UIDs valid
* OK [UIDNEXT 17] Predicted next UID
* OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 61] Highest
A002 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed (0.000 secs).
Client: A003 FETCH 1:* (UID FLAGS)
Server: * 1 FETCH (UID 13 FLAGS (\Deleted nonjunk))
* 2 FETCH (UID 15 FLAGS (nonjunk))
A003 OK Fetch completed.
Client: A008 LOGOUT
Server: * BYE Logging out
A008 OK Logout completed.
Connection closed by foreign host.
= My settings =
* My settins age identical on both server1 and server2, except by
'listen', 'address' and 'mail_replica' directives.
# doveconf -n
# 2.2.13 (6bb26098a45c): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 3.13.0-30-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
auth_master_user_separator = *
auth_mechanisms = plain login
auth_username_chars =
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ01234567890.-_@=
auth_worker_max_count = 1
disable_plaintext_auth = no
doveadm_password = secret
doveadm_port = 12345
listen = server1
log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log
login_greeting = MAILBOX1 IMAP/POP3 server
mail_fsync = never
mail_gid = dovemail
mail_plugins = notify replication quota
mail_uid = dovemail
passdb {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext
driver = sql
}
passdb {
args =
outlook 2013
I am trying really hard to wrap my head around why people insist on using this program... Where I have outlook 2013 users, I have had nothing but problems getting their mail to work with imap. my solution has been to set them up with pop, which works just like it always has. Or move them to a different program. recently, I have a customer who requires multiple machines, all using outlook 2013, to access the same email address, so pretty much have to use imap. if I set up just one of the machines with imap, it works more less as expected, with hiccups such as mail taking an hour or two or more to show up. But shortly after I connect a 2nd machine to the same account, one or both machines start to go wonky. Symptoms include deleted items returning, read messages becoming unread again, and duplicates being constantly created and deleted. The last I can confirm by watching in webmail and refreshing the inbox every few seconds; as mail shows up and deletes in outlook, so it does in webmail too. On my test machine connected to the same server, I have evolution, outlook and thunderbird all connecting to one account with no problems. Well, outlook hiccups, but it's not unusable. And I have other users on the system that share email accounts across a variety of other clients and platforms, including older versions of outlook. I have tried checking message rules, there are none; removing all folder subscriptions; running scanpst, which finds errors even before the account finishes syncing and ever time I run it after that; I have looked for viruses/malware; I have confirmed there is no forwarding or some trickery happening on the server; chkdsk and similar hardware checks all come up clean, the computers are only a couple of months old; I have got certs set up with SANs and the CA installed such that outlook does not error on the certificate; and I have tried just about every combination of settings that seem relevant. The one thing that does seem to work, at least for a few minutes or an hour or two, is deleting and recreating the accounts on one of the computers. But the problem inevitably returns in short order. Surely people have outlook 2013 connecting via imap to dovecot without problems; is there some special trick that google is hiding from me? -- Computerisms Bob Miller 867-334-7117 / 867-633-3760 http://computerisms.ca
ACL with Public Namespace
I've configured a namespace like this:
namespace avisos {
type = public
list = yes
location = maildir:/var/mail.avisos:INDEXPVT=~/Maildir/avisos
subscriptions = yes
prefix = AVISOS.
mailbox DIVULGA {
auto = subscribe
}
}
This is the namespace representation in filesystem:
root@imap:~# ls -lha /var/mail.avisos/
total 44K
drwxr-xr-x 7 vmail mail 4,0K Set 9 18:21 .
drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 4,0K Set 9 17:08 ..
drwxr-xr-x 5 vmail mail 4,0K Set 9 16:49 .DIVULGA
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17 Set 9 18:21 dovecot-acl
-rw-r--r-- 1 vmail mail0 Set 9 18:11 dovecot-acl-list
-rw-r--r-- 1 vmail mail 360 Set 9 18:11 dovecot.mailbox.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 vmail mail8 Set 9 18:02 dovecot-uidvalidity
-r--r--r-- 1 vmail mail0 Set 9 14:57 dovecot-uidvalidity.540f3f88
-rw-r--r-- 1 vmail mail 249 Set 9 18:11 subscriptions
This is the content of dovecot-acl file located at namespace's root level:
root@imap:~# cat /var/mail.avisos/dovecot-acl
authenticated rs
After reload dovecot service, it trows this error message in log:
Sep 9 18:14:13 imap dovecot: imap(user@mydomain): Error: Failed to
autocreate mailbox AVISOS.DIVULGA: Permission denied
So, I've changed the dovecot-acl file to this one and the problem was
solved.
root@imap:~# cat /var/mail.avisos/dovecot-acl
authenticated rsk
But that change created another problem: dovecot-acl file is copied into
AVISOS.DIVULGA. So, the user can create a maildir inside it. This behaviour
is bad because invalid maildirs are created under the filesystem. My
intention is to don't permit the user to create any maildir inside any
location of that namespace. But, I want to make possible to the
administrator to edit the dovecot.conf, insert a new mailbox into namespace
avisos and reload dovecot service to create new maildirs automatically.
How can I solve this problem?
--
Att.
Bruno Galindro da Costa
Re: vsz_limit is 18,447 PB
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org wrote: vsz_limit = 18446744073709551615 B } Still the same value? why not 265MB? I guess this is Dovecot's approximation of infinity. It's the largest value that fits into a 64-bit signed integer (2^64-1). Joseph Tam jtam.h...@gmail.com
Re: Replication problem
Le 19/08/2014 10:34, Ve (HOME) a écrit : Hi, I'm using mdbox and replication. Due to configuration error synchronization was not able to be done last week. Since then the problem has been corrected but synchronisation for some mailbox always failed in I/O stalled timeout for 600 seconds. The link between the two servers is quite slow and multiple sync are done in parallel leading to congested link. I can't replicate with rsync as change in the mdbox has been done on the two servers to get back to a working state. What do you think could be done to resynchronized the two dovecot server. Another question is what is this timeout ? Timeout of communication i.e no data received during 600 seconds ( to me that looks unlikely ) or 600 seconds for doing the full sync or 600 seconds for one mail sync. Thanks for any help. Regards, Vincent Hi After some digging, the problem is this 600 seconds timeout that in my case is unsuffisant to transfer one big mail. So retry and ..; same result.. and again and again I have verify with strace that data is exchange continuously during the sync between the two host but i can't succed in uploading the file during that time. Is there a way to configure this timeout ? Eventually a manual sync with a larger timeout to restore replication before limiting maximum size in postfix ? Possibly a feature would be to have a shorter timeout but applied to the transmission ( ie. nothing receive during 30 sec = timeout ) or a timeout compuited base on size ( ie. 300 sec for 10 mo for example) Any help appreciated Vincent
Re: Creating a backup of incoming mail
On 09 Sep 2014, at 02:06 , Robert Schetterer r...@sys4.de wrote: Am 09.09.2014 um 09:05 schrieb LuKreme: On 06 Sep 2014, at 18:20 , Will Yardley dovecot@veggiechinese.net wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:33:52AM +0200, Patrick De Zordo wrote: To backup all mail (incoming and outgoing), BCC all mails, you could do the following.. Add to your /etc/postfix/main.cf the following: ---8- # Auto-Backup all mails transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport backuplmtp_destination_recipient_limit = 1 lmtp_destination_recipient_limit = 1 recipient_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre sender_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre Why not just use $always_bcc? Does that apply to INCOMING mail? (that's what I am trying to backup) optional to recipient_bcc_maps sender_bcc_maps Well, heck. I feel twice as dumb as I did before I read your message. Thanks for that, I think. :) -- I DID NOT SEE ELVIS Bart chalkboard Ep. 7G07
Re: outlook 2013
Quoting Bob Miller b...@computerisms.ca: I am trying really hard to wrap my head around why people insist on using this program... Where I have outlook 2013 users, I have had nothing but problems getting their mail to work with imap. my solution has been to set them up with pop, which works just like it always has. Or move them to a different program. I have no idea what your doing to cause this issue :( I have a normal install of dovecot running, and I have 3 webmail pages open, 2 phones using imap, and a thunderbird connected to it. I started with outlook 2007, then 2010, and now 2013 for the last 2 years or 3years (I upgraded to it in beta at first). I haven't had any issues at all, I can delete emails, move emails, ..., and they instantly change in the other programs. I just use the normal outlook2013 config options for the account, besides making sure the ssl settings are right. I think I have only used it on the 2.2 branch though, what dovecot version are you using?
Re: outlook 2013
Hi Patrick, Thanks for your reply. I have no idea what your doing to cause this issue :( I have a normal install of dovecot running, and I have 3 webmail pages open, 2 phones using imap, and a thunderbird connected to it. I started with outlook 2007, then 2010, and now 2013 for the last 2 years or 3years (I upgraded to it in beta at first). I haven't had any issues at all, I can delete emails, move emails, ..., and they instantly change in the other programs. I have several accounts that are used by a variety of different programs and devices, as well, but the only program that gives me any problem is outlook 2013. And not quite consistently, on some few machines I have seen it work the same as any other client. This one particular case has me quite baffled though. I just use the normal outlook2013 config options for the account, besides making sure the ssl settings are right. I think I have only used it on the 2.2 branch though, what dovecot version are you using? # dovecot --version 2.2.13 sigh. At least now I know it should be working, so I will keep searching fior a solution...
Re: outlook 2013
On 09 Sep 2014, at 15:09 , Bob Miller b...@computerisms.ca wrote: I am trying really hard to wrap my head around why people insist on using this program… Which program? Where I have outlook 2013 users, I have had nothing but problems getting their mail to work with imap. my solution has been to set them up with pop, which works just like it always has. Or move them to a different program. That’s odd. The one and only thing that Lookout does pretty well is IMAP. Surely people have outlook 2013 connecting via imap to dovecot without problems; Yep. is there some special trick that google is hiding from me? Not really. -- He loves Nature in spite of what it did to him. - Forrest Tucker
Re: outlook 2013
I have had this problem a lot on my old Dovecot 0.9 system.. it seems to be OK on 2.2 however. It’s really noticeable when interacting with another Apple map system. One key thing is the Outlook by default doesn’t immediately purge your deleted items. It lags on that a bit. There are settings to change that. Trent On 10 Sep 2014, at 8:51 am, Bob Miller b...@computerisms.ca wrote: Hi Patrick, Thanks for your reply. I have no idea what your doing to cause this issue :( I have a normal install of dovecot running, and I have 3 webmail pages open, 2 phones using imap, and a thunderbird connected to it. I started with outlook 2007, then 2010, and now 2013 for the last 2 years or 3years (I upgraded to it in beta at first). I haven't had any issues at all, I can delete emails, move emails, ..., and they instantly change in the other programs. I have several accounts that are used by a variety of different programs and devices, as well, but the only program that gives me any problem is outlook 2013. And not quite consistently, on some few machines I have seen it work the same as any other client. This one particular case has me quite baffled though. I just use the normal outlook2013 config options for the account, besides making sure the ssl settings are right. I think I have only used it on the 2.2 branch though, what dovecot version are you using? # dovecot --version 2.2.13 sigh. At least now I know it should be working, so I will keep searching fior a solution...
Re: outlook 2013
I had a much more exciting experience with Outlook for Mac (which is much worse…) Changed from Dovecot 0.9 to 2.2 but changed the folder separator from . to \, so that I could have shared folders with dots in the username. When you do this, it starts creating a new mailbox every time it connects every minute, called like Trash 1, Trash 1 1, Trash 1 1 1, Trash 1 1 1.. I got up to about 40+ appended folder names. It also does this with INBOX, Sent, etc. It won’t ever stop doing this, and even if you change the folder separator back it still keeps doing it. Only way to fix is to change the server name which causes it to purge the entire local cache and start over (basically a quick delete/re-add). My other favourite issue with Outlook for Mac was it eating messages, they’d come in, and disappear. Spam filtering was off, no rules setup, they just disappeared, and got deleted from the server. Eish. Trent On 10 Sep 2014, at 12:15 pm, Trent Lloyd tre...@webinabox.net.au wrote: I have had this problem a lot on my old Dovecot 0.9 system.. it seems to be OK on 2.2 however. It’s really noticeable when interacting with another Apple map system. One key thing is the Outlook by default doesn’t immediately purge your deleted items. It lags on that a bit. There are settings to change that. Trent On 10 Sep 2014, at 8:51 am, Bob Miller b...@computerisms.ca wrote: Hi Patrick, Thanks for your reply. I have no idea what your doing to cause this issue :( I have a normal install of dovecot running, and I have 3 webmail pages open, 2 phones using imap, and a thunderbird connected to it. I started with outlook 2007, then 2010, and now 2013 for the last 2 years or 3years (I upgraded to it in beta at first). I haven't had any issues at all, I can delete emails, move emails, ..., and they instantly change in the other programs. I have several accounts that are used by a variety of different programs and devices, as well, but the only program that gives me any problem is outlook 2013. And not quite consistently, on some few machines I have seen it work the same as any other client. This one particular case has me quite baffled though. I just use the normal outlook2013 config options for the account, besides making sure the ssl settings are right. I think I have only used it on the 2.2 branch though, what dovecot version are you using? # dovecot --version 2.2.13 sigh. At least now I know it should be working, so I will keep searching fior a solution...
§-sign in passwords
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey users, I've got a constellation with dovecot, postfix, froxlor and roundcube. My problem is, when a user has got a paragraph sign in his password, every mail client tells him, that he entered a wrong password. The log says as usually password mismatch. did anyone else fixed this problem already? Hope you can help me :) Pascal -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUD+SHAAoJEA3oZzzqW4iVobwH/0r/g9eP2inhqCNLqBBN3Ret gU9L9dXM8iqOBl3ylgTK1Fvf/7rhnPHhM43oS+KAoaOcrG4u9PI83hfKYqMGuZPB +1/PhMcEmydUl98mjT76tC/SuGAgRnWlnc6eA+LB1Zp8EgN0h4l8zLXvw2mv6nA5 dyEHUq6cW9oIg38jMe0rXAb5mqNROAGtKTaM7182Xxk5dnJAfb5ZdNPZ8Vbn0A3d ENE9hzdndNeQPkDIVmdD6Fv1kWVwCf7shAPgQ3yJoJxOUaEq9sl4BQRI/GcLU6RF lpQFsMQTjwDa9RWPYvOT33SHDiwYLAr9l65C5A1ReLNROSaTW5rE+lL9NiUWcD8= =jP+Y -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: §-sign in passwords
Quoting InterNetworX | Pascal Heverhagen p...@inwx.de: Hey users, I've got a constellation with dovecot, postfix, froxlor and roundcube. My problem is, when a user has got a paragraph sign in his password, every mail client tells him, that he entered a wrong password. The log says as usually password mismatch. did anyone else fixed this problem already? non-ASCII characters are only supported in the AUTHENTICATE command. My guess is that your MUA is trying to send those characters via the LOGIN command. michael
